College of Religion & Theology, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

ORIGIN OF EVIL / SATAN / PATRIARCHY

OLD WOMAN, YOUNG MAN PT 2
CHAPTER 6

Guru Rasa Von Werder

IT'S TRUE, SOME WOMEN LOVE EVIL & SOME MEN LOVE MOTHER GOD

IT’S TRUE, SOME WOMEN LOVE EVIL & SOME MEN LOVE MOTHER GOD

“Satan Rules the World, & He Works Through Men” – Old Demons Working to Create New Ones

I have a great new insight or vision. It has been won by a lifetime of effort, & I believe it is true. Here it is:

The ORIGIN OF EVIL – The Christian Myth of Lucifer & His Demons – What Really Happened “in Heaven?”

By RasaVon Werder

What Really Happened is that the Human Male turned against Mother God & Women – this Myth personifies what happened “in Heaven” & Earth & I will prove my case.

We all know the Christian myth where Lucifer, looking in the mirror at his own beauty, decided he was the fairest of the fair & said to God,

“I will not serve!”

With this statement, he immediately fell from grace, & lost the beauty & light that he had, & turned into the “serpent” or “reptilian” called Satan, & was cast into Hell by St. Michael the Archangel, who said to him & anyone,

“Who is like God?”

PATRIARCHY CRUCIFIES WOMEN FIRST, THEN ALL OTHERS INCLUDING ANIMALS

PATRIARCHY CRUCIFIES WOMEN FIRST, THEN ALL OTHERS INCLUDING ANIMALS

With Satan “one third” of Heaven emptied out – all those who agreed with him followed him into Hell for all eternity, where their job now is to assault the human race – which they hate with all their might – & tempt us to sin relentlessly, never giving up the pursuit of destruction.

I have studied the nature of demons in my ministry as a Catholic & from the great Protestant exorcist, Bob Larson. I purchased all his valuable teachings on audio/video, $1,000. worth, & have been doing successful exorcisms most of my life.

I am going to say my words “ex Cathedra” – as the Pope of the “Mother God Church,” & that means I am infallible! (smile)

This myth personifies the male desire to defy women & their Mother God, feeling they were as good as women or better, & therefore they should not serve women nor the image of God as them. This portrays “the Leader or Leadership being able to convince one third of the male population to go along with them. Interestingly, the myth appears within Patriarchal religion & can be taken as a secret message from men who STILL WORSHIPPED MOTHER GOD & WOMEN. The men who are AGAINST Mother God & women are the ones who’ve tried to convince us YOU MUST BELIEVE THAT SATAN & DEMONS ARE LIVING CREATURES, SEPARATE FROM US, THEY ARE NOT PSYCHOLOGICAL STATES OR PARTS OF OUR EVIL SELVES, WE ABSOLUTELY MUST BELIEVE THEY ARE TANGIBLE, LIVING, SEPARATE CREATURES. (From that point of view, indeed, evil persons are living creatures.)

WHEN WOMEN RULE THERE IS NO WAR

WHEN WOMEN RULE THERE IS NO WAR

The next interesting moment is where the story tells us that the instant the leader & his men made the decision to turn their back on God as Mother, they were DOOMED to Hell for all eternity & all they do 24/7 is try to get the human race to join them! Does this not sound like Patriarchal men, all their governments & institutions?

The devils are all LIARS FROM THE FIRST, & they come to STEAL, KILL & DESTROY – is this not PATRIARCHAL MEN & women? They are con artists, users, cheats & thieves. They will kill you if they think they can get away with it.

Do you not see with me, ever so clearly, that men have created HELL ON EARTH, & want EVERYONE TO BE IN IT & that those who THINK LIKE THEM are also doomed & will live outside the Love of Mother God, encased in the Hell of their own hate & limitation?

Patriarchy is a death trap – “the pit of no return.” It lives as a sociopath, a thing unto itself, whereas Mother God’s religion, voiced by Jesus, says to love others as you love yourself, & forgive them who hurt you.

Jesus also said,
“Satan is the Prince of this World.”

The hypothesis that Lucifer/Satan demons are symbols of Patriarchy & its manifesto makes incredible sense.

If you ask
“Who is Satan?”
You get,

“He is a living perverted, evil creature, who lives outside the grace of God & wants to bring people to sin & eternal perdition.”

THE WAR MACHINE OF MEN IS ENDING AS MEN ARE ENDING

THE WAR MACHINE OF MEN IS ENDING AS MEN ARE ENDING

FROM WIKIPEDIA:
Edited with remarks from Rasa:

In traditional Christian understanding of the holy Hebrew scriptures, the Torah, Satan is a synonym for the Devil. For most Christians, he is believed to be an angel who rebelled against God—

(ed: specifically, males who were once part of the Matriarchal Heaven – God the Mother was Queen – & they rebelled against her, & against Matriarchs, & against Matriarchal principles of Life.)

and also the one who spoke through the serpent and seduced Eve into disobeying God’s command. His ultimate goal is to lead people away from the love of God—to lead them to fallacies which God opposes.

(ed: All Patriarchal tenets are fallacies, all their beliefs, at the core, are evil. Everything they do is outside of Love, it is for personal profit, for control, & damage to others, to all life. A Patriarch is a sociopath, a perverted, twisted being who if he is the head of a family will kill every member in it, & ultimately himself.)

Satan is also identified as the accuser of Job, the tempter in the Gospels, the secret power of lawlessness in 2 Thessalonians 2:7, and the dragon in the Book of Revelation.

(ed: sounds like every-day politics & business as usual in our society.)

WOMEN RISING, MEN FALLING, IS OCCURRING NOW

WOMEN RISING, MEN FALLING, IS OCCURRING NOW

Before his insurrection, Satan was among the highest of all angels and the “brightest in the sky”. His pride is considered a reason why he would not bow to God as all other angels did, but sought to rule heaven himself.

(ed: Heaven was Matriarchy, & he was one of its servants, but he sought to rule Heaven himself! Pride? They are built on it. Why did they want to rule Heaven/Women – take Mother God off her throne & put a man there?
They wanted to dominate.
Women were taught to bow to men, to serve men, sacrifice for them, do anything men wanted. They cooked & cleaned, they primped, they spent all they had on being beautiful, they had to charm them day & night. Women were sluts when they wanted sluts, madonnas when they wanted housewife’s, whatever they wanted – women had to do. Institutionalized discrimination closed all doors to women except marriage, it stopped them from education, jobs, & security, slave security came from being servants of men in marriage, without a man, women faced poverty. This was ALL PLANNED BY THE DEMON MEN.)

WE'RE AT THE CROSSROAD BETWEEN PATRIARCHY ENDING & THE RETURN OF MATRIARCHY

WE’RE AT THE CROSSROAD BETWEEN PATRIARCHY ENDING & THE RETURN OF MATRIARCHY

The popularly held beliefs that Satan was once a prideful angel who eventually rebels against God, however, are not portrayed explicitly in the Bible and are mostly based on inference (e.g., Ezekiel 28 and Isaiah 14:12–17). In mainstream Christianity he is called “the ruler of the demons” (Matt. 12:24), “the ruler of the world” and “the god of this world”. (2 Cor. 4:4).

(ed: God of this world, indeed. The male leadership of this world is worshiped, it was once Goddesses, then it became the “reign of the phallus,” the steeples/dicks on top of their fake churches instead of domes/caves of Matriarchy.)

The Book of Revelation describes how Satan will be cast out of Heaven, down to the earth, having “great anger” and waging war against “those who obey God’s commandments and hold to the testimony of Jesus”. Ultimately, Satan is thrown into the “Lake of fire”, not as ruler, but as one among many, being tormented day and night forever and ever.

MALES FIRST FETTERED WOMEN BEFORE THEY COULD DESTROY ALL OTHER LIFE

MALES FIRST FETTERED WOMEN BEFORE THEY COULD DESTROY ALL OTHER LIFE

(ed: Yes, it is the ultimate frustration/rage of Satanic male that he cannot be worshiped as is Woman
Man is NOT THE SOURCE OF LIFE, Dr. Bryan Sykes describes him as a “parasite” on the body of a woman – anthropologist Ashley Montague explained this in 1952.
When a bully tries to take the place of the leader but can’t, he’s going to be angry.
Every woman knows how quickly men get hysterical when we assert our dominance. You take a risk for acting like an independent human, speak with dignity, no kow towing to them, a full emancipated human, with her own thoughts, not centered on him, not living for him, – this makes him freak out. This is the Satan in him which wants to believe WE MUST SERVE HIM, NOT HE US.
But thank God, according to the myth, only one third of males wants to DOMINATE. Thank God for small mercies, two thirds of them want to obey.

The wrath of Satan, who wants to destroy the human race – this is Patriarchy

When you dwell on THE RAGE OF SATAN it’s a perfect analogy to the dickheaded, arrogant son-of-a prick that calls himself “manly,” the kind that tortures animals, children, women & other men – another characteristic is they are either HOT or COLD – Hell goes both ways.
When they want to bed you they are hot with passion, every word a lie – typical. Now they feel POWER – “I had her – I am in the driver’s seat NOW I CAN REJECT HER & I WILL, WHAT JOLLY FUN!” When they have had their pleasure they are cold as ice, no words because they are not speaking to you any more. So they either burn you or freeze you to death in their Hell.
Can’t wait to see them thrown into the Lake of Fire.
How did they become this way? Through the agency of old men or demons from the Hell of Patriarchy.

THE TIMES THEY ARE CHANGING, ROLE REVERSAL

THE TIMES THEY ARE CHANGING, ROLE REVERSAL

Demons from the Hell of Patriarchy – What They Teach the Young Men – Why Subsequently Young Males Don’t Know How to “Make Love”

The way men “make love” is a sore point with many women. The way you relate with, or your attitude with another, is determined by what you think & feel about the other. You’re going to treat someone differently if you harbor great respect or lack respect for them. Young men are taught not to respect women.

In broad brushstrokes Patriarchy has made sure that women would not have the slightest chance of being loved or looked up to. For a woman to even have the imitation of respect rendered a “respectable housewife,” a “lady” or “Madonna”, she has to forfeit her human rights & liberty. I have a motto that says,

“I used to be a lady, but it wasn’t any fun.”

MEN ARE FINDING THEIR FEMININE SIDE, WOMEN ARE REVERTING TO MACHO ROLES

MEN ARE FINDING THEIR FEMININE SIDE, WOMEN ARE REVERTING TO MACHO ROLES

Ladies don’t like sex – they are sexually repressed, they are always monogamous. I don’t know what their version of “fun” would be, but life can only be enjoyed as compliant, dutiful members of Patriarchy, no conflicting thoughts or actions against it, no behavior disapproved by the old demons. You dwell on that, I don’t have time.

In Patriarchy YOU CANNOT RESPECT A WOMAN & SO THE QUESTION ASKS HOW CAN YOU LOVE HER? YOU CAN’T & YOU DON’T.

Following that, the next question would be what sort of sex lovers would these guys be, raised by the old demons? They would be miserable lovers, selfish, without regard for a woman’s feelings.

“Making love” expands beyond sex, before & after. Making love begins in the mind – the perception of the lover. Thoughts & feelings regarding the lover are the prelude to consummation, in fact, the act of “making love” & “orgasm,” if any, are only a minor bump in the road of love.

It seems to me that using a woman as a “garbage disposal for sperm,” “a place to dump a load” is not love, but it is mainly the perception old demons want males to have. This is how they see it,

“Son, women are for using. Men are for admiring. You admire other men for their manly qualities, which means, men are heroes. Admire men, use other men as role models, do not take women seriously, do not listen to them, do not admire them. If you listen to women, obey them, even your Mother, you are a sissy & a Mamma’s boy. Men do not obey women, they obey men.”

In this way, the old demon sets up the young man for WAR.

WOMEN ARE DESPERATE FOR LOVE BUT MALES ARE TAUGHT NOT TO GIVE IT TO THEM

WOMEN ARE DESPERATE FOR LOVE BUT MALES ARE TAUGHT NOT TO GIVE IT TO THEM

For what else does obedience to other men lead up to? Of course, you would have competition under any circumstances, Matriarchal as well as Patriarchal, but in Matriarchy, males would be competing for the favors of women, to live under the authority of this or that woman. But in a Patriarchal society, when a man “wins,” he gains a “harem” of women who belong to him. In the old days men had physical harems where women were kept under lock & key, their property. This then shrunk down to men with multiple mistresses – only the most extreme Patriarchs still have physical harems. Then after mistresses, you simply had males with a lot of women lovers, they didn’t support them, but they had liberty to bed them.

Not so for the women, their sexual opportunities were limited – today, this has changed drastically & is moving in the direction of multiple partners & harems for women.

Old demon continues:

“Son, the last thing you would ever want to do would be to love a woman, this is weakness. Show no feelings. She has a hole between her legs, & also, her mouth. Fuck one of those holes or both. If she is to be your wife, then show some consideration, if not, throw her to the curb when you’re done – you owe her no kind of allegiance or kindness just because she allowed you to fuck her.”

WHEN WILL YOUNG MEN SEE THE LIGHT?  WHEN OLD WOMEN TEACH THEM

WHEN WILL YOUNG MEN SEE THE LIGHT? WHEN OLD WOMEN TEACH THEM

The problem with women gaining control – there was never a way where one lone woman could beat the system, could get the rights & respect she deserved, when the entire society went against her. One lone wolf doth not make a pack, there has to be group mobilization, union,, for women to get their rights & respect. Just as the power of the demon-males was won over thousands of years, in spots, until it took hold of most of the world, that power must also be won back by women, not in thousands of years, but within hundreds. 20200 looms as a time, for me, when we will be inside Matriarchy once again.

This entire system of men against women & Mother God, entailed a completely new world, which took thousands of years of stealing from what women had created, usurping it, misappropriating the good of the women’s creation into Patriarchy, then twisting & ruining it, changing all belief systems so they would be anti-women, pro-men, erasing all the good women had done from history, pretending that history started with male wars – what an elaborate spider web of lies Satan wrought! He’s been working at it for a long time, & now, it’s unraveling!

and God said to Satan,

“The WOMEN SHALL CRUSH THY HEAD!”

this means that the woman, Matriarchy, MOTHER GOD, will finally defeat & oust the man, Patriarchy, & his invention of a male God.

 

College of Religion & Theology, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

OLD WOMAN, YOUNG MAN, BEGINNING

OLD WOMAN, YOUNG MAN, – WHY THEY BELONG TOGETHER…..BEGINNING – PART ONE

(Thanks to Female Supremacy 2 for many of the images portrayed in these galleries.  She is on FaceBook)

Opening Remarks

The VISION of MATRIARCHY

This book shows one of the facets of the coming Matriarchy – old women with young men will be a common sight.

The word “vision” is explained by the great mystic, (Saint) Mary of Agreda, as having several dimensions, one of which is Intellectual Vision or Understanding. To understand a complicated or difficult thing “at once” or by “revelation” is to have a VISION of it, which means, that one sees THE WHOLE PICTURE, that she sees it not in part, but the entire whole.

(You will see captions to images here, but the images did not appear.  Nevertheless, the meaningful comments remain.)

(Caption:   At 20 Kellie Everts exploded on the Hollywood modeling circuit. Here you see what men do, take a beautiful, perfect woman & degrade her with the term “cheap dates.” This book denounces male domination with its lack of respect of women & all life.)

The Lies of Patriarchy

In our world, to understand the vision of Matriarchy is not an easy thing, because the entire culture is mind control for Patriarchy, which is opposite to Matriarchy, and the brainwashing begins in infancy, and by the time a person grows up, unless something happens, they are lost to Patriarchal thinking.

Importance of Ashley Montagu: Touch!

THIS IS ME, RASA VON WERDER, WITH MY FIRST OFFICIAL MALE MODEL IN 2010--DONE FOR A BOOK COVER

THIS IS ME, RASA VON WERDER, WITH MY FIRST OFFICIAL MALE MODEL IN 2010–DONE FOR A BOOK COVER

How Models Have FunPIX FLAT

OLD WOMAN, YOUNG MAN - WHY THEY BELONG TOGETHER BY GURU RASA VON WERDER

OLD WOMAN, YOUNG MAN – WHY THEY BELONG TOGETHER BY GURU RASA VON WERDER

Ashley Montagu was one of the great teachers of touch. Consider babies in orphanages (or homes) simply DIED when they were not being touched (except for absolute necessities like bathing, feeding & diaper changes.) One wonders if people are not also dying for the body / mind / heart need of touch – hugging, caressing, massaging, rubbing, & when appropriate, sensual kissing, licking, sucking & humping. People are moving to SUBSTANCES, legal & illegal, to stifle their pain. Can some of this pain be alleviated by the natural, God-given remedy of TOUCH?

For me, escape from Patriarchy started long ago – in part by seeing Ashley Montagu on the David Susskind “Open End” show. Here was a man espousing female supremacy, an outrageous idea both then and even now, circa 2011. His book, “The Natural Superiority of Women,” was published in 1952, he promoted it years hence, and it must have been “59 or “60 when I saw him.

Ashley Montagu put a seed in my head that grew, and I knew that if women really were superior to men, (and he had the proof, based on their having two X chromosomes compared to male having one), then everything taught in our world was wrong, the basic premise of our culture was faulty, and nothing that was right was being promulgated. And so, I studied everything around me, trying to figure out why it was all men’s way, but it took years to fall into place.

( Caption:   I knew little but suspected something was wrong with our society. The second wave of the feminist movement had begun, with Betty Freidan’s “The Feminine Mystique,” (Feb. 1963) – which taught that men were portraying women as either happy housewives or neurotic career women. I was on the career path & observed that too many doors were closed to women. Later I learned the term “institutionalized discrimination,” & that devaluing, degrading women was a big part of this. )

I Enter the Internet

(Caption:  Why does she look so happy? Because she’s enjoying the beginning of sensual touch & mutual God-given pleasure. Touching, loving, is a remedy for ills, made so by God & Nature. Why does God make touch & sex so pleasurable? So we would STAY ALIVE through HEALTH, giving us MOTIVE TO LIVE, & also, btw, procreate life. The PURPOSE OF SEX IS TO SHARE LOVE, the by-product of it is children.)

When I entered the internet in 2004, it was not for Matriarchal but spiritual work. But soon, the Female Empowerment concept entered in, arising from natural instinct within my soul. I added this and “The Feminine Divine” to the curriculum

of “Woman, Thou Art God”, and soon after much research concerning these subjects arrived. It is ironic that most of the information/research to prove the downfall of men and the uprising of women – came from the opposite sex.

(They said I couldn’t make it – haha. Never listen to people around you when they are negative, resist their statements. IT’S ALL IN THE MIND –HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT YOURSELF DETERMINES YOUR HAPPINESS. In the end, happiness is all that matters. Don’t pray for things, for some specific person to love you, pray for happiness, love yourself. )

William Bond and Other Great Souls

Sexuality must be REDEFINED in Matriarchal terms. Patriarchy has REPRESSED sex & filled it with rules & regulations that stifle the natural instinct (meanwhile all sorts of atrocities are committed, secretly, mostly by the needy males, because people’s natural instinct is twisted, & flows against nature.) The Culture of Death – necrophilia – Patriarchy – has lifted DEATH & destruction to a pedestal (WAR!) while making sex A DIRTY WORD! How did things get so turntable? It is because the natural instinct of male is TO KILL (in theory, to protect us, but it has run amuck!) & so they find JUSTIFICATION in all things murderous while defaming all things LIFE, such as sex & its pleasure. Notice how sex is USED & ABUSED but never JUST ACCEPTED as totally natural, & more than benign, it’s bountiful, delightful & even SACRED! In Matriarchy – biophilia – the Culture of Life (thanks Mary Daly for the terms!) sex is seen as POSITIVE!

William Bond appeared– I call him “The Prophet of Matriarchy.” He’d been on the internet for eight years before me, on “Women Should Rule the World”, – he’d published two books, “Gospel of the Goddess”, with Pamela Suffield and “Make Love, Not War”, he had big yahoo groups, later adding blogs, and was the first person to give Matriarchal lectures on Youtube. William was an inspiration and example for me, – I thought, if he could do it, I could and soon caught up with him in production of material. I learned from the writings of William, I use his quotes as some of the sharpest points for Matriarchy – a favorite being that women are corks which men held them down, but once they let go, women popped up. He also pushed the idea of female nurturing power, vs. males lack thereof; that women care for others, men don’t, and so, women should rule the world. On top of that he explained that when men are brutalized, they become brutal, but under the same conditions, women do not, because of their maternal instinct. And so, he says, males can be mind controlled, brain washed, to commit atrocities, as in war. He had worked his theses out before I appeared. I had been in different arenas, on the world stage, instituting female competitive body building (causing machisma), (was awarded by the WBBG in 2007 as the Progenitor of modern competitive female body building), “Stripping for God,” (proving spirituality and sexuality do mix) and as a professional “dominant woman,” espoused that females are superior and should rule the family and world – my manifesto was repeated on national TV shows. I was not yet preaching Matriarchy – William was the catalyst to get me into that frame of mind.

We became friends, but jealous women (as usual) interfered so it was rocky, but all was made right. These women, who temporarily succeeded in pulling William away from me twice, have had no success in the Female Empowerment arena, and returned to the oblivion they deserve. William is again my partner, and this time for keeps, as he claims I am the leader of our movement.

