College of Matriarchal Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Uncategorized

William Bond–Female Spiritual Power

How Women Can Dominate the World Through Spiritual Power

William Bond

There was a time at the dawn of recorded history when people worshiped the Great Mother. This was a golden age of peace and harmony where women rule the world and men worshiped women as goddesses. But later when people no longer worshiped the Great Mother and worshiped male gods then female power declined and we now live in a world of conflict, wars, poverty and widespread suffering.

So now in our patriarchal world men clearly more powerful than women. Physically, men are on average bigger and stronger than women and mentally more competitive and aggressive than women. This means that in our materialistic world men have all the advantages.

Clearly women will always find it difficult to compete against men for power in our patriarchal world. Some women are able to teach themselves to be assertive and competitive and be successful in dog-eat-dog world of patriarchal politics and business. While other women can take advantage of men’s submissive and masochistic desires and dominate men in the Femdom world. But there is another way women can gain power without having to learn how to be assertive or find passive or masochistic men and that is through spiritual power.

Although men have all the advantages in the materialistic world, women have the advantage in the spiritual world. Unfortunately, women are not using this power, because in our patriarchal world with its patriarchal religions this information is not given to women. We all have been taught to worship male gods and women do not know the unlimited power of the ancient Great Mother.

Mystics tell us that God is the ONE, the All-That-There-is, One mind and One Spirit. This means that God cannot be masculine because the masculine is all about aggression, competition, conflict and individualism, all of which brings about separation and therefore cannot create Oneness. So in no-way a male god can be One mind, One Spirit. This is why the nature of God has to be feminine. Because the nature of the female is about nurturing and maternal love and it is through unconditional and universal love that we can all become ONE in love and harmony.

Therefore because God is the ONE, She is All-powerful, omnipotent and omnipresent. She then becomes the most powerful force in the universe. So when a women is in communication with the ONE she can become in tune with this unlimited power.

Unfortunately, in patriarchal religions women are not taught this. They are instead taught that God is male and so when a spiritual woman attempts to pray to God or meditate, she finds it difficult to contact God because she is praying to a false male god. It is a bit like trying to tune into a radio station but are given the wrong tuning frequency. For this reason we find that only a small number of mystics are able to communicate with God within patriarchal religions.

Patriarchy teaches us that not only God is male he is also judgmental and punitive. For this reason Christian in the past called themselves, “God-fearing people” as they feared god’s wrath and punishment. It is true that Jesus taught that God is a loving Father God but somehow this concept never caught on. Probably because in a patriarchal world we are taught that love is a weakness. So if we think of a all-powerful masculine god we assume he must have masculine power which is aggression, force and violence.

This is why a true god of love can only be female. We find this in the past in Pre-Christian times love is always represented by a Goddess, like Aphrodite, Venus, Freya and Radha. Unfortunately these goddesses were part of a patriarchal pantheon which always had a creator male God. So people could not find the total Oneness of God through prayers to these goddesses if a male god was the creator.

At the dawn of recorded history we do find ancient Great Mother who gave birth to the world. So in this deity we can find true Oneness because not only is she female, she was the creator of our universe. This means ancient people could see her as the Creator Mother whom like a mortal mother give us, her children, unconditional love.

So if that is true, why would people move away from such a wonderful, uplifting religion like this? It seems that the holy women of the Great Mother made a fatal mistake of allowing male priests into this religion.

According to Robert Graves, male priests where allowed in the priesthood if they were female in their behavior. So these priests wore women’s clothing, had false breasts and even castrated themselves. Probably at first, they only had male priests who were genuinely very feminine in the way they were. But this left the door open for deceitful ambitious men who would see this as an opportunity to gain power for themselves by becoming priests.

So this type of priests would pretend to be feminine but inside will be competitive males and set about competing with the holy women for power. They claimed that it was unfair that they only worshiped a female deity and not a male one as well. Holy women in an effort to be fair gave into this and so the Great Mother had a son. Over time this son became either the lover or brother of the Great Mother and they became joint creators of the world.

Once a male god was introduced he undermined the whole concept of Oneness. In is easy to tune into a sense of Oneness through the unconditional love of Great Mother. But a lot more difficult if a aggressive and competitive male is introduced into people’s prayers and meditations. So people began to lose their connection to the Oneness of the Great Mother in these changing religions.

So as women began to lose their connection to unlimited power of the Great Mother they found themselves at the mercy of men. Over time, male priests began to take control of religions creating powerful male gods and pushing the priestesses into second place. Finally goddesses and priestesses were push out of religions completely and we only had male gods with male priests like we see in Christianity, Islam and Buddhism.

In more recent times things are changing and female power is beginning to rise again. In the last two hundred years the power that patriarchal religions have over people has been undermined by science and atheism. This is giving women the opportunity to try and recreate the ancient religion of the Great Mother. Unfortunately, knowledge of the theology of the Great Mother has been destroyed but it can be rediscovered through meditation and communication with the Great Mother.

What is difficult for people used to the teachings of patriarchal religions is the idea that the Great Mother loves us all unconditionally and She will give us everything we want and desire. Which people find hard to believe as many of us are not getting what we want or desire. But that is mostly because we now worship false male gods or don’t believe in religion at all.

Unfortunately, because we are given the gift of freewill and because we are brainwashed by patriarchal teachings and attitudes most of us wrongly use our freewill to prevent ourselves getting what we want.
We are taught by patriarchal teachings that we have to work hard to get what we want or to be ‘good’ for God to give us what we desire.

In spite of the false teachings of patriarchal religions many spiritual people have somehow managed to find a tenuous connection to the Great Mother and been worshiped like gods. Some have created religions through this like Buddha and Mohammad or religious sects some of which ended badly. Well known examples would be Jim Jones which ended up with the massacre at Jonestown. Or David Koresh which led to the Waco siege and more to mass killings. Then finally, Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh who at one time had a large international following but ended up in prison.

In the past these gurus or god-men have blamed their failings on the Devil but nowadays they tend to blame the ego which has become a modern day scapegoat. Patriarchal religions haven’t delivered a better life for us all and many people feel that God has abandoned them. This is summed up in the words of a Bee Gee song called “Wind of Change”.

Don’t you understand what I’m sayin’,
we need a god down there.
A man to lead us children,
take us from the valley of fear.

Make the lights shine down on us,
show us the road to go.
Help us survive, make us arrive,
teach us what we need to know.

What we don’t realize is that God hasn’t forsaken us, it is we who abandoned God, when we choose to worship false male gods. The whole history of patriarchal religions tell us that men, even with the best intentions, cannot teach us the unlimited wisdom of the Great Mother. Only women can do this providing her teachings hasn’t been contaminated too much by the teachings of patriarchal religions.

The competitive and aggressive nature of men prevent them from tuning into the unlimited wisdom of the One mind, One spirit. Only women through their maternal love can do this and find the Great Mother within themselves.

This then brings up the question and that is if the Great Mother is all-powerful why did she allow this to happen? After all if God was male we would expect him to actively interfere in our world and the fact that God does not do this, shows us that God is Female. She is totally feminine and so gives us all, her children, unconditional love. So no matter how badly these power-hungry men behaved she still loves them. She has given us all the gift of freewill and so will never actively interfere with the freewill of anyone.

Instead of bowing down and worshiping spiritual minded men we all would be better off if we worshiped spiritual minded women who have contacted the Great Mother through prayer and meditation.

For centuries women have been successful mediums or channels even though their teachings have been contaminated by patriarchal thought. Much of it has been dismissed by patriarchal critics as pollyannaish platitudes as they seem unrealistic optimistic. And example of this is Mary Baker Eddy the founder of Christian Science who believed we don’t need doctors as we could all heal ourselves in the same way as Jesus healed people in the Bible.

The difficultly with Christian Science is that in the 19th century when it started, it had to compromise too much with patriarchal beliefs within Christianity. Mary Baker Eddy push things as far as she dare, by claiming that God was both male and female. These compromises made it difficult for her followers to communicate with the Oneness of the Great Mother and perform miracles.

We have similar teachings in, “A Course In Miracles” channeled by Dr Helen Schueman these are teachings again come from the feminine One and as they were channeled in the 20th century there was less need to compromise with any patriarchal spiritual teachings. Though the true nature of God is not discussed in these teachings.

The best example of Goddess teachings come from the medium Esther Hicks. Unfortunately, although her teachings comes from the ancient Great Mother, her husband claimed they come from Abraham an Old Testament prophet.

This confusion came from a misunderstanding. Her husband Jerry Hicks asked her, while she was channeling, who was speaking through his wife. She answered they come from the beginning of all religions. Jerry Hicks assumed this must be Abraham because he was the founder of the patriarchal religion of Judaism from which came Christianity and Islam. What he didn’t know was that there were other religions before Judaism and that the foundation of all religions was the ancient religion of the Great Mother.

So he claimed his wife was channeling Abraham even though her teachings was very different to the teaching of Abraham we find in the Bible. But the name stuck, which was a pity as the name does put off anyone interested in Goddess spiritual teachings.

To sum up. Men have all the advantages in a materialistic world because of they are, on average, larger, stronger and more aggressive than women. But women are far more powerful spiritually because the ONE is feminine in nature and therefore women find it much easier to access spiritual power then men.

In the patriarchal age men lost their connection to the unlimited power of the Great Mother because they were tricked into worshiping male gods. Which allowed men to take over and rule the world. So women can regain their power when they stop worshiping male gods and find the ONE the Great Mother, within themselves.

College of Matriarchal Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Uncategorized

William Addresses Matriarchy

William Addresses Matriarchy – Rasa Von Werder replies

from William:

It has been said that, “power is never given away, if you want power you have to take it.” For this reason patriarchal men are not ready to give up their power. Women have to find ways to take power away from patriarchal men. It is very difficult for women to battle for wealth and power alone in a patriarchal world. It would be a lot easier if women could band together in a powerful sisterhood and support each other.

The power of sisterhood was demonstrated in Britain during the 1980s with the Greenham Common peace camps. At the time the USA military wanted to set up bases in Britain to fire their cruise missiles. Many people in Britain were opposed to this and protested outside the Greenham Common airfield where the cruise missiles were due to be launched. It soon emerged that the majority of these protestors were women. So when the protestors wanted to set up a peace camp outside of Greenham Common it was decided that only women could be part of this peace camp.

These women kept on protesting outside of Greenham Common airfield until the end of the cold war. They broke through the security fence around the air-base many times and fought with the police. So they did demonstrate that women could work together and form a powerful sisterhood. Yet after the end of the Cold War women have never got together to form another sisterhood.

The reason might be that, as you point out Rasa, is that women are generally poor. I did read somewhere that women only own 1% of the world’s wealth. So in spite of equal pay laws women are still paid less than men even for the same work. So it is hard for women to help each other, if women don’t have a lot in which to share with other women.

Another point is that it is easy to motivate women to help animals or children but not for themselves. You don’t have women coming together to form a sisterhood to help themselves to become wealthy or gain political power, they are more motivated in helping others.

So this is the irony of the whole situation. Women would make better leaders of the world because the majority of them, are more caring people than men. But because of their unselfish nature they are less likely to work to gain wealth and power for themselves than what men will do. So we end up being ruled by selfish and uncaring people because truly caring people are not ambitious enough to gain personal wealth and power for themselves.

So women need to know they would be better rulers of the world because they are more caring people than men. And so if they truly want to make our world a better place they have to work together to gain wealth and power and then they will have the power really help those in need.

William

…………………………………………………..

Hi William,

Remember, it isn’t only poor in money. They are demoralized, beaten down & broken down, intimidated, made to feel unworthy, made to feel weak.

Women’s belief system has the change. ‘As a woman thinketh, so is she.’

I don’t think the accumulation of wealth is the answer. When women gain something else they will gain wealth. What they need is faith in themselves along with faith in Mother God. This has been eroded in their psyche. They were made to feel second class.

All the evils done to women have gotten under their skin. They have to climb out of this skin & reach for the skies. They have to have FAITH, trust & confidence in God, that God is on their side, & Go wants them to rule the family & the world. This is what we must convince them of – that it is the Will of God that females dominate our society.

When they had the Montgomery Bus Strike the black people met in Churches every night & sang & prayed together. This gave them FAITH, this gave them STRENGTH against the enemy – the white people who forced them into subjection. They needed God – women need God.

Money does not bring the kind of salvation women need. Their earning capacity is already increasing, & many old women, who are widows, are left multi millions by their husbands. But what do they do with the money? Nothing for the cause of Sisterhood, nothing for Matriarchy. They waste it – put it back into the Patriarchy & status quo.

I take a look at myself. I was poor most of my life, but I did the work of God. I had the Love of God & She gave me the Anointing, the Power to fight my battles. Look at David & Goliath. The Israelites were facing the Philistines. Suppose you offered any person who could stand up to Goliath a million dollars to defeat him – would you have found such a man? No. It was David, the little shepherd boy his brothers laughed at.

But he was ANOINTED. You are Anointed, so am I. It was the Anointing of God that made me fight for all that I did, that brought me to this day – same with you. The Anointing made you write all you wrote. These are words of the Holy Spirit.

Back to money. It was for the love of God I sought celibacy. And when I gained it, took the vow, eventually I found Richard Von Werder. He secured me for life, left me the money to build my Church. God gave him to me because of my celibacy. It’s a miracle you could find a man that would accept you with the tag of ‘no sex,’ but he did, because he saw me as a Mother. That’s how God worked it – Rasa gives me her celibacy – I give her security. No one would believe it, but it’s true.

Why did I preach? As some sort of gimmick for my act? People accused me of such. But it was no gimmick. It was for love of God. I got no extra pay for it, in fact, most owners didn’t want me to preach. The audience didn’t want me to preach. Only God & I wanted me to preach. Yes it got me famous, but I never got wealthy from dancing, I never made more than 40k a year on it, it was not about money.

Why did I walk up & down the street for 2.5 months with a bullhorn preaching with all the evils around me? For a gimmick? What gimmick? What advantage or reward? And then I spent one month every day calling out to God, one hour a day, against all the predators – to smash them – & to save all the victims. Some months later the “Crisis” of the Catholic Church broke out into the open – against predators. I asked God how this was possible. God said to me,’

“Don’t you remember your prayers?”

And why have I said thousands of hours of prayers to help others, & given out hundreds of religious books, & said hundreds of Masses for Souls in Purgatory, & did a hundred proxy baptisms to help others? Were these all gimmicks? If so, for what reason?

And why have I done all this Matriarchal work, written all these articles & books & got them published? Some gimmick? For money? I make no money on my websites, no money on books – no money for any spiritual work I do – nothing. I live off the money God gave me which is enough & I live frugally & plainly – no luxuries. I’m saving my money for the Sisterhood. I knew I should be modest with it as some cause would come about, & this is it. Some people ridiculed me for not spending my money but it’s for God’s work.

Without my being centered on God, money would mean nothing. Just as many women who have it don’t usually spend it for Female Empowerment or Matriarchy. Look at the women we know, for a while on Face Book & the Yahoo groups. How many of them really did anything for Matriarchy? How many helped you with your Sacred Work?

Somehow I gave the wrong impression in my letter, speaking about how patriarchs want to keep women in poverty. You did not read it carefully or else I did not write it right.

Right now I am trying to say is I gave myself to God & Her work – & She gave me the money to support me, keep going, & do the work. I know many women who put their mind on money & some of them got it, but when they did, they did not use it for God or Matriarchy.

“Put first the Kingdom of God, & all shall be added unto you.”

And so what women need is to put Mother God first. Put their eyes on her, what She wants to do. Give themselves to her, She will give them the Anointing, & with the Anointing, they can win the fight against patriarchy.

That’s what they did in the Civil Right movement. They gathered in Churches. St. Martin Luther King Jr. was a man of God & he mobilized people spiritually. A lesser man could not have done it. He lifted the spirits of black people, whose spirits have been mowed down – they felt powerless, hopeless, worthless. He made them feel proud of themselves, stand tall. Then James Brown came out with a song, “Say it Loud, I’m Black & I’m Proud,” & they started the slogan, “Black is Beautiful.”

That’s what I did for females. I gave them female body building. Here they now ‘stand tall’ as muscular as the men – as freaky as them. Drugs are bad & that’s what did it, but they proved men got that way by drugs, & they can do it too, it’s just chemicals. So being muscular ‘like a man’ is now no big deal!

I also gave them Female Domination. I presented it on several national TV shows, it became ‘mainstream’. Not sure how much influence I had there, maybe some.

One TV show & several big radio shows I spoke for Prostitutes, they are people, not things. I helped lift them up.

Then ‘Stripping for God.’ I lifted every adult trade worker by this, proving we are in the Grace of God or can be. We can save souls, we can minister. We are not lowlife sluts, we are Creations of God.