Building the Vision

(Caption:  What woman does not like to have her feet kissed, a symbol of veneration & worship? When the old women mentor the man/boys they will teach this sort of thing, whereas thrown to girls their own age, guys don’t learn much, except “give me a blow job” & hump. The girls complain bitterly how inept they are, & the remedy is THEY MUST BE TAUGHT. Girls don’t have the AUTHORITY to take charge of males & teach them, it HAS TO BE the old women! (by old I am referring to women over fifty!))

There were other important people. Mark Hopkins had produced a site that was supreme, where he’d gathered research for four books called “The Fall of Mankind,” proving “the future belongs to women,” and there exists a “male decline and extinction.” He rocked my world, I’m glad that I downloaded his site, because I can no longer find it on the internet. Mark’s site is one of the most priceless on the web, a one-of-a-kind creation. I

shuddered at the thought some day it might not be there, and that day seems to have come. (Later on, I saw pictures of Mark Hopkins – I never knew the physics genius I’d been sharing ideas with was a hottie on the scale of one to ten, a twelve!)

My disciples Michael Krause and Nicolas Strachan have been very helpful. Mark Hopkins has been great. Dozens of people took part in “building the vision”, even women (usually competitive & unfriendly to me – this is changing) helped! Pretty soon, I had all the information needed to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt why Patriarchy is evil to the core, why men cannot rule the world, why women have to take authority, and that, indeed, Patriarchy is declining and Matriarchy is coming.

 

 

 

 

College of God & Love, College of Religion & Theology, College of the Gender War

SEXUALITY IS FEMALE POWER

 

Rasa Taking Over NOW As President.
Article by Mark Hopkins

His terrific article speaks about: “Sexuality as an expression of female power” versus “Sexuality as a means of imposition on the female”.

THERE ARE NO TWO THINGS; GOD AND MATTER.  MATTER IS GOD, GOD IS MATTER.  ALL IS ENERGY AND ENDS IN INFINITY.

THERE ARE NO TWO THINGS; GOD AND MATTER. MATTER IS GOD, GOD IS MATTER. ALL IS ENERGY AND ENDS IN INFINITY.

 

THERE ARE NO TWO THINGS; GOD AND MATTER.  MATTER IS GOD, GOD IS MATTER.  ALL IS ENERGY AND ENDS IN INFINITY.

THERE ARE NO TWO THINGS; GOD AND MATTER. MATTER IS GOD, GOD IS MATTER. ALL IS ENERGY AND ENDS IN INFINITY.

Mark writes:

I offered my perspective on the matter when you and a group of followers tried to take the helm of NOW in a struggle against a more prudish mindset. The struggle was essentially “Sexuality as an expression of female power” versus “Sexuality as a means of imposition on the female”.

Before the 1950′s women were actually to the right of men politically. The book Rising Tide talked about the gradual shift. The oldest who came into NOW, however, still had a large part of that older mindset, hence the rather schizophrenic take on sexuality that can’t make up its mind whether to be 19th century Victorian or modern, 21st century freely sexual.

This was what could be called the “Prude Crowd” versus the “Stripper Crowd” power struggle. The result of the Prude Crowd winning over was to leave out a critical part of the feminist movement …
putting to the lie the meaning of the name “NOW”.

WHEN YOU ENGAGE IN SEX, THINK OF THE GOD WHO CREATED IT AND THANK HER FOR IT.  GRATITUDE FOR SEX IS RIGHTEOUS.

WHEN YOU ENGAGE IN SEX, THINK OF THE GOD WHO CREATED IT AND THANK HER FOR IT. GRATITUDE FOR SEX IS RIGHTEOUS.

WHEN YOU ENGAGE IN SEX, THINK OF THE GOD WHO CREATED IT AND THANK HER FOR IT.  GRATITUDE FOR SEX IS RIGHTEOUS.

WHEN YOU ENGAGE IN SEX, THINK OF THE GOD WHO CREATED IT AND THANK HER FOR IT. GRATITUDE FOR SEX IS RIGHTEOUS.

2809 RASA VON WERDER FLAT

The time may be ripe for another power play. That older mindset is largely alien to most of us Millennials and GenXers and — unlike then — there is now a large cadre of followers waiting to join ranks to take the whole place over and completely strip out the Victorian-laced element from the organization (puns intended).

The latest kick by NOW is to inject yet another scarlet letter into their propaganda push, the latest case being to identify flirtation, whistling and catcalling as “Street Harassment”.

A whistle and catcall is a compliment that I have both received often and returned. Needless to say, it greatly offends me when some outside group injects itself into our culture, our ways, our interactions and purports to speak on behalf of me *or her* like some kind of overlord or patron.

GOD IS INFINITE ENERGY AND GOD IS WITHIN YOU.  THIS IS WHO YOU ARE.

GOD IS INFINITE ENERGY AND GOD IS WITHIN YOU. THIS IS WHO YOU ARE.

RASA RED EDGAR FLAT RASAVONWERDER FLAT

I’ve had women yell out “free booty call here!” while running past them, or a butt pinch or two in a club, or an entire troup of cheerleaders yelling out the UWM dorms during summer cheerleader camp “hey you! Yeah you (describing clothing). Yum, yum, yum! Work it baby!” like construction workers. And it’s gone the other way, I’ve walked up to women to tell them that I think their presence graces the ground they walk on like angels in our midst and have gotten nothing but big smiles and sometimes even squeals of delight in reply.

This is not street harassment. It is how we do flirtation, especially in the urban setting, and in non-protestant cultures (e.g. Hispanic culture). And we don’t like it when uptight Protestant “liberals” come into our midst to try and impose their cultural norms on us.

I’ve already lived in a Communist state once before. I don’t need to do so again or to suffer through the same left-wing borderline Leninist mindset that would presume to socially engineer sets of norms on us.

I notice, in particular, that the networks where this got the most airplay on TV are the ones that had the oldest most Eastern and Protestant mindset (CBS), while at the very same time on a network, such as Telemundo, the women were prancing all around (along with the men BTW), both taking it and giving it.

Those of us who are of the younger generations are growing more and more weary of this older “Liberal, but still rooted in the 19th century because I can’t make up my mind” schizophrenic mindset and we’re coming to the point where we just have to say to the oldest “You’ve had your day, you’ve had your say, Now get the *hell* out of our way! It’s our century now.”

What a sweet irony it would be to have that new followership led by someone who comes from that world but was ahead of her time and more in line with us of this world.

Rasa says: Mark, I infiltrated NOW with 40 women from my group called “Prostitutes and Feminists.” There was an election going on, and all these women being members were going to vote for me to be a member of the board. The election was called off. Their politics is as old as high-button shoes. I started my own movement called “Female Empowerment – Matriarchy” which is now the thing, their thing is antiquated.

TESLA MATERIAL SUBMITTED BY MARK HOPKINS

“In recent times, large numbers of bees and their hives have gone missing.”
“What lies behind this mystery? Have they all died out? Or perhaps something more ominous has taken place.”
“In 1926, it was foretold by the pioneer of AC and wireless, Nikola Tesla, that when all the world came to be connected in a network with mobile devices that you could carry in your pocket capable of downloading movies and television. That the struggle of the human female toward equality would end in a new order, with the female as superior, as human civilization drew closer and closer to the perfect civilization of the bee.”
“And at the center of that civilization is the queen, who dominates the hive.”

RASA VON WERDER SAYS:
TESLA WAS A GREAT MAN AND PROPHET AND HIS WISDOM HAS COME TRUE. MATRIARCHY IS UPON US – GIVE IT TWO HUNDRED MORE YEARS.

ABOUT BEES:
IT’S OBVIOUS THAT THE PATRIARCHS UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE DOING, WITH POLLUTION, AND THERE’S A REASON WHY THEY ARE PUTTING SO MUCH POISON OUT THERE REGARDLESS OF THE BEE DYE-OUT. THEY WANT US TO BE DEPENDENT ON THEIR GMO CROPS WHICH ARE LIMITED IN VARIETY – THESE CROPS APPARENTLY DON’T NEED POLLINATION.

College of Religion & Theology, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

THE END OF MEN <> MALE GODS WILL DISAPPEAR

THE END OF MEN <> MALE GODS WILL DISAPPEAR

http://embodimentofgod.com/guru-rasa/

We are still inundated with men interpreting reality and men explaining it, so there is a block here somewhat, like all that is of men has primary importance.

As males disappear so do their "Gods" and the supposed "power" of them

As males disappear so do their “Gods” and the supposed “power” of them

I AM THE VOICE OF WOMEN, THE COMING AGE OF WOMEN TAKING OVER THE PLANET, THE FAMILY, THE WORLD.
IN ME THE ENTIRE VISION OF WHAT IS THE FUTURE COMES TO PASS. I SEE IT AS NO ONE SEES IT.
MEN SEE IN PART.
THE ONE CLOSEST TO SEEING THE ENTIRE PICTURE, MAN WISE, IS DR. BRYAN SYKES, THE GREAT GENETICIST. HE SEES THE REALITY AS IT IS.
ALL THE NONSENSE OF MALES WILL PASS, INCLUDING THEIR VIOLENCE, THEIR KILLING.

THESE MEN ARE STILL TALKING AND ACTING UPON THEIR OWN ACTIONS AS IF THEY WERE THE ULTIMATE REALITY – THEIR VIOLENCE, THEIR WARS, THEIR LEADERS.
THEY ARE ALL GOING TO DIE, AND THEIR EGOS, POMPOSITY, POSTURING, WILL DIE WITH THEM.
THEY ARE GOING EXTINCT NOW, WITH 8% OF ALL MEN NOW INFERTILE.
YET PEOPLE ARE STILL TALKING ABOUT THIS TIME OF MEN AS IF IT WILL GO ON FOREVER & NO ONE BUT MYSELF & BRYAN SYKES ARE SPEAKING OF THE TOTAL REALITY, WOMEN COMPLETELY TAKING OVER. (THERE ARE SOME VOICES REITERATING WHAT I SAY, BUT I SAY IT FIRST, THEY FOLLOW.)

THAT IS WHAT I AM CONCERNED ABOUT.
IT IS A GIVEN, AN ABSOLUTE FACT THAT MALES ARE FINISHED, THEIR WORLD IS FINISHED.

College of Religion & Theology, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

EVIL WAY MEN RUN THE PLANET

EVIL WAY MEN RUN THE PLANET

By William Bond

MEN WAITING TO DESTROY OTHERS - ONE WAY OR ANOTHER
MEN WAITING TO DESTROY OTHERS – ONE WAY OR ANOTHER

MALE EVIL CRAZED MEN

Marx is credited with starting communism but most of his writing was about capitalism. He clearly didn’t like capitalism, but he appreciated its power to create wealth and power and wanted to understand why.

He read all of the economic theorists of the time, and was strongly influenced by Adam Smith the Scottish economist. People then were trying to understand where wealth came from, some said it came from the land, others said it came from trade but Adam Smith said bluntly in his book, “The Wealth of Nations”, (considered to be by many, the capitalist bible) that wealth came from work.

The reasoning behind this, was that to make anything, you first had to have the raw material by digging minerals out of the ground, cutting down trees, or growing cotton. The minerals, trees or cotton were then processed and made into metal, cloth or wood. Then with these materials, items can be made and sold. To do everything in these processes required someone paying other people to do them.

Marx was in full agreement with this analysis, but a few things concerned him. He noticed in all societies there were people who worked and those who didn’t, but the strange thing was, that many of the people who didn’t work, seem to have far greater wealth than the workers. In fact, most people who worked never seemed to get the reward their work produced and most lived in poverty. So he attempted to understand why this was happening.

A clear understanding for why the people who worked were not benefiting from the work they did, can be seen in the feudal society. In this system, a peasant was given by his lord, a small plot of land. He then worked three days a week on it to feed himself and his family. Then for another three days a week, he worked on his lord’s land, where everything he produced was taken by the lord, and on Sunday he rested. (Here he had to go to Church to be indoctrinated by the local priest.) There was little need for money to change hands, in this arrangement; the peasant worked half for himself and half for his lord.

This then made sense for why the lord was so much richer than the peasant. The peasant’s wealth only came from three days of work a week while the lord, if he had a few hundred peasants, was getting the benefit of all the work of all the peasants that worked for him.

The insight that Marx had was that this was exactly the same situation in a capitalist system. The only difference was that what was going on in the feudal system was clear and obvious for anyone to see, the capitalist system was more complicated and so, who got what wasn’t so transparent.

WICKED, EVIL MEN RUNNING OUR WORLD, MAKING IT HELL
WICKED, EVIL MEN RUNNING OUR WORLD, MAKING IT HELL

CRAZY MEN EVIL DANGEROUS MEN

The capitalist system created wealth in the same way a merchant or trader did it. The way a merchant operates was to buy a product, take it somewhere else and then sell it, mostly for a greater price than what he paid for it. The only difference was that the merchant bought items he could sell, while the capitalist bought people’s labour and sold the fruits of their work for a profit.

In other words, a capitalist was a man who set up a factory and employed people to make things, then he sold what had been made, for more than the wages he paid his workers. The greater the difference between the wages his gave to his workers and the price of the sold the items they made was how much profit he made. So, he was like a feudal lord, the more workers he had working for him, the more items they produced, which he could sell, the richer he became.

Where it was different from the feudal system was in the feudal system it was clear as day how much work the peasant did for himself and how much he did for his lord, but in the capitalist system, it was murky. The capitalist knew, because he would know how much wages he had paid and how much profit he was getting, but no capitalist would share this information with his workers. This is why workers when negotiating with employers for wages, were always at a disadvantage.

For the worker it was like playing a game of poker with your cards laid face up on the table for all to see, while your opponent the employer, had his cards close to his chest and hidden from you. This meant the capitalist had the advantage in bluffing the workers in how much wages he was able to pay them, while the workers had no room to bluff and could only guess what cards the employer had.

There was another difference between capitalism and feudalism. In the feudal system the arrangement between the lord and the peasant was set in stone, because to change it would cause too much trouble. This wasn’t true in capitalism, how much the capitalist was willing to pay his workers and how much pay they would accept, was always open to negotiation, and would change every year, with the rise in the rate of inflation.

Capitalism was created through the industrial revolution, where workers worked in factories making things with the help of machines. At the time, some people assumed that having labour saving machines would benefit everyone, both the workers and the bosses. But Marx noticed that nearly always, the majority of the wealth created always end up in the hands of the bosses and not the workers. So he wanted to understand why.

He realized that when a new technology would come to one factory the benefit would only be temporary. If a factory uses a new machine that cut production time in half, in theory the factory owner could cut the working hours of the worker and pay them better wages. And to be fair, some factory owners actually did do this. But no factory owner could do this in the long term.

MANSCREWTHROAT

STUPID MEN, DESTROYING EVERYONE, EVERYTHING AND THEMSELVES
STUPID MEN, DESTROYING EVERYONE, EVERYTHING AND THEMSELVES

A factory owner can only benefit from new technology while he holds the patent to it and so can prevent other factory owners using the same technology. If he then uses the wealth created to benefit his workers, then he is in a vulnerable position. If his competitor acquires similar technology but keeps the wages and hours of his workers the same he can sell the product at a cheaper price and gain a far greater market share. So the factory owner who is paying his workers a decent wage can quickly go bankrupt if he cannot cut costs.

So it seems that in the capitalist system, “nice guys come last”. Capitalists who care about their workers and want to pay them more money for fewer hours are far more likely to go broke than factory owners who are ruthlessly pushing down the wages. This means that the capital system rewards factory owners who are merciless in exploiting the people who work for them, which is why, the workers were not receiving the benefit of labour saving technology. Most of the wealth of the industrial revolution went to the capitalist and not the workers. The only way the workers benefited from the industrial revolution was that many of the products produced in factories were now cheaper.

At the time of the industrial revolution there were many educated people like Marx and his friend Friedrich Engels who were outraged by the large gap between rich and poor and wanted to do something about it. So people like this were trying to bring in laws to make capitalism more humane. Some of these people were also capitalists, (Friedrich Engels came from a wealthy capitalist family) but the caring capitalists where in the minority. The whole system rewarded ruthless hard-nosed businessmen. So with the wealth capitalism created, the more successful capitalists could control the political system of all capitalist countries through corruption.

At the beginning of the industrial revolution most European countries were ruled by royal families who had little sympathy for the new capitalist whom they rightly saw as a threat to their power. This is why the industrial revolution started in Britain, because the power of the monarchy there had been greatly undermined by the English Civil War, (1642–1651). At the end of this war, King Charles 1 was beheaded and for a few years the dictator, Oliver Cromwell, ruled Britain. Although the monarchy was later restored, to Britain, it’s power was greatly undermined and it had to share power with the English parliament. Then over time the power of the monarchy decreased and parliament took over completely.

STUPID MEN, DESTROYING EVERYONE, EVERYTHING AND THEMSELVES
LITTLE BRAINS, ADDLED BRAINS, LISTEN AND THINK WITH HALF A BRAIN

BIG BODIES SMALL BRAINS NUTSO MEN

So capitalism started in England and was a great success, simply because it could better utilize modern technology. The French monarchy understood the importance of science and technology and set up a scientific committee to encourage its use. But while French scientific experts were arguing and discussing technology, English businessmen started to use it. They at first used crude steam engines, invented by people like Thomas Savery, Thomas Newcomen and James Watt, to pump water out of mines.

Then later, these steam engines powered the first factories as labour saving machines. How steam engines worked was not a mystery, it was just that English businessmen found ways to utilize this technology to make money. The wealthy aristocratic intellectuals of Europe already had a lot of money and didn’t have the same incentive to build factories to gain more wealth. (The ancient Greeks invented the first steam engine, two thousand years ago, but they also couldn’t find a use for it.)

With the great wealth technology created, the capitalist had far greater influence over a “democratic” structure than the monarchy, as is was far harder to bribe wealthy royal families than poorer members of parliament. As Robert Walpole, the first English Prime Minister in the 18th century was to say about his fellow members of parliament; “All those men have their price.” The industrial revolution also allowed working class men with a flair for business or engineering to become wealthy.

Later, the same was true for the USA, not being ruled by a royal family, capitalists were free to bribe congressmen, senators and even presidents to make laws favourable to them. Capitalism became the main driving force in destroying monarchy in Europe. They undermined it in the 19th century and finally destroyed it, in the early 20th century. (Though their efforts to do this backfired in Russia. Although they got rid of the royal family, they ended up with something even worse, a communist government.)

This demonstrated that power and wealth were the same thing. The capitalist could destroy the power of royal families in Europe because they could generate more wealth than what royal families could. Another problem that intellectuals like Marx had was that although they could see the big gap between rich and poor created by capitalism, there was a mystery about why the people didn’t get angry about it and rise up against the rich and powerful. This was a concern for the rich themselves. Friedrich Engels understood this fear, because he came from a wealthy family.

To keep the workers in their place, the capitalists used exactly the same methods used for thousands of years by the royalist. The first royal families were simply bandits who robbed the first agricultural civilizations. They then became warlords and ruled by violence and intimidation. This created an unstable situation because the people would resent this. So these warlords learnt from the priests, the art of propaganda. What they did was to claim that these warlords were entitled to rule, because they were gods. Although this sounds an absurd claim today, it does show us the power of propaganda and indoctrination.

The people were subjected to a campaign that only gave them one point of view and anyone who said anything contrary to it was killed. Over time, the people became brainwashed into believing what was told them by the warlords and priests. Later on in history people began to question the whole idea of rulers being gods and so they had to change it, to claim that kings rule through the will of god. Though in time even this was questioned, as in the case of Charles 1 of Britain, when his claim of the “divine right of kings”, didn’t stop him from being executed.

WHAT MEN SHOULD BE DOING INSTEAD OF RUNNING THE WORLD
WHAT MEN SHOULD BE DOING INSTEAD OF RUNNING THE WORLD

From this, the capitalist learnt that not only had they to have laws favourable to them, they had to control the whole propaganda machine set up by the Royal families. This meant that schools, universities, newspapers and even the book industry had to be controlled by the capitalists, to indoctrinate the people to only believe what the capitalists want them to believe.

We can see this happening today in the USA. The writings of Karl Marx or John Keynes are not taught in schools or universities, unless they are slanted to criticize their ideas. Whereas the writing of economists like Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman are promoted, simply because they are all very much in favour of capitalism and do not in any way criticize it – Karl Marx and John Keynes found fault with it.

Nowadays capitalists use the media to brainwash the people to believe the most outrageous ideas. Like it is perfectly acceptable that the wealthy should pay less percentage of their wealth in taxes than working class people. That when we are in an economic crises working peoples wages need to be cut, but not the profits of the rich, that even though we have high unemployment, it is still the fault of the unemployed that they don’t have a job, because they are not looking hard enough for work. The most savage con-trick is the austerity program in Europe which claims that we are in debt, but the worker have to pay it off. People in countries like Ireland, Greece, Italy and Spain have been subjected to savage cuts to public services and wages.

The unfortunate fact is that these cuts to people’s standard of living will continue while the capitalists get away with it. As people continue to be brainwashed by the media and not question it, the capitalist need not be frightened that the people will revolt. After all with the modern technology, it can use the internet to keep an eye on what people are doing and gauge how likely it is for anyone to organized a revolution. What George Orwell wrote in his book, “1984″ has come true, as many people now complain, “1984 was supposed to be a warning, not a text book manual.”

WASH CARS, NOT RUN THE WORLD
WASH CARS, NOT RUN THE WORLD

Back in the 19th and 20th centuries capitalist didn’t have the same degree of surveillance that they have today, and so they could only guess at the degree of unrest there was among the people. (No one saw the Russian revolution coming and it was a shock to everyone.) Marx recognized that the common people rarely rose up in revolt, unless they had leaders that came from either the middle-class or even the upper-class. This was true in the French revolution where it was educated middle-class people which were its leaders.