So, like St. Martin lifted the blacks, I lifted the women. I know my work isn’t finished yet but that’s what I did so far.

As far as money, the money will come, when we have turned to Mother God – She will provide. But money alone? Without God? Satan can keep it.

One last thing – your work. Is it for money? No, you want to do it. And Pete – all the help he’s given us – why did he create the matriarchy site when I asked him to? Why does he share all my articles? Why has he fixed pages for us? Money? No, he BELIEVES. Women MUST BELIEVE ….. Rasa

One More Thing – to Reiterate

It is established in Buddhism that one must have SELF CONFIDENCE as well as faith in God to reach the goal of Enlightenment. Tenzin Palmo, an Englishwoman who became an Enlightened Being within the discipline of Buddhism {she spent 12 years in a cave in the high Himalayas alone} said that her ‘root Guru’ told her that she was lacking confidence & she must buoy this up.

In the movie about the present Dalai Lama {living in India}, “Kundun”, it shows him, as a teenager, being taught his lessons. And it is stated that one must have confidence in oneself that they can succeed.

This is what has been eroded in women, as I have attempted to say, how they have been impoverished or deprived of prosperity. They have lost confidence in themselves & therefore other women.

I have been throughout my life disturbed by wherever I went, when there was mixed company, the women & men always deferred to the male present – under any circumstances, like the male, no matter how young, small, uneducated, unready, unskilled, just because he is a man – the man must lead.

This is demonstrated in a sickening way in the famous movie/play ‘A Raisin in the Sun.’ A ridiculous man throws away the fortune the family gained from the insurance of a man’s death. But the Mother of the family still gives the moron-son the right to choose what the family does next – he’s got no brains but does have a penis & that’s enough.

Women have been taught to look down upon themselves. Constant abuse does that – its demoralization. Only God can help them, & a strong will – they need both.

The belief in oneself goes like this: If you have no confidence, you have no courage that goes with it. St. Teresa of Avila said the most important virtue in the beginning is COURAGE.

The rock star Madonna, who became the #1 touring entertainer in the world, said the hardest thing she ever did was in the beginning, when with $35 in her pocket & nothing & no one helping, she began her effort to be

‘somebody’.

I did the same when I left Brooklyn with 50 cents in my pocket, to drive to Hollywood with a photographer I didn’t know – I gave that 50 cents to a bum & then had nothing. The photographer dumped me on the street in Venice, CA, then I was alone with $60 to my name. Four years later he saw me in Playboy as a star, they gave him my address, he visited me in a house in Beverly Hills with a Lincoln Continental in the driveway. He was perplexed as how it happened. It was confidence / courage together with hard work. I did not sell myself – no man gave me anything – I entertained.

In all of life, you must believe you have the capacity to reach God – your greatest good – that you are a creation that is WORTHY of God. If you are so beaten down you feel you’re worthless, then you will believe you deserve nothing. This is where we start with women. We must convince them they are NOT WORTHLESS but WORTHY, they have value.

How is this done? I began the verbal teaching section of my mission with the cyber ‘University of Mother God Church’ & the website, ‘Woman, Thou Art God.’

Woman Thou Art God told women they are not mere mortals, they are Divine. As a Divinity you are above the dust, you are not temporary but immortal, you are an Infinite Being. All this is true, we are all Infinite. We all come from an Infinite Source of Energy, we appear temporarily in solid form, then we return to Infinity {those in Hell do not see Infinity because they have of their own volition encased themselves in a shell of misery}.

But women were so beaten down they saw themselves as mortals, second to men. They had been browbeaten, demoralized, victimized & villainized {slut shamed} for thousands of years, they felt helpless to the system called patriarchy.

To fight back meant more persecution – few could take the risk. There was personal safety, then children to protect {all fell on the woman}, a roof over one’s head; food had to be put on the table. How can you fight an ideology when all this is at stake? All can be taken away from you if you stand out as a rebel to society, if your head is above the rest it’s easy for them to chop it off.

Women were kept busy doing what they do best – taking care of people. They nurtured men & children, they did most of the volunteer / charity work while men took all the front-line positions, the seats of fame & fortune, everything that was praised & valued – while women remained peasants & serfs, never to be heard from. The rare women who ventured into the man’s world – their efforts & accomplishments were ignored, erased, or appropriated by men. They were robbed. There was no HER story – only his – men wrote the books.

Men, in their dictionaries & academia, declared who we were, what we were like & what we had to do. At that time (up until the modern era women were deprived of education), only men could be doctors

*** When did medical schools allow women?

Two laws in the U.S. lifted restrictions for women in the medical field – Title IX of the Higher Education Act Amendments of 1972 and the Public Health Service Act of 1975, banning discrimination on grounds of gender. ***

* Princeton and Yale began admitting women in 1969, with Brown University following in 1971 and Dartmouth in 1972 *

after killing off millions of doctor-women in the Inquisition! Therefore doctors declared if we were sane or insane, fit or psychotic, neurotic or good to go.

We were told by ‘those in authority’ – yes, they PUT THEMSELVES IN AUTHORITY OVER US – legitimate, legal, official authority– who we were, what we were, what was moral or immoral for us, righteous & wicked behavior, what we do or don’t do – & not so strangely, all their rules & laws applied to US more so than them, MOSTLY us {whoever heard of human males following the 10 Commandments?} – we had to obey, act right, do right in order to be decent citizens of society.

This systematic beating down of women accomplished their purpose – we were down on the ground & they walked all over us.

Now the question is how do we re-moralize women, & it would be as difficult as facing a child, but 7 years old, who has been beaten by both his parents, put down, treated badly, & now we must tell the tyke,

“You are worthwhile, you are valuable, believe in yourself, trust in your ability to succeed, find God & all the good that God may bring.”

In my quest for knowledge, sanity & happiness, I had the Catechism. When things went wrong, I remembered the Cross & also Holy Mary who stood by the side of Jesus through it all, & then the Saints. Each Saint embodied another Christ, another Mary. What were their lives like?

I studied their lives & could see that with the imitation of these Great Souls, I could achieve what they achieved – my Salvation was the Saints, who when knocked down to the ground, tortured, brutalized or deprived, living in poverty yet rising above it all – here were the Lighthouses for my Salvation.

And so, I imitated them & worked to inculcate their virtues such as humility, fortitude, patience, bearing pain without hate or revenge & so on. And of course, believing, trusting, hoping & loving God, believing in all good, that God loved me no matter what people did, that I had Guardian Angels, that Saints would reach down to me from Heaven & so forth. And that’s what saved me.

I think we’re on the right track. Teach women they are valuable, that God loves them, they are not second rate. Teach them to follow saints & great Heroes from the past & today – NOT the patriarchs.

Show the women the evil Patriarchs & their agenda have done – War – exploitation, cruelty, injustice – all evil; they came to steal, kill & destroy.

Teach them to turn their back on patriarchy & embrace a Sisterhood, no matter how hard it is.

Yes, the journey of a thousand steps begins with one. I plan to start, while still alive, a Temple to Mother God. It doesn’t have to be fancy, a simple structure will do – nothing ostentatious or luxurious, just a place to meet, greet, pray, sing & dance for Mother God – hear sermons about her. This Temple is off limits to men – we preach Female Separation here, a new beginning for women.

With this Temple I hope to attract Sisters, then these Sisters & I – If I’m still alive – start a Convent of women who are against patriarchy, but not against all men.

This is something that needs to be done, I can see it clearly. Why has no one done it? – Certainly not in the Western world. Yes there are some new women-only, now women-dominant communities in Africa, there are some Matriarchal Communities here & there, {Mosuos of China stand out} Mexico has one town where only women can do commerce, etc. But I must add – none of these sports a religion for women only, where women stand apart as Spiritual Leaders – where women meet exclusively in safe space to worship & explore a Mother God in our own image & likeness – as we are in hers.

But I have seen nothing in the Western world, for Western women, to set apart a spiritual community of women with their own religion & scriptures.

To sum up, women must find confidence in themselves & Faith in a God who loves them, empowers them, takes care of them. They must no longer look to patriarchy for support – they have to forfeit patriarchy & get their eyes on Mother God. If they establish a relationship with God this way, God will provide the answers, the ways & means. She is a jealous God & wants no Gods before her, & if we put her first, She will provide. Rasa

College of Matriarchal Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Uncategorized

William Bond Issues of Matriarchy

William Bond Discusses Matriarchy

with Rasa Von Werder & Friends

From William:

There is something I do wonder Rasa, and that is, are women frightened of men? I agree many women secretly think they are superior to men but women won’t challenge the status quo and is it because of fear? Men are obviously bigger stronger and more violent than women and so do women think that if they challenge men’s power, men will turn on them. This might be why feminist say meekly, “we only want equality”.

So I do wonder if it is women’s fear of men, is the barrier of women coming together to take power. If that is the case how do we reassure women that it is possible for women to take power away from patriarchal men and rule the world?

……………………………………………………………………….

Hi William,

That’s a great question & I think you know the answer, but it needs to be said.

Women are afraid of more than violence. They fear OSTRACISM, which in cults like the Amish & Hutterites is called SHUNNING.

Patriarchy has RULES, & when we women break them, we are deprived of things men & Patriarchy can give us – deprived of help, services, a good place in society, a good mate or good friends – all the things a commonwealth offers.

When we break the rules we are shunned by women as well as men – because women who side with us get treated like us, get shamed or criticized or ridiculed. People turn their backs on us, ignore us, refuse to invite us to parties, dinners or events, when we are ‘outside the patriarchy’ or we are marginalized, ‘outsiders.’

A great example of this in nature is a little fawn {deer} is being chased by a lion. A big herd of Wildebeasts is near, she runs to them to seek shelter. But the Wildebeasts don’t want the lion in their midst, they push the little fawn out & sacrifice her.

This is what happens when we women ‘raise our heads’ against Patriarchs. They are the Lion who wants to devour us when we break the rules – destroy us. And so other women don’t wants this Lion of Wrath to come after them. And so the traitor women like those we spoke about lately, repudiate those women who seek Matriarchy, women dominating the family & the world. They kow tow to the Patriarchs to make points & keep their own privileges & safety.

I am one of those women who are treated badly by society. My profession is a mark against me. But being single is another bad mark. When we were girls we had great sisterhood. By the time college is over or college age – women are supposed to pair up, then they are friends only with other couples. {Men however can be friends with men like men’s clubs or men’s activities, but for women this is a no-no. It does happen but not as much. The husbands have fits when women want ‘girls night out.’} The single women become outcasts unless they form groups like lesbians. This is because a single woman will EMPOWER the married woman & this is not allowed. So I am no longer invited to dinners, parties or events by my neighbors or people I know, because I am single. When my husband Richard was with me, people were much friendlier.

Single men, however, are welcomed everywhere, because they empower the man. This is permitted.

Loss of societies services is no joke – survival or an easier life can depend on it. Being alone, without friends, can make life much harder. Friends help. You know how people in the old days did ‘barn raising’ or gathered to rebuild a house when it burned down? This happens only to those who are valid members of this society, not to those who are hated or marginalized or outcasts. Outcasts don’t get any favors.

One more factor. Women are competitive to each other & would rather hurt a sister than help her. This is so wrong for Sisterhood. It’s the ‘slave mentality.’ They are slaves of patriarchy, so they must seek what it gives & in order to get ahead, they will walk on the injured body of their sister. They will hurt the sister who has what she wants, they will lie, cheat & steal to get what she has – the way women steal men from another when that man has money. I have seen that sickening policy. The way out of this is being noble, charitable, self sacrificing, but few people are like that.

Those are the basics. …………….. Rasa

…………………………………………………………………………

William,

Also, it’s a matter of economic survival. Survival is the first need, so it’s easier to play along with them than buck the system.

It’s rough going to get a thing started. I believe my Sisterhood will work because I will leave them the funds to get it started – even keep it going forever as I will not allow them to use up the principle of what I leave – only the earnings {that’s my plan}. I will encourage them to be frugal as well as self-sufficient like in homesteads, farms & also earn money themselves in various ways, even being in the regular society {but they will always home a home, a Sisterhood to return to if anything goes wrong like getting fired}. If they have economic security from a Sisterhood, & they are not dependent on men financially, they might accept that & the ideas we purport.

No one wants to be homeless or live in the kind of poverty that is hurtful.

I mentioned that in the old days maybe even now in country areas – neighbors would get together for ‘barn raising’ or rebuilding a burned down house. It factors into a single woman’s life like this {my life}. Recently there was a snowstorm that caused great damage, many trees & huge branches falling on houses, cars & yards – much devastation.

I ran into a man who had a room in his house caved in from a tree & within one week it’s been rebuilt. How? He told me he had all kinds of friends like construction workers, electricians & handymen. They all got together.

Meanwhile, the huge branches that fell in my driveway & yard, crashed the back window in my car, have been sitting in my driveway & behind it for 2 weeks. I have no friends to call for help. Yes I do have one handyman & will await his coming to clean this up.

I sit here in this house with NO FRIENDS to call upon in emergencies because I am outside the grace of patriarchy, marginalized, ostracized, a single woman who was in the adult trade – persona non grata.

When I need help I must look at the paper & that is where the highest priced services are, as well as the con men & thieves. I have been conned & even physically robbed by such people. So I am at their mercy. But those who have friends get a break. ….. Rasa

…………………………………………………………………………

from Steve Andrews:

Yes, William, I am well aware how insane the way patriarchal religions, as well as cults, control followers. The really sad thing is that control relies on fear and belief. Humans will easily believe the most insane nonsense and without any evidence, unlike other species. It is what makes us different from the great apes. They will not understand or believe any madness humans share. It has to do with our belief in symbols too. Symbols can be given good or bad meanings to humans but to other animals they are meaningless. The meaning of a human symbol depends on the culture using it. Money works this way. It is a symbol of value, a value that has been decided on and that others within the culture using it believe in.

………………………………………………………………….

From William Bond:

I personally know people who have been ostracized Steve. Years ago I was friends with a Jewish woman. She married a Christian and because of this, her family did a ritual and morn her as if she had died. This was because none of them were allowed to contact her again, so she had ‘died’ to them. In my wife’s family she had a aunt who had a child when she wasn’t married and her parents wouldn’t have anything to do with her, because she had ‘shamed’ them.

In Islamic countries it gets even worse where they have an ‘honour’ system. Where a man can be ‘dishonoured’ if he wife, mother or sister, breaks the rules. So the only way he can regain his ‘honour’ is to kill his female relation. So some men are forced by this system to kill their wives, sisters and even mothers. This demonstrates how insane patriarchy can become. …..William

………………………………………………………………………….

wabond@rocketmail.com> wrote:

From what you say Rasa, it seems patriarchy has been successful in undermining the sisterhood. So that women are forced to look to men for help and support rather than other women. This is why feminism cannot work because men are by nature far more competitive than women and compete against each other for wealth and power and have no interest in equality. Unfortunately men also compete against women for wealth and power.

This is the weakness of feminism, if women only want equality between women and men, women have to compete against men for wealth and power as individuals. Whereas, if we see it as a straight fight between men and women for wealth and power, then it makes more sense for women to form a sisterhood to achieve this. It might be why the feminist slogan, “the sisterhood is powerful” hasn’t worked out as feminism restricts it. For the sisterhood to be powerful, women have to forget all ideals about equality and use it just to gain wealth and power for themselves and win the battle of the sexes. ….. William

…………………………………………………

From Rasa to William & Friends:

This is a KEY pivotal issue & you said it straight out: “ it seems patriarchy has been successful in undermining the sisterhood. So that women are forced to look to men for help and support rather than other women.”

This is what happens to women. No woman will help her because it is FORBIDDEN. It’s not written down, but it’s an ABNORMAL thing for women to ‘care’ about other women. How can I explain it? I will need the help of Mother God. But this is SO IMPORTANT that we MUST explain it in our Matriarchy thesis – Why we are having trouble getting it going – what Patriarchy does to BLOCK it.

OK I took a break & Mother God said this:

“They want to keep women IN POVERTY.”

Understand poverty in the broadest sense, the OPPOSITE of PROSPERITY. Then what is prosperity? The great teacher Catherine Ponder said this, that prosperity is on all levels, not only financial. There is spiritual, emotional, mental, physical & financial prosperity.

I understand how I was kept poor by my family, through abuse – have documented in detail how I was kept working but with no thanks, allowance or privileges. I was a slave. Was I 3/5 of a person as the African slaves were declared?

{Article one, section two of the Constitution of the United States declared that any person who was not free would be counted as three-fifths of a free individual for the purposes of determining congressional representation. The “Three-Fifths Clause” thus increased the political power of slaveholding states.}

How was this done? Of course it was ‘abuse’ but what forms did it take?

If Mom & her accomplices said it in words, it would have been,

“You have no value”

“You are tainted”

“You don’t deserve love”

“Your job is to work”

“You aren’t allowed pleasure”

“You’re not to have comfort”

“No recognition for you”

“You’re {God forbid} not to be praised!”

“Since you have no value, you deserve no recompense in any way for your labor. You are to work without reward or recognition or thanks” {This helped me later to do my missionary work such as female body building, as I got no rewards, no money or thanks, & later, repudiation, so I was prepared. A person not used to this would fold up, give up & go away.}

“There is nothing to redeem you, no matter what you do, we are not pleased. It is impossible for you to ‘work your way up’ to our favor, you are doomed. If you accomplish great things, these will be repudiated, shrugged off & dismissed.”

Note: the spirit of my Mother lives on in some members of my family. And it is exactly what I said. And this is how I compare such abuse to Patriarchy, declaring women second class, undeserving, no matter what they do – they are still second class! To enforce this position men take effort. They ERASE the good works & accomplishments of women, when poor women dare raise their heads & do remarkable things. Since men WRITE THE HISTORY, give the awards {Nobel Peace Prize} they give the kudos to THEMSELVES, it’s almost impossible for a woman to get recognition – because recognition is given in magazines owned by men, in book publishing companies owned by men, in Universities owned & operated by men, & various other venues owned or controlled by men.

Then there’s ‘Man Made Language’ explained by Dale Spender. They write the words & definitions, they own the dictionaries & Encyclopedias! And so, the words pertaining to women are put-down words.

John Lennon said ‘Woman are the Niggers of this world.’ If you are black – until recently – you were doomed. You were ‘untouchable’ in caste. No matter what you did, you were still black & many despised you, looked down on you, discriminated against you, & paid you less for your labor. People did injury to you with impunity. You had less RIGHTS in a court of law, were judged & condemned more quickly & easily than whites.

(I might add here that women are also discriminated against by the political Patriarchal judicial justice system.)

I also need to address how the writings of William Bond & myself DIFFER from the Academics. We are GRASS ROOTS, they look upon non-academics or those in alternative lifestyles or DIFFERENT cultures as subjects or guinea pigs TO BE STUDIED. They see “us” as SEPARATE from themselves, they being above, looking down at us – our voice is not as important as theirs, we have no right to tell our story as we don’t have their ‘mental capacity’ or understanding & who we are, what we are, why we do what we do must be explained BY THEM, NOT BY US! They EXPLAIN US to the ‘rest of the world’ & the world must believe them, they don’t want to hear us speak!

words for grass-roots, laboring class, middle-class, ordinary people, proletariat, rank-and-file, the masses, wage-earners, working-class, working people, middle America, common people.)

But let me get to the point of why women don’t help women – why there’s no SISTERHOOD.

When sisters bend down to fallen sisters to lend a helping hand, this is frowned upon by Patriarchs because to alleviate the POVERTY of a woman is to EMPOWER her or make her less vulnerable for men to exploit.

As already explained, the purpose of Patriarchy is the DISEMPOWERMENT of women or to KEEP them in POVERTY {remember poverty in the broad sense of the word, not only financial!} To give comfort, praise, to magnify a woman gives her COURAGE & inspiration! Gives her the Power to be independent – strong – Men don’t want that.

And so female heroes – Heras – were in short supply prior to the women’s movement.

William, Pete, there is much work to be done. Building a new house might be easier then rebuilding an old one. This old house of patriarchy is so deeply flawed, to attend to all its flaws will take many lifetimes. { Steve is working on some of that – what they’ve done to ecology – a whole ‘nother subject – just part of their destruction. There is also the animal rights movement on top of that. To undo its damage, great sacrifice.}

That is why in the New Religion for women I tell them to WALK AWAY from the old house, disregard them, their ideas, agenda, rules, laws & culture, & just begin from the beginning – our own hearts & minds, upon which is written all we need to know. What starting points we need we can get from the past, we don’t need males at the helm. It’s time to BUILD OUR OWN HOUSE.

Nevertheless, those who are repairing the damage men have done are legit. It needs to be done like factory farming has to end – specie-ism is a sin, filthy nuclear reactors & weapons have to be dismantled – Governments will be rebuilt.

None of this can or will happen until WOMEN ARE EMPOWERED. Until women support one another, men will rule. Until women respect themselves, men will rule. The women have to somehow, somewhere, some day, break this spell men have got them under & rise up to Mother God, look at her, see her, rely on her Power, trust her judgment, believe in her & know she is with us, inside us, guiding the way. Women must forget the world’s allure, as Satan said to Jesus,

“I will give you all the kingdoms of the world & their glory if you will bow down & worship me.”

When we fear the world & covet its rewards or glories, we take our eyes off God – Who is the Creator, enabler & One we must love. We believe in & love Satan if we believe the world will give us what we want.

The world is a TEMPORARY solution; it’s here today, gone tomorrow. Take our minds off the world & look to all that God embodies – Truth, Justice, & Love. The basic principles never change – Love they neighbor as thyself & Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. This is the opposite of Patriarchy, who says do to them before they do to you. There is no other way to liberty & happiness on our planet except matriarchy. And matriarchy cannot happen by the will of men, it has to be women. And indeed, men can help, but this help is given as helpmates, not ‘equals’ or ‘dominators.’

That’s it in a nutshell, women must help other women, respect & love them, for Matriarchy to occur. Otherwise what we have here is a continuation of NUTS-HELL.

Friends, I’m not done with this. I will add a part called ‘Personal Experiences’ of where I reached out to women in my area & how the men reacted. Three were married couples, 3 were friends. There were FIREWORKS when I influenced them toward empowerment. I was unable to stay friends with any of them as the husbands / bf’s went wild. One said I’d no longer be welcome if I talked that way – the others told their wives to end our friendships. And one just wanted to talk to my husband & have his wife & me as an audience, when we started our own conversation he cut it short by interjecting. That is another subject I must cover – how men interfere when women try to talk to each other in public. They think it’s their sacred right to butt in. They have done this to me a hundred times.

College of God & Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Uncategorized

William Bond on Matriarchy

What is Matriarchy? William Bond

& Rasa Von Werder with Friends

Just one other thing, it seems to me that their definition {a certain site} of matriarchy is really feminism this is what the Merriam Webster dictionary says about this.

Definition of feminism

: belief in and advocacy of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes expressed especially through organized activity on behalf of women’s rights and interests.

So all we have to do is point out that feminism is not the same as matriarchy and use dictionaries to prove this point.

William

One thing I’ll like to add to this, if you look up the world matriarchy in dictionaries online. They all say things like. –

Definitions of Matriarchy ( noun) A society, system, or group in which women dominate men and have the power and authority. ( noun) A group or family where the mother or oldest female is the head of the family with descent typically traced through the female line.

https://sociologydictionary.org › matriarchy

So if there is any dispute in this then all Pete has to do is reference a few dictionaries.

Just one other thing, it seems to me that their definition of matriarchy is really feminism this is what the Merriam Webster dictionary says about this.

Definition of feminism

: belief in and advocacy of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes expressed especially through organized activity on behalf of women’s rights and interests.

So all we have to do is point out that feminism is not the same as matriarchy and use dictionaries to prove this point.

William

Hi Everyone

I think people like Heide Xxx are trying to make matriarchy ‘respectable’ to academic audiences by claiming matriarchy is all about sexual equality. So it seems patriarchy can talk about using force and violence to dominate and control women and other men but women are not allowed to do the same.

There is the same issue in Feminism which again promotes sexual equality. But not all Feminist agree as lesbian Feminists like Mary Daly call themselves Radical Feminists because they are not interested in equality with men as they see men as the enemy and think of it as a straight fight between men and women for power. Radical Feminism also has a Wikipedia page.

So I suppose we can call ourselves ‘Radical Matriarchy’ or perhaps ‘Uncompromising Matriarchy’. Making it clear we see matriarchy as women ruling countries or the world and not trying to be equal with men. There is also Gynarchy and there is even a unfinished Wikipedia page on this.

This argument over what exactly is Matriarchy is nothing new. I first heard about matriarchy from the book, “The First Sex” by Elizabeth Gould Davis. She was then criticized by the likes of Riane Eisler, in her book, “The Chalice and the Blade” who claimed that Matriarchy is all about equality. Both of these books were published in the 1970s.

I agree we can bring the Goddess in it, if we are talking about starting a Goddess religion.

William

Hi Everyone

I have mediated on this Rasa, as you suggested and this is what I’ve got. Everyone accepts that patriarchy mean male rule so therefore matriarchy is female rule. But if we talk about equality between men and women then there is a word for this, and that is egalitarianism. Therefore matriarchy and egalitarianism are not the same thing.

I also have looked up the word archy, like you see in both patriarchy and matriarchy and the word archy is a ancient Greek word meaning rule or government. For this reason patriarchy means, rule by patriarchs, while matriarchy means, rule by matriarchs. That is why a government of only men is called patriarchy and therefore a government of only women will be a matriarchy.

But if people still want to dispute this then Rasa you have your own word and that is WomanthouArtGod. That is a word you made up yourself and therefore you have the right to define it as you like. The idea that God is a woman is a very powerful concept and can be used as a powerful tool in empowering women.

William

The way I would see Heide is that she wants to write about matriarchy but make it respectable and get the approval of the academic world. Which is hard to do because she is wanting a patriarchal institution to approve of what she says about matriarchy! Which means she is trying to obtain the approval of the enemies of matriarchy. She is very aware that many women who write about matriarchy like Marija Gimbutas has been savagely criticized by the academic world and doesn’t want to suffer the same fate. So she will always side with patriarchy and try to water down matriarchy so it won’t be seen as a threat to patriarchy. In other words she is an appeaser and is jealous of you, Rasa, because you are free to say whatever you like and do not have to answer to patriarchal men. It is a shame because we are all on the same side and we all want to promote matriarchy but she is trying to persuade patriarchal men that matriarchy is a good idea.

…………………………………………………………..

Hi Pete

Thanks again for what you have manage to achieve for both myself and Rasa. Is WordPress on the Wikipedia blacklist? Some time ago I made a alternative mermaid blog on WordPress when I feared that Google might delete my blogs.

William

https://mermaidsarereal.wordpress.com/author/wabond/

You’re very welcome, William. I just checked now, and while it is a good blog IMHO, I found out that unfortunately any URL with the wordpress.com domain is also blacklisted, as are pretty much all other blog sites like Blogger. It wasn’t always like this, as back in 2010 or so I remember it was still OK (but strongly discouraged) to cite blogged sources, but now they are all automatically blacklisted and rejected by the Wikipedia algorithm. Just like LULU is blacklisted (but Amazon.com, BarnesandNoble.com, and Goodreads.com are apparently fine).

It is done automatically by domain. Note that EOG is fine because it the URL does not end in any of the blacklisted domains like wordpress.com or blogger.com.

So unfortunately, William, every single one of your own sites is currently blacklisted. That is why I cited EOG as well as Goodreads, Amazon, and Google Books, in order to cite your work in a roundabout way.

Best wishes and have a nice day,……………… Pete

………………………………………………………………..

From Rasa,

Well, my EOG is on WORD PRESS. Before my genius webman, Nick Kushner, left me for CA & an untimely death {he was about 30} I asked him to give me a site I could manage – as I’m an amateur – {he had done all my uploading prior to that & he worked 5 days a week for nearly 3 years.} That resulted in EOG. It does not have the art & polish as my other 2 sites because Word Press doesn’t have that sort of capacity, at least that I can handle. Maybe it does but I haven’t even tried to do anything unusual – I just thank God I can get articles up with nice scenery & images.

OK so maybe William can change the name of his Word Press site so it doesn’t end up as that shyt?

I have noticed that we have all worked individually in the past, each beating his own drum mostly. Just bits of camaraderie. (We helped each other a little, here & there, the big change was when Pete started sharing my articles every time. And of course I put his articles on my site & blog – then he became an owner of our blog by the grace of William, then Vallah. And of course, William had created that blog for me in the first place & for one solid year was posting all my stuff, like 95 articles in one year!)

But now we have joined together as a team or a strong force & look how much more we accomplished. Yes Pete is the key here but I am cooperating with him & helping. Steve is beginning to help – he has done so in the past by putting William & myself on his pages several times.

In the Bible I like the story of the old man who is going to die soon & he has instructions to leave his 3 sons – on the mgt. of their property. He takes a large bundle of sticks & asks each one individually to break them in two. They try & they can’t. Then he splits the sticks into 3 bundles & again asks each one to break them – & this time they can do it. You know the moral here.

We can do more together than individually. Cooperation, caring about each other’s work, pushing it forward, will be the most rewarding for our cause. Symbiosis in nature.

And we have made such great progress, I think it’s important now to listen to Mother God, keep praying, & when energy is there, keep working. That’s what I hope to do.

First, we need to put William on the map – He is our original Guiding Light or Lighthouse – the Prophet of Matriarchy – the one who made me say ‘Bingo! This is it! I never knew that all his work would be disregarded or ‘blocked’ by those who can verify & magnify him. There is a great threat that both he & I will be ERASED as the perusal of Wikipedia shows me how easily this is done. All they do is set themselves up, as for instance, the ‘Matriarchy’ site & exclude us. Then they set up the ‘female body building site’ & exclude me. {People clic it to see the history or progression of a thing, since we aren’t there, they don’t know we had anything to do with it} Simply by having VOICE they become the ‘winners,’ we the ‘losers,’ as they have done to WOMEN IN HISTORY.

We all know that males have systematically excluded the accomplishments of women throughout the ages – Freyja Derrickson dug up much of that & made memes out of it like ‘I discovered radium but you will never know it because I didn’t have a penis.’

What they’ve been doing to us for years is steal our ideas, our intellectual wealth, appropriate it for themselves, do what we taught them, & reap the benefits. {OK, it’s not all of them – some. There is a movement toward female ascendency going on with or without us.}

Now back to the drawing board. You asked, Pete, for links to regular sites that you can place on the Wikipedia for William. He’s never worked on that it seems. Steve has apparently, as I see he got a couple reviews of his book & much other activity. You have to REACH OUT to get reviews or articles by people. All my work – 95 to 99% of it – which you see listed there on my sites – was myself writing letters & making phone calls. It was my second profession. I danced & preached, yes, & 50% of my time & effort went into contacting media. And ditto for body building. These were ALMOST FULL TIME JOBS, LET’S SAY half of the time jobs.

Almost every TV show there, I made the call. Almost every article there, I made the call or wrote letters – including to Europe. You see all those foreign-language articles – I sent them packages with who I was & chromes of me. It cost plenty money postage wise but I did it. I went to ‘Hotalings,’ a foreign, international magazine stand in NYC, & would buy dozens of foreign publications & contact them.

When I was at the Playboy Club I did not wait for some mysterious man with pad & pencil to interview me. First I did a radio show & praised Playboy. I took a copy of the radio show with the tape of me talking about Playboy – went up to the manager’s office – Sheldon Wax – no appointment – I took a risk he’d say he was busy, but he saw me. As quirky as it seems, I played that tape, lol. Like Playboy needed my radio show – what it did was it opened his heart & mind to me. He said they’d already done a couple things on me in Playboy, it wasn’t customary for them to do that many things on one person. But I talked him into it, & they did a decent story on me for ‘Stripping for God’ & later, had me in their various forums & ‘Sex in the News,’ etc. {Later poor Sheldon died, with his wife, in a TWA crash. I bought 10 Holy Masses for them, even though they were Jewish & not supposed to get Masses.}

Third example & I will quit. The YAHOO groups when they were popular. I joined 350 groups. It took me TWO YEARS to screen those I could post on. That being done, I spent NINE HOURS every Saturday posting on all those that I had articles for. This went on for a couple years. Then I got a new employee, Pete, from Texas. He set up a SPEEDY SPAM system for me & then I could do in 1.5 hours what I did in 9. In 1.5 hours, I posted my articles on about 300 yahoo groups every week! Which meant 300k people reached with articles! I gained a reputation as you can guess.

I’m just giving you a SAMPLE of what I did to get the media, there is so much more, but let’s let it rest. What I’m saying is we have to be AGGRESSIVE if we want OUR MESSAGE out there to help SAVE THE WORLD. Matriarchy is the answer – we all know it. How do we get it into the minds of people, men & women? Only one way – MEDIA. How do we get media? By CONTACTING THEM.

So there you have it, what’s on my mind today. somebody – me I guess – has to contact dozens, even hundreds of sites, & ask them to consider William’s articles & books for review or analysis or comment. Simple as that. When they do it, Pete can link it to Wiki.

Who do we contact? right now, I’m not sure. I guess POLITICAL SCIENCE sites, anthropology sites, sites that deal with the Gender Issues, or ANY SITES that might give the subject some voice. It will be experimental – I have not started. That is my plan.