Unfortunately the communist revolutions in Russia and China weren’t much of a help to the workers in those countries as they ended up with dictators like Joseph Stalin and Mao Tse-tung, who only partly implemented Marx’s ideas. The very fact that there was a communist revolution in these countries frightened the capitalists.

It is doubtful if Marx would have approved of the communists in the USSR and China because he believed in democracy, not only in politics but also in the workplace, where the workers had a say in what happens in the companies where they are employed. He recognized that dictatorship in industry was as bad as dictatorship in politics. It is of interest, that the only place where workers nowadays do have union representation in the boardroom of companies, is in Germany, and Germany is one of the most successful manufacturing countries in the world.

As Marx pointed out, the best ways for the capitalist to drive down worker’s wages was to have high unemployment. This is because when employers didn’t have enough people to work in their factories, they were competing with each other for workers. As the result to attract these workers they had to pay them better wages then other employers. So the capitalists were forced to give their workers better pay.

This was the situation in 19th century USA , where the capitalist found they had a labour shortage. So they had to attract workers from Europe and to do this, they had to pay better wages than European workers. This resulted in a higher standard of living, for ordinary people in America than in Europe . After WW1 the capitalists got fed up with the high wages they had to pay their workers, as it ate into their profit margins. But they couldn’t easily cut pay, because the American workers now had strong unions. So they organized the Wall St crash of 1929.

It has been claimed that the Wall St crash caused the world-wide depression of the 1930s. But people with better knowledge know that the Depression was caused by the reaction to the stock-market crash. The crisis was used as an excuse for the banks to cut lending and without being able to borrow money, many businesses went broke and the workers in these businesses lost their jobs. This then created high unemployment, and unemployment is the most efficient weapon capitalist can use to cut worker’s wages.

MEN WANT TO TURN EVERYONE ELSE INTO SLAVES - THEY ARE NOT FIT TO RULE THE WORLD

MEN WANT TO TURN EVERYONE ELSE INTO SLAVES – THEY ARE NOT FIT TO RULE THE WORLD

The capitalists were better off when there was high unemployment. This was because workers without a job and no means to support themselves became desperate for employment and were willing to accept lower wages and poor working conditions. It made little difference if workers went on strike, because the employer could sack all the strikers and hire unemployed people instead.

When the USA did this, the Europeans had to follow suit. With American industry now paying lower wages, they could undercut the European prices for industrial goods. With this competitive advantage, every other country had to do the same. They could have set up trade barriers, but European capitalists, like the American capitalists, saw the big advantage of high unemployment. Though some capitalists like Henry Ford weren’t in full agreement with this. He was trying to sell cheap cars to working class people but with lower wages and high unemployment, fewer working class people could now buy his cars.

As far as the capitalists were concerned, the depression gave them everything they wanted, there was no incentive for them to take capitalist countries out of the Depression, as it was good for business. But there was another group of people who also saw the depression as a great opportunity and that was the Soviet Union. The USSR realized that with millions of disgruntled workers in Europe and American, this was a golden opportunity to export communism to the rest of the world.

Germany suffered the worst in the Depression as the Versailles Treaty had bankrupted her. The victorious Allies of WW1 tried to make Germany pay them for the price of the war. So the Soviet Union began to finance the German communist party. The thought of Germany becoming another communist country frightened Capitalists all over the world. As the result they in turn financed an extreme right-wing party called the Nazis. With their financial backing, the Nazis party got into power instead of the Communist party, but Hitler, its leader, wanted to settle old scores – this is what started WW2.

Many Capitalists welcomed this, because selling arms to the military was far better business than selling to the people. Businesses have gone bankrupt because of changes in technology, fashion or new competitors. But this is not a problem when selling to the military during a war. The military in times of war are unlikely to haggle over price and want as much military hardware as possible. War is highly profitable to most manufactures. This is why American capitalists still supported Hitler’s rise to power, even though they knew he was a warmonger.

The Soviets were also financing communist and other left-wing parties in the USA in the 1930s and this greatly alarmed the American capitalists. So much so, they were persuaded by Franklin Delano Roosevelt to take America out of the Depression. As Arthur Schlesinger, the America historian and intellectual said, “It was now a matter of seeing whether a representative democracy could conquer economic collapse. It was a matter of staving off violence – even, some thought, – revolution.”

WE ARE MOVING BACK INTO MATRIARCHY AND WOMEN WILL STRAIGHTEN OUT ALL OF THIS

WE ARE MOVING BACK INTO MATRIARCHY AND WOMEN WILL STRAIGHTEN OUT ALL OF THIS

1379636_307668299372660_1781323010_n 1374714_307669999372490_1050422561_n 1376470_307671582705665_368294360_n 1377366_307670562705767_927829160_n

In the 1930s Keynes explained how to get countries out of the depression and that was through artificially creating full employment. The theory was that once you had full employment, the employers were forced to pay better wages to keep their workers. The employer who didn’t pay his employees enough would lose his workers to an employer who is paying better wages. Then, as the workers now had money to spend, they would buy more goods, creating a demand in shops and factories. To meet this demand, factories have to increase production or even open new factories, further increasing employment and boosting the whole economy.

The first country to try this was Sweden in 1932, where a newly elected Labour government created full employment by committing to a programme of public investment. Recovery was swift and by 1934 the Sweden ‘s economy was back to pre-1929 levels of output.

In 1933 Hindenburg the President of Germany appointed Hitler as Chancellor. He then announced a 4 year plan to abolish unemployment. Like in Sweden he soon began to use Keynesian economics to get Germany out of the depression. In 1932 Germany had 6 million people unemployed, but by 1936 it was down to one million and by 1938 unemployment had been virtually eliminated.

Hitler had instigated a massive infrastructure improvement campaign of building railways, autobahns, dams and other civil works. Then, when he became leader, he opened arms factories and quickly made Germany the strongest military force in Europe. Although German no longer had high unemployment, the wages were still kept low as Hitler and banned all workers’ unions and the Government decided the level of wages.

One of the ways Hitler overcame unemployment was to discourage women from working. He was to pay a heavy price for this in WW2, because Britain, Russia and the USA all recruited women to work in arms factories, increasing production and allowing more men to fight in the military. Germany tried to counter this by using slave labour from conquered Eastern European countries, but their arms production never matched the Allies, and this was a major reason why they lost the war.

The American experience of using Keynesian economics wasn’t so decisive, mostly because President Roosevelt had to have the support of both the Congress and Senate to do this. He managed to form what was called The New Deal Coalition, which focused on the “3 Rs” which was Relief, Recovery and Reform. Like Hitler, Roosevelt started an infrastructure improvement campaign, but it wasn’t anywhere near as large as Germany and Keynes in England criticized it for being too timid. It wasn’t big enough to bring back full employment and Roosevelt had to pay unemployed relief for those who still couldn’t get work. So the Roosevelt’s “new deal” didn’t bring America back to full employment until 1941, when the USA entered the Second World War.

Now consider what is happening today in the 21st century when government spending is being cut because we are told the country cannot afford it. It begs the question; where did Hitler and Roosevelt find the money for their respective infrastructure improvement campaigns, as well as the money to fight a world war? Because after all, both countries had just came out of an economic depression.

The shocking answer is that they simply printed the money, to pay for all this. The only barrier for governments printing as much money as they like is high inflation. There have been a few examples of hyperinflation in history, like in the Weimar Republic after WW1 where Germany was forced to pay the Allies the cost of the war. The German government tried to do this by printing money, and then buying gold and foreign currency in which to pay reparations. (The Allies wouldn’t accept German marks.) But they printed too much money and this caused hyperinflation. This was an unusual situation and hyperinflation only happens when you have irresponsible governments.

The point is that wealth is not created by money, but by work and production. How rich a country is depends on how much a country is able to produce. This is why the present day austerity measures do not work. If governments follow policies that limit production, then the wealth of the country decreases. So if they cut production to keep unemployment high, then the fictional debt they are suppose to pay becomes even more. The way to cut debt would be to encourage full production but governments today will not do this, as it would create full employment.

WW2 not only made the USA a lot stronger but it also did the same for the Soviet Union. As the result, Western capitalists feared the USSR even more than before the war. Then to make matters worse in 1949 China became communist as well. Many capitalist in the West feared a world-wide communist revolution. So to prevent this, they realized that they had to make life better for working class people than in communist countries. To do this, all western countries adopted Keynesian economics from the late 1940s to the 1970s. In that time, all these economies grew, as well as worker’s wages as unemployment was eliminated. As Harold Macmillan, a British PM, was to proclaim in 1957, “you’ve never had it so good.”

During the Keynesian years, the gap between rich and poor slowly decreased which was great for working class people but it seems, not for the rich. Because of this, in the 1970s, Keynesian economics began to be attacked and politicians began to promote the economics of Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman. This was at the time the USSR was losing the technology arms race with the USA. While in China , in 1976 Mao Tse-tung their leader had died and the people who followed him were not so interested in the communist ideal as what he was.

Near the end of the 1970s, western capitalists felt that communism was no longer a threat to them. So every Western country adopted monetarist economics as advocated by Milton Friedman. The result was that government spending was cut and unemployment quickly rose. Governments promised the people that this was only temporary and thing will get better later, but it never did for working class people but it did for the rich. Since the beginning of the 1980s the gap between rich and poor has been growing ever since. The rich now feel they are safe because without communism or any viable left-wing political parties, the workers have no-where to turn to.

In recent years the writings of Marx and even Keynes have started to become popular, mostly because it is clear that the economic theories of Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman simply do not work and are the reason for the economic crisis we are in.

Marx predicted that capitalism would destroy itself and he reasoning went like this: As Adam Smith pointed out wealth come directly from work. So it means that the more workers an employer has working for him the more wealthy he is. But if he then uses labour saving machines, he will then use less employers to make the same product. At first this might mean bigger profits to the factory owner, but if other factories use the same technology, then the number of employers he can use will decrease. So, if competition forces the profit margin for each worker to be the same as before, the profits for his whole business will decrease with every new technological innovation.

Over time as better and better labour saving machines are invented, the work-force will become even smaller, and so a large firm will have far less workers working for it. Because of competition with other firms, each firm will undercut each other’s prices so amount of money that the factory owner makes from each worker will become less and less.

Another problem will be that as better technology is invented, these new machines will became extremely expensive, again cutting down profit margins. Also, having to buy expensive machines to make goods to sell, means that it is harder for new firms to get started, as the capital layout becomes too great to start a new business.

In this situation, to restore their large profits, factory owners realize that they have stifle their competition. This can be achieved by working together and forming a cartel, or forcing their competition out of business or buying up your competitors. Then without competition, a firm can charge whatever they like. It been recognized by many people that the end result of capitalism is monopoly.

This has become the situation today, where competition is being stifled. So that any successful small firm get either forced out of business or brought up by larger established firms. Many large industries in a monopoly or a cartel can charge whatever they like for the goods they produce, resulting if high profit margins which go the rich and never the poor.

How can we use capitalism and modern technology for the good of everyone, and not just for the few who control governments through corruption? The biggest problem we have is that it doesn’t matter which system is used; it is generally selfish men who are in charge. Men tend to be more efficient when competing with each other and this might be why capitalism has been such a success. But unfortunately competition is all about winning and losing where the winners get everything and the losers nothing. We see in all capitalist countries a large gap between rich and poor. In fact, we see it in all male dominated patriarchal countries.

WOMEN WILL SOON RUN THE WORLD AND WE WILL HAVE HAPPINESS AGAIN

WOMEN WILL SOON RUN THE WORLD AND WE WILL HAVE HAPPINESS AGAIN

If we want to live in a more equal and caring world then we will have to be ruled by women. Unlike men, women are motivated by their maternal and nurturing instincts and so female leaders are far more likely to create a far more equal society based on the economics of both Marx and Keynes.

Five thousand years of recorded history have shown men to be totally selfish when they rule the world. We can only change this if we have caring and loving people to rule our world instead which means we have to have women rule our world.

 

By William Bond
Rasa Von Werder says: William Bond is a political genius. He especially wrote this for Embodiment of God, our new Matriarchal website, and I am grateful to him.

College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

Women Must Know How to Train Men <> Like Dogs, haha

MANAGING MEN <> WOMEN MUST LEARN HOW

By William Bond…..comments by Rasa Von Werder…..5 20 14

The Femdom scene is in theory about women dominating men, even though men originally created it. Because of this, most of its behaviour is more masculine in character. Men go to a Dominatrix to be whipped, spanked or tortured, which is a masculine perspective. Men have been whipping slaves, children and women for centuries, to assert their power over them. So is this behaviour appropriate for women?

Up until the 20th century, it was commonplace for parents and schools to beat children. The saying of the time was, “spare the rod and spoil the child.” Child rearing was cruel in other ways. Male child experts in the early 20th century were advising mothers that picking up crying babies only encouraged them to cry more. They even advised mothers to lock a baby in a room on its own, if it cried too much. Mothers followed this advice, even though it went against their natural instincts in caring for babies.

Male child experts in the early 20th century were advising mothers that picking up crying babies only encouraged them to cry more.  They even advised mothers to lock a baby in a room on its own, if it cried too much.

Male child experts in the early 20th century were advising mothers that picking up crying babies only encouraged them to cry more. They even advised mothers to lock a baby in a room on its own, if it cried too much.

RASA SAYS: HERE WE HAVE “MANSPEAK,” THE MEN TALK, TALK, TALK ABOUT THINGS THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT. IT SEEMS TO ME THIS IS AN INDICATION OF THEIR JEALOUSY THAT WOMEN PAY MORE ATTENTION TO BABIES THAN THEM–IT’S SIBLING RIVALRY. THEY WANT ALL OUR NURTURING POWER. THEY STEAL OUR POWER BECAUSE THEY DO NOT USE IT SINCERELY.

Fortunately, one male child expert, Dr Benjamin Spock, broke ranks and in 1946 published a book called, “The Common Sense Book of Baby and Child Care,” this book encouraged mothers to follow their natural maternal instincts in caring for their children.

RASA SAYS: IT ALL COMES BACK TO THAT, OUR OWN NATURAL INSTINCT AND INNATE WISDOM, HANDED DOWN FROM WOMAN TO WOMAN. WHAT THEY DID WAS SEPARATE US FROM OUR ANCESTORS AND THEN TELL US WHAT TO DO; ALL ABOUT CONTROL OF US. BUT THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT REARING CHILDREN. ALL DR. SPOCK DID WAS HAVE GOOD ADVISE REGARDING ILLNESSES, AS HE WAS AN M.D. THAT WE CAN GET POINTERS ON AS WE NO LONGER HAVE FEMALE HEALERS–BUT THEY ARE COMING BACK AS WOMEN ARE GETTING MORE DOCTOR DEGREES THAN MEN. THEY WILL REWRITE THE MEDICAL PROFESSION, IN TIME.

HERE WE HAVE "MANSPEAK," THE MEN TALK, TALK, TALK ABOUT THINGS THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT.  IT SEEMS TO ME THIS IS AN INDICATION OF THEIR JEALOUSY THAT WOMEN PAY MORE ATTENTION TO BABIES THAN THEM--IT'S SIBLING RIVALRY.  THEY WANT ALL OUR NURTURING POWER.  THEY STEAL OUR POWER BECAUSE THEY DO NOT USE IT SINCERELY.

HERE WE HAVE “MANSPEAK,” THE MEN TALK, TALK, TALK ABOUT THINGS THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT. IT SEEMS TO ME THIS IS AN INDICATION OF THEIR JEALOUSY THAT WOMEN PAY MORE ATTENTION TO BABIES THAN THEM–IT’S SIBLING RIVALRY. THEY WANT ALL OUR NURTURING POWER. THEY STEAL OUR POWER BECAUSE THEY DO NOT USE IT SINCERELY.

BABYLILY BABY DEER MASTIFF

As the result, his book became a international best-seller and changed the way children were brought up in Western countries. Then, with the rise of Feminism in the 1960s, mothers questioned violence against children. As women became empowered and had rights to bring up children in the way they wanted, they rejected all forms of physical punishment. They even had the cane banned in schools.

We see a similar pattern in animal training. Again, up until the 20th century, animals were trained by punishment, but as women became empowered, and got involved in animal training, they questioned the use of punishment. This led to a more humane form of animal training, in recent years, where animals are far less beaten or hurt.

In 2005, BBC TV produced a show called, “Bring Your Husband To Heel,” it was about a dog trainer called Annie Claydon who showed wives how to train their husbands, using animal training methods. Unfortunately, this caused so many complaints that the BBC cancelled the show. The biggest complaint was that it was demeaning for men to be trained like an animal, but there is another way of looking at this.

RASA SAYS: WOMEN, SHUT UP. THEY DON’T EVEN KNOW WHEN THEY ARE BEING EMPOWERED AND ARE THE FIRST ONES TO RAISE A SHOUT WHEN BRAVE WOMEN MAKE STRIDES. TRYING TO SUCK UP TO MASSAH I SUPPOSE.

It has been recognized that dogs can be dangerous animals and for this reason it is recommended that dog-owners should train their dogs, so they have control over them. A properly trained dog is far less likely to attack people or children, than an untrained or badly trained dog. But men are far, far more dangerous than dogs, as men are more likely to attack their wives and family than any dog. This is why it is important that women learn how to train and control men, for their own self-protection.

RASA SAYS: THE STATISTICS SAY THAT MALES MOLEST THEIR OWN CHILDREN AND THOSE OF OTHERS IN ALARMING NUMBERS. THEY ARE ALSO MORE VIOLENT, MORE PRONE TO ANGER THEY CAN’T CONTROL. THE MOST DANGEROUS ANIMAL IN THE HOME IS A MALE NOT CONTROLLED BY A WOMAN/WOMEN.
OUR DISADVANTAGE IS WE ARE ALONE WITH THIS CREATURE. IN MATRIARCHY THERE WERE SEVERAL WOMEN AND NUMEROUS WOMEN CLOSE BY WHO COULD BE ON CALL DURING AN ALTERCATION. BUT IN THE NUCLEAR FAMILY – WHICH IS SET UP FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF MEN – WE ARE VULNERABLE. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT, THAT WE ARE SITTING DUCKS.
ANYTHING TO HELP US SUFFER LESS ABUSE AT THEIR HANDS WOULD BE HELPFUL.

animal training, in recent years, where animals are far less brutalized.

up until the 20th century, animals were trained by punishment, but as women became empowered, and got involved in animal training, they questioned the use of punishment. This led to a more humane form of animal training, in recent years, where animals are far less brutalized.

scan0165 - Copy scan0166

Now, training men like dogs is a common Femdom fantasy, but Femdom uses old fashioned methods in training men, by beating them, while Annie Claydon, in her show, used more humane, up-to-date methods. Using animal training on people is not a new idea, it has been employed by Behaviour Psychologists since the end of the 19th century.

Scientists have claimed psychology is not a real science, because it depends too much on opinions and theories. Even today, psychologists can make diagnosis on mental patients based on guesswork. They still diagnose people as schizophrenic or paranoid with little regard for the harm a wrong diagnosis can do to them. They can get away with this; because once a person is diagnosed with a mental illness, people will no longer take what they say seriously. This means that people diagnosed with a mental illness can find their human rights taken from them.

Behaviour Psychology has been the target of this criticism and for this reason only uses observable facts. They began with animal studies, like the infamous Ivan Pavlov experiments on dogs, which demonstrated how to make a dog neurotic. Then these animal studies were used on humans. Like the equally infamous “Little Albert experiment,” by John B. Watson, – this today would not be allowed, as it would be seen as child abuse. These types of experiments gave Behaviourism a bad name. Then John B. Watson was to make an extraordinary claim, which frightened many people, as he made it sounded like Behaviour Psychology, was simply brainwashing. He wrote. -

“Give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own specified world to bring them up in and I’ll guarantee to take any one at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might select – doctor, lawyer, artist, merchant-chief and, yes, even beggar-man and thief, regardless of his talents, penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocations, and race of his ancestors. I am going beyond my facts and I admit it, but so have the advocates of the contrary and they have been doing it for many thousands of years.”

Behaviourists hadn’t discovered anything new. People have known how to train animals and people for thousands of years. All the Behaviourists did was to observe and test what type of training was most effective, using scientific methods. The way people are trained is through reward and punishment, and it has to be said that men generally like to use punishment, while women prefer rewards.

n 2005, BBC TV produced a show called, "Bring Your Husband To Heel," it was about a dog trainer called Annie Claydon who showed wives how to train their husbands, using animal training methods.

536954_200150586789685_422960319_n 68693_10200304102110037_1450531862_n 317907_529913323695461_1342934668_n

Both punishment and reward was first used in Behaviourism but la,ter on, B. F. Skinner demonstrated that rewards were far more effective for training animals and people than punishment. His ideas were used by the military, advertisers and animal trainers but not so much in schools or the wider society. Because we live in a male dominated patriarchal society, people still believe that punishment is a better form of training people than rewards. In spite of the fact that evidence doesn’t show this.

The reason why rewards are better than punishment is not hard to work out. People who are punished only do enough to not get punished and no more, and if they can secretly sabotage what they are forced to do, they will. In sweatshops where people are overworked and underpaid, the standard of workmanship is generally poor, simply because people feel exploited and unappreciated and therefore have no interest or pride in their work.

Another example of this was in the British army in WW1 where it was discovered that private soldiers were deliberately acting if they were stupid. The soldiers gave their officers a hard time by pretending they didn’t understand or misunderstood what they were being ordered to do. Therefore, the officers would get frustrated in spending large amounts of time trying to explain what they wanted. This was because the men were trained by punishment and resented it. This led to a military discipline offence called, ‘dumb insolence,’ which is just another term for passive aggression.

Animal trainers used Skinner’s work because they found that rewards were the only way they could train dolphins and small whales. Also, this was a far safer way of training large animals like big cats or elephants. Upsetting a large animal by punishing them is a dangerous thing to do, as these animals have been known to take revenge and kill trainers when given the chance.

THE MOST DANGEROUS ANIMAL IN THE HOME IS A MALE NOT CONTROLLED BY A WOMAN/WOMEN

THE MOST DANGEROUS ANIMAL IN THE HOME IS A MALE NOT CONTROLLED BY A WOMAN/WOMEN

pic9 pic1 pic3pic4 pic8

THE ANIMALS CAGED ABOVE ARE BILE BEARS–UNBELIEVABLE TORTURE IN CHINA, CAGED UP FOR LIFE, WITH HORRIBLE PAINFUL CONTRAPTIONS TO THEIR STOMACHS TO REMOVE BILE–JUST TO SHOW HOW EVIL MALES ARE TO OTHERS–AND WOMEN RECOIL TOWARD TRAINING MEN LIKE DOGS? THEY WILL DO ANYTHING FOR MONEY, IN GENERAL. MILLIONS OF ANIMALS A YEAR TORTURED FOR HUMAN REMEDIES–ELEPHANTS KILLED FOR TUSKS IN FRONT OF THEIR BABIES–DITTO RHINOS – AND WOMEN FEEL SORRY FOR MALES BEING DEHUMANIZED?  THIS DEMONIC SYSTEM HAS TO STOP AND IT IS BEING STOPPED BY MOTHER GOD AS KALI, THE KILLER OF MEN.

The men who started Femdom have never understood any of this, as they tried to encourage women to punish men as a means of female domination. Whereas we can see in the case of Annie Claydon, she preferred to use rewards to train both dogs and men. The reason why men prefer to train animals and people through punishment is because force and aggression are masculine characteristics. But another reason is that it is simple and direct and easy to understand, while training through rewards can be more complicated. Because it involves keen observation and understanding of how the person or animal you are attempting to train, thinks and feels. Observation and empathy are generally feminine qualities.

So, modern training is the study of human and animal behaviour and trying to understand why animals and men behave they way they do. Then to encourage, the behaviour you want through rewards, like food, petting and praise. Modern trainers also have the attitude that if a trained animal does something wrong, then it is the trainers fault and not the animals. Therefore, there is no reason why a trainer should want to punish an animal.

So how does this work out in practise? Something simple would be to train a dog to sit on command. The trainer holds up a dog treat above the dog’s head, which gets the dogs attention. She then slightly moves forward, to cause the dog to retreat just enough to sit down. While at the same time, she gives the command, “sit” just before the dog’s bottom hits the ground. She then rewards the dog with the treat and with petting and praise. So in the dog’s mind, is the association between the word “sit”, it sitting down and then getting food. This then is repeated many times until the dog will automatically sit on command, without having to be tricked into sitting or given a treat.

Obviously, women can’t use this trick on men, unless it is a Femdom fantasy scene. But she can observe his behaviour and praise him, whenever he does something she wants him to do, or directly order him to do something and then praise him when he obeys her. Repetition is another part of training, if she gets the man to do as he is told a number of times, it became automatic for him to obey her. The military uses this method to train soldiers by giving them an enormous number of orders until obeying orders come second nature to soldiers. Likewise, the more times a man obeys orders from a woman, the more habitual it becomes for him to obey her.

It is claimed that in dog training it is important to establish who the alpha leader is. The old-fashioned way was by the cruel method of tying a dog to a post and then beating it. Modern trainers have realized that such extreme methods are not needed to establish who the boss is. It can be done through body language and tone of voice. Just by the trainer thinking that she is the boss, will bring about the appropriate body language. This works for both dogs and men.

DOGS MAN'S BEST FRIEND, BUT MAN IS NOT DOGS BEST FRIEND

DOGS MAN’S BEST FRIEND, BUT MAN IS NOT DOGS BEST FRIEND

KELZEB TooDamnedCute bardot1

PICTURED ABOVE IS BRIGITTE BARDOT

Animal trainers are taught a lot about body language. This is because animals don’t speak, but communicate with each other through body language and so animals better understand this than we do. This means, animal trainers have to be aware of their body language, to know how to communicate with animals. This is why animal trainers must have self-awareness. Body language also works on humans on the unconscious level. So awareness of your own body language is important in training both dogs and men. (Though the body language that will work for men and dogs may not be appropriate when training other animals.)

In the USA there is a argument between two dog-training experts, Cesar Milan and Victoria Stilwell. The disagreement is that Cesar Milan believes strongly that the dog-owner needs to take the alpha position and be the pack leader to successfully train dogs. Victoria Stillwell disagrees and claims this is an old-fashioned idea and trying to be an alpha leader is not required. This might be true for her, but not necessary for other people. Her body language, tone of her voice and even the way she dresses, clearly shows to both dogs and men, that she is the boss. That is the reason why she finds training dogs so easy, she doesn’t have to try to be the pack leader, because her normal body language tells dogs very clearly, that’s what she is.

RASA SAYS: IT SOUNDS LIKE VICTORIA STILWELL IS IN DENIAL THAT SHE ALREADY REPRESENTS THE PACK LEADER. PEOPLE ARE SO DELUSIONAL.

The real issue between them is that Cesar Milan believes that to establish the alpha position the owner needs to restrain the dog by holding it down. Which although is nowhere as bad as beating the dog, it is still too much for Victoria Stillwell.

RASA SAYS: I USED TO WATCH CESAR ALL THE TIME. HE WOULD STAND UP TO A DOG, NOT BACK DOWN, JUST WALK CLOSER AND CLOSER, OR CONTINUE THE HAIRCUT OR WHATEVER, WITHOUT REGARD TO THE DOG BARKING OR MENACING. HE PROVED HE HAD NO FEAR – THE DOG WOULD BECOME AFRAID. I NEVER SAW HIM HOLD A DOG DOWN OR RECOMMEND IT. HE ALSO TAUGHT HIS CLIENTS TO WALK THROUGH HIS PACK WITHOUT LOOKING AT THEM, LIKE THEY HAD NO FEAR. A LOT OF THIS IS SCARY STUFF. I HAVE BEEN BITTEN BY A STRANGE DOG WHO JUST CHASED ME, BIT ME, AND RAN AWAY.
I DID TRY TO LEARN FROM CESAR AND OTHERS, BUT THERE IS A LOT TO THIS, TO TRAIN OTHERS, A TREMENDOUS APPLICATION OF THE MIND AND SKILL.

She claims that even this, is cruel to dogs. She campaigns against animal cruelty of all kinds, like her strong opposition to choke, prong and shock collars being used on dogs. Though she will recommend male dogs being castrated if they are too aggressive and for dogs to be put-down, if they make an unprovoked attack on children.

4a4142dceed30

Because Victoria Stillwell is a woman, she focuses a lot on positive training methods of rewards and observing dog behaviour to understanding what it thinks and feels. People can learn a lot from animal training in child-care. As some people can unwittingly train their children to be the opposite of what they want, because they lack self-awareness. The classic example of this would be the father complaining about his son’s bad language, when he grumbles. “My bloody kid swears all the time; I can’t think where the fuck he gets it from.”

RASA SAYS: THE IDEA OF THE ROLE MODEL IS PARAMOUNT IN GETTING OTHERS TO FOLLOW. THOSE CHILDREN WHO HAVE NEGATIVE ROLE MODELS HAVE A TERRIBLE BEGINNING, HARD TO OVERCOME. THEY IDENTIFY WITH THEIR ROLE MODELS. IF BOTH THEIR PARENTS DO NEGATIVE THINGS, IT IS A TERRIBLE HANDICAP FOR THE CHILD.
ONE PROBLEM WITH THE PATRIARCHY VS MATRIARCHY SCENE IS THAT MALES HAVE CREATED AL THE HEROES TO BE MALE, AND THEY HAVE DEPRIVED THE WOMEN OF CREDIT DUE TO THEM FOR ALL THEIR ACCOMPLISHMENTS, AND THEY WORK HARD ON GIVING MEN CREDIT FOR ALL THINGS AND DEPRIVING WOMEN OF SAME.
WOMEN NEED FEMALE ROLE MODELS.
I PROVIDED THIS WHEN I LIFTED WEIGHTS AND PROMOTED IT, THEN PREACHED AND DANCED, “STRIPPING FOR GOD,” THEN WENT ON NATIONAL TV SHOWS AS A FEMALE SUPREMACIST AND DOMINATRIX. NOW I GIVE EXAMPLES AS A GURU/TEACHER WHO AT THIS TIME IS HAVING FUN AND DONE WITH SEXUAL REPRESSION.
I KNEW THAT TO INFLUENCE WOMEN I HAD TO FIRST SET THE EXAMPLE, AND THEY HAVE FOLLOWED.
RIGHT NOW THE EXAMPLE IS TEACHING SEXUALITY. IN ORDER TO TEACH, I HAVE TO DO IT. MY 31 YEARS OF CELIBACY HAVE ENDED, AND I AM TAKING NUDE EROTIC SHOTS OF MALE MODELS TO PROVE MY POINT. I WAS THERE; I TOOK THE PICTURE– OF MANY MALES. PEOPLE CAN DRAW THEIR OWN CONCLUSIOS. IT’S LIBERATING TO WOMEN THAT IT IS NOT THEM AS THE SEX OBJECT, BUT THE MAN’S TURN.

When training through rewards, the trainer has to be aware of what the animal or person they are trying to train, thinks are rewards. An example of this, is again in child-care, when parents have a extravert child who want to be the centre of attention. If the parents do not give the child attention when they are sensible, but give them a lot of attention when they are disruptive, they can unwittingly, train their children, to misbehave. This is because these children will prefer the negative attention where the parent is shouting at them or punishing them to getting no attention at all.

Parents who are more intelligent and self-aware may realize that extravert children crave attention and use this to train them. So, all they do is ignore the children when they are behaving in anti-social ways and only give them attention when they are acting sensibly. Or use their need for attention as a reward, when teaching them. (Though this may not work so well with introverted children, who may not want much attention and prefer to be left alone.) So what works for one child may not work for another.

Another example was a couple I knew where the man who was obedient to the woman began to change and would sometimes disobey her. The woman then tried spanking him, to make him obedient, it worked for awhile but then he went back to being disobedient again. She then discovered that he actually enjoyed being spanked by her, so what she thought was a punishment, was in reality, a reward. He was being disobedient so she would spank him. She then refused to do this anymore but he continued to be disobedient and that ended the relationship.

Women have one powerful tool in training men and that is nagging. Now, this may be a surprise to many women who have nagged their husbands for years and it hasn’t worked. The reason is that most women use nagging in a negative way. If we go back to Victoria Stillwell, she claims that you have to be positive when training dogs; the same is very true when nagging.

 

The reason why nagging can be effective in training men is that it is the same method used by religions, governments and advertiser to indoctrinate the people. All they do is to repeat the same idea over and over again, which is what nagging is. But to be effective, it has to about what you want and not what you don’t.

So if when a woman nags her husband and tells him repeatedly that he is a “no good, lazy, good-for-nothing.” All she is doing is brainwashing him into believing this to be true and he becomes more lazy. If she nags him that, “You, never bring me flowers and always forget my birthday,” she is unwittingly indoctrinated him to behave like that.

So nagging has to be positive. If a husband does something the wife wants him to keep on doing, then she needs to tell him this, and keep on telling him. So if a husband does bring his wife flowers then she needs to praise him, and then if he does not do it again, she has to remind him of what he did, but not in a way that is critical. Some women may complain they do this anyway and it doesn’t get results, and this is where knowledge of animal training is needed.
Animal trainers get it wrong all the time, when training animals, but then find that something they did, has confused the animal. It is very easy to give an animal or a man mixed messages, which can sabotage the training.

Some wives object to this, claiming that praising men is pandering to their egos, which is what women have been doing for centuries. Also, some women do think that she has to praise men to get what she wants, but she doesn’t get any praise in return. Women can have a genuine gripe about this, if praising men only gets limited results, whereas, if they learn animal training, they would accomplish a lot more. So women would be less inclined to complain about pandering to men’s ego, if doing this, gets them better results.

RASA SAYS: THIS PRAISE SITUATION, IS’T IT WHAT MOST OF US WOMEN DO ALL THE TIME? AND WHAT MEN USE TO GET SOME PUSSY? IS THIS SUPPOSED TO BE SOMETHING NEW? PEOPE DO IT TO ME ALL THE TIME, ALSO, TO GET SOMETHING OUT OF ME. IT’S AN OLD TRICK. THREE COLLEGE GIRLS I WAS OUT WITH THIS WEEKEND – ONE OF THEM PRAISED ME NAGGINGLY HOW GREAT I AM, HOW POPULAR, HOW FAMOUS, GET THEM FREE DRINKS. I WAS HESITANT. THE OWNER, A LADY WHO HAD JUST ASKED ME FOR MY AUTOGRAPH HEARD HER SCRIPT THE TENTH TIME, TOLD THE WAITRESS WE COULD EACH GET ONE SHOT, AND I ORDERED JACK DANIELS FOR THEM. PRAISE TO GET SOMETING OUT OF SOMEONE – AS OLD AS THE HILLS.
HOWEVER, I WOULD USE ANOTHER WORD: AFFIRMATION. AFFIRMATION OF THE GOOD IS A POSITIVE THING, USING IT WORKS.

Women have naturally used positive reinforcement on children for thousands of years. When women don’t listen to male child experts, they normally praise children and give them rewards and encouragement, to train them to be better people. What works for children also works on men and animals.

Another objection is that some people claim it is all about manipulating people, and yes, this is true. If you are a big and strong man, like John Wayne or Clint Eastward and not afraid to use violence, you don’t need to manipulate anyone, you just tell them, “do this, or else”. But if you are not a big macho man, then you have to use more clever methods to get what you want. Positive reinforcement, is a far more humane method of training people, that force and intimidation. However, it has to be admitted that many people do fear manipulation. What people like in the John Wayne approach, is that it is direct and easy to understand. Whereas people fear manipulation, as they may not understand what is going on.

RASA SAYS: GOOD POINT. I HATE DEVIOUSNESS.

Another point is that men use negative reinforcement on each other and on women. In competitive games men try to undermine the confidence of the people he is playing against. Men even make a competitive game out of insulting each other. They call it ‘banter’ where the cleverest insult wins the game. Unfortunately, they also play this game with women and even children, to undermine their confidence. When challenge about this behaviour the response is always, “can’t you take a joke?” The point being, that a person with no confidence is a lot easier to dominate, so this is why men do this. Surely positive reinforcement used by women is far, far better than negative reinforcement used by men. Though admittedly, women can also use negative reinforcement like with nagging and moral blackmail.

RASA SAYS: WILLIAM BOND IS MAKING REALLY GOOD POINTS HERE

Animal trainers can make animals do amazing things, but the act of training an animal requires time and patience. To get an animal to do a circus act, requires a trainer to break down the whole act into small pieces and then teach it, bit by bit. The same can be true for a woman training a man to do something he may not wish to do. For instance, a wife may have a husband who was never taught to do housework, and has no interest in learning. If she is a bossy woman and he is submissive, then it is not a problem, she can order her husband to do it. However, if she hasn’t this amount of control over him, she can use positive reinforcement.

She can start by asking her husband to help her do some of the housework together. She then should try to make it a pleasant experience, for him, by being friendly and giving him praise and thanks for what he is doing. So if she suggests they do it again, then he is likely to be agreeable to it. She then can make it a regular thing of them doing housework together. Over time, she can start to gradually give him more of the housework. But in doing this, she still needs to ensure the housework is still a pleasant experience for him, so praise and little rewards are still needed. When he is used to doing this, she can ask him to do some of it on his own. Then start to sometimes help him but others times to leave him to do it by himself, until finally she helps him less and less, until it becomes his job to do it all the time.

As the result, the wife has trained her husband to do the housework without him being aware she did this. And she even may have brainwashed him to enjoy doing housework. Animal trainers talk about small steps and “setting the animal up for success,” in other words making is as easy for the animal as possible . The same would be true of in training a man. Though the difference would be, the reason you take small steps with a man, is not to make it too obvious that he is being trained.

Animal trainers have discovered that it is far easier to train an animal if you make it a pleasant experience for them. Animal trainers can easy work out how dogs are feeling, by the action of their tails, ears and body language. It is not so easy with human beings, because human can hide or disguise their emotions. This is true of many men brought up in a macho environment who have learnt, not to display any feelings. Men even learn to act differently to what they actually feel, to survive in the macho world. This then can make it difficult for a woman to work out what men actually enjoy.

For instance, some men can respond positively when a woman shouts at him and acts like a sergeant major, but other men may hate this and would display passive aggression. They have this problem in sports psychology. Coaches have found that you can strongly motivate some players by shouting insults at them, but with others, it has the opposite effect. So some players need praise and encouragement to perform at their best, while others need, “a good kick up the backside.” This means that keen observation, flexibility and an open mind are very important in training men.

Some woman may complain that they don’t want to train men or play power games with them. Unfortunately, just because many women do not want to play games with men; it doesn’t mean men won’t play power games with women. This is why men rule the world; they are more willing to play power games, than what women are. Men are naturally competitive; this is why they like sport and even war. They also bring their competitive instincts into their relationships with women.

RASA SAYS: OBJECTION TO “THIS IS WHY MEN RULE THE WORLD.” YOU IMPLY HERE THAT RULING THE WORLD OCCURED ON SOME KIND OF A PLAYING FIELD. IT HAPPENED BY VIOLENT TRIBES RIDING ON HORSEBACK ATTACKING SMALL COMMUNITIES, KILLING PEOPLE. IT WAS NOT ANY SORT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE OR MIND GAMES, IT WAS STRICT VIOLENCE, AND STRICT VIOLENCE IS STILL THEIR BIGGEST CARD: WAR. WITHOUT WAR, THERE WOULD BE NO MALE DOMINANCE. ALL THE OTHER GAMES FOLLOW, BUT WAR – MURDER – IS THE FOUNDATION. WOMEN DID NOT WANT TO BECOME DEMONS AND KILL INNOCENT PEOPLE.

In the power game between the sexes, men have the advantage of size, strength, aggression and violence. This is how men have dominated women for thousands of years.

RASA SAYS: THAT IS AN IMPORTANT PART. ADD TO THAT INSTITUTIONALIZED DISCRIMINATION, LAWS THAT PREVENT FEMALES FROM EDUCATION AND JOBS AND YOU HAVE MOST OF IT.

Even if some men do not use violence, they can still use the threat of violence to intimidate women. So women have to be clever to deal with this, which is why many dominant women are also very intelligent women. Lack of intelligence is not a problem when using masculine forms of domination but is essential if women want to control men. If a woman doesn’t use her natural feminine wiles properly, they can be ineffective and can achieve the opposite results to what was intended. As we have seen in the case of negative nagging.

RASA SAYS: SPEAKING OF INTELLIGENCE. THE ONLY WOMAN WHO AVOIDED GETTING HER HEAD CHOPPED OFF BY HENRY VIII WAS THE ONE WHO TOLD HIM TO DISREGARD HER COMMENTS ABOUT RELIGION BECAUSE HER ARGUMENTS WERE MEANINGLESS ANYWAY – THEY WERE “A WOMAN’S OPINION.” HER INTELLIGENT DEFENSE SAVED HER LIFE.

Behaviourists hadn't discovered anything new.  People have known how to train animals and people for thousands of years.  All the Behaviourists did was to observe and test what type of training was most effective, using scientific methods.  The way people are trained is through reward and punishment, and it has to be said that men generally like to use punishment, while women prefer rewards.

Behaviourists hadn’t discovered anything new. People have known how to train animals and people for thousands of years. All the Behaviourists did was to observe and test what type of training was most effective, using scientific methods. The way people are trained is through reward and punishment, and it has to be said that men generally like to use punishment, while women prefer rewards.

502fe9e66c688 51955947367e4 51c32db27b6ed

Fortunately, for women, the methods women can use to win the battle of the sexes has now become a science. Academic women can study Behaviourist psychology and the works of B. F. Skinner, which is used to day by advertisers, political parties and the military to train soldiers. Less academic women also can use animal training, and see the videos on this on YouTube from animal trainers like Victoria Stillwell.

If you have problems in converting animal training to training men, then there are even books on this as well. Like, “What Shamu Taught Me About Life, Love and Marriage,” by Amy Sutherland, “How to Make Your Man Behave in 21 Days or Less Using the Secrets of Professional Dog Trainers,” by Karen Salmansohn and “How to Train a Man,” by Nancy Winters. All these books are written in a humorist style but that is only to try and make the subject matter acceptable to readers.

Amy Sutherland claims she trained her husband by praise and encouragement while ignoring any behaviour she didn’t want. Karen Salmansohn received a lot of criticism for her book in the Amazon.com reviews. One was called, “As A woman I am greatly offended by the ideas in this book.” This critic went on to say.-

“I read this book after reading an article in News week discussing the authors views on behavior modification for men. I do not write reviews, but I was very disappointed and upset while reading the damaging instructions that are given in this text. If you value yourself and the men in your life you will not perpetuate or endorse the outrageous thinking and behavior this book employed. I am ashamed of myself for purchasing the book. I thought surely it would be written in fun and not as a manual to alter a man’s character. It should not need to be said, but I feel it needs to be, women should treat men with respect and value who they are and not change them. Woman who feel justified in manipulating men to act a certain way are controlling and devalue the relationships between men and woman. The instructions detailed in this text are irresponsible and demeaning to both genders.”