Rasa

Rasa to Friends:

I noticed on the ‘Matriarchy’ page the mention of Camille Paglia. Have not heard her name for years. At the beginning of the women’s movement she distinguished herself by pooh-poohing some of the basic complaints of women. In other words, she made her mark by appeasing men, working against women. And there she is, on Heidi’s page!

This proves further that Heidi is not a Matriarch. What a phony. She made sure all those equality-egalitarians are there & now Camille Paglia. I will study the site more, I only glanced at it. Like she deserves to be there, but I don’t?

……………………………………………………………….

Good evening, Rasa. Indeed, Camille Paglia certainly does not deserve to be on that site at all. She and other pseudo-feminists like her are textbook examples of “dicks in skirts” who luuurrrve to butt in and attempt to invalidate Women’s concerns. Heide Hoodoo is indeed a phony, and certainly not of God at all, as your channeling of her confirms. Fortunately, she and/or her sockpuppet seems to be backing down for now, or at least has been awfully quiet since a day or two ago. She must really be gnashing her teeth in frustration right now, lol. So far, no further reversions or deletions on her part since then to any articles, and we seem to be winning now, God willing. ……………… Best wishes, Pete

……………………………………………………………………………

Hi Everyone

I think we do need to define exactly what Matriarchy is and say clearly feminism is not matriarchy. The women’s movement have been taken over by left-wing politics because feminism is about sexual equality but matriarchy is not about equality. If we are talking about matriarchal governments then you have to discriminate against men. (In much the same way patriarchal governments discriminate against women). For this reason matriarchal politics will be more right-wing than left wing.

This not not unusual in the women’s movement. The British Suffragettes led by Emmeline Pankhurst looked to left wing parties the Liberals and Labour for support. The Liberals actively blocked the Suffragettes while Labour promised to help, but in the end did nothing to help the Suffragettes. This is one of the reasons Emmeline Pankhurst when women did get the vote, became a Conservative MP. Another reason was that wealthy women, who were probably Conservative, financed the Suffragettes.

Another point is that when Pamela and I wrote, “Gospel of the Goddess” the only people who supported us was the Femdom people. This makes sense because Femdom people also want women to rule the world. The problem is that femdom sexual fantasies are all about women being cruel to men. Whereas the argument for matriarchy is that we all would be better off if women ruled the world because women are far more loving and caring people than men.

So we have to make it clear that matriarchy is neither feminism or femdom.

………………………………………………………………………..

From Pete:

Indeed, that is true, William. Defining and listing what Matriarchy is NOT (feminism, femdom, or patriarchy with the genders reversed) is just as important as defined what it is. There is of course some overlap with feminism in that many self-proclaimed feminists have (overtly or covertly) had Matriarchy in mind to one degree or another as an ultimate endgame or logical conclusion. But it is clearly not the same thing as feminism per se. Feminism is ostensibly about equality, and is thus at most a steppingstone or gateway to Matriarchy.

That is not to say that Matriarchy is inegalitarian overall. In terms of class, race, and other demographic categories, Matriarchy is far more egalitarian than patriarchy could ever hope to be. It is not a pyramid, more like a circle.

But in terms of gender? Matriarchy is very clearly an express train that does NOT stop at Equality Street. That does not mean that men will be oppressed, but men will clearly be excluded from positions of power…………………….. Pete

…………………………………………………………………

From William:

Agreed Pete. Even though matriarchy will discriminate against men, because to have a true matriarchal government you have to have only women in positions of power. The reason for matriarchy is that most women are more caring people than most men. So a matriarchal government will treat men a lot better than how patriarchal governments have treated women or even other men.

This is also the only way matriarchy can get into power and retain it. It is unlikely we will have a Amazon army go out and conquer the world through force and violence in the way some patriarchal empires have tried to do. The only way a matriarchal government can get into power is through democratic means. So people will vote for caring women as they will see them as being better to rule them than patriarchal minded men. Also, matriarchy if they are to retain their power have to prove to people they are caring rulers, to keep the support of the people. ……………….. William

…………………………………………………………………

And every word you guys said is absolutely true & ultimately of the GREATEST VALUE. Re feminism: My opinion is that the original women who tackled this were seeking EQUALITY UNDER THE LAW, not necessarily equality in ALL WAYS – just the law. In their secret heart of hearts, allwomen believe they are SUPERIOR TO MEN. But of course they don’t say it, it is deep inside. And why do they think this? Instinct & observation. What they feel inside as Mothers, what they observe men doing from the day they can crawl.

These PRINCIPLES of which you speak, that we must explain what Matriarchy is & WHAT IT IS NOT are CRUCIAL. Shall we do a page for Wikipedia called maybe MATRIARCHY 101? Because we can’t rewrite what is there – the ones who made it will keep it that way, it needs a new page.

My idea is that we should give no room for antagonists or naysayers or anti-Matriarchy people – those who are against women, against women rulership or dominance. These would be the equality-egalitarian types, all of them. She has plenty on that site – just leave them out.

From the past just speak of those who were / are 100% for Matriarchy – Marija Gimbutas, Merlin Stone, all the people that wrote in favor of it, even some men {I have a book in my library called “The Redundant Male” by 2 Men – Never read it yet, lol} – skip the rest.

Of course that includes William & myself. And we should go into some details what our books teach. My Cougar books – Old Woman – Young Man – should be included, ditto again all William’s books on the subject.

And something NO ONE references that is key to the subject of Matriarchy -The extinction of men. We must give space to “Adam’s Curse – A Future Without Men” by Dr. Bryan Sykes – world’s leading geneticist. {I’ve spoken to him by e mail} His theories are seconded by another top geneticist – Steve Jones – with his book “The Descent of Men” – I have spoke to him by e mail also…….Another great book, pro-Matriarchal – believes we are more like Bonobos than Chimps & many other theories that agree with ours – “Sex at Dawn” by Christopher Ryan & Cacilda Jetha – New York times Bestseller! I have the book right here. Of course Heidi Hoodoo mentions none of these.

But with the extinction of men, is it not appropriate to prepare for Matriarchy?

Oh yes, femdom. We ask the question, is Matriarchy femdom? Then William & I explain what ‘femdom’ is within our Patriarchal culture – he’s done it a thousand times, I’ve LIVED IT. What males want to do is control women in the femdom experience “topping from the bottom” They used to give me SCRIPTS, I produced them for money. {THE MORE VIOENCE, CRUELTY & DEGRADATION IN THE SCRIPTS, THE BETTER THEY SOLD.} During sessions they explain what they want, the mistress does it, he pays her. It’s a form of sex therapy like regular sex.

That is NOT, of course, what true ‘femdom’ is. True femdom is my good husband Richard Von Werder, who helped me in all ways & provided for me upon his death. William is that way with his wife. She doesn’t believe in the ‘femdom’ scene but William helped her & served her from day One. These men are HELPMATES.

One last thing: How will Matriarchy come about? William, you mentioned democracy, not violence. Democracy is rule of the majority. How do they rule? By vote. How do they vote? By what they know or believe. How do they know or believe? By seeing, hearing, observing, through EDUCATION. That’s where WE COME IN – that’s what Almighty God Anointed us for. Jesus was Anointed to TEACH. He taught through his works, example & words. We in our writings are teachers of the TRUTH. The people don’t automatically know it, in particular, they have been LED ASTRAY by the Patriarchs who ERASED the Herstory of Matriarchy & the accomplishments of women – {now they want to do the same to us!} Our teachings will SHOW THE WAY for people to BELIEVE in Matriarchy, then they will ACT in favorable ways toward it – There’s a million things they can do to bring it about, if they believe, they will do them. Resisting lies is a beginning. Getting active in government is a beginning – many such things.

The floor is yours guys…………………….Rasa

College of God & Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Uncategorized

Gospel of the Goddess

A Return To God The Mother

God The Mother

IN THE WESTERN WORLD, we are all familiar with the concept of a male god, whether the idea comes from Christianity, Judaism or Mohammedanism. When we think of a male god, at the back of our minds is a picture of an old man in the sky, who has a certain set of laws, rules and regulations we must all obey. If we follow these rules we will be loved and approved of by god, but if we disobey, we will be condemned and punished. Even today, when the power of this belief has been weakened, and many do not believe in a god at all, the image of Jehovah from the Old Testament is still very strong. Though we may consciously reject this view of god, subconsciously and within the structures of our society, the idea lives on. When we feel we have done the wrong thing, or ‘sinned’, we tend to feel guilty or unworthy in some way, and expect punishment. It is so ingrained in us, that to a large extent the ‘Jehovah’ figure is the only way we can envisage God. We appear to have only two choices; either this male god exists or there is no God at all.

By William Bond and Pamela Suffield

Introduction

Jesus Christ, through the teachings that have come down to us in the New Testament, attempted to offer an alternative, by describing a God of Love, who loves us all no matter what we do or who we are. Unfortunately, even though Christianity attempts to uphold the teachings of Christ, we find when we discuss the nature of God with many Christians, that they are still heavily influenced by the Jehovah of the Old Testament, and see God as wrathful, judgmental and punishing unless you ‘get it right’.
However, in the second half of the Twentieth Century, another concept of God has appeared. This time God is not a man but a woman. Its promulgators talk about ‘the Great Goddess’ or ‘the Great Mother’, who existed in the Western World before the advent of male-centred religions and before Christianity achieved its dominance of the whole of Europe. Many books have been written on the necessity for our society to turn towards the Great Mother, who has been ignored in the Western world for millenia.
On the face of it, assessing the idea of a female Creator in a purely intellectual way, it seems quite ridiculous. Why should it matter whether God is male or female? Surely a Supreme Deity is beyond being male or female at all. Eastern religions like Buddhism and Taoism already accept the genderlessness of God. In Taoism, we are presented with the concept of the ‘Tao’, which means ‘The Way’. There is no entity or image which can be worshipped or appealed to. Buddhism is similar, but since its ideas were taught by an historical man, Gautama Buddha, he is the one worshipped, despite the fact that he insisted he was not a God.

If we were assessing the nature of God in an entirely logical way, the concept of ‘The Tao’ would be the truest representation, since it perceives of a supreme entity as pure energy, beyond all ideas of human form and character. The trouble with this idea is that human beings find it difficult to grasp what the Tao is really like. It is ever mysterious, and beyond the comprehension of our limited minds. We seem to need an image that we can relate to, that we can understand in human terms. The truest representation of God which we can grasp, and which fits in with our growing ideas of a loving deity, is of God as the Great Mother. A masculine god is omnipotent, but judges, condemns and gives only limited love. His power is used to punish transgressors and reward the faithful. Man does the same. However, when you think of a mother, the picture is different. An ideal mother gives her children unconditional love which never changes. No matter what the child does, it will always be loved, supported in its growth, and nourished by the mother. Even if the child abuses her or commits horrendous crimes within society, this love never disappears. A wise mother obviously encourages loving behaviour, and discourages mistakes, but her love never wavers.

When we think of the Great Mother, we are thinking of an entity who will love us all, for ever, because we are her creations, – her children, to use the earthly metaphor. This is a completely different picture from the one drawn by belief in a male god, which relies on the threat of punishment, or withdrawal of love and rewards, to keep us in line. Since it is now time for the ‘feminine’ side of our Creator to be accepted and valued by men, it makes sense to worship a female deity. Only in this way will we begin to balance our society, which has denigrated and denied The Great Mother’s gifts for millenia.
As we all know, in our society there are many people who do not obey the rules of the Church and still escape punishment. Some of them seem to flout all of the laws of society and religion yet still prosper and thrive. Others obey all the rules, behave in a very humble and loving way, yet seem to receive no reward for their actions. They are often despised and taken advantage of. The Church avoids the implications of this by saying that such people will be happy in the afterlife, and the others will go to Hell. Since this is only a speculation, it is of little practical help to those suffering in the here and now. The priests of the god can only offer a better life when we are dead – what they cannot deliver is happiness and joy now. In contrast to this, the priestesses of the Great Mother can promise peace, joy and paradise on this Earth while we are alive.

To be in paradise does not require us to be disciplined and sacrificial for the sake of future rewards; all it requires is a change in attitude. In the world of the god, whether it is the one reflected to us through Christianity, Judaism, Mohammedanism or Science (which is our latest male religion) we are offered a world of conflict and fear. We have to accept rules and regulations to keep us in check; we have to accept the masculine world of aggression and conquest, whether it is conquest of ourselves or others. All harmonious ideas of joy and happiness are looked down on as impossible, leaving us with only suffering as the route to salvation. In this worldview, we learn and achieve only through struggle and pain, so it becomes an inevitable and necessary part of existence.
When we look to the Feminine and the Great Mother, there is a different perspective. The Great Mother will always look after us, no matter what we do and no matter what we believe in or say. There is no requirement to subscribe to a particular religion or way of behaving to ‘earn’ her love – she loves us all, and equally, anyway. The Feminine is a concept of harmony, of bringing together, of joy and peace. The priests of the god see a world that is out of harmony with itself, where only the strongest survive and the weakest go to the wall. This is not necessary.

The feminine world-view shows us harmony in everything – on Earth, and in the whole of Creation. This idea of the essential harmoniousness of creation was recently brought out very clearly in the book ‘Gaia’ by James Lovelock. It is interesting that he named his book after the ancient Earth Goddess, who was worshipped as the original deity. Though she was at one time acknowledged as the first to emerge from the primaeval state of Chaos, later male-dominated cultures devalued her and placed the sky gods like Uranus and Zeus above her.

The truth of existence is that how we see the earth we live on and our fellow human beings, shapes our lives. Our desires and fears act as magnets, drawing towards us the reality which we feel is the ‘true’ one. If we believe in conflict and limited love, that if we do not behave in a certain way we will not be loved or rewarded, then this will be the reality we create. We will become aggressive or defensive towards other people because we expect them to hurt us or exploit us. This in turn attracts to us the very aggression we fear, and confirms our beliefs. If we believe that only the strongest and most ruthless survive, and that this is by divine order, then we will have no qualms about exploiting the earth and our fellow man. But always lurking will be the fear that someone even stronger or more ruthless will snatch everything we have won away from us. If we also allow ourselves to judge others and find them better or worse than us, stronger or weaker, then we live in fear of others judging us. We create a god who does this when we die, sending some to Heaven and the rest to Hell based on his judgement of our worth.

The history of our species for the last few thousand years has been centred on conflict. Our idea of ‘right’ is based on force, which is a particularly male attribute. A good example of this can be seen if we look at the Falklands war. Britain sent a Task Force to the Falkland Islands to retake them from Argentina, who had snatched them from us. If we had not possessed a strong Navy and Army then the Islands would now belong to Argentina. Each side in the conflict believed that justice was on its side, yet it was superior strength which prevailed. Although in many ways we are more enlightened than in the past, our society is still based on the idea that ‘might is right’. The boundaries of countries, the distribution of wealth and land and the use of a particular language, owe their existence to the use of force on weaker people. Within each country, an unwritten law states that the more powerful you are, the more you can ignore the law and the rights of others less powerful than you. Once you have accumulated wealth and power by the use of aggression, then you invoke the force of the Law, the Police and Religion to prevent other equally rapacious people from relieving you of your booty. In such a world, no-one can be happy. Even if you are strong and successful, there is always fear that one day your strength and aggression will fail and you will become prey to others.
But if we were to return to worshipping the Great Mother, our direction would inevitably be towards harmony. There would therefore be less likelihood of aggression towards others, and even less likelihood of aggression towards ourselves. Since we would look for evidence of harmony, it would be there, and since no-one would be perceived as a threat to us, we would not provoke aggression in others or draw it to ourselves. We would be more likely to co-operate with our fellow man and have no reason to exploit him. In a harmonious Universe there is no need to fight for what you need – all resources, whether material, emotional or spiritual, are available to everyone because they believe that this is the case. The idea of scarcity can only exist when there is fear that you may miss out on something that you need, and that only you can provide it, by right behaviour, force or belonging to the ‘right’ religion or group.

There would be no reason for anyone to feel unworthy, as we do now, because we would know that we are loved by the Great Mother. Though we may make mistakes, this in no way changes her love, and she is always ready to help and support us. We would no longer have the inner conflicts bequeathed to us by the male priests of the god, reflecting in the world as strife and struggle, thus allowing us to live at peace with ourselves and the world.

Unfortunately, throughout recorded history, we have only known a patriarchal society. Though there is some evidence that matercentric (guided by women) societies have existed, we have no real way of telling how they functioned. All evidence that these societies existed, and were harmonious, was ruthlessly suppressed by the male-dominated cultures who took over from them, and where it could not be eliminated, was reinterpreted to support the ideas of the prevailing religion and culture. However, there are stories of a Golden Age, which existed before recorded history, in many religions and mythologies. In the East, the ‘Tao Te Ching’ talks of a time when everyone lived in harmony, and catalogues the changeover from this period of peace to the present patriarchal society. Initially, in this Golden Age, there was no conflict of any kind, nor any rules and laws. Gradually, these were introduced until we arrived by slow degrees at our present fear-ridden society.