RASA SAYS: AS USUAL, SOME WOMEN TRY TO WIN OUR WAR AGAINST THE MALE GENDER, BUT THERE ARE ALWAYS THE OTHERS WHO JUMP TO THEIR SIDE. TRYING TO MAKE POINTS WITH THE ENEMY, OR ELSE, FEELING GUILTY ABOUT BEING STRONG. THIS WOMAN IS A LOSER WHATEVER WAY YOU LOOK AT IT.

What the author of this review is forgetting is that all over the world, millions of women are assaulted, raped and murdered, by men, every year. If women are not taking an active interest in changing men, then there are a lot of patriarchal religions and governments that are. Men are being brainwashed by the media and the general culture to be violent macho men and this violence is being used against women. When men are encouraged to be violent, women always suffer, because women are physically smaller, weaker and less aggressive than men. As the result, women are at a big disadvantage, in a patriarchal society when men are taught violence.

Other people may object that if these methods can be used by women to train men, then there is no reason why they can’t be used by men, to train women. Yes, there is nothing to stop men doing this. However, positive reinforcement has to be a far more humane method of treating women than force and intimidation. In addition, positive reinforcement methods are more likely to be used by women than men, because observation, empathy and social skills are more natural for women. Another point is that alpha men already use behaviourism; both the military and advertisers have used these methods for a long time.

The reason why men prefer to train animals and people through punishment is because force and aggression are masculine characteristics

The reason why men prefer to train animals and people through punishment is because force and aggression are masculine characteristics

hunger scan 080 FIN hunger scan 082 hunger scan 087 autumn017 hunger scan 066

RASA SAYS: I MIGHT ASK HOW DOES THE MILITARY USE THE POSITIVE TO TRAIN MEN? I HAVE SEEN MOSTLY NEGATIVE–SERGEANTS SCREAMING AT THE RECRUITS, PUTTING THEM DOWN, ORDERS BEING MADE WITH NO NICENESS WHATSOEVER, NO PRAISE THAT I CAN SEE. BUT THIS IS MOVIES AND TV. HAVE I MISSED SOMETHING?

Women need to be aware that advertisers use these methods, to sell their children unhealthy junk food. Or governments are encouraging male violence through, “shoot-them-up” films and violent video games. Patriarchal religions with anti-women agendas have been brainwashing people for centuries. The more women know about the secrets of brainwashing and indoctrination, the better they will be in defending themselves and their families, as well as using it to ensure their male partners and sons are trained in a way that supports women and not the interests of the few alpha men that rule our world.

The point is, that if a woman was to have a pet like a lion or tiger and that pet was to kill her or her children, she would be condemned. She did not protect her family. Yet, as many women have found to their cost, that men can be as dangerous as any large wild animal. A woman, who was to have a pet lion, would at least learn how to handle and control it, for her own protection. The same is true when a woman chooses to live with a man.

RASA SAYS: OH, IF ONLY WE COULD CONTROL THEM. I BELIEVE THESE WAYS WORK TO SOME DEGREE. HOWEVER, THE BEST WAY, LET’S FACE IT — IS LEVERAGE. WHAT DO I MEAN? WOMEN HAVE TO GAIN THE UPPER HAND, AS MALES HAVE HAD. MALES PREVENTED WOMEN FROM EDUCATION AND WORK, FETTERED THEM TO WORK AS SLAVES EITHER IN THE HOUSE FUKKING, BREEDING, BEDDING, COOKING, CLEANING OR ELSE IN THE BROTHEL DOING WHAT THEY DO THERE. OTHER JOBS WERE NOT EASILY AVAILABLE.
BUT WOMEN HAVE BROKE FREE. THEY WILL SOON BE THE BOSSES OF MEN. THIS IS LEVEREGE.
THE GOLDEN RULE IS “THE ONE WITH THE GOLD MAKES THE RULES.”
AND PEOPLE WORK WITH THE SIDE “THEIR BREAD IS BUTTERED ON.”

ONCE WOMEN HAVE POWER MALES WILL NOT BE BEATING THEM UP AS EASILY, OR ABUSING CHILDREN. THE NUCLEAR FAMILY IS GOING THE WAY OF HIGH-BUTTON SHOES. MANY WOMEN WILL CHOOSE NOT TO MARRY, HAVE SEX WITH MULTIPLE GUYS WHILE THEIR CHILDREN, IF ANY, HAVE PROFESSIONAL CARE. THEY WILL HAVE MANY MORE CHOICES FOR LIFESTYLE AND RELATIONSHIPS.

I ALSO KNOW THAT, ON THE OTHER HAND, THERE WILL BE A SET OF NEW PROBLEMS FOR WOMEN ONCE THEY ARE WEALTHIER THAN MEN. THERE WILL BE EXTORTION, THEFT, ALL KINDS OF FINANCIAL CHICANERY. I HAVE BEEN THROUGH SOME OF IT, THE THEFT AND FRIVOLOUS LAWSUIT PART. WHENEVER I HAVE A MALE IN THE HOUSE NOW, I MAKE SURE ALL MY FINANCIAL PAPERS AND CREDIT CARDS, CHECK BOOKS, INFORMATION, ARE ALL LOCKED UP. WHAT THESE POVERTY-STRICKEN MEN WILL DO IS GO THROUGH EVERYTHING A WOMAN HAS IN ORDER TO STEAL AND BRING LAWSUITS TO GET MONEY OUT OF WOMEN–THIS IS INEVITABLE, AND IT WILL BE WORSE WITH MALES DOING THIS TO WOMEN THAN WHAT WOMEN HAVE DONE TO MEN–AS MALES ARE NOT AS NICE AS WOMEN, WE ALL KNOW. THEY WILL BE DESPERATE, AND DESPERATE PEOPLE DO DESPERATE THINGS. WOMEN MIGHT EVEN HAVE HELP GROUPS OF HOW TO PROTECT THEMSELVES ONCE THEY BEGIN DATING MALES WHO ARE SEX OBJECTS AND IN NEED OF CASH. SOME OF THESE GUYS FANCY THEMSELVES AS GIGOLOS. THEY HAVE SEX WITH YOU AND THEN AFTERWARD DEMAND MONEY. I HAD TO CALL THE POLICE ON ONE SUCH CASE AS I DIDN’T KNOW IF HE WOULD GET VIOLENT. THE POLICE REMOVED HIM FROM MY HOME.

INDEED, I PREDICT A NEW SET OF PROBLEMS RATHER THAN THE ONES WE HAVE DEALT WITH IN THE PAST. WITH ROLE REVERSAL CONSIDER ALL THAT A POOR PERSON DOES TO TRY AND GET MONEY OUT OF THE RICH–WOMEN WILL NEED A NEW KIND OF DEFENSE AND PROTECTION.

THE EASIEST WAY I CAN THINK OF TO PREVENT TOO MUCH TROUBLE IS TO “FUKK’M AND DUKK’M.”

IN OTHER WORDS, ONCE YOU LET THEM INTO YOUR HOUSE FOR ANY LENGTH OF TIME, HAVE A LIVE-IN RELATIONSHIP, YOU ARE AT GREATEST RISK. I HAVE SEEN WEALTHY FAMOUS PEOPLE GET SUED FOR ALL KINDS OF MONEY BY SOME COMPANION WHO FUKKED THEM AND GOT A LOT, BUT WANTED MORE. THAT’S WHAT I MEAN BY NEW SETS OF PROBLEMS.

by William Bond…..Comments Rasa Von Werder…..5 20 14

College of Matriarchal Love, College of Religion & Theology, College of the Gender War

KALI MA KILLER HISTORY OF DEATH AND LIFE

KALI MA KILLER HISTORY OF DEATH AND LIFE

Typed out for Mother God by William Bond

Kali Ma – from the book by Barbara G. Walker, “The Woman’s Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets”

With Comments by Guru Rasa Von Werder

“Dark Mother,” the Hindu Triple Goddess of creation, preservation, and destruction; now most commonly known in her Destroyer aspect, squatting over her dead consort Shiva and devouring his entrails, while her yoni sexually devours his lingam (penis). Kali is “The hungry earth, which devours its own children and fattens on their corpses…It is in India that the experience of the Terrible Mother has been given its most grandiose form as Kali. But all this – and it should not be forgotten – is an image not only of the Feminine but particularly and specifically of the Maternal. For in a profound way life and birth are always bound up with death and destruction.”

RASA SAYS: PLEASE NOTE THAT KALI IS KILLING SHIVA – SHIVA THE MALE GOD. TO ME, THIS IS A VIVID AND PRECISE SYMBOL OF MALE EXTINCTION. ANOTHER ITEM STRIKES ME:  “her yoni sexually devours his lingam (penis)”.  AGAIN, THIS IS NOT SHE AS SHAKTI, GIVING LIFE, SHE IS TAKING IT.  HOW IS MAN GOING EXTINCT?  WITH HIS Y CHROMOSOME CRUMBLING, HE IS GETTING INCREASINGLY INFERTILE.  HE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO DUPLICATE HIS DNA INCLUDING THAT Y CHROMOSOME THAT MAKES MEN.  AND SO, MOTHER GOD IS AFFECTING HIM IN HIS SEXUAL REPRODUCTION, DEVOURING HIS PENIS TO DEATH.  THIS IS ANOTHER CLUE TO EXTINCTION.  SO STRANGE THAT THIS WAS KNOWN THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO, WHEN PATRIARCHS BEGAN ATTACKING, TAKING OVER, WHEN SATAN APPEARED, HIS DEMISE WAS ALSO WRITTEN ON THE WALL – KNOWN – ON THE VERY DAY HE THOUGHT HE WOULD RULE FOREVER.

Kali was the basic archetypal image of the birth-and-death Mother, simultaneously womb and tomb, giver of life and devourer of her children: the same image portrayed in a thousand ancient religions. Even modern psychologists face this image with uneasy acknowledgement of its power. It seems the image of the angry, punishing, castrating Father is somehow less threatening than that of the destructive Mother – perhaps because she symbolized the inexorable reality of death, whereas he only postulated a problematic post-mortem judgment.

RASA: PLEASE BEAR IN MIND AS YOU READ ALL THIS, EVERYTHING IS ATTRIBUTED TO KALI. BUT MOTHER GOD HAS A MYRIAD OF FORMS, AND YOU CAN SEE ABOUT THE SAME THING FOR ALL HER FORMS—IT’S ALL HER IN VARIOUS APPEARANCES. BUT AGAIN, WHY IS SHE SO SPECIFIC IN THIS APPEARANCE? IT IS WITHOUT A DOUBT THE KILLING OF MALE—ALL MEN AS SHE STANDS NOT JUST ON ONE MAN OR ONE DEMON, BUT THE GOD OF ALL MEN, THE MASCULINE GOD SHIVA, NOT GIVING HIM LIFE AS SHAKTI DOES ON TOP OF HIM, BUT GIVING HIM DEATH. TAKE NOT THAT WHEN MOTHER GOD GIVES LIFE TO SHIVA HE IS ON THE GROUND INERT. SHE GETS ON TOP OF HIM AND BRINGS HIM LIFE. THIS, AS KALI, IS THE OPPOSITE.

Tantric worshipers of Kali thought it essential to face her Curse, the terror of death, as willing as they accept Blessings from her beautiful, nurturing, maternal aspect. For them, wisdom meant learning that no coin has only one side: as death can’t exist without life, so also life can’t exit without death. Kali’s sages communed with her in the grisly atmosphere of the cremation ground, to become familiar with images of death. They said: “His Goddess, his loving Mother in time, who gives him birth and loves him in the flesh, also destroys him in the flesh. His image of Her is incomplete if he does not know Her as his tearer and devourer.”

Few western scholars understood the profound philosophy behind the hideous image of Kali the Destroyer. The London Museum displayed such an image with the label saying only, “Kali – Destroying Demon.” The Encyclopaedia Britannica devoted five columns to Christian interpretations of the Logos without ever mentioning it origins in Kali’s Om or Creative Word; Kali herself was dismissed in a brief paragraph as the wife of Shiva and “a goddess of disease.”

RASA SAYS: IMBECILIC MALES AND THEIR POLITICIZED ACADEMIA, DISCREDITING ALL FROM MOTHER GOD AND WOMEN. THEY WILL DIE FOR IT.

Certainly, as the Kalika or Crone she governed every form of death including disease; but she also ruled every form of life.

Kali stood for Existence, which meant Becoming because all her world was an eternal living flux from which all things rose and disappeared again, in endless cycles. The gods, whom she bore and devoured, addressed her thus:

RASA SAYS: NOTICE SHE BORE THE GODS. MOTHER GOD IS THE SOURCE OF MALE GODS.

Thou art the Original of all manifestations; Thou art the birthplace of even Us; Thou knowest the whole world, yet none know Thee…Thou art both Subtle and Gross, Manifested and Veiled, Formless, yet with form. Who can understand thee?…It is Thou art the Supreme Primordial Kalika…Resuming after dissolution Thine own from, dark and formless, Thou alone remainest as One ineffable and inconceivable…though they self without beginning, multiform by the power of Maya, thou art the Beginning of all, Creatrix, Protectress, and Destructress.

Brahman’s assigned Kali’s three functions to three male gods, calling them Brahma the creator, Vishnu the preserver, and Kali’s archaic consort Shiva the destroyer; but many scriptures opposed this male trinity as offensively artificial. A prayer in the Tantrasara said: “O Mother! Cause and Mother of the World! Thou art the One Primordial Being, Mother of innumerable creatures, Creatrix of the very gods; even of Brahma the Creator, Vishnu the Preserver, and Shiva the Destroyer! O Mother, in hymning Thy praise I purify my speech!” The Nivana Tantra treated the claims of male gods with contempt:

RASA: TREATED MALE GODS WITH CONTEMPT. INDEED. HER KIDS.

Brahma, Vishnu, Mahesvara [Shiva], and other gods are born of the body of that beginningless and eternal Kalika, and at the time of dissolution they again disappear in Her. O Devi, for this reason, so long as the living man does not know the supreme truth in regard to Her…his desire for liberation can only give rise to ridicule. From a part only of Kalika, the primordial Shakti, arises Brahma, from a part of only arises Vishu, and from a part only arises Shiva. O fair-eyed Devi, just as rivers and lakes are unable to traverse a vast sea, so Brahma and other gods lose their separate existence on entering the uncrossable and infinite being of Great Brahma and the other gods is nothing but such a little water as is for a hollow made by a cow’s hoof. Just as it is impossible for a hollow made by a cow’s hoof to form a notion of the unfathomable depths of a sea, so it is impossible for Braham and other gods to have a knowledge of the nature of Kali.

RASA: NO GOD STANDS BEFORE MOTHER GOD.

Even the arrogant Vishnu, who claimed to have brought the whole earth out of the primal abyss, received the grace of enlightenment concerning Kali and wrote a poem about her: “Material cause of all change, manifestation and destruction…the whole Universe rests upon Her, rises out of Her and melts away unto Her. From Her are crystallized the original elements and qualities which construct the apparent worlds. She is both mother and grave…The gods themselves are merely constructs out of Her maternal substance, which is both consciousness and potential joy.”

The Yogini Tantra said of Kali, “Whatever power anything possesses, that is the Goddess.” Shakti, “Power,” was one of her important names. Without her, neither man nor god could act at all.

RASA SAYS: AGAIN, LET US REMEMBER, THAT ALL THESE TERMS GO BACK TO “MOTHER GOD” AS WE IN THE WEST UNDERSTAND IT. MOTHER GOD IS SHAKTI, DURGA, KALI, AND ALL OTHER NAMES, AND ALL THE QUALITIES HEREIN WORSHIPED AND EXPRESSED GO TO “MOTHER GOD.” MOTHER IS CALLED DURGA, SHAKTI, KALI, ETC.

It is She as Power (Shakti) who takes the active and changeful part in generation, as also in conceiving, bearing, and giving birth to the World-Child. All this is the function of the divine, as it is of the human, mother…It is thus to the Mother that man owes the World of Forms of Universe. Without Her as material cause, Being cannot display itself. It is but a corpse…primacy is given to the Mother, and it is said, “What care I for the Father if I but be on the lap of the Mother?”

A Tantric scholar points out that “the poets have found much more intimate cries of the heart when they spoke of the Deity as their ‘Mother’ than when addressed themselves as God as Father.” Kali’s poets approached her through love: “By feeling is She known. How then can lack of feeling find Her/” In their view, “All is the Mother and She is really herself. ‘Sa’ham’ (She I Am) the Sakta says, and all that he senses is She in the form in which he perceives her. It is She who in, and as, him drinks the consecrated wine, and She is the wine.” She feeds him as a mother feeds her child, and he becomes immortal: “Deathless are those who have fed at the breast of the Mother of the Universe.” The Yoginihrdaya Tantra says, “Obeisance to Her who is pure Being-Consciousness-Bliss, as Power, who exists in the form of Time and Space and all that is therein, and who is the radiant Illuminatrix in all beings.”

As a Mother, Kali was called Treasure-House of Compassion (karuna), Giver of Life to the world, the Life of all lives. Contrary to the west’s idea of her as a purely destructive Goddess, she was the fount of every kind of love, which flowed into the world only through her agents on earth, women. Thus it was said a male worshipper of Kali “bows down at the feet of women,” regarding them as his rightful teachers.

RASA SAYS: THIS LAST PARAGRAPH IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO WOMEN FOR THEIR MATRIARCHY AND TO MEN FOR THEIR RESTITUTION THROUGH THE WORSHIP OF MOTHER GOD AND WOMEN.

The name Eve may have originated with Kali’s Ieva or Jiva, the primordial female principle of manifestation; she gave birth to her “first manifested form” and called him Idam (Adam). She also bore the same title given to Eve in the Old Testament: Mother of All Living (Jaganmata).

RASA SAYS: MOTHER GOD, THROUGH FEMALE, GAVE BIRTH TO THE FIRST MAN THROUGH PARTHENOGENESIS. THE “OUT OF THE RIB OF ADAM” IS A FAIRY TALE OF OLD HUSBANDS AND THEIR WISHFUL THINKING-LIES.

As the primal Deep, or menstrual Ocean of Blood at creation, Kali was certainly the same as the biblical tehom, Tiamat, or tohu bohu, the “flux” representing her state of formlessness between manifested universes. As Mahanila-Sarasvati the great blue River-Goddess, she was probably the original namesake of the River Nile. As Kundalini the Female Serpent, she resembled the archaic Egyptian serpent-mother said to have created the world. It was said of Kundalini that at the beginning of the universe, she starts to uncoil in “a spiral line movement which is the movement of creation.” This spiral line was vitally important in late Palaeolithic and Neolithic religious symbolism, representing death and rebirth as movement into the disappearing-point of formlessness, and out of it again, to a new world of form. Spirals therefore appeared on tombs, as one of the world’s first mystical symbols.

RASA SAYS: KUNDALINI SHAKTI IS SHAKTI, ALSO CALLED CHITI-SHAKTI, AND REPRESENTS THE HOLY SPIRIT OF GOD, THE FEMININE DIVINE SPIRIT.

Luna priests of Sinai, formerly priestesses of the Moon-goddess, called themselves Kalu. Similar priestesses of prehistoric Ireland were kelles, origin of the name Kelly, which meant hierophantic clan devoted to “the Goddess Kele” (see Kelle). This was cognate with the Saxon Kale, or Cale, whose lunar calendar or Kalends included the spring month of Sproutkale, when Mother Earth (Kale) put forth new shoots. In antiquity the Phoenicians referred to the strait of Gibraltar as Calpe , because it was considered the passage to the western paradise of the Mother.

RASA SAYS: AHA, NOW I KNOW WHY ST. PATRICK ALWAYS BLESSES ME ON HIS DAY. I USED THE NAME KELLIE FOR MUCH OF MY LIFE, AS THE DANCER/PREACHER OF MUCH FAME, AND NAMED MY DAUGHTER KELLIE.

Indo-European languages branched from the root of Sanskrit, said to be Kali’s invention. She created the magic letters of the Sanskrit alphabet and inscribed them on the rosary of skulls around her neck. The letters were magic because they stood fro primordial creative energy expressed in sound – Kali’s mantras brought into being the very things whose names she spoke for the first time, in her bold language. In short, Kali’s worshippers originated the doctrine of the logos or creative Word, which Christians later adopted and pretended it was their own idea,

RASA SAYS: HERE IS THE EXAMPLE OF MALES STEALING FROM WOMEN, THEN PRETENDING THEY INVENTED IT. ALL MALE RELIGIONS ORIGINATED FROM WOMEN’S TEACHINGS, INCLUDING THE KORAN.

Kali’s letters magically combined the elements, which were previously separate as fiery-airy (male) or watery-earthy (female) forces. The former were “cruel”; the latter “benevolent.” This distinction seemed to reflect the Tantric view of Kali as Lady of Life and her spouse as Lord of Death.

Though called “the One,” Kali was always a trinity: the same Vigin-Mother-Crone triad established perhaps nine or ten millennia ago, giving the Celts their triple Morrigan; the Greeks their triple Moerae and all the other manifestations of the Threefold Goddess; the Norsemen their triple Norms; the Romans their triple Fates and the triadic Uni (Juno); the Egyptians their triple Mut; the Arabs their triple Moon-goddess – she was the same everywhere. Even the Christians modeled their threefold God on her archetypal trinity.