Today, society is yet again changing, and we will in the future progress into another matercentric society. Obviously, there will be those who oppose this, some because they wish to retain patriarchy, and others because they believe that the ideal society is one in which men and women are equal. This is not yet possible, even if we could define what ‘equal’ means. As recent research has shown, (in ‘Brain Sex’ by Anne Moir and David Jessel) there is a fundamental difference between the male and female brain, which manifests itself in the way men and women think and feel. While men can ignore feelings, and rely on ‘logic’ to make decisions, it is necessary for our evolution to move into a female-centred society, one in which we worship a female deity and in which men can learn to care for others.
It is possible that in the far future we will have a society in which neither sex is dominant, but at our present stage of evolution, it is spiritually necessary and inevitable that we move into a matercentric society, as we will explain in subsequent chapters. This will benefit both men and women. At the moment, our patriarchal society, with its many rules and regulations, intolerance and aggression, gives immense advantages to men, because it reflects their way of seeing the world. There is no real way that women, or men for that matter, can achieve equality in such a society. We are seeing a drive for freedom within many countries of the World, and a growing acceptance of other’s ways of living. Many patriarchal structures which restrict freedom are being eroded or destroyed. In this climate, women will be far less disadvantaged than before, because they have less need for order and hierarchy than men, and because men will not be able to use aggression and logic in the same ruthless way they are accustomed to. As men see that women’s ability to mobilise both intellect and feeling in decision-making leads to greater stability, they will no longer wish to dominate. They will see clearly that they will be far happier directed by women than by other men, and gladly allow them to guide society.

From Bard of Ely:

Many people have never heard of matriarchy, and as a subject it has been almost taboo. This is because we live in a patriarchal world, a world run by men, and yet, at the same time, ruined by men, as we can easily see by the ongoing terrible news of wars, destruction of the environment, poverty and suffering for countless humans, as well as the appalling cruelty to animals and the threat of extinction to many species. One man who has spoken out eloquently and fearlessly about matriarchy, and has explained how a world run by women would be a workable solution to the problems we face, is William Bond.

Bond is the co-author with Pamela Suffield of Gospel of the Goddess: A Return to God The Mother, a book that explains how patriarchy has brought so much suffering to the world, a world which benefits the powerful men in charge of it, a world that suppresses the rights of women, and has caused so much devastation and death for thousands of years. It explains how the patriarchal world is so out of balance but how matriarchy would restore the balance and harmony we need.

Bond’s teachings are easy to understand. For example, he teaches that women, as mothers, are caring and nurturing, unlike their male counterparts who live by the motto of might is right. A world run by women would not be a world run by greedy and power-crazed big business men and by violence and aggression, but would be a world in which compassion and care would be priorities.

I read the Gospel of the Goddess back in 1994. So impressed was I with his knowledge that I interviewed Bond for my Hubpages blog. He is an expert on the subject of matriarchy and proposes how the world could be changed for the better if we were to move into a matriarchal culture. It would be a paradigm shift that really would bring the change so many people have desired and sought.

https://discover.hubpages.com/relationships/Author-William-Bond-talks-about-matriachy-in-this-HubPage-interview

William has books available on other places besides Lulu. This is called Apple, he has a few books there:

‎Gospel of the Goddess

‎Gospel of the Goddess

‎Religion & Spirituality · 2011

Many people believe that the ideal society is one in with men and women are equal. Their only experience has been a conflict-ridden, male-dominated society, based on aggression and hierarchy, and they are looking for a more loving and peaceful existence. If the female qualities of nurturing and caring become more valued, they, feel, the world would be a better place.

This ideal is a future possibility. But before we can achieve it, it is both spiritually necessary and inevitable that we move into a female-centered society, one in which we worship a female deity, the Great Mother, and are guided by women who manifest her power and love. Only by passing through this stage, in which men learn to love and care for others, and women learn to care for themselves, can we eventually reach an egalitarian society, which will value our individuality and our connectedness with everything. Such a world will be one of happiness, harmony, and joy.

Why Women Should Rule the World

https://books.apple.com/us/book/why-women-should-rule-the-

world/id444730970

If man is so clever and intelligent, why is he incapable of solving fundamental problems like crime, war, injustice, poverty and suffering Men cannot claim that the problems of the world are unsolvable because men have the intelligence and problem solving skills to put people into space, invent computers and produce all the wonders of modern technology. So why are not men, using his great intelligence and vast resources to overcome the suffering of our world The problem is that men’s basic instinctive drives, motivate him to compete and fight, bringing about a world of violence, warfare and injustice. This is why we need women to rule our world instead. This Book explains how and why we have created our insane world of suffering and how we can choose to create a loving and caring planet.

‎Sexual Evolution

‎Sexual Evolution

‎Science & Nature · 2011

This book uses evolutionary theory to explain human sexual behaviour. Desmond Morris attempted this in his book, “The Naked Ape” but he assumed that men had always been the dominant sex. Whereas this book questions these assumptions and demonstrates that we can use human sexuality to prove that Stone Age were very different types of people than conventional science has led us to believe. The book explains the evolution of the clitoris, oral sex, homosexuality and why women have large breasts and men have larger penises than any other ape. It also explains the sex life of the bonobo ape, and how it related to human sexuality. It also tells the reader about the significance of the Aquatic Ape Theory, and the Goddess Neolithic civilizations.

‎Freemasonry and the Hidden Goddess

‎Freemasonry and the Hidden Goddess

‎Religion & Spirituality · 2012

COLOUR ILLUSTRATIONS: What are the origins of Freemasonry? What is their purpose? Even Freemasons themselves don’t seem to know this and present many different theories on the origins of Freemasonry. Yet the origins of Freemasonry and purpose of Freemasonry is clearly told in their symbolism, which this book clearly explains.

‎The Origins of the Mermaid Myth

‎The Origins of the Mermaid Myth

‎History · 2012

There are stories of mermaids from all over the world. We are told that mermaids are myths, invented by stupid sailors who have mistaken sea-cows for women with fish tails. This book has a far better explanation for the mermaid myth than that. As it shows that mermaids were not myths but real life women. And there are a few that have survived up until modern times.

College of God & Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Uncategorized

Women Must Rule the World

Why Women can do a Better Job in Ruling the World, Than Men

If man is so clever and intelligent, why is he incapable of solving fundamental problems like crime, war, injustice, poverty and suffering?

We are so negative about ourselves. Religion teaches us, “we are born in sin”, the scientific ‘Selfish Gene’ theory claims we are all basically selfish. Capitalists tell us that “greed is good”, because man can only be motivated by greed. We are also told that ideals like love and compassion are unrealistic and impracticable in our cruel world.

These beliefs encourage us to fear and hate each other. As we blame, condemn, punish and try to control others in a futile attempt to impose order in our chaotic world. Yet we know human beings are also capable of love and compassion, as well as intelligent and rational behaviour. So why are we not using our great intelligence to create a caring and loving world?

Men cannot claim that the problems of the world are unsolvable because men have the intelligence and problem solving skills to put people into space, invent computers and produce all the wonders of modern technology. So why are not men, who rule our world, using his great intelligence and vast resources to overcome the suffering of our world?

The problem is that men’s basic instinctive drives, motivate him to compete and fight, bringing about a world of violence, warfare and injustice. Men are emotionally incapable of creating a caring and compassionate world. This is why we need women to rule our world instead.

This Blog explains how and why we have created our insane world of suffering and how we can choose to create a loving and caring planet.

This blog is available as a printed book at. –

Books by William Bond

Who is William Bond? 4-27-22

From Rasa Von Werder

When I first got on the Internet in 2004, William Bond was already there, preaching a subject that interested me greatly –Matriarchy.

By 2005 I had galvanized my work onto a site called “Woman, Thou Art God” which contained all my basic beliefs as well as some galleries portraying myself & other women as “Goddesses.” I did not include my ‘show business’ name Kellie Everts as this was a new beginning – I had quit dancing & was now embarked on another role, Guru Rasa Von Werder, a spiritual leader & teacher.

As I searched the web for material on Female Empowerment, female superiority, matriarchy, there was scant little information. Whatever was there I collected & put onto my site. I wrote articles. I thought about the female situation a lot, were women really superior? Ashley Montague said so in 1953, but he was dead.

William Bond was alive & kicking. He did not believe in Female Superiority per se {nor in other things I believed in like good & evil, global warming, male extinction or the devil} but what we agreed on was the glue that would bind us together, at least in my part – he wasn’t as sure about me.

From then on, as I read the teachings of William Bond, I knew he was sent by the Almighty, that he was Gifted of the Holy Spirit & Anointed, & that we had to have ‘Divine Relationship.’

After a few years I convinced him of the same. At first when he saw there was a great conflict from other women toward me he said he had to ‘stick with the majority.’ But I knew most of them were phonies & fakes – not chosen by Her Majesty – & time proved me right – they all fell away when their egos were not gratified.

William Bond has a way of saying the ‘obvious’ which everyone can believe if they weren’t hypnotized. He says it & suddenly, the Emperor HAS NO CLOTHES! And we all know it’s the Truth, AFTER he says it – but no one was saying it!

Like ‘Men do a terrible job of running the world, their instinct doesn’t permit them to be loving & caring, they have not a Maternal instinct as do women – they are made to have conflicts & wars” {words approximate.}

Of course! We knew it all the time but we were lost in the maze of Patriarch reasons / excuses & LIES about why the world is the way it is, always has been, always will be.

Patriarchy is a TRAP of taking our minds off the TRUTH & convincing us if only the Democrats or Republicans win or vice versa – all will be solved. It’s the wrong party, the wrong man in charge, when the right MAN comes along all will be straightened out. Right, & I will SELL YOU A BRIDGE.

William says straight out there is NO RIGHT MAN, it has to be WOMEN {collectively, not ‘dicks in skirts”}. Just look at the basic instincts & you’ll know the answer – as simple as that.

And because of William Bond I had a touchstone of who to hang onto who knew the Truth & I would work with him, look at him as my Lighthouse on earth, encourage one another & push each other on in a cruel & twisted world. {End Rasa Part}

College of God & Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Uncategorized

the PROPHET of MATRIARCHY

the PROPHET of MATRIARCHY

William Bond Espouses Truth 4-23-22

Divine Goddess

· William Bond’s Blog

· Mermaids are real!

· The Return of Matriarchy

· Why Women Should Rule The World

· The Aquatic Ape Theory

· Matriarchy FAQs

· Female Friendly Femdom

· Femdom Matriarchy

· The Matriarchal Tao

· Rasa Von Werder

· Mermaids Are Real: Video

· Gospel Of The Goddess

· Freemasonry And The Hidden Goddess

· Scientific Matriarchy

William writes: I am honoured that Pete wants to write an article about me but to be accurate I just want to point out that my ideas about matriarchy didn’t come just from myself. I first heard about matriarchy in a book called, “The First Sex” by Elizabeth Gould Davis in the 1970s. I then went on to read the works of Robert Graves who also wrote about matriarchy. Then later I read, “When God Was a Woman” by Merlin Stone and finally the books of Marija Gimbutas.

Most books about matriarchy have been about matriarchy in ancient civilizations. Whereas I have mostly written that it would be a good idea for women to rule the world now and in the future. This is again not a new idea I have read this in books like “The Return of the Goddess” by Edward C. Whitmont and “Our Own Worst Enemy” by Norman F. Dixon.

So many people have written about matriarchy, though this has mostly been in academic circles there has been few books written about matriarchy for the general public. The first author credited for writing about matriarchy was Swiss author J.J. Bachofen in the 19th century in his book “Myth, Religion and Mother Right”. Though his book is more about Matrilineal inheritance than matriarchy. Where he points out that in many ancient cultures, inheritance came down the female line because before strict marriage laws men didn’t know for sure whom their children were. This allowed women to gain wealth and power from their mothers. So marriage laws were invented to prevent this happening where women were forced to only have sex with her husband and no other man. This allowed men to inherit wealth and power from their fathers as their fathers could now be fairly sure whom their sons were.

* Rasa says: This infuriates me & justifies my ideas about marriage in our society. I call it ‘the hotbed of abuse’ but this adds fuel to the fire. Wow, how much men had to do to cripple women, disempower them! *

I first wrote about matriarchy in my Book, “Gospel of the Goddess” which I co-authored with Pamela Suffield. We wrote it as a New Age book but couldn’t find a publisher to publish it. It was finally published by a Femdom publisher. Then later on I was encouraged by a professional Dominatrix Dianna Vesta to write articles about matriarchy for her web-site on the internet. Then Rasa Von Werder later took over the role of promoting my writings.

Although femdom people have been helpful in promoting my writings the problem has been that I think that the reason why women should rule our world, is because they are far more caring and loving people than men. So it would be a good idea to have caring and loving women rule our world. The trouble with this, is that femdom fantasies dictate that dominant women have to be cruel and sadistic women. So femdom people do like the idea of women ruling the world but not if they are kind, loving women. This is where Rasa Von Werder has been helpful, as the idea of loving and caring women ruling our world has not been a problem for her…… William

More from William,

Most of my writings I have on my blogs. My early writings on the internet is my blog “Divine Goddess”, All my mermaid writing is on “Mermaids are Real”. I was interested in Freemasonry for a while and wrote a book on it which I finally made into a blog at. “Freemasonry and the Hidden Goddess”. I also put my book, “Gospel of the Goddess” on a blog.

To tell you about my life. I was born in London in 1946. When I was four years old my parents immigrated to Australia and we lived in Western Australia. In 1970 I came back to England and have lived here ever since…. William

I am grateful for the nice things you say about me Rasa but all I have done is point out the obvious. It should be obvious that men do a terrible job in ruling our world but the reason why people go along with it, is because of propaganda and indoctrination. Male rulers like to fight wars and we are told that war is ‘glorious’ and justified and soldiers in books and films are turned into heroes. Even just violence is glamorized as we see in cowboy and gangster films where violent men are again glamorized.

Patriarchy also produces a world where there is a large gap between rich and poor. The patriarchal elite get away with this by threatening the people with violence or prison if they complain too much about this. They also use propaganda to glamorize rich and powerful people. Propaganda, indoctrination and intimidation would not be needed to rule people if patriarchal rulers were compassionate people.

Caring rulers will be loved by the people and would not need indoctrination, propaganda or threats to keep their postilion of power. This is what we are up against, if we want to challenge patriarchy we have to realize we will be fighting a propaganda war. And if we are successful in doing this, then we will be subjected to threats as well.

All I am is a person with a questioning mind but I’m not sure I know how to fight a propaganda war. I can see that the whole idea of matriarchy does appeal to many people but they are frightened of patriarchy and the methods it uses to control people. Probably showbiz people are better equipped to fight a propaganda war as they know how to attract people’s interest. In the end people will listen to any idea providing they find it entertaining or dramatic.

William

…………………………………………………….

Hi William,

You speak Truth & as long as you keep saying it, people will be attracted to the Truth. No lie can live forever. Truth has a God Power behind it – God is Truth. Lies have the negativity within them, this will eventually turn to dust. Truth is Infinite, lies are of the dust. They are temporary. Yes people are mesmerized by them for a while, but eventually the hypnosis fades away & they awaken to see the Truth.

Even though many people are enslaved by these lies, it also is temporary. They shall eventually escape. It seems like forever – thousands of years – but this will end – they call it ‘Kali Yuga’ which is Patriarchy. But Matriarchy is coming back. You spearheaded it on the internet, the first one to preach it. I came along & followed you – I became your friend because you speak Truth. You are of Mother God, her Infinite Power, Anointed by her. If it wasn’t for you I would have been all alone in my Female Empowerment work. And now Ajax the Great has joined us – we are the Three Musketeers. Remember when I tried to form the four Musketeers – You, me, Betty & Thomas? But Betty betrayed us & took Thomas with her – they were not meant to be. God separates the chaff from the wheat, but it takes time. We must trust in her. We do not want people in our midst who are traitors to Mother God.