Her three forms were manifested in many ways: in the three divisions of the year, the three phases of the moon, the three sections of the cosmos (heaven, earth and the underworld), the three stage of life, the three trimesters of pregnancy, and so on. Women represented her spirit in mortal flesh. “The Divine Mother first appears in and as Her worshipper’s earthly mother, then as his wife; thirdly as Kalika, She reveals Herself in old age, disease and death.”

Three kinds of priestesses tended her shrines: Yoginis or Shaktis, the “Maidens”; Matri, the “Mother”; and Dakinis, the “Skywalkers” who attended the dying, governed funerary rites and acted as angels of death. All their counterparts in the spirit world. To this day, Tantric Buddhism relates the three mortal forms of women to the divine female trinity called Three Most Precious Ones.

Kali’s three forms appeared in the sacred colors known as Cunas: white for the Virgin, red for the Mother, black for the Crone, symbolizing birth, life, death. Black was Kali’s fundamental color as the Destroyer, for it meant the formless condition she assumed between creations, when all the elements where dissolved in her primordial substance. “As white, yellow, and other colors all disappear in black, in the same way…all beings enter Kali.”

The Black Goddess was known in Finland as Kalma (Kali Ma), a haunter of tombs and an eater of the dead. European “witches” worshipped her in the same funereal places, for the same reasons, that Tantric yogis and dakinis worshipped her in cremation grounds, as Smashana-Kali, Lady of the Dead. Their ceremonies were held in the places of ghosts where ordinary folk feared to go. So were ceremonies of western “witches” – that is, pagans. They adored the Black Mother Earth in cemeteries, where Roman tombstones invoked her with the phase, Mater genuit, Mater recipit – the Mother bore me, the Mother took me back.

RASA SAYS: CONTACT WITH SOULS IN PURGATORY IS AN IMPORTANT FORM OF MINISTRY. I HAD IT FOR 30 YEARS, HELPED THOUSANDS OF SOULS BY MY PRAYERS AND SUFFERINGS.

Sometimes Kali the Destroyer wore red, suggesting the blood of life that she gave and took back: “As She devours all existence, as She chews all things existing with Her fierce teeth, therefore a mass of blood is imagined to be the apparel of the Queen of the Gods at the final dissolution. The gypsies, who worshipped Kalika as a disease-causing Goddess they called “the Aunt,” clothed her in red, the proper color for gypsy funerals.

Blood was as much a part of Kali’s worship as it was of the worship of the biblical God who said blood must be poured on his altars to bring remission of sins (Hebrew 9:22). The difference between the western God’s demand for blood and Kali’s was that Jewish priests took away the meat and ate it themselves (Numbers 18:9), whereas devotees of Kali were permitted to eat their own offerings, as in Calcutta :

The temple serves simply as a slaughterhouse, for those performing the sacrifice retain their animals, leaving only the head of the temple as a symbolic gift, while the blood flows to the Goddess. For to the Goddess is due the lifeblood of all creatures – since it is she who has bestowed it – and that is why the beast must be slaughtered in her temple; that is why temple and slaughterhouse are one.

This ritual is performed amid gruesome filth; in the mud compounded of blood and earth, the heads of the animals are heaped up like trophies before the statue of the Goddess, while those sacrificing return home for a family banquet of the bodies of their animals. The Goddess desires only the blood of the offerings, hence beheading is the form of sacrifice, since the blood drains quickly from the beheaded beasts…the head signifies the whole, the total sacrifice.

RASA SAYS: THIS HAD TO HAVE BEEN INTRODUCED BY MEN. MOTHER GOD DOES NOT WANT US TO SACRIFICE LIVING CREATURES, BUT WANTS US TO SACRIFICE OUR SINS; ADDICTIONS, BAD HABITS, VICES, ATTACHMENTS TO EARTH THAT KEEP US FROM GOD. IN MATRIARCHY THEY DID NOT SLAUGHTER ANIMALS, THEY KEPT GOATS AND SHEEP FOR MILK AND WOOL BARBARA WALKER SAYS ELSEWHERE. BUDDHA, A VERY MATERNAL SPIRITUAL LEADER, SAID NOT TO SACRIFICE ANIMALS. THIS HAD TO BE INVENTED BY THE MALES.

Beheading or throat-cutting were common methods of sacrificial killing in the western world too. “Kosher” killing for Yahweh consisted, and still consists, of draining the animal’s blood, because blood was the special food of deities. Kali demanded sacrifice of male animals only, for they were expendable – a custom harking back to the primitive belief that males had no part in the cycles of generation. Shiva himself, as Kali’s sacrificial spouse, commanded that female animals must never be slain at the altar.

Kali was the Ocean of Blood at the beginning and end of the world, and ultimate destruction of the universe was prefigured by destruction of each individual, though her karmic wheel always brought reincarnation. After death came nothing-at-all, which Tantric sages called the third of the three states of being; to experience it was like the experience of Dreamless Sleep. This state was also called “the Generative Womb of All, the Beginning and End of Beings.” Kali devoured Time itself. At the end of Time, she resumed her “dark formlessness,” which appeared in all the myths of before-creation and after-doomsday as elemental Chaos.

The mystical experience of Kali was often described as a preview of formlessness beyond the veil of death: a psychic return to the womb, to be united with Kali’s oceanic being. Thus Ramakrishna described it:

I was suffering from excruciating pain because I had not been blessed with a vision of the Mother…I feared that it might not be my lot to realize her in this life. I could not bear the separation any longer; life did not seem to be worth living. Then my eyes fell on the sword that was kept in the Mother’s temple. Determined to put an end to my life, I jumped up and seized it, when suddenly the blessed Mother revealed herself to me…the temple and all vanished, leaving no trace; instead there was a limitless, infinite, shining ocean of consciousness or spirit. As far as the eye could see, its billows were rushing towards me from all sides…to swallow me up. I was panting for breath. I was caught in the billows and fell down senseless.

RASA SAYS: I ALSO SAW GOD AS THE INFINITE OCEAN OF BLISS, THE HORIZON KEPT OPENING, IT WAS THE GOLD OF LOVE. I WAS GOD, GOD WAS ME. PRIOR TO THIS I HAD HAD THE EXPERIENCE OF DROWNING IN THE OCEAN OF GRACE WHICH WAS NOT BLISSFUL.

Ramakrishna revitalized the worship of the Mother, as his pupil Vivekananda said; “It was no new truths that Ramakrishna came to preach, though his advent brought old truths to light.” Vivekananda predicted the resurgence of the Mother into the consciousness of the world’s population, after patriarchal religions had forced her into concealment in the unconscious. “One vision I see clear as life before me, that the ancient mother has awakened once more, sitting on her throne rejuvenated, more glorious than ever. Proclaim her to all the world with the voice of peace and benediction. Clearly, this Goddess was much more that the London Museum ‘s “Destroying Demon.”

RASA SAYS: BRAVO TO RAMAKRISHNA AND VIVEKANANDA

5 20 14 by Barbara G. Walker, comments Rasa Von Werder

 

College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Shrine to Shakti

THE GENETIC EXPERIMENT CALLED MEN IS OVER

THE GENETIC EXPERIMENT CALLED MEN IS OVER

RASA VON WERDER     5 17 14

I HAVE BEEN ALARMED BY THE BIRTH RATE OF MUSLIMS AND CATHOLICS. YOU CAN SEE THE PROBLEM OF MOTHER GOD AND ALL LIFE BY SUCH STATISTICS – HOW PATRIARCHY KEEPS GOING NO MATTER WHAT WE DO.

IT TO ME, ONLY UNDERLINES HOW MOTHER GOD HAS DEALT WITH IT FROM THE ORIGINS—MALES CAN CIRCUMVENT MOTHER GOD AND WORSHIP OF HER BY CREATING MORE AND MORE DEMONS – PATRIARCHS – BUT EVEN THOUGH THEY FORCE WOMEN TO HAVE KIDS ONCE A YEAR – (WHICH IS CRUEL AND TYRANNICAL, BAD FOR MOTHERS AND CHILDREN, MOTHERS DIE, CHILDREN DON’T GET THE NURTURING THEY NEED, WE HAVE A PANDEMIC ON ATTACHMENT DISORDER) – NEVERTHELESS – IF THEY BECOME INFERTILE THE WOMAN DOES NOT GET PREGNANT, PATRIARCHY DWINDLES.

SO MOTHER GOD HAS GOT THEM RIGHT BY THE BALLS, NO MATTER WHAT MEN DO, IF THEY ARE INFERTILE THEY CANNOT CREATE MORE DEMONS/MEN.

THIS DOES NOT STOP WOMEN FROM CREATING WITH THEIR VARIOUS METHODS, THE EGG IS REPRODUCTIVE, THE WOMEN DOES NOT NEED THE MAN, BUT THE MAN NEEDS THE WOMAN, HE CANNOT REPRODUCE MEN WITHOUT THE FEMALE. THE MALE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GET AROUND THIS. MOTHER GOD HAS CHECKMATED HIM.
…………………………………………………………………………..

WILLIAM BOND SAYS:

like I said I am sure we have the technology for two women to have a child together already, it just needs someone with the money and scientific knowledge to make it happen.

Yes, I can understand why women want to get rid of men completely, considering the suffering men inflict on women. But I would prefer it if women can find a way to control men, even it if means men have to be women’s slaves. But if that is not possible, then perhaps it is best for men to disappear. Perhaps women will have pet dogs instead.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

WE STILL HAVE 100,000 YEARS LEFT OF THESE CREATURES.  I AM BOOKING THE MOST BEAUTIFUL MALES IN THE WORLD TO POSE ON THIS SITE.  IF YOU KNOW OF ANY, GET IN TOUCH.

WE STILL HAVE 100,000 YEARS LEFT OF THESE CREATURES. I AM BOOKING THE MOST BEAUTIFUL MALES IN THE WORLD TO POSE ON THIS SITE. IF YOU KNOW OF ANY, GET IN TOUCH.

IMG_9380 ZX CRPFLT IMG_9380 ZX FLAT IMG_9834 ZX CRPFLT

LET’S LEAVE IT AT THAT……YOU THINK IT MAKES ME JOYFUL TO IMAGINE BEING WITHOUT MALES, AS A HETEROSEXUAL FEMALE? I STEP OUT OF MY SKIN TO SEE THE ENTIRE PICTURE, –I AM NOT LIMITED TO MY BODY. I AM A SOUL, AN EMBODIMENT OF GOD, MOTHER GOD ON EARTH. PLEASE DO NOT PUT ME INTO THE SMALL FRAMEWORK OF “A WOMAN SCORNED” WHICH IS CALLED “PERSONALIZING.” (WHENEVER WOMEN COMPLAIN SOME GUY SAYS, “OH, YOU POOR DEAR, HOW MEN MUST HAVE HURT YOU.”) THEY MAKE IT SEEM LIKE SHE IS A PATHETIC, RESENTFUL VICTIM WHO NOW WANT TO DISH OUT HATE AND REVENGE. IN THIS WAY, MALES TAKE THE HEAT OFF THEMSELVES, THE ATTENTION AWAY FROM THEIR MALICE, AND PUT THE STING ONTO THE WOMAN AS ONE WHO IS DAMAGED AND WEAK.

I SEE WHAT MALES HAVE DONE ON EARTH–THE MIND-BOGGLING DESTRUCTION AND CRUELTY. IT IS FAR WORSE THAN ANYTHING EVER DONE TO ME. YOU CAN SEE THAT AS WELL.

AS FAR AS MAKING MEN OUR SLAVES, I BELIEVE THAT IS LEFT FOR THE NEXT 100,000 YEARS, UNTIL THEY ARE GONE. THAT DAY IS COMING SOON, THEY WILL BE SLAVES FOR A TIME, BEFORE THEY ARE ESCORTED OUT BY EVOLUTION AND THEIR OWN KARMA. THE GENETIC EXPERIMENT CALLED MEN IS OVER.

 

(SEE DR. BRYAN SYKES, WORLD TOP GENETICIST, ON MALE EXTINCTION:  “ADAM’S CURSE-A FUTURE WITHOUT MEN”)

RASA VON WERDER…..5 17 14  Comment by William Bond

College of God & Love, College of Love Making, College of Matriarchal Love, College of Religion & Theology, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

KALI KILLS MEN! <> TO STOP THEIR PATRIARCHY

KALI KILLS MEN! <> TO STOP THEIR PATRIARCHY

EXPLANATION OF MALE EXTINCTION THROUGH THE IMAGE OF KALI:

I NEVER UNDERSTOOD KALI, & IN STUDYING HER READ A LOT OF LONG-WINDED STUFF THAT BASICALLY EXPLAINED SHE IS THE GODDESS OF “CREATION & DESTRUCTION.” THAT DID NOT SATISFY ME BECAUSE HER IMAGE IS PURE DESTRUCTION, NO CREATION, & THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER IMAGES OF MOTHER GOD THAT BESPEAK CREATION.

HERE IS THE CLUE: DURGA TURNED HERSELF INTO KALI DURING THE BATTLE WITH THE GREATEST DEMON WHO EVER LIVED (SYMBOL OF PATRIARCHY, NAMED MAHISHASURA)…..AT ONE POINT IN HER BATTLE WITH THE DEMONS THIS ONE DEMON SPURTS BLOOD WHEN SHE SPEARS HIM. THE PROBLEM IS EVERY DROP OF BLOOD SPRINGS FORTH A NEW DEMON!

AT THIS POINT DURGA, (WHO IS ONE IMAGE OF MOTHER GOD AS WARRIOR AGAINST GREAT EVIL) TURNS HERSELF INTO KALI, THE FEROCIOUS IMAGE WE KNOW OF. IN THIS FORM SHE LAPS UP THE BLOOD OF THIS DEMON SO NO MORE CAN SPRING FORTH.

CONSIDER HER IMAGE WITH A LONG TONGUE, SALIVATING, GARLANDS OF SKULLS AROUND HER WAIST, STANDING ON SOMEONE KILLING HIM, HOLDING A SWORD HAVING CHOPPED OFF SOMEONE’S HEAD.

WHAT WAS SHOWN ME IS THIS IS THE IMAGE OF MALE EXTINCTION.

 

CONSIDER: EACH DROP OF BLOOD COMING OUT OF THE MALE IS LIKE HIS SPERM. EXTINCTION IS HAPPENING LIKE SO: THE Y CHROMOSOME CANNOT REPAIR ITSELF. (WHEN THIS BEGAN I HAVE YET TO DISCOVER). HOWEVER, THE SPERM COUNTS OF MALES DETERIORATING RAPIDLY IS A RECENT OCCURRENCE (THEY BEGAN REALIZING IT’S EXTENT IN 1992). IT IS BY THE SPERM COUNT DIMINISHING UNTIL THEY CANNOT REPLICATE THEMSELVES ANY MORE THAT MALE EXTINCTION OCCURS.  IN OTHER WORDS, MALES ARE CREATED WHEN THE Y CHROMOSOME IS PASSED ON, WITHOUT THE  CHROMOSOME,  MALES STOP BEING BORN.  THE Y CHROMOSOME IS PASSED ON FROM THE MALE.  (HOWEVER, THIS DOES NOT PREVENT FEMALES FROM REPRODUCING!  THE HUMAN RACE WILL NOT GO EXTINCT.)

FIGURES PROVE THAT IN 1950 THERE WERE ONE MILLION SPERM COUNTS PER ML – OF MALES STUDIED ACROSS THE GLOBE. THIS FELL TO 75 MIL IN 1970 AND 50 MIL IN 1990 – WITHIN 40 YEARS, MALE SPERM HAS DECREASED BY HALF.

DR. BRYAN SYKES SAID THAT BY WAY OF NATURAL OCCURRENCE, THERE WILL BE MUTATIONS OF THE MALE SPERM – REGULARLY – (DUE TO THE BREAKDOWN OF THE Y CHROMOSOME) – AND AS THIS CONTINUES, HE PREDICTS MALE EXTINCTION AROUND 100,000 YEARS, GIVE OR TAKE 25,000.

THE IMAGE OF KALI SPEAKS TO ME THAT MOTHER GOD (OR NATURE AS BRYAN SYKES CALLS IT) IS REMOVING MEN – THIS IS HER WAY OF STOPPING THEM – AN EFFECTIVE MEANS TO BE SURE.

WHAT GAVE ME THE SECOND HINT WAS THE DILEMMA OF MORE AND MORE DEMONS BEING BORN FROM THE BLOOD OF THE DEMON AS IT SPATTERED. THIS I TOOK TO BE THAT NO MATTER WHAT MOTHER GOD DID TO STOP PATRIARCHY, AS MORE AND MORE MALES ARE BORN IT CONTINUES. IT IS MALES WHO STAND FOR PATRIARCHY, MALES WHO MAKE WAR AGAINST MOTHER GOD AND WOMEN. REMOVING MALES IS THE END OF THE PROBLEM. EVERYTHING ELSE HAS BEEN TRIED – AS EXEMPLIFIED BY HER BATTLES.

A THIRD HINT WHAT THIS MYTH IS ABOUT IS “KALI YUGA” – AN EVIL AGE WHOSE ONLY MERCY IS THAT IT’S SHORT. SO KALI YUGA IS THE AGE OF PATRIARCHY, THE AGE MOTHER GOD STOPS THROUGH KALI.

I WILL DO MORE RESEARCH ON THIS IN THE NEXT DAYS, THIS IS THE BEGINNING.

RASA VON WERDER…..5 16 14

College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

HERO FANTASIES OF MEN <> LEGENDS IN THEIR OWN MINDS

MALE SUPERHERO FANTASIES <> LEGENDS IN THEIR OWN MINDS

By William Bond……..Comments by Rasa Von Werder

Thanking Female Supremacy Now 2 for the wonderful illustrations.  She finds the images, photo shops them, and adds captions.  Brilliant work!

Male fantasies seem to revolve around competition, conflict and violence. In any comic book character, we find supreme beings like Superman or Spider-man, prodigiously powered heroes fighting against mega villains. Violence is the central theme of these stories and the hero wins in the end  by  being stronger or smarter than the villain.

These stories are popular with males because most of them would like these powers. Boys also like western, martial arts, spy, gangster and war stories. Although these heroes don’t have superpowers they are strong and skillful with their fists or guns.

So whether to be obedient to women or to other men is not an issue with men.  It only becomes an issue when they are brainwashed into believing they are superior to women, by alpha men.  Patriarchal leaders do this, because they want men to obey them and not obey women instead.

So whether to be obedient to women or to other men is not an issue with men. It only becomes an issue when they are brainwashed into believing they are superior to women, by alpha men. Patriarchal leaders do this, because they want men to obey them and not obey women instead.

1157503_284684018337755_1114485626_n 1471145_331376470335176_424868782_n 1524859_331376243668532_1066651580_n 1003496_277746772364813_1253780800_n 1016797_277746289031528_1396306055_n 1016971_277746282364862_1216715503_n

RASA SAYS: YES, INDEED, I AGREE. RECENTLY THEY HAD A SERIES OF JOHN WAYNE MOVIES ON TCM. I NEVER WATCHED JOHN WAYNE MOVIES BECAUSE THEY ARE MOSTLY COWBOY SHOOT’M’UPS OR WAR STUFF. BUT WITH THE HOSTS EXPLAINING IN DETAIL THE LIFE OF JOHN WAYNE, THE HISTORY OF HIS MOVIES, IT SEEMED SO INTERESTED, I TOOK A PEEK. (AFTER WATCHING SEVERAL OF THESE PICTURES I GOT A REWARD; JOHN WAYNE BECAME MY FRIEND FROM HEAVEN AND NOW GIVES ME GOOD ADVICE. HE ESPECIALLY RATTED OUT THE MALE MODELS THAT WERE GIVING ME SO MUCH TROUBLE – HE OPENED MY EYES.)
IN ONE OF HIS EARLY MOVIES JOHN WAS AN INNOCENT COWBOY RUNNING WITH TWO LOSER TYPES AND CHASING SOME BEAUTIFUL WOMEN. HE HAS TO INFILTRATE THE AREA’S MOST DEADLY GANG, AND FINDS HIMSELF IN THEIR MIDST, WHERE THE WORST OF THEM PITS HIM INTO SOME CONTESTS.
WHAT DREW MY ATTENTION WAS THE PREDICTABILITY OF THESE CONTESTS – IN ALL MALE HERO MOVIES THE WINNER HAS TO HAVE SUPERLATIVE POWERS AND SKILLS. OBVIOUSLY THESE ARE ALL MALE FANTASIES AND THERE ARE NO MEN LIKE THESE, BUT IT’S EASY TO DRAW A PICTURE, INSERT CAPTIONS, OR HIRE AN ACTOR TO PRETEND TO BE HEROIC.
SO THIS VILLAIN CHALLENGES JOHN WAYNE TO THREE CONTESTS, WHERE EVERYONE SMIRKS THAT JOHN WILL BE DEFEATED, BUT JOHN WINS ALL THREE. DARNED IF I CAN RECALL THEM, BUT TWO WERE UNUSUAL, LIKE DART THROWING & SOMETHING ELSE WEIRD, THE THIRD BEING A SHOOTOUT. JOHN HITS THE MARK ON ALL THREE, HE’S THE GREATEST, NOW THE GANG PULLS HIM IN AND HE IS UNDER COVER.
ALL MEN WANT PEOPLE TO BELIEVE THEY ARE GREAT, BUT FEW ARE GREAT. GREAT MEN ARE BUDDHA, JESUS, MAHATMA GANDHI, SAINT MARTIN LUTHER KING JR., MY MATRIARCHAL HERO WILLIAM BOND, HONEST, STEADFAST MEN WHO DO RIGHT.
THE “WALTER MITTY” SYNDROME IS ALL IN THEIR HEADS.