* Re Betty leaving us. She wanted ‘my position’ as the leader of Matriarchy – she said she was more appropriate. She got Thomas to serve her by creating a blog where people would PAY for a course on Matriarchy, & even got, by some miracle, to get Thomas to get her the ability to receive credit card payments! She also had Thomas create a video on Matriarchy for her. But her efforts completely FAILED. No one bought her course; she got few You tube views while I got millions. Why? Because she was not sincere in her love & service to Mother God. She wanted to USE Matriarchy to SERVE HER. She wanted money, fame & fortune. And so, Mother God did not give her any Grace – not only that, she deserved punishment for injuring me – she wrote letters to many people to get me blocked & blacklisted from places, not only on the internet but in my home town! {And why? Because she attacked William & I defended him! She is psychotic.} She went back to the place she belonged – a village called Nonentity. And so, many are called but few are chosen. I saw a few other women on the internet whom God had called – but they resisted obedience to God & they themselves wanted to be served. Serving God is sacrifice, not exploitation of her. *

I follow Mother God, that’s why I help you – because you are her right hand. You obey her, her Truth. Truth is blessed, it is virtue to preach it. To preach lies is doomed – those who do so are not of God. We leave behind this world of lies & hope in, believe in, & await the Truth to return to our world. It will – but by the time Mother God’s Monarchy returns, we will be dead. But our work lives on. People will benefit by it – we will enjoy our rewards in Eternity. Think of the incredible good your words, left behind, will do. These words will flourish, they will be repeated. They will live on for all time. I mean Jesus was 2k years ago – his words are all over the place but they Crucified him. But his Spirit lives on. So will your Spirit.

Another thing. Not all people are mesmerized. Many are calling out to God in their hearts. They are persecuted, left behind, impoverished & unhappy. They are saying where is God? Then they see your writing, or mine, or Ajax’s. Then they know somebody is out there speaking Truth. They are then enlivened & filled with hope. Some of these people cannot do anything – they are impoverished & have no Voice – maybe some have a tiny voice like Face book, to speak Truth. But others who are galvanized are also Anointed, Empowered by God, & they will do much.

Let us continue to give hope, Light & inspiration to the captives of this world & all join hands. This life is temporary & although we don’t see all the benefits & rewards of our work, someone will. Two hundred years from now Matriarchy will be well under way & five hundred years from now the majority of the world will be under Female Rulership. Think of the goodness of that. We are part of the beginning.

As far as promotion, show business and all that. I used whatever way I could to get the attention of the media. The media would broadcast my Truth – In a sense, I tricked them into being my Voice box. It was the Grace of God that got me to do female body building, Stripping for God, female domination, & all that I did. You did not have that kind of opportunity, but you did what you do best – formulating the Doctrine, theology, & Manifesto for Mother God – re women ruling the family & the world – & this is as important as anything else. You stayed humble & did not have your name in Lights & did not do TV shows & interviews all over the world. But you were & are effective, all the words you produced – the ideas – will continue.

Let us praise Mother God for what she has done through us!

I can see the Light at the end of the tunnel more & more clearly every day. The Light in me, the clarity, is getting stronger. I am greatly enlivened as I see the end of the Patriarchal lies & the beginning of Matriarchy…… Rasa

…………………………………………………………….

William Bond continues: I agree Rasa that the best way women can take over and rule our world is through the help and support of MotherGod. As I have said before, because most women only know what the priests of patriarchal religions tell them, and so they are unaware that God is female. Because of this, women today do not know they are closer to God than what men are. Women are better mediums and psychics than men because it is easier for them to become One with MotherGod. This then gives women great power, but are discouraged from using this power by patriarchal priests and religions.

If we could create a matriarchal religion that worshiped MotherGod and women were taught and encouraged to communicate with MotherGod through mediumship. Then women would be able to use the great power of MotherGod.

If you can use your name, Andrew, to publish a mainstream book about the Great Mother it would be a help. Do you want articles for you book? I could perhaps write an article about the Gaia theory and relate it to the ancient worship of the Great Mother.

William

College of Matriarchal Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Uncategorized

4 Movies & NY Law Journal on Rasa

4-23-22 Rasa Life Story Movie Prediction

Lawsuit against Morton Downey Jr. front page New York Law Journal

I’m at a movie theater with a female to my right. We’ve been watching this movie in color, & it’s about Bruce Springsteen. After a while I exclaim,

“This is the FOURTH TIME he’s doing this song!”

*** (BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN has been chosen to symbolize me, lol. Why? Because he toured coast to coast for many years, an entertainer. But one more quirky similarity I just recalled. Freehold, N.J. He is from around there, & I lived near there for 7 years of my young life! We just put in Wikipedia ‘on a farm near Freehold, NJ!

But the BIG REVELATION here is FOURTH TIME! I’ve been praying to God many times – will this be one movie or a series? Because I channeled a dozen souls, all of them keep repeating “You will make big money from this.” I sense REALLY BIG but they don’t tell me how much. I keep asking, will there be one movie or a series? And nobody so far has answered, but this dream does.) ***

I see a lot of color on the screen, like saturated shades of dull red, brown dark colors, the images & colors blend together, like no separation. He’s on stage with his men, someone playing drums, this & that instruments, all on stage. But like, my God, the same song four times!

* (DARK COLORS, RED, BROWN: These colors represent suffering. This has been my life, lots of pain.) *

My lady friend & I both know, somehow, that Bruce is in the house, to the right of us, back a ways, sitting against the wall. Since he’s the subject of this movie plus he’s a celebrity, there’s reason to want to meet him.

I tell my friend, let’s go speak to him, but she is reluctant, so I tell her,

“I’m going, even if you don’t.

So I head in his direction. By way of a joke, I say,

“It’s a crazed fan”

as I approach.

He’s sitting, surprisingly, all alone with just one female in the seat behind him – who is affiliated with him. No one is mobbing him, maybe he’s incognito, somehow disguised or didn’t tell anyone he’d be here so all the seats to his right & left & in front are empty.

The female behind him is young, pleasingly plump, & for some reason, as I approach, she takes a layer of her clothing, white, pulls it up partially covering her face. It’s like saying “Oh my God” or “Wow.”

*** (WHY IS HE ALONE? Except for one female behind him etc: The behavior of the female is tricky, but I discern this is a hint that the person approaching is God, & there’s a saying that God is so imposing / overwhelming that people might cover their faces at her approach – the Light of God is so Bright it frightens people. {I have heard in writings that when a bad sinner faces God at the immediate judgment the sight of her is so frightening that they ask to be removed & sent to Hell – Because God to them is not a friend, but a judge. They stand condemned. Of course one who is filthy with sin, even thought they are saved, might also want to get to Purgatory fast & get cleaned up.}

This then tells us that the dreamer is my God Self, while Bruce is my flesh & there is something amazing in this that God kneels to my flesh. It shows incredible intimacy with God – that we are One.

Why is he ALONE? This might be a hint that there is no one like him, as ‘birds of a feather stick together’ & if one has no birds of like feather, no one sticks to them. But this might give the hint why the movie is being made – individuality – there is no one else like this.

Who then however is affiliated with Bruce – me? The only human I can think of that’s been behind me all my life is Our Holy Mother – & this is strange that she should be startled by my God Self, but it’s just a symbol.

Calling myself, the God Self of Rasa, a ‘crazed fan’ as a joke means what?

I think it’s an analogy that I have been ‘a crazed fan’ of God & now God is my ‘crazed fan.’ It’s a reflection of each other. There is no difference, so to speak, when one enters Nonduality.

And in this kneeling, God shows to me that She acts toward me the way I have acted toward her – we are the same.) ***

OK so now I KNEEL right in front of Bruce like putting my head into his lap & quickly assure him,

“You KNOW ME, we spent FOUR HOURS speaking to each other one time.”

And so he is assured it’s not just some random stranger or someone out to do him harm.

My kneeling there, we are extremely close & affectionate, like if you had a pet in your lap.

*** (FOUR HOURS TOGETHER! Again the number 4 is saying there will be FOUR MOVIES.

And again, these are but symbols, not to all be taken literally. “I Strip for God” & God acknowledges me the same way.) ***

……………………………………………..

publication: Aha, the New York Law Journal re my lawsuit against Morton Downey Jr – front page!

The New York Law Journal Friday Sept. 22, 1989 Front Page

TV Station Faces Libel Trial Over Downey Show

by Alan Kohn

After the judge completed his analysis of libel law, public and private figures, and New Jersey’s law on assault and battery, one fact remained: WWOR-TV must defend itself against a suit by Kellie Everts, a self-proclaimed “stripper for God.”

Ms. Everts has sued Morton Downey Jr. and numerous persons associated with his former television show and WWOR-TV Channel 9 over her treatment when she appeared as a guest along with another stripper, a belly dancer and some male strippers on a program that was videotaped Oct. 26, 1988, and telecast Nov. 4.

In his decision in Everts v. Downey in Kings Count, Supreme Court, IA 17, Justice Elliott Golden, after viewing a videotape of the telecast, noted that at the conclusion of the program, Mr. Downey had loosed a “barrage of invectives” against the plaintiff, among which were “slut” and “pig.”

Among the names he called her during the program was a fat bitch”. During the “entire program,” Justice Golden stated, Mr. Downey “singled out plaintiff for his vituperation and abuse, apparently for plaintiff’s claim that she was a “stripper for God.”

Mr. Downey’s remarks plus allegations of assault and battery, are the basis of Ms. Everts’s suit. The record did not show, the justice stated, whether anyone other than WWOR-TV had been served, so that he was only dealing with the television station’s motion to dismiss, which he denied.

In his analysis, the justice, after examining case law, stated the decisions led to a “powerful syllogism. A defamation is actionable only if it is false. Opinions cannot be false. Therefore, opinions can never be actionable, even if defamatory.”

Mr. Downey’s “defamatory language,” the justice continued, could be divided into “separate segments: the statements and charges he uttered during the entire show and the “barrage” at the conclusion.

Thus, calling Ms. Everts a “fat bitch” during the program, the judge ruled, fell into the category of statements described as “mere opprobriums which are tolerated on the theory that it will be understood to amount to nothing more than vulgar name-calling.”

Circumstances Weighed

Mr. Downey’s charge that the plaintiff “must be on drugs or is diseased,” Justice Goldin found, “must be considered in view of the circumstances in which those statements were made. In each instance, the remark was predicated by Downey’s alluding to plaintiff’s assertion that she had a vision from the “Blessed Mother” that she should no longer engage in sexual activity.

“These statements come under the general principle that statements of underlying fact provide the context in which an opinion maybe be understood to be an opinion.”

A “more serious question” was presented with respect to “defamatory statements” directed at Ms. Everts at the program’s end, particularly when during the entire program Downey singled out plaintiff for his vituperation and abuse, apparently for plaintiff’s claim that she was a “stripper for God”, the justice found.

After finding Ms. Everts was a public figure the justice stated this did not preclude her from recovering for the “libelous conduct of Downey” but declared she must prove malice. A finding that WWOR-TV “SHOULD HAVE HAD SOME SERIOUS DOUBT AS TO THE TRUTH OF Downey’s statements may circumstantially be made,” Justice Golden found.

“Thus, the records shows that there was about a nine-day period between the original live show, which was videotaped, and the telecast – ample time for defendant to have reviewed this tape. This factor becomes relevant when considered in light of defendant’s concession that Downey was known for his loud, combative and provocative style.”

Salaciousness?

As a matter of fact, a review of the tape shows that Downey’s performance was more than just loud, combative and provocative but in certain segments of the program, outright salacious…Downey directed his venomous and oft-time degrading language at plaintiff, although another stripper and a belly dancer were co-guests on the program.

“All of this should have alerted defendant to the concrete possibility of damaging defamatory statements for which it could be held liable. Suffice it to say there are circumstances here for a jury to ponder and weight to determine if, or to what extent, the defendant showed actual malice in the presentation of this program, in addition to the other issues herein.”

One of the other issues, Justice Golden stated, was WWOR-TV’s claim that even if the statements at issue were found to be defamatory statements of fact, the complaint still should be dismissed for failure to plead special damages.

The justice rejected the claim, holding the defamatory meaning was “apparent from the statements themselves. They are statements that held plaintiff up to public contempt, ridicule, aversion and disgrace.

“Extrinsic facts are unnecessary to explain their defamatory meaning necessary in libel per quod and therefore, there is no need to plaintiff to allege special damages.”

Ms. Everts was represented by Jack B. Solerwitz, Mineola, L.I. WWOR-TV’s lawyers were Laurence Greenwald and William A. Rome, of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan.

The decision of the judge not to dismiss this case is long – appears on pg 25, 3^rd column, & goes on for many pages, citing the assault and battery {he knocked Kellie Everts down into her chair} and other defamations uttered by Morton Downey Jr. – It is probably about 10 pages typed.

College of God & Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Uncategorized

Kellie Everts – Rasa Von Werder

Life of Kellie Everts aka Rasa Von Werder & WIKIPEDIA

Kellie Everts was born on July 16, 1945 in Calw, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, as Rasa Sofija Jakstas, to Lithuanian parents, Stasys and Regina Jakstas, who had fled Stalin. They ended up in a displaced person’s camp and in 1949, boarded the Navy ship S.S. Heintzelman bound for the U.S.A.

Her parents were sponsored to an ethnic community in Newark, N. Jersey where Dad, a professor, created a Lithuanian school in the Church auditorium, (this on the heels of founding the first State Teacher’s College in Kaunas, Lithuania.)

None of them spoke English – but school, after seeing the drawings of Rasa, age 5, skipped her a grade forward, her drawings were put in a children’s gallery at a museum, & a Christmas card she drew age 6 was mimeographed by school staff and hundreds of copies distributed. She was considered a child prodigy.

But trouble brewed for Rasa. Her Mom cuckolded Dad with the organist in the Church – he was renting a room with the Jakstas family and the paternity of Regina Jakstas’ next child was disputed. There was a split. Rasa at eight found herself moving with Mom & the organist, Marius Bernotas, to a farm near Freehold, N.J. Dad was supposed to join them but never did, and at age ten Rasa put down her pencil & said ‘I will never draw again’ (but age 15 she picked up her water color brush & made a painting outside her bedroom window called ‘Water Tower’ – this won Second place within a major art contest inside a competition of five schools) and even said ‘Maybe there is no God.’ She was the only person in her family, then, besides Dad, destined to wear glasses and her eyes grew worse as Dad, refusing to take her to live with him, told her,

“the remedy {for your pain} is knowledge. You must study.”

Her Mom, at age ten, began a concerted and constant persecution of Rasa, hating her for loving Dad, and turned the rest of the family against her. Rasa’s morale broke down, she suffered at school and couldn’t concentrate, she broke rules and was expelled. Thereupon Dad had to take her in to finish school and she moved to Brooklyn with him.

But this didn’t last long. Within a year Rasa wanted to make her mark. She met a man from Hollywood – Andre De Dienes, a photographer who’d been close to Marilyn Monroe. Upon seeing her he told her to meet him the next morning at 6 AM at the ChelseaHotel,

“I’ll take you to Hollywood and make you a playmate of the month. You will be ‘Ms Hawaii.’

And so, at age 16, she was on her way by car with Mr De Dienes and days later, saw palm trees swaying in the wind. De Dienes plans for her crashed when Rasa resisted his advances. He gave her the bucks for modeling & dumped her on the street in Venice, CA.

With the money Rasa rented a room, bought a bottle of peroxide and bleached her hair blonde. She put on the second-hand pink checked cotton bikini and headed up the beach – to where she did not know – ending up on top the Santa Monica Pier, looking down at the Muscle Beach volleyball players. One of these men, Stanley Everts, a teacher, walked up to her, asked her on a date, and months later became her husband. She asked for a small loan so she could get her life started there but he refused and said,

“Either marry me or remain homeless.”

This liaison resulted in a daughter named Kellie, born June 20, 1964.

Soon Kellie Everts was offered modeling jobs and movie roles – the husband trashed her pictures & ridiculed the offers, refused to free her for show business work.

Kellie had sent her photo in to ‘Strength and Health’ and they picked her as ‘Ms Body Beautiful.’ This brought a letter from Mr Universe Vern Weaver, who was arriving to that area and wanted to take her to a body building show. Kellie went in spite of the husband’s objection and there met Bill McCardle, Mr Southern CA and his photographer. This resulted in an offer to be on the cover of “Strength & Health.” Kellie went, the photographer set her up by leaving her alone with McCardle who raped her – sick to her stomach a couple months later she discovers she’s pregnant. It was not her husband Stanley’s child because his recent operation for cancer left him sterile.

This disastrous pregnancy caused a major rift between Kellie and her husband. He did not believe she was raped and tried to strangle her. Somehow she escaped; the second time he knocked her down, sat on her chest & began to strangle her she got away, grabbed the baby & ran, took a cab to a Hollywood motel. This began a full-time modeling career, she joined an agency and was hired by dozens of photographers and movie makers, with images of her splashed all over the country and a few ‘body beautiful’ type movies.

Strangely enough, the Mother who hated her had convinced her she was ugly – she was not allowed to sit at the table with family at the farm – Mom said, ‘You’re not a pretty sight to look at.’ The treatment of her had been so brutal she gained an inferiority complex and suffered from PTSD for years. And yet, soon people would be paying to see her beautiful body, her name in lights at the biggest club in Hollywood – the Classic Cat.

But Kellie’s husband found her and let her known he was given six months to live – the cancer had returned. She pitied him and went back to nurse him, which she did until his death in April 1966.

What a dark day when she discovered that out of revenge, Stanley Everts had cancelled his life insurance and left his child and wife penniless.

The day after his funeral, with one buck in her pocket, Kellie got a job at a private men’s club in Santa Monica, “The Ball”, dancing topless. It was survival.

A long and colorful career started in show business as well as religion & the academic field. Life for Kellie had just begun.

She’d lived in many places – Germany, cities like Newark and Brooklyn, worked hard on a farm for seven years and now, in middle age, she started a video business, earning the most money she’d ever had. She parlayed it to buy a wilderness near the Catskill Mountains complete with riverfront, five acre island, a swamp, a pond and a creek outside the kitchen door.

But Kellie was not alone for long, someone loved her in true love, Richard Von Werder. After 14 years of betrothal, Kellie finally married him on Oct 28, 2000, but he had a bad heart which he succumbed to on July 7, 2002.

Their love had been spiritual and true – Kellie was celibate since May 27, 1978 & remained so for another eight years {31 yrs total}. In the year 2004 she began to use the money Richard left her to build the internet ‘University of Mother God Church’ with the flagship site ‘Woman Thou Art God.’ She’s been expanding that theme ever since – She believes that females should run the family and the world.

Her plans for the future are to leave her resources toward building a Temple to Mother God, a convent and Sisterhood of Matriarchal women – a new kind of convent that allows females sexual freedom.

She will bequeath her work to the Sisterhood with guidelines to carry on. There are good prospects for funding this movement, they have found gas and oil under Kellie’s property, “The Marcellus Shale.”

Career: Body Building

How female body building got started. It took a while for Kellie Everts to get the credit she deserved, officially, for being the instigator of modern competitive female bodybuilding.

In 2005 she built her Kellie Everts biographical website which included the account of what she did for female body building. There was no such thing as ‘female body building’ when Kellie Everts entered her first contest, ‘Ms Americana,’ in 1972 – an affair put on by the IFBB in tandem with a major event for men.

Kellie took part in several contests of that sort by the IFBB (International Federation of Body Building) and the WBBG (World Body Building Guild) and did well in all of them. The first one she won 2^nd place and BEST BODY. In 1973 she won two trophies, one in New York, 2^nd place Ms Body Beautiful U.S.A. & in CA, run by Reg and Shari Lewis, ‘Most Voluptuous’ the IFBB Ms Americana contest. The following year, 1974, she won trophies in two contests, one the title in the WBBG Ms Body Beautiful U.S.A., FIRST place, and the IFBB Mr Olympia event held their Ms Americana on the same stage – the Felt Forum – where Kellie won 2^nd place and as usual, BEST BODY.

What perturbed Kellie as she participated in these contests is the treatment of women compared to men. The men were held as greater value, with much respect and prize money. The women were considered secondary, a ‘side show’ with no prize money. She wished she could remedy the situation where women who lifted weights – such as she did – could flex, be considered body builders, be given respect and prize money. The opportunity to promote these ideas was about to present itself.

Dan Lurie asked Kellie to pose for a female body building shoot in a gym for his magazine, Muscle Training Illustrated, she complied – it was 1974.

Soon thereafter the art editor of Esquire, Jean-Paul Goude, decided to do a pictorial on an ‘Amazonian’ type woman – strong, fit and muscular – for Esquire.

He called every gym in New York & was told they knew no such woman. He called Dan Lurie asking if he knew any female body builders. Dan told him there was only one – Kellie Everts. He asked what does she look like? Dan said to pick up his magazine on the stand, she was there. Goude did and liked what he saw, Kellie was hired.

This was the first spark that spearheaded the revolution. No one had heard of this before – female body building, and here it was in a reputable magazine, Esquire.

A plethora of attention followed – radio and TV interviews, more magazine articles. Esquire sent Kellie to Wash DC to do the AM Wash show and other shows – the Esquire pictorial was repeated in Holland.

She appeared on the national “Mike Douglas” show re the article and “To Tell the Truth” asking which is the woman minister who is also a body builder? When the panel finished Kellie did bench presses. The shock-type host Stanley Siegel had her on three times, there were other shows. When the furor died down about a year had gone by. Kellie wanted to keep the attention going.

She knew that John Paul Goude was an influential art director, she called him and said let’s get this story into Playboy. He said ‘we can’t’ – they won’t do it. I might be able to get it into Oui {a Playboy publication at the time}. But Kellie said ‘It has to be Playboy, their influence is what I’m after.’

And so, John Paul Goude produced the article which Playboy dubbed ‘Humping Iron.’ They looked at the piece and weren’t sure. They said

‘We’ll pay you half, and if we use it, the other half.’

And luck did strike soon after – as the movie ‘Pumping Iron’ came out. Here they had this article in their hands, which they called ‘Humping Iron.’ We had it made.

This article, promulgated by Playboy, did the trick. It was not as sensational as Esquire as people heard of female body building by now – but Playboy gave it its imprimatur, the Seal of Approval. They declared that a female with muscles was sexy and beautiful so the public now had permission to ‘move on with the show’ – ‘To the Barbells, Girls,’ the cried out.

Soon after this – within months, someone organized a body building show for women. It wasn’t IFBB or WBBG, it was a strange egg from an eccentric man. Then Sports Illustrated ran a big article – 1979 –Miss Well, WHAT?

And it was then that the IFBB held its first body building contest, called Ms Fitness and the year after that, 1980, began the official start of female Body Building Contests, the Ms Olympia. And that is how modern female competitive body building got started.

The IFBB continued promoting female body building for some years but Dan Lurie went into semi retirement. Everyone was busy with the new ladies, Kellie Everts was ignored. But in 2006 Kellie heard about Doug Going and Dan Lurie resurrecting the WBBG. She put together all her material proving her case – that she was the Progenitor -– and distributed them to the bodybuilding world.

Soon they would have a WBBG shindig in Providence, R.I., invite all the great old stars and give awards and induct people into their Hall of Fame (Sergio Olivia, Harold Poole). Kellie was invited, and the WBBG, after hearing her case, declared her to be the ‘Progenitor’ of female body building – gave her a plaque and recognition – that was February, 2007.

Controversies and Objections to Female Body Building,

present Issues re Drugs

It is always the new thing that gathers scandal, raises objections, because the ‘old thing’ is in the heads of people. Indeed, the male body builders of the first days were not warmly met – they were an anomaly and made fun of. The average man might have felt intimidated when a ‘freaky muscle monster’ appeared. But within the discipline itself, among their peers, the ‘biggest & the best’ were looked up to.

There were also norms for female bodies & with it behavior. An ideal woman was Jayne Mansfield, the character she played; in the skin of a perfectly thin, shapely body was a ditsy Marilyn Monroe. Women were not supposed to be smart, aggressive, or dominant toward men. The rules echoed through the 50’s and 60’s everywhere: Laugh at men’s jokes, don’t contradict them, don’t be smarter than them, don’t beat them in sports – if your 60 year old boss {you’re 20} wants a date, DON’T tell him you only see him as your father! What was the bottom line? SUBMISSION.

The teaching was obey these rules OR ELSE. Or else what? Your boyfriend will leave you, you won’t get a husband, you will not be a harmonious member of our society. If you step out of line you will not succeed with snagging men, holding and keeping JOBS. Men and jobs were almost ‘synonymous’ because in the Patriarchal system, unjust laws & practices kept women paid less for the same work and many jobs were forbidden. Women could not get ‘men’s’ jobs like police, firefighting, construction workers, or truck drivers.

It went farther. If you look at the classical orchestras prior to the feminist uprising of the 60’s – there are NO WOMEN playing instruments. Why? Did women not want to play music? No – the male conductors would not hire them. Of course, all these anathemas toward women had EXCUSES like they weren’t strong enough to be police or firemen – construction could be dangerous and women had no penchant in those areas and women did not LIKE to drive trucks. They did not ask the women what they wanted – they TOLD THEM what they could or could not do.

Even in the tax-paid schools where boy and girl were supposed to be equal: Boys sports were funded heavily but girls not. Why? We were told girls did not like to play football or any contact sports. They weren’t ‘into’ sports as they were not AGGRESSIVE {meanwhile we were being told it was forbidden to be aggressive!} Females were not ASKED they were TOLD what they wanted. The school inequity resulted in a law called “Title IX” where it was illegal to spend more money on boy sports than girls. {But later, some schools would work around it.}

Women were also deprived to some degree from HIGHER EDUCATION. The Ivy League schools did not begin to admit them until 1976! Higher education means MORE EARNING CAPACITY – this is well known.

And because of this discrimination in educational DEVELOPMENT / physical skills starting from grammar school – because of being BARRED from many higher-paying jobs even in the working class, because of being PAID LESS than men when they did finally do the same work – all this rendered women seeking men for subsidies / support in order to live their lives – including lives that had dependents – children.

If women had an equal share of the societal resources with men, they could even raise families by themselves, as they could hire other women to help care for children. But lacking equal jobs or pay it was arduous for women to both work and raise children – thereby rendering them dependent on men, thereby modifying their behavior to obey standards men imposed –the standards already mentioned; laughing at their jokes, deferring to them, being passive, and giving in to sexual demands.

Now put all this aside and take a look at a woman now, breaking the barrier to lift weights. A woman enters beauty contests because she’s ‘got what it takes.’ She wins and uses these titles to further her career. Meanwhile she notices the disparities between the men’s and women’s contests. Men treated like heroes – they get money – women treated like subordinates, no money, and they aren’t even recognized for what they have to do to look good – some of them lift weights – certainly Kellie Everts exercised and lifted weights 45 mins each day. But this is not noted. She’s looked upon as ‘beautiful’ & has a great body, but no woman in these contests flexes or ‘shows off’ or poses in any way to demonstrate muscles – later, after the idea is promoted, a lady named Laura Combes does a double bicep pose {1979} at a contest in Warminster, Pa, and she is reprimanded by the contest promoter, George Snyder.

But we’re not there yet. Jump back years when Kellie Everts enters the scene. She’s training age 19 but not doing anything public. That’s 1964 and she’s pregnant. She doesn’t want to lose her figure and buys weights – except the IFBB salesman in Santa Monica won’t sell her anything above 2.5 lbs because he notices her belly and says he’s afraid she might hurt herself – she buys 5 lb barbells elsewhere, but still, they aren’t heavy enough and she uses her husband’s weights. But skip all that. Jump to the strong public promotion starting with Kellie’s 1975 Esquire article {Muscle & Grit, Religion & Tit, that’s what Kellie Everts is made of} and culminating in the 1977 Playboy ‘Humping Iron.’

She’s doing articles & TV for body building. What is the public objection, sometimes critical comment?

Questions: “Why would a woman want to lift weights? Why does she want to look muscular? Why does she want to look like a man? Only lesbians would want to look like men. What is the purpose of this?”

The idea of a muscular, strong or aggressive woman was then a threat to men, including some men who promoted male body building. In their eyes, they saw men as Gods dominant over women. Pictures on covers featured males with bikini clad, shapely females ‘draped’ over them like they were statues of Power, but women clung to their bodies – they were subordinate. It was demeaning. It was another dimension of male domination over women.

Jump ahead now to 1980 and beyond. The women in the contest to the shock and horror of some – are using testosterone {or its derivatives, what they call anabolic steroids and later growth hormone}. One lady is heard complaining she has to shave every day. They are already beginning to look like men – a feature Kellie Everts and Lisa Lyon insisted was impossible, they would never look like men from training because they lack testosterone. But they can look like men if they take testosterone. Yes, the men are taking drugs. And there, Kellie heard them complain at the contest that women are taking ‘male’ hormones. OK, if you have male hormones, then why are you men taking them? And if you are, why can’t the women? Gander and goose.

But things go awry. Indeed, men and women have the right to do whatever they wish with their bodies. They also have the right to smoke. They also have the right to kill themselves.

But the world of body building has gone awry. What was once representative of health is now a freak show. Men have become monsters at their own peril, and the promoters were the biggest hypocrites. They knew these men and some women were taking dangerous drugs – the ones who were the most muscular won yet the promoters were saying they disapproved of drugs.

Most of these people in the contests lost, there would be few winners – but they all had to risk themselves with the drugs – Russian Roulette. Who were the biggest winners? The promoters, those who made money whoever won or lost.

The body builders were the slaves, most of them made no money. The promoters always made money because they sold images, supplements and weight training equipment. They pretended their supplements & systems made these guys & gals what they were – it was fraud – the illegal drugs made them that way, which the body builders paid for themselves. Very few of them made money. Ronnie Coleman, for instance. But look at him now.

He became the biggest and the best through drugs, he made big money. But he spent two million on operations trying to put his skeleton back together. He’s not sure he’ll ever walk right again, so in the end, he lost. His X rays show screws throughout his back and hips.

Some of the women who were the biggest and the best fell apart, like rags of their former selves, looking like aliens for the drugs. The drugs puffed them up for a while, but after quitting all they had left was the cornrow teeth {the drugs expanded their jaws} and tufts of facial hair – Pitiful and pathetic shadows of their former selves. This was the result of excesses, which the promoters mostly, not the body builders, profited from. It’s a sad testament to excess and a thing that was positive in the beginning but ended up wrong.

Alright, body building was a business. In spite of where it went wrong, the idea of women’s muscles – prowess – fitness – freedom did leak into the entire world, and the image of women as well as behavior changed forever. Although the body building world and their contests for women have mostly collapsed {since 2015 the main events are not even held—there is one by new people that pays 50k} women universally have caught on and it’s OK for women to lift weights and be muscular, even aggressive. It has changed the world for women, indeed & dispelled the notion that they have to be passive toward men. So the work of Kellie Everts was accomplished in spite of the contests getting twisted by drugs.

The Stripper for God[edit]

Initially, Rasa had won the titles of Miss Nude Universe in July, 1967, Miss Americana 2nd place and Best Body in 1972 (on the same stage with Arnold Schwarzenegger), Miss Body Beautiful 2nd place in 1973, Miss Body Beautiful U.S.A. first place in 1974, and Miss Americana 2nd place & Best Body 1974 (the same stage with Arnold Schwarzenegger again). She made nine appearances in Playboy. She first appeared as Miss Nude Universe, hers was the first female body builder as “Humping Iron”, May 1977, predating Lisa Lyon‘s appearance by three years.^[6] She had two pages of pictures on her “Stripping for God” in Playboy. Her dancing career went from March 1966 to August 1987, dancing coast to coast and all over Canada as well. She then quit to become a producer of her dancing and female domination videos, making enough money to purchase a large property with island in Upstate New York in 1989, where she has lived ever since.

Ministry[edit]

In Sept. 1973, Everts gave her first spiritual talk (prior to dancing) at the Melody Theater in Times Square as a religious minister. The combination of stripper and evangelical religious conviction led to the creation of what the press called the “Stripper for God”.^[7][8][9]

The “Stripping for God” created an obvious controversy about the idea of being both sexual and spiritual at the same time, as oppose to only one or the other, due to the prevailing social norms and constructs. Likewise, by extension the related concept of being both a person of God and also in the adult trade at the same time was controversial as well.

Everts traveled in the United States and Canada, giving over 1,000 sermons in burlesque theaters and nightclubs.^{[10][page needed][11][page needed][12][page needed][13]}

She also travelled several times to Canada, and made one trip to the United Kingdom^{[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]} In 1988, she appeared on The Morton Downey, Jr. Show.^[23]

Everts later changed the emphasis of her mission to the return of matriarchy and the feminine divine. On June 16, 1978 she preached on the message of Our Lady of Fátima in front of the White House, with the aim of bringing about the conversion of Russia and, by extension, preventing a potential nuclear World War III. The gist of the message was, “Pray the Rosary for the conversion of Russia, or nations will be annihilated.”^[24]

Since shifting her focus, she then founded her own church, The University of Mother God Church, which later evolved further into a new religion specifically for women.

As a Guru of the new religious movement she founded, many of her followers believe she is an Avatar, or an incarnation of God, much like Ramakrishna.

Her spiritual beliefs are that she was sent by God to help humanity, primarily via female empowerment and then ultimately matriarchy, which she believes is the only hope for humanity and solving the world’s problems. Her goal is to restore the worship of God as Mother, and female leadership in all areas of life including spirituality, in order to attain a world of biophilia, that is, life and love.

Author[edit]

On May 24, 2004, Everts, under her present name Rasa von Werder or Guru Rasa of the Church of MotherGod, started the Woman Thou Art God Website.^[25] She has since continued publishing online on her religious beliefs, and has thirty-six (and counting) books published on female empowerment, her biography, matriarchy spirituality and various other subjects, many available on both Amazon and Lulu. Since 2014, Rasa has also had another main website as well, Embodiment of God, that further builds upon the first one. ^[26] She has also collaborated with other authors as well, most notably including William Bond, who is also featured on that site.