So the fantasy world of most males is fierce competition and violence. This is why men like watching sports or playing them, because sport is about competition – and boxing, rugby, American or Australian football are especially violent. If men are unable to play sports, they can play violent video games. Even intellectual board games like chess have a background of war between kingdoms.

Why do men like competitive and violent games? The human male is not alone in liking violence. In the animal world the male lions, rams, stags and bulls fight against each other for dominance. Men likewise do the same, but where animals fight with claws or bang their heads together, men use spears, swords, rifles, machine-guns, bombs, tanks, aircraft, warships and nuclear bombs. As the result, weapon-technology makes men the most dangerous animals on the planet. We can see this, in the nuclear attack on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of WW2.

RASA SAYS: I HAVE DONE A LOT OF PRAYING AND CHANNELING ON THE EVIL OF MEN AND THE DEVASTATION TO OUR PLANET. THIS VIOLENCE EXPLAINED HERE HAS NOT GONE UNNOTICED BY THE UNIVERSE, THE HIGHER POWER OR WHAT WE CALL “GOD.” THAT WHICH IS ABOVE AND BEYOND IS PUTTING A STOP TO IT ALL BY REMOVING MEN OFF OUR PLANET, OR PUT IN ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE,
“HE WHO LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD.”
MEN, WHO DESIRE TO KILL MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, ANIMALS, AND NATURE, ARE DYING THEMSELVES. THEIR VIOLENCE, LUST FOR DEATH HAS COME UPON THEM. DR. BRYAN SYKES SAID,
“HUMAN MALES ARE A GENETIC MODIFICATION EXPERIMENT THAT DID NOT WORK, AND NATURE IS REMOVING THEM.”
HOW DID THIS EXPERIMENT NOT WORK?
BY THEIR MALICE.
ONCE, THEY LIVED PRODUCTIVELY UNDER THE SHELTER AND AUTHORITY OF WOMEN – THIS WENT ON FROM THE BEGINNING OF TIME TO ABOUT 5,000 YEARS AGO. IN THE AGE CALLED KALI YUGA, THEY BEGAN TO ATTACK PEACEFUL AGRARIAN COMMUNITIES, WHERE MEN AND WOMEN LIVED IN HARMONY, WHICH EVENTUALLY LED TO PATRIARCHY – (THE WORST SYSTEM EVER OPERATED ON OUR PLANET.)
THESE MEN ARE DESCRIBED IN THE BIBLE AS “LUCIFER” TURNING INTO “SATAN” AND TAKING A THIRD OF THE ANGELS WITH HIM – AN ANALOGY FOR MEN TURNING AGAINST MOTHER GOD AND WOMEN, WANTING TO BE WORSHIPED AS GOD, WANTING THE GLORY. THIS LUCIFER SAID HE WAS THE BRIGHTEST ANGEL IN HEAVEN AND HE SHOULD BE WORSHIPED, BUT THIS WAS AN AFFRONT AND THE GRACE OF GOD WAS DENIED HIM AND HENCEFORTH – HE WAS DOOMED.
GOD’S ANGEL CONSIGNED THIS CREATURE AND HIS FOLLOWERS TO HELL, BUT THEY ARE ALLOWED TO ROAM THE EARTH SEEKING WHOM THEY CAN DEVOUR. SATAN COMES TO
“STEAL, KILL AND DESTROY” – PATRIARCHY.

THERE IS NO REDEEMING VALUE TO SATAN (AND HIS DEMONS, AND HIS AGENDA, HIS PATRIARCHY) IN ANY WAY, NOR MUST WE PITY HIM. WE CAN ONLY AVOID HIM AND HIS TEMPTATIONS AND HIS WORKS, AND ARE TO COMBAT HIM WITH THE WORDS OF GOD, AS JESUS DID IN THE DESERT.
WE, WHO ARE OF GOD, ARE MIGHTILY ABUSED, AS SATAN AND HIS PATRIARCHAL DEMONS KNOW WHO WE ARE – WE ARE TO BE ESPECIALLY PERSECUTED.
THOSE WHO SIDE WITH SATAN, BOTH FEMALES AND MALES, ARE NOT ALL MURDERERS, BUT THEY ARE ON THE “BROAD HIGHWAY TO HELL”, LIVING ONLY FOR THE WORLD AND THE LOWER LIFE, DEVOID OF SPIRITUAL LOVE. THIS IS PART OF THE AGENDA OF SATAN, FOR US TO LIVE LIFE WITHOUT LOVE, TO FOLLOW THE WORLD AND DIE WITH IT. THIS IS HIS PLAN. HE HAS A DESTRUCTIVE IDEA FOR EACH AND EVERY ONE OF US.
AS THE SAINTS EXPLAIN, MORE PEOPLE ARE LOST THAN SAVED, AD PART OF THE REASON IS PATRIARCHY.

In their fantasies, men are even worse, as in the popular, “Star Wars” films, where some super-weapon destroys whole planets with billions of people. The trouble is what men fantasize becomes reality as technology advances. During the cold war between the USSR and the USA they brought us close to nuclear war. This would have wiped out our present civilization.

The problem for women is that men can take their competitive and violent behaviour into relationships. According to a World Health Organization; article “Violence against women: a problem of epidemic proportions”, they claim, “It affects more than one third of all women globally.” (They admit, this is a very conservative estimate.) This violence consists of assault, rape and murder. In Muslim countries, it can be worse with genital mutilation and acid thrown on the faces of women, as well as stoning and beheading.

62989_277746249031532_1262572581_n 44695_277746692364821_671342730_n

What is clear is that men would be better off following the orders of women and not other men.  This is because alpha men seem to care little about the men they rule - they will send them to wars to die, or create societies where the majority live in poverty, while they live in extreme wealth.  This is why female leaders would be better for the majority of men.

What is clear is that men would be better off following the orders of women and not other men. This is because alpha men seem to care little about the men they rule – they will send them to wars to die, or create societies where the majority live in poverty, while they live in extreme wealth. This is why female leaders would be better for the majority of men.

61661_277746742364816_300438893_n 62403_277746739031483_1509710043_n

RASA SAYS: INDIA ALSO, FOR LESS THAN ONE DOLLAR, MALES BUY ACID AND THROW IT INTO THE FACES OF THEIR WIVES, WHICH TOTALLY DISFIGURES THEM AND EVEN BLINDS THEM. FOR WHAT? MOST OF THEM, IT’S ABOUT DOWRY. THE WOMAN DIDN’T GIVE ENOUGH. ONE BEAUTIFUL GIRL SAID,
“WHERE WAS I GOING TO GET $75.?”
BECAUSE SHE COULD NOT DELIVER $75., HE BLINDED HER IN ONE EYE AND DISFIGURED HER, A ONCE STUNNING WOMAN IS UGLY FOR LIFE.
SHE CRIED BECAUSE SHE KNEW ANOTHER GIRL WHO GOT A FAKE EYE SURGERY SOME PLACE – A GIFT – BUT SHE COULD NOT AFFORD IT.

Men’s competitive instincts are also present in men’s sexual fantasies. Women have complained that pornography, seen and read by men, is men dominating or humiliating women as well as inflicting violence on them. This is because many men do see their relationship with women as a competitive power game. As the result, men can use their larger size and strength to dominate women through force.

RASA SAYS: I WONDER HOW MUCH OF THIS DOMINATION/VIOLENCE COMES FROM MALES BEING RAPED BY MEN AS CHILDREN? TO FORCE A CHILD TO SUCK HIS COCK AND RECEIVE SODOMY IS VERY PAINFUL – TRAUMATIC.

Men like to claim that women are a mystery, but women must find men’s behaviour quite strange. They think if you love men, they will give love in return. Some men can return love, but many become more selfish and abuse loving women.

Women then make the mistake of thinking that if they love these abusive men more, they will change. But it doesn’t work. Men think that if they abuse a woman and she gives love in return she is masochistic and “asking for it.”

RASA SAYS: SOME OF THEM DON’T BELIEVE THEIR BEHAVIOR IS ABUSIVE. THEY THINK THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO TREAT OTHERS AS THEY DO. THEY FIRST NEED A WAKE-UP CALL THAT WHAT THEY ARE DOING IS WRONG.

We can see this when Western men go to countries like the Philippines or Thailand to find wives. They do this because Asian women have a reputation of being loving and submissive. Yet Asian women’s loving nature doesn’t seem to be appreciated by Asian men, where violence against women is more commonplace than in the West.

RASA SAYS: WESTERN MEN WANT TO DO THEM LIKE ASIANS DO – ABUSE THEM, OR AT LEAST, FEEL FREE TO DO SO WHILE THE WOMAN SUBMITS. I HAVE SEEN REPORTS LIKE THIS.
ONE GUY WRITES BOOKS ABOUT MALE EMPOWERMENT. HE SAYS WESTERN WOMEN ARE DESTROYING MARRIAGE, MEN ARE GOING TO ASIAN COUNTRIES SUCH AS YOU SAY, TO FIND DECENT WIVES.
TRANSLATION: WESTERN WOMEN ARE STANDING UP TO US. THEY WON’T TAKE OUR CRAP ANY MORE, SO WE HAVE TO FIND WOMEN WHO WILL.

Feminists also have problems with men’s behaviour. They think that sexual equality is a reasonable and sensible idea, but men don’t get it. Yes, logically, men can see the sense of equality, but men’s competitive instincts get in the way. Competition and equality are not compatible. Competition is not about fairness; it is all about wining and losing. The winner gets everything and the loser nothing. Because of this, if men see women as losers, then they won’t appreciate the loving and caring aspects of women. Some men go as far as claiming that women’s loving nature is a weakness.

RASA SAYS: THROUGH THIS ARTICLE I WILL EXPLAIN HOW DANGEROUS IT IS TO BE “DOMINATING” THESE CREATURES. BUT I WILL SAY THIS – I AM LEARNING TO LOVE THEM LESS, BE LESS ACCOMMODATING.

Women see life differently, as they like the idea of equality, fairness and sharing. Women’s loving nature comes from their maternal instincts where they devote their lives in nurturing and caring for their children. They will also care for children who are not their own, as well the sick, the elderly, men and animals. The maternal instincts of females are very important for the survival of the human race, because without it, babies and children could not survive to be adults.

In recent times, what has come to the surface is a desire by men to want women to dominate them. This is called the Femdom scene, where men will pay or encourage women to be dominant and even inflict violence on men. So why would men want women to do this? Femdom is all about one partner dominating the other.

Male domination is part of many cultures like Islam, where a man is ‘dishonoured” if a woman was to disobey him or disrespect him. Because of this, according to Islamic custom, he then has the ‘right’ to beat her up or even murder her. So, male-dom is seen as ‘normal’ as it is part of many cultures of the world, while femdom is seen as strange and perverted because it’s not part of any world cultures.

So where did these male S/M fantasies in men come from? Sigmund Freud wrote about the Madonna/whore complex, where men either worship women as goddesses or despise them as sluts. Since then, many other psychologists and feminists have noticed the same thing. This unbalanced view of women probably comes from men’s competitive instincts, of seeing everyone in terms of winners or losers. If a woman is a winner she deserves to be worshiped, but if she is a loser then she is despised. Psychologists have noticed that this is a strong element of men’s sexual fantasies.

In the case of men who follow the Madonna/whore complex, they do not want to have sex with the Madonnas. This is also true of Femdom, where a man will go to a Dominatrix to be beaten or tortured, but not to have sex with her. There is also castration, cuckold and chastity belt fantasies involved in Femdom where men do not have sex with women he worships.

THE IDEA OF SEPARATING THE BOYS IS TO “IMPRINT” THE MALE UPON HIS BRAIN, WIRE IT TO GET THEM TO RESPOND TO MALE STIMULI AND AUTHORITY. OTHERWISE THE MALE WOULD REMAIN FOREVER BONDED WITH THE MOTHER/FEMALE. THIS IMPRINTING TAKIES THE FORM OF SEXUAL ABUSE AS WELL AS BRAINWASHING AGAINST WOMEN AND IN THE DIRECTION OF BRUTALITY. THE BOYS ARE BRUTALIZED BY MAKING THEM DO WHAT THEY WOULD NOT WANT TO DO – SUCK COCK AND GET SODOMISED.  WITH THEIR MOTHER/WOMEN THEY RECEIVE NORMAL, TENDER SENSUAL TOUCH; CARESS, MASSAGE, KISS FROM INNOCENT TO WHEN THEY GROW UP, EROTIC INTERCOURSE WITH WOMEN.

THE IDEA OF SEPARATING THE BOYS IS TO “IMPRINT” THE MALE UPON HIS BRAIN, WIRE IT TO GET THEM TO RESPOND TO MALE STIMULI AND AUTHORITY. OTHERWISE THE MALE WOULD REMAIN FOREVER BONDED WITH THE MOTHER/FEMALE.
THIS IMPRINTING TAKES THE FORM OF SEXUAL ABUSE AS WELL AS BRAINWASHING AGAINST WOMEN AND IN THE DIRECTION OF BRUTALITY.
THE BOYS ARE BRUTALIZED BY MAKING THEM DO WHAT THEY WOULD NOT WANT TO DO – SUCK COCK AND GET SODOMIZED. WITH THEIR MOTHER/WOMEN THEY RECEIVE NORMAL, TENDER SENSUAL TOUCH; CARESS, MASSAGE, INNOCENT KISS — WHEN THEY GROW UP, EROTIC INTERCOURSE WITH WOMEN.  BUT THE OLD SATAN MEN DO ANYTHING THEY CAN TO TRUNCATE THEIR RELATIONSHIPS WITH MOM AND WOMEN.

546891_307668239372666_86886383_n 546907_307668862705937_770959162_n 960033_307670409372449_184751276_n 988745_307668336039323_1987934063_n

Not all men are happy about the way males treat women. Many men get angry about violence done to women, because they do appreciate women. Yet equality, as advocated by feminists, still doesn’t seem to be an option to these men. They still believe that if they are not going to dominate women, then women should dominate them. Their competitive instincts are too strong to accept equality. Because of this, the middle ground of egalitarianism is not realistic.

Some men take their femdom fantasies to the extreme and want women to be cruel but few women want to do this. Also, many of these men become frighten of their own fantasies. They might fantasize being beaten by a cruel woman but not want to act it out in reality.

RASA SAYS: NO, MANY DO NOT, CANNOT LIVE OUT THEIR FANTASIES. THEY FEAR PAIN. THEY THINK ABOUT IT, IT SOUNDS EXCITING. BUT IN THE DOING OF IT THEY BACK OFF.

There are men who do actually have relationships with cruel women who beat them up. However, this does require the man not to use his greater size and strength to defend himself or hit her back. Many of these men find this too hard to take and soon want to get out of a relationship like this. It is a lot easier for a man to get out of an abusive relationship than it is for a woman, who is physically smaller and weaker than a man and may have children to care for. As the result, most abused women need the help of relations, the police, or a woman’s refuge, to do this. This becomes nearly impossible in extreme patriarchal societies, which do not support women.

RASA SAYS: IN THE ANCIENT DAYS OF MATRIARCHY, THIS DID NOT HAPPEN; IT IS A RESULT OF THE NUCLEAR FAMILY, OR ELSE HAREMS CONTROLLED BY MEN. WHEN WOMEN HAD MATRIARCHAL CLANS THEY BANDED TOGETHER, LIKE BONOBOS, AND PREVENTED MALE ABUSE. THEY PREVENTED INTIMIDATION, BEATINGS AND CHILD ABUSE. THE NUCLEAR FAMILY IS A PATRIARCHAL INVENTION; SO ARE HAREMS OF WOMEN. ALL DONE FOR THE MALE’S CONVENIENCE ENDS UP EVIL.

Men’s competitive instinct is the reason they don’t appreciate caring women; they see a loving nature as submission. Men claim that, “the killer instinct” is needed to be a winner. The most competitive man is generally the most ruthless. These men not only win in sports, but in the games of business and politics; it’s is not surprising to find such men ruling our world. While men rule there can be no such thing as a loving, caring government.

It seems men appreciate women more if they are bossy or dominant, than if they are loving and caring. In the eyes of men, bossy women are winners while loving women are losers. Therefore, because men worship winners they will respect and worship dominant women because, to them, dominance and winning go together. The saying, “never give a sucker an even break,” tells us a lot about men’s attitudes.

RASA SAYS: THESE ARE INTERESTING IDEAS WHICH I HAVE FOUND DIFFICULT TO IMPLEMENT. THE THING IS, I THINK WOMEN OFTEN PLAY A GAME OF BEING NICE. THEN WHEN THE CURTAIN COMES DOWN, THEY HAVE SNAGGED YOU, THE TABLES TURN. THEY DON’T GET VIOLENT BUT THEY SIMPLY DON’T SERVE YOU ONCE THEY HAVE SNAGGED YOU.

I HAVE ALSO NOTICED THAT THE MOST POWERFUL FEMALE MOVIE STARS HAVE THAT ABILITY TO BE TOUGH AND DOMINATING – MANY OF THEM WERE BISEXUAL, WHICH MAYBE GAVE THEM AN EDGE. GRETA GARBO, MARLENE DIETRICH, MAE WEST (WAS ONCE A MALE IMPERSONATOR), BETTY DAVIS, BARBARA STANWYCK, JOAN CRAWFORD, EMANATED A TOUGHNESS THAT EARNED RESPECT.

Men like to have relationships where who is the boss is clearly established; if this is not done he will start to play power-games with his partner – he’s testing. It the woman reacts by standing up for herself, then he is likely to accept her as the boss. But if she tries to appease him, he will feel he is boss. If the woman is assertive sometimes and not at other times, this can confuse the man and the power games can go on throughout the whole of their relationship.

Some women experience men who verbally abuse them and don’t understand why. The answer lies in sport where competing players will verbally abuse each other. The main reason is to undermine the confidence of the opposing players. Men do the same to women if he is playing a power game with her. If he can undermine her confidence, then she is less likely to stand up for herself and is therefore easier to dominate.

So does this mean that women have to act like a cruel femdom dominatrix to gain the respect of men? The problem with this is that most women are not as cruel or violent as men. Women’s maternal instinct will get in the way of most women wanting to be callous and heartless with men. Women want to have loving relationships, not uncaring relationships where she is not allowed to love her partner. Therefore, if women want the type of relationship they like, with men, they have to set the agenda. And she can only do this if she is the dominant partner. This can sometimes be a problem in Femdom relationships.

The reason is, that if a woman tries to fit in with a man’s femdom fantasies she finds he starts to, “top from the bottom.” This means, she is in a relationship where it seems that he is submissive and she is dominant, but in reality it is he who is telling her how he wants her to behave. As the result, she ends up having to act out his fantasies and not hers.

In the competitive patriarchal world most men end up losers because only a handful of men can claim to be winners.  We can see this in any sport.  Most sports will have hundreds of players competing against each other, but in the end, there can be only one champion.  As the result, there can be only one winner out of hundreds of losers.  The same is also true in business and politics.  The numbers of leaders of countries or companies are very few compared with everyone else.  Therefore, although men are competitive, there are few winners.  Losing for men, is far more commonplace.

In the competitive patriarchal world most men end up losers because only a handful of men can claim to be winners. We can see this in any sport. Most sports will have hundreds of players competing against each other, but in the end, there can be only one champion. As the result, there can be only one winner out of hundreds of losers. The same is also true in business and politics. The numbers of leaders of countries or companies are very few compared with everyone else. Therefore, although men are competitive, there are few winners. Losing for men, is far more commonplace.

1236829_292209787585178_1107506869_n 1240479_296846847121472_1070151112_n 1208540_301527339986756_1355539099_n 1234832_301754269964063_1582440077_n

RASA SAYS: I CAN’T TELL YOU HOW MANY LETTERS I GET FROM MALES WHO SAY THEY WANT TO BE MY SLAVE AND THEN TELL ME WHAT TO DO. I ASK QUESTIONS, THEY DON’T ANSWER. I ASK TO SEND A PICTURE – NOT SENT, OR ONE WITHOUT A HEAD. THEN THEY DEMAND SKYPE OR THIS AND THAT. THEN I TELL THEM I AM NOT INTERESTED AND THEY TELL ME I LOST A GOOD SLAVE. HAHAHAHA.

What this means, is that a woman has to establish that she is the boss, in reality. And if that is not acceptable to him, then she should get out of the relationship. But once that is established, she is free to train him to be exactly what she wants him to be. She can even teach him to become a loving human being. So by teaching him how to love, she can have the loving relationship she wants. A woman who tries to teach a man how to love from a subordinate position is doing it the hard way.

RASA SAYS: THERE, YOU SAID IT. IN PATRIARCHY, WITH ALL THE FACETS BEING AGAINST WOMEN, WOMEN BEING IN SUBORDINATE POSITIONS CANNOT RULE. IT’S ONLY WHEN MATRIARCHY BECOMES MORE REAL WE CAN PUT OUR FOOT DOWN. IT’S ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO CONTROL MALES WHEN WE ARE SUBORDINATE—IT HAPPENS, BUT IT IS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT. THOSE OF US WHO TRY TO BE DOMINANT, THEY JUST LEAVE AND FIND A WOMAN TO SUBMIT.