Later Years[edit]

In her later years, after 30 years of celibacy, beginning age 63 in 2008 {God told her to stop suffering, quit celibacy & have fun – it was ‘the Will of God}, she became a “cougar” and photographer of males, largely in the college town of Binghamton, New York, for the purpose of furthering the cause of female empowerment. At Binghamton University, she was a big hit overall, featured several times on the front page of their student newspaper. She has written about this experience in several books (see Bibliography section).

Rasa has also further expanded upon her new matriarchal religion for women, writing the book Woman, Thou Art God: The New Religion for Women in 2019-2020, and is currently working on several other books.^[27]

+

College of Matriarchal Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Uncategorized

Joe Tex, Jackie Wilson & Richard Pryor

Chapter 9 Joe Tex Jackie Wilson Richard Pryor 4-7-22

Thinking about these guys is so dreary, I procrastinated writing this. If they weren’t famous I wouldn’t. How can I get through these men as fast as possible? I’m typing a mile a minute, lol.

Joe Tex. I met him, like several other stars, at a place called ‘Mambo Maxie’s’ – a club I stumbled upon on my way from one of the go-go jobs 1967. I used to check in there often while going to & fro my job – it was always entertaining even the ones not famous. There I saw Etta James, Little Richard & this clown Joe Tex.

‘Mambo Maxie’ was a stout Jewish guy who always stood in front collecting a buck from each entrant. Sometimes he didn’t charge me. Don’t know his background, but it must have been in show biz, he seemed ‘the old carny’ type. He reminded me, personality wise, of Elvis’ manager Col. Parker – a fast talker. It wasn’t a big place so how could he afford these stars? Probably gave them a bunch of bullshyt about how much money they’d make ‘at the door’ or by percentage or whatever – the way con artists sometimes fooled me into thinking I’d make bread at the door – which you never do when they give you that offer {except once I did for 3 months & made a fortune, but I got over on this wise-guy Lebanese man & made him sign a contract where I checked the cash register every day}.

So I stumble into the club one day & Joe Tex is performing. I’m seating next to a lovely black lady, thin, elegant & we converse {I never saw another white person in the club, Mambo Maxie & I were the only two.}

Joe Tex has a great band, he’s a good performer, we’re impressed. We both decide to go meet him.

The minute we’re backstage together Joe goes crazy for my breasts. He orders the photo man to take pics of him kissing my chest – dozens of them. They are ridiculous poses, I don’t know how I consented, probably because I was overwhelmed at the moment by his fame & the performance & all that.

He never took one look at the attractive black lady – only babbled on & on about ‘your titties.’ {Yes, I was wearing a low-cut top, custom made, of a brocade velvet material, it was beautiful – Various colors of brown & light grey & brown custom-made bell-bottoms to match.}

The black lady, Rhonda, shakes her head & says

“He’s SIMPLE”,

meaning Simple Simon, known for his stupidity.

After 15 minutes of this ordeal, the photo man has processed a dozen stupid, embarrassing photos & Joe Tex disappears, not paying for a single one. I pay the guy, take them into the bathroom, tear them into hundreds of pieces & flush them down the toilet.

Who he was:

“He went on to have four million-selling hits, “Hold What You’ve Got” (1965), “Skinny Legs and All” (1967), “I Gotcha” (1972), and “Ain’t Gonna Bump No More (With No Big Fat Woman)” (1977).”

From Wikipedia:

Joe Tex was born Joseph Arrington, Jr. in Rogers, Texas, in Bell County to Joseph Arrington and Cherie Sue (Jackson) Arrington.

In early August, 1982, Tex was found at the bottom of a swimming pool at his home in Navasota, after which he was revived in hospital and sent home. Just a few days later, on August 13, 1982, five days after his 47th birthday, he died at GrimesMemorialHospital in Navasota, following a heart attack.

……………………………………………..

Next Creep: Jackie Wilson, from Wikipedia:

Jack Leroy Wilson Jr. (June 9, 1934 – January 21, 1984) was an American soul and rock and roll singer and performer. Wilson was a prominent figure in the transition of rhythm and blues into soul. He was considered a master showman and one of the most dynamic singers and performers in pop, R&B, and rock and roll history, earning the nickname “Mr. Excitement”.

“Lonely Teardrops“, which peaked at No. 7 on the pop charts, ranked No. 1 on the R&B charts in the U.S., and established Wilson as an R&B superstar known for his extraordinary, operatic multi-octave vocal range. Wilson’s “Lonely Teardrops” sold over one million copies.

Due to Wilson’s fervor when performing, with his dynamic dance moves, impassioned singing and fashion sense, he was nicknamed “Mr. Excitement”. His stagecraft in his live shows inspired James Brown, Teddy Pendergrass, Michael Jackson and Elvis Presley, as well as a host of other artists that followed. Presley was so impressed with Wilson that he made it a point to meet him.

Wilson’s powerful, electrifying live performances rarely failed to bring audiences to a state of frenzy. His live performances consisted of knee-drops, splits, spins, back-flips, one-footed across-the-floor slides, removing his tie and jacket and throwing them off the stage, basic boxing steps like advance and retreat shuffling, and one of his favorite routines, getting some of the less attractive women in the audience to come up to the stage and kiss him. Wilson often said “if I get the ugliest girl in the audience to come up and kiss me, they’ll all think they can have me and keep coming back and buying my records.”

Wilson scored hits as he entered the 1960s with the No. 15 “Doggin’ Around”, the No. 4 pop ballad “Night“, another million-seller, and “Baby Workout“, another Top 10 hit (No. 5)

On September 29, 1975, Wilson was one of the featured acts in Dick Clark‘s Good Ol’ Rock and Roll Revue, hosted by the Latin Casino in Cherry Hill, New Jersey. He was in the middle of singing “Lonely Teardrops” when he suffered a massive heart attack. On the words “My heart is crying” he collapsed on stage; audience members applauded as they initially thought it was part of the act. Clark sensed something was wrong, then ordered the musicians to stop the music. Cornell Gunter of the Coasters, who was backstage, noticed Wilson was not breathing. Gunter was able to resuscitate him and Wilson was then rushed to a nearby hospital.

Medical personnel worked to stabilize Wilson’s vital signs, but the lack of oxygen to his brain caused him to slip into a coma. He briefly recovered in early 1976, and was even able to take a few wobbly steps, but slipped back into a semi-comatose state.

Wilson died on January 21, 1984, at the age of 49 from complications of pneumonia. He was initially buried in an unmarked grave at WestlawnCemetery near Detroit. {Rasa says, later someone raised the bread to put him into a Mausoleum – WTF happened to all his money?

‘Nat Tarnopol had taken advantage of Wilson’s naïveté, mismanaging his money since becoming his manager. Tarnopol also had power of attorney over Wilson’s finances.’ This man was later found guilty of fraud & robbing Jackie Wilson of big money but by this time Wilson was in a coma….Rasa says – too bad the FAMILY didn’t sue this creep Tarnopol.}

Personal Life:

Wilson had a reputation for being short-tempered and promiscuous. In her autobiography, Patti LaBelle accused Wilson of sexually assaulting her backstage at a Brooklyn theater in the early 1960s.

On February 15, 1961, in Manhattan, Wilson was shot and seriously wounded by a woman named Juanita Jones. However, Jones was one of his girlfriends, and she shot him in a jealous rage after he returned to his Manhattan apartment with another woman, fashion model Harlean Harris, an ex-girlfriend of Sam Cooke. Wilson’s management supposedly concocted the story about her being a zealous fan to protect Wilson’s reputation. They claimed that Jones was an obsessed fan who had threatened to shoot herself, and that Wilson’s intervention resulted in his being shot. Wilson was shot in the stomach; the bullet resulted in the loss of a kidney, and lodged too close to his spine to be removed.

In March 1967, Wilson and his drummer, Jimmy Smith, were arrested in South Carolina on “morals charges”; the two were entertaining two 24-year-old white women in their motel room.

My Account:

I go to Vegas with my lady friend Marleena & her boyfriend {she was with me when I met O.C. Smith & also Otis Redding}, we go see Jackie’s show. We sit in the front row. He’s dynamic, great, all that they say he is.

Then, to my surprise, his valet comes over to our table after the show & says Jackie would like to meet me, could I go back stage? He was very polite, I went.

OK so it’s assumed we’re going to spend the night together. We go to the slot machines & he hands me a dollar. I put it in & out pops $56. Because he gave me the dollar, I offer it back to him & he takes it – every last bit. $56 in 1966 is $490 today! Wow – he was NOT a gentleman, he just took nearly $500 from me. The least he could have done, if he was short on money, was keep half & give me half, but no, he had to have every penny.

We walk into a lounge where the band sees him & strikes up “Baby Workout”. Can’t recall what happens there but next, we’re in his large hotel room sitting in bed.

We have done nothing – yet. The phone rings. It’s his WIFE! He didn’t tell me he had a wife, I am mortified! Someone must have called her – she’s probably in another state – & told her he went off with a woman, so she calls. He assures her HE’S ALL ALONE. She says she might just come over – he tells her be his guest. Of course, she doesn’t take a plane to Vegas to check it out.

After that I tell him I don’t feel like doing sex. First he robs me, then he doesn’t take me to dinner – now this – the final straw. He says that’s fine – he DOESN’T CARE. Bullcrap, but good work, I don’t have to put out. He did not appeal to me sex wise. Had he been a decent fellow I would have done it, but he wasn’t.

OK the last time I saw him is so ironic. He was on the stage on the floor, in some obscure club in Watts –I’m the only white person there. It’s his antic of asking women to come up & kiss him, so after a few other girls do it, I go up also – actually not up as the stage is level with the audience – & the bastard just stares at me & says no, he won’t kiss me. It has nothing to do with anything but this: black men, when black women are around, – are scared shitless to show attention to a whitey. It’s all it was. He would suffer their wrath if he kissed me.

The exact same thing happened to me with Muhammad Ali. I was at a show with major stars & he was one of them. A bunch of people stood around him to say hi after the show. I was last in line, began to talk to him. And there, from the surroundings, black women began to razz him,

“Ali, Ali,”

which meant,

“You’re not supposed to get chummy with white women,”

and he walked away.

But as we all know it’s the opposite when black women aren’t around. James Brown once told me,

“When I said bring a girl friend I meant bring a WHITE GIRL.”

And he lied to my black best friend – Ginger. He told her he usually didn’t date white women, but I was different. The truth is every time he was in town he dated only white women – one I saw was a hostess from a restaurant. He offered $3,500 for sex with a movie star –beautiful blonde Diane McBain. {She starred in Spinout with Elvis, 1966 } That hurt me as it made it seem he valued her way more than me. Diane did not even take him up on it. {His valet told me about it.}

………………………………………..

Creepy Richard Pryor

Might as well tell the story of the next creep while I’m on a roll.

I met a few famous people at this club I visited – Maverick’s Flats in LA – quite a place.

One night Richard Pryor, the comedian, is there. I don’t know if he did a show or not but he was off by a wall surrounded by people. I sat there & listened to his repartee & at the close of the night he asked me out. Yes, I was flirting with him but so were a dozen other females {all black.}

At that time I had a lovely house rented at 1860 Heather Ct, Beverly Hills, off Heather Rd off Coldwater Canyon Drive. I was driving my white Corvette & he a new Caddy – so he followed me.

We got into bed, I told him let’s skip the sex for now, I’m tired. He snoozed off without complaint.

In the morning I was going to make him a sumptuous breakfast, & had he been nice to me, I might have done sex.

So I get up, go to the kitchen & start putzing around, & there, I see out the window, he’s gone off without saying goodbye, got into his car & just took off. No class.

Strangely, & to his benefit, years later, he appears to me as a client in Purgatory & I help him ascend into Heaven! Can’t recall the details & dates – it’s all written down somewhere, but where?

Richard Pryor explained on Wikipedia

Richard Franklin Lennox Thomas Pryor Sr. (December 1, 1940 – December 10, 2005) was an American stand-up comedian and actor. He reached a broad audience with his trenchant observations and storytelling style and is widely regarded as one of the greatest and most influential stand-up comedians of all time. Pryor won a Primetime Emmy Award and five Grammy Awards. He received the first Kennedy Center Mark Twain Prize for American Humor in 1998. He won the Writers Guild of America Award in 1974. He was listed at number one on Comedy Central‘s list of all-time greatest stand-up comedians. In 2017, Rolling Stone ranked him first on its list of the 50 best stand-up comics of all time.

He grew up in a brothel {Rasa says: adult entertainment/therapy center} run by his grandmother, Marie Carter, where his alcoholic mother, Gertrude L. (née Thomas), was a prostitute. {Rasa says: Let’s call it without insult, adult trade worker or sex therapist} His father, LeRoy “Buck Carter” Pryor (June 7, 1915 – September 27, 1968), was a former boxer, hustler and pimp. After Gertrude abandoned him when he was 10, Pryor was raised primarily by Marie, a tall, violent woman who would beat him for any of his eccentricities. Pryor was one of four children raised in his grandmother’s brothel {Rasa says: Adult entertainment/therapy venue}. He was sexually abused at age seven,and expelled from school at the age of 14.

Rasa remarks re this opening description of Richard Pryor’s life: When they use the words ‘brothel’ – he grew up in a brothel, the writer predicts an assumption from the reader. Ditto ‘prostitute’ – his Mom was one, same thing. I take some pointers from the milestone setter Dale Spender with her thesis ‘Man Made Language.’ She explained how males control/create language & how words describing women have become degraded as women are degraded, for instance, the word ‘Mistress’ once meant ‘Mistress of the house’ & over the years it fell down to a second woman kept by a man. Or today it’s a paid dominant – neither ideas is flattering.

{Then the men who write the dictionaries describe the sexuality of males as ‘virile’ – ‘red blooded’, while women who like sex are called ‘nymphomaniacs’ or if they don’t like sex they are ‘frigid’ – nothing in between. No robust, red blooded, healthy women described. Women who like sex are MANIACS, lol.}

I take issue with these words being used here as the writer ASSUMES the reader will think,

“That explains it. Grew up in a brothel, Mom a prostitute – that’s why he was crazy.”

The thoughts that go with ‘brothel’ & ‘prostitute’ are part of the man-made language which has us believing sexual behavior for women is PROHIBITED & if they engage in sex except where sanctioned they are wicked, evil beings. No such assumption goes to the man – he can frequent adult trade women & remain exempt from the stigma. He’s expected to be ‘virile’ & ‘red blooded.’ And so it’s obvious this double standard is imposed by Patriarchs, not by women or God – we’re at the mercy of their bias, mind control & tyranny.

I insist, first for myself then others, these terms / ideas be rethought. Women in the adult trade are entertainers & therapists & should be given respect as such. They are not wicked evil doers for dancing or posing naked, nor are they immoral because they offer their services on the street or elsewhere {often to the worst of men, the least desirable & sometimes dangerous.}{Think how awful the world would be if no woman did sex for money – increase the numbers of sick & dangerous men when their needs are unmet. Adult therapists should be given MEDALS not malevolence. I have watched men take food out of their child’s mouth so they could use the money for sex.}

And so, remove the notion of ‘bordello’ or ‘prostitute Mother’ caused Pryor to go crazy. There’s violence from a female caregiver, his Dad being a ‘hustler – pimp’, he was sexual abused starting age 7, his Mom abandoned him age 10, being an alcoholic she might have done him a favor. Look to these factors for his PTSD. {end Rasa statements}

Pryor served in the U.S. Army from 1958 to 1960, but spent virtually the entire stint in an army prison. According to a 1999 profile about Pryor in The New Yorker, Pryor was incarcerated for an incident that occurred while he was stationed in West Germany. Angered that a white soldier was overly amused at the racially charged scenes of Douglas Sirk‘s film Imitation of Life, Pryor and several other black soldiers beat and stabbed him, although not fatally.

In 2004, Pryor was voted number one on Comedy Central‘s list of the 100 Greatest Stand-ups of All Time. In a 2005 British poll to find “The Comedian’s Comedian,” Pryor was voted the 10th-greatest comedy act ever by fellow comedians and comedy insiders. {End Wikipedia}

Rasa says: My last remarks on him are like so. He was a miserable wretch who needed psychological therapy for his PTSD, instead, like many who become drug addicted, he medicated himself. When I met him he was on a talking streak which was no doubt fueled by Cocaine. By the time morning rolled around, he left without saying good bye because he was a zombie without drugs. Most addicts are zombies when sober – they’re lifeless. I can’t imagine living with him, it would be Hell. People can be talented while still sick. With his brand of comedy, he vented his tortures, perhaps this was his therapy, & could be why he was so good. {End Chapter 9}

1,048 views