A man will respect a bossy women and will learn from her, but will have no respect for a submissive woman and ignore what she has to say.

RASA SAYS: I DO UNDERSTAND THIS PREMISE, BUT WHAT HAPPENS IN A PATRIARCHAL SOCIETY, WHEN YOU REJECT THEM, STAND UP TO THEM, OR GET TOUGH, THEY FREQUENTLY THREATEN US OR EVEN BEAT US UP. IT HAS HAPPENED TO ME. THE THING IS, WE HAVE NO ONE TO BACK US UP – IT IS ONE LONE WOMAN AGAINST ONE LONE MAN, HE’S VIOLENT, HE’S NASTIER, BIGGER, STRONGER, LOVES TO HURT. NOW HE BEATS YOU UP OR RAPES YOU, YOU GO TO AUTHORITIES, THEY ARE ON HIS SIDE. SO IT IS DANGEROUS FOR US TO ACT DOMINANT IN PATRIARCHY. WILLIAM, YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN A WOMAN. YOU CAN BE DOMINANT AT TIMES, NOTHING HAPPENS, OTHER TIMES, YOU GET BEAT UP. THAT IS WHY THE BEST ROAD FOR WOMEN, SAY, WHEN LEAVING A MALE, IS TO DO IT BEHIND HIS BACK. THEY GET VIOLENT WHEN WE HURT THEM – WOMEN GET KILLED.
THE REASONING IS CLEAR, BUT IN ACTION, IT GETS TRICKY.

What has become clear in patriarchal history is that when men rule the world they only create conflict and poverty. Without the influence of women, men become so competitive, that they end up fighting with each other, which leads to warfare. This is made worse today with modern technology where powerful weapons can destroy whole cities. As we see in the Femdom scene men are not against women ruling the world, they only demand that women play the dominant role and act like winners. Men cannot respect women who try to appease them and behave like losers.

RASA SAYS: AS I SAID, WE HAVE TO GET INTO MATRIARCHY IN STAGES, WHERE WOMEN HAVE A BACKUP OR SUPPORT. TO DOMINATE THESE GUYS WITH NO BACKUP, NO SUPPORT, THE SOCIETY BEING AGAINST US, IS DANGEROUS.

Some women may object that men will not accept female dominance, but that is because they don’t understand the true nature of men. Women suffer far more abuse and violence in extreme patriarchal countries than in countries where Feminist women have demanded their rights. So trying to appease men, clearly does not work.

RASA SAYS: THE BEST POLICY AGAINST MALE ABUSE IS TO LEAVE THEM ON THE SLY AND GO WHERE THEY CANNOT GET AT YOU. SOMETIMES THEY STALK US. I HAVE HAD IT HAPPEN TO ME MORE THAN ONCE. USUALLY THE BEST PROTECTION IS ANOTHER MAN, IF YOU CAN FIND ONE, OR A BIG DOG. DOMINATION IS DANGEROUS IN PATRIARCHY; CAN YOU NOT SEE THIS, WILLIAM BOND? I WAS A PROFESSIONAL DOMINANT FOR TEN YEARS, IT GOT ME INTO TROUBLE A COUPLE TIMES. MEN CHANGE THEIR MINDS, THEY GET VIOLENT.

Although men will compete against women for power, they are used to being losers.

RASA SAYS: WOW, THAT IS A MOUTHFUL: “they are used to being losers” – WILLIAM COMES UP WITH THE MOST AMAZING INSIGHTS!

In the competitive patriarchal world most men end up losers because only a handful of men can claim to be winners. We can see this in any sport. Most sports will have hundreds of players competing against each other, but in the end, there can be only one champion. As the result, there can be only one winner out of hundreds of losers. The same is also true in business and politics. The numbers of leaders of countries or companies are very few compared with everyone else. Therefore, although men are competitive, there are few winners. Losing for men, is far more commonplace.

RASA SAYS: YES, AND LOSING AGAINST A WOMAN IS THEIR ULTIMATE DEFEAT, FOR, WHEN MEN LOSE AGAINST OTHER MEN, THEY CAN TAKE THAT BETTER, AS THEY ARE LED TO BELIEVE MEN ARE THE NATURAL DOMINANTS, THE STRONGER ONES. BUT WHEN A WOMAN, WHO IS SAID IN PATRIARCHY, TO BE THE WEAKER SEX, DEFEATS AND DOMINATES A MAN, HE SEES THIS AS THE ULTIMATE HUMILIATION. IT IS AT THESE TIMES THEY ARE THE MOST DANGEROUS AND VIOLENT. WOMEN KNOW THE PRICE TO PAY FOR REJECTING A MAN HARSHLY. WOMEN LEARN TO LIE, TO BE SNEAKY – THEY MUST BE WITH MEN – IN ORDER TO PROTECT THEIR SKINS. I HAVE LEARNED THE HARD WAY WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU REJECT THEM FORCEFULLY – I HAVE BEEN PUSHED AND BEATEN BADLY BY MEN.

Men are also used to obeying orders. The whole of patriarchal society could not exist without men’s total obedience to authority.

RASA SAYS: ANOTHER GOOD POINT ONLY WILLIAM COULD HAVE THOUGHT OF. MANY THINGS WILLIAM SAYS ARE TOTALLY ORIGINAL, NO ACADEMIC SAYS THESE THINGS, BECAUSE ACADEMICS ARE FOLLOWERS – THEY SEE REALITY LIKE STATISTICS, STUDIES AND EXPERIENTIAL KNOWLEDGE (INTERVIEWS, CONVERSATIONS, OBSERVATIONS), THEN THEY MAKE REPORTS ON IT. THEY DO NOT DO A LOT OF ANALYSIS, THEY DON’T DARE. BUT IF YOU NOTICE WILLIAM ANALYZES, AND SO DO I. HE DRAWS CONCLUSIONS, HE AND I SEE THINGS SUCH AS THE OTHER “MATRIARCHAL PUNDITS” DO NOT. TO BE HONEST, WE LEAD THE WAY. THEY SHOULD GIVE US CREDIT, BUT THEY ARE TOO PROUD AND SELFISH.

An extreme example of this is the military, where officers can order their men to do insane things like attacking the enemy in hundreds or thousands, or go against machine gun fire knowing that the majority of them will not survive. Men like to call this bravery or iron-discipline but it also extreme submission to authority.

RASA SAYS: INDEED, IT IS SUCH A FARCE TO CALL MILITARY MEN “HEROES” AUTOMATICALLY – ASSUME THEY DID HEROIC THINGS, WHEN MOST DID NOT. THE MEDIA LIKES TO EXPRESS THINGS IN THEIR OWN BIZARRE WAY, LIKE PEOPLE WHO HAVE SUFFERED CATASTROPHIC OR FATAL ILLNESSES. THE TABLOIDS CALL THEM “BRAVE” WHEN MAYBE THEY WERE COWARDS, SCARED TO DEATH. THEN THEY MARSHAL IN OUR POOR BOYS WHO HAVEN’T EVEN LIVED, SEND THEM PETRIFIED TO KILL AND BE KILLED, AND CALL THEM “BRAVE” WHEN THEY DIE, AND GIVE THEM POSTHUMOUS MEDALS (WHICH MEAN LITTLE OR NOTHING.) THESE POOR BOYS ARE DELUDED AND BRAINWASHED. I MEET THEM DOWNTOWN, HAIR SHAVED DOWN TO SKIN, GETTING READY TO BE USED AS CANNON FODDER, OR WHAT IS EVEN WORSE, TO GO FOREIGN PLACES AND DO DAMAGE TO CIVILIANS.

The ultimate example of men’s submission is suicide bombers, who will obey orders to blow themselves up. The Japanese were able to order their pilots to make kamikaze attacks on enemy ships in WW2. While today, many terrorist groups use suicide bombers, who strap explosives around their bodies and set them off in crowded areas. So men will obey orders even if the order is to kill themselves.

RASA SAYS: JUST GOES TO SHOW HOW STUPID MEN ARE, HOW SUSCEPTIBLE TO INTIMIDATION. I SAW A DOCUMENTARY ON WHAT HAPPENED IN JAPAN. THOSE GUYS DID NOT WANT TO DO IT. THEY WERE TOLD THEY HAD TO, – IF THEY CAME BACK ALIVE THEY WOULD EITHER BE KILLED OR LIVE LIVES WORSE THAN DEATH, THROUGH DISHONOR. THEY COULD NOT FACE COMING BACK. IMAGINE WHAT WENT THROUGH THEIR MINDS AS THEY KILLED THEMSELVES. WHEN YOU CONSIDER THINGS LIKE THIS YOU UNDERSTAND WHY I SAY,
“WE MUST SAVE MEN FROM MEN.”

So whether to be obedient to women or to other men is not an issue with men. It only becomes an issue when they are brainwashed into believing they are superior to women, by alpha men. Patriarchal leaders do this, because they want men to obey them and not obey women instead.

RASA SAYS: WHAT AN INCREDIBLE STATEMENT. THIS IS WHAT I’VE BEEN SAYING IN “OLD WOMAN – YOUNG MAN – WHY THEY BELONG TOGETHER.” IT IS THE OLD MEN WHO WANT CONTROL OVER THE YOUNG – THEY ARE THE FUTURE. OLD WOMEN WERE ONCE THE MENTORS, GUIDES OF THE YOUNG, INCLUDING THE MALES. THE MALES ARE ESPECIALLY TARGETED FOR WAR. MEN’S HOMOSEXUAL ATTACKS AGAINST THEM FROM CHILDHOOD ARE PART OF THE WORST DEVASTATION—MALES FIND WAYS OF SEPARATING CHILDREN FRO THEIR MOTHERS SO MOMS CANNOT PROTECT THEM. IT IS EITHER DONE IN MONASTERIES (CHINA, INDIA, TIBET) OR HAREMS (MUSLIMS, MORMONS), SAMBIA TYPE TRIBES THAT TAKE BOYS FAR INTO THE JUNGLE, OR SECRETLY IN WESTERN & OTHER CULTURES UNDER VARIOUS CLOAKS, STARTING WITH THE HOME, BUT INCLUDING CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, MILITARY — WHEREVER THEY CAN ROPE IN THE BOYS.

THE IDEA OF SEPARATING THE BOYS IS TO “IMPRINT” THE MALE UPON HIS BRAIN, WIRE IT TO GET THEM TO RESPOND TO MALE STIMULI AND AUTHORITY – OTHERWISE THE MALE WOULD REMAIN FOREVER BONDED WITH THE MOTHER/FEMALE.  THIS IMPRINTING TAKES THE FORM OF SEXUAL ABUSE AS WELL AS BRAINWASHING AGAINST WOMEN AND IN THE DIRECTION OF BRUTALITY.

THE BOYS ARE BRUTALIZED BY MAKING THEM DO WHAT THEY WOULD NOT WANT TO DO – SUCK COCK AND GET SODOMIZED. WITH THEIR MOTHER/WOMEN THEY RECEIVE NORMAL, TENDER SENSUAL TOUCH; CARESS, MASSAGE,  INNOCENT KISS — WHEN THEY GROW UP, EROTIC INTERCOURSE WITH WOMEN.

THE OLD MEN TRUNCATE ALL THAT, PUTTING THEMSELVES IN THE PLACE OF WOMEN, MOTHER WITH HER SENSUAL INTIMACY (WHICH IS IMPORTANT) AND EARLY EXPERIENCES WITH FEMALES. IT IS THE FIRST EXPERIENCES THAT MAKE A MARK. THANK GOD FOR SMALL MERCIES: THAT THEY CANNOT REMOVE THE CHILDREN PRIOR TO 5 OR 6 YEARS OLD – EXCEPT FOR RAPE IN THE HOME, THE BOYS ARE NOT TAKEN INTO MONASTERIES FOR ABUSE, NOR WERE THEY TAKEN BY THE ROMAN/GREEK/SPARTAN “MENTORS” PRIOR TO AGE 7. THE MONASTERIES IN CHINA DO ROPE THEM IN SOMETIMES AS EARLY AS 5, BUT USUALLY 6 OR 7 IS THE EARLIEST.

I BELIEVE IF THE MALES BEGAN RAPING THESE BABIES FROM DIAPERS, MOST OF THEM WOULD BE GAY/BISEXUAL. A FEW ARE SAVED FOR HETEROSEXUALITY BY THEIR EARLY EXPERIENCES WITH MOM.
HOWEVER, NONE ESCAPES HATRED OF WOMEN IN PATRIARCHY. AT THE VERY LEAST, THEY SHOW CONTEMPT OR A LACK OF RESPECT. FEW MALES VENERATE WOMEN AS THEY WOULD IN A MATRIARCHY.

What is clear is that men would be better off following the orders of women and not other men. This is because alpha men seem to care little about the men they rule – they will send them to wars to die, or create societies where the majority live in poverty, while they live in extreme wealth. This is why female leaders would be better for the majority of men.

On the personal level a dominant woman is far less likely to abuse a man and her family than a dominant man is to abuse his wife and family. According to, The Lancet medical journal: “More than a third of women murdered around the world are killed by their partner.” This figure is higher in extreme patriarchal countries where violence again a woman is encouraged. But this is not true the other way around, as few women have been known to kill their husbands. Also, fathers are far more likely to kill or abuse their children than are mothers.

So it is better for all families, if wives are the dominant partner. And it will be a lot better for everyone, if women rule the world.

RASA SAYS: SOME ADDITIONAL THOUGHTS. ABOUT DOMINATING MEN. DO YOU REALIZE WILLIAM, HOW DANGEROUS IT IS FOR A WOMAN TO BE HARSH WITH MEN, TO DOMINATE THEM, OR TO BERATE OR REJECT THEM IN A PATRIARCHAL SOCIETY? IT SOUNDS GOOD, TO DOMINATE MEN. BUT WHEN YOU DO IT, YOU MIGHT SUFFER VIOLENCE. THAT’S WHY WOMEN BACK OFF – THEY STAY QUIET WHEN MALES CARRY ON. WOMEN HAVE LEARNED BY EXPERIENCE HOW MEN BEHAVE, THEY NEED TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AND THE CHILDREN.

I KNOW IT SOUNDS GREAT TO “DOMINATE” A GUY. I HAVE DONE IT.  WHEN YOU MEET A MAN YOU HAVE TO TREAD CAREFULLY TO SEE WHAT HE IS LIKE. FIRST, IS HE DANGEROUS? IS HE A LOOSE CANNON? DOES HE HAVE PROBLEMS IN HIS HEAD THAT COULD MAKE HIM GO OFF? YOU CAREFULLY SCREEN MEN BY PHONE BEFORE YOU MEET THEM.
AFTER YOU MEET THEM, YOU ARE IN DANGER BECAUSE YOU WILL BE ALONE WITH THEM. ONCE THEY START GOING CRAZY YOU MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO DEFEND YOURSELF – YOU’RE ON EGGSHELLS THE FIRST MONTHS, YEAR, YOU KNOW A MAN.

I EVEN HEARD OF ONE WHO WAS WONDERFUL FOR YEARS UNTIL HE GOT HIS WIFE TO QUIT HER JOB (A GREAT JOB!), GET RID OF ALL HER FRIENDS, BUY A HOUSE IN A REMOTE LOCATION – THEN AND ONLY THEN DID HE RELEASE HIS DEMONS. HE YELLED AND SCREAMED AT HER, EVEN HOLDING A GUN TO HER HEAD. HE WENT FROM JEKYLL TO HYDE. SHE SOMEHOW FORGAVE HIM AGAIN AND AGAIN, BEFORE FINALLY QUITTING, LUCKY TO BE ALIVE. SHE TOLD HER STORY ON THE RADIO.

IN MY PERSONAL AND BUSINESS LIFE I HAVE HAD TO SCREEN AND MEET HUNDREDS OF MEN – SO I SPEAK FROM EXPERIENCE.
AS A WOMAN WHO HIRES MODELS, I THANK GOD FOR THE PHONE WHERE I CAN DIAL 911. A MODEL THAT I WAS PAYING $200. TO SUDDENLY DEMANDED MORE MONEY, HE SAID,

“I COULD GO CRAZY – I HAVE A TEMPER.”

TODAY, I TAKE NO CHANCES. I DIALED 911 AND THE POLICE REMOVED HIM FROM MY HOUSE.

ANOTHER SHAKEDOWN OCCURRED WITH A HOUSE PAINTER WHO I KNEW FOR YEARS, MY NEIGHBOR. I PAID HIM ALONG THE WAY, BUT AFTER A WHILE, I OWED HIM THE BALANCE. THE LAST DAY HE GAVE ME A BILL $2,000. MORE THAN OUR AGREEMENT. I ASKED HIM WHAT IT WAS ALL ABOUT – INSTEAD OF TALKING TO ME HE STARTED YELLING,
“JUST PAY ME – JUST PAY ME.”

HE KEPT YELLING FOR A HALF HOUR. MY CRIPPLED HOUSEMAN COULD NOT HAVE HELPED. I WAS AT A LOSS WHAT TO DO. JUST THEN A FRIEND CALLED ME, A NEIGHBOR. SHE HEARD HIM YELLING, I EVEN HAD HIM TALK TO HER ON THE PHONE AND HE WAS INCOHERENT. SHE ASKED ME IF SHE SHOULD CALL THE POLICE, I SAID YES.
IT TOOK THE POLICE – 2 CARS CAME – 45 MINUTES TO CALM HIM DOWN. THIS MAN COULD HAVE BEEN DANGEROUS, IT WAS HARD FOR THE POLICE TO MANAGE HIM. HE SAID TO HIM,

“IF YOU ARE TALKING LIKE THIS TO ME, I CAN IMAGINE HOW YOU SPOKE TO HER.”
HE FINALLY CALMED DOWN AND I PAID HIM THE AGREED SUM.

THE PROBLEM WITH MALES AND A LONE WOMAN – A FEMALE WHO HAS NO HUSBAND, SERVANTS OR BACKUP TEAM BEHIND HER – THEY FEEL BIG AND BOLD AND WANT TO GET THEIR WAY. MEN DO ROUTINELY CHARGE WOMEN FOR THE SAME SERVICES, MORE THAN THEY DO MEN. IT’S ALL,

“SHE’S WEAK, SHE CAN’T FIGHT BACK – I WILL GET MORE OUT OF HER.”

IN FACT, AUTOMOTIVE PLACES HAVE A HANDBOOK WHERE THEY TELL SALESMEN TO CHARGE THE MOST MONEY TO WOMEN, ESPECIALLY BLACK WOMEN! THESE ARE THE POOREST OF THE POOR! IT’S ALL ABOUT USING US UP – WE ARE WEAK, THEY ARE STRONG, CHOKE THE MONEY OUT OF US, RAPE US, OR BOTH.

I WILL TELL ONE MORE STORY. IN MY 20’S I HAD A BOYFRIEND WHO WAS FAIRLY SUBMISSIVE. HE USUALLY DID WHAT HE WAS TOLD, TO A DEGREE, SO I BECAME MORE DOMINATING. ONE DAY BEFORE GOING TO WORK, I GAVE HIM MONEY TO BUY PAINT AND START PAINTING MY APARTMENT.

EIGHT HOURS LATER I CAME HOME AND HE WAS PASSED OUT ON THE COUCH. THE PAINT WAS ON THE FLOOR, OPEN, HE HAD DONE A TINY BIT OF THE WALL, BOUGHT WHISKEY, GOT DRUNK.

I WOKE HIM UP, YELLED AT HIM TO GET OUT OF THE HOUSE, I WAS THROUGH WITH HIM.

HE GOT UP, STARTED KICKING ME WITH KARATE KICKS, PICKED UP THE PAINT AND THREW IT ALL OVER MY APARTMENT, SMATTERING ALL MY BELONGINGS, PAINT WAS DRIPPING OFF MY FURNITURE AND WALLS.

I FLED DOWN THE SIX FLIGHTS OF CHAIRS WITH HIM CHASING ME WITH AN IRON BAR.

MY WHOLE BODY, ESPECIALLY BREASTS, WERE COVERED WITH BLACK AND BLUE MARKS. THE POLICE OFFICER WHO TOOK THE CASE TOLD ME THEY ALWAYS ATTACK THE BREASTS.

HE ALSO TRIED TO PERSUADE ME TO DROP THE CHARGES. INDEED, THEY SAY POLICE DON’T LIKE TO START DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES BECAUSE WOMEN USUALLY DROP THE CHARGES – BUT THIS PROVES THAT POLICE WANT YOU TO DROP THEM. HE KEPT TELLING ME TO FORGIVE THE GUY!

I DID TAKE HIM TO COURT, HIS MOTHER PAID A FINE—I GAVE THE SUM TO MY GURU. THE APARTMENT WAS NEVER THE SAME UNTIL YEARS LATER WHEN I TOTALLY REMODELED IT. THERE WAS SO MUCH DAMAGE BECAUSE AFTER BEING BEATEN, AND STRESS WISE, I DID NOT HAVE THE ENERGY TO REMOVE THE DRIPS OFF THE WALLS, THE HARDENED DRIPS REMAINED FOR YEARS.

THAT BRINGS US BACK TO DOMINATION.

IN ORDER TO BE THE DOMINANT PERSON, YOU HAVE TO HAVE SOMEONE BEHIND YOU PROTECTING YOU, OTHERWISE YOU HAVE NO LEVERAGE. WHEN YOU STAND UP AGAINST ANOTHER, IT IS YOUR STRENGTH AGAINST HIS. A WOMAN MIGHT HAVE NERVES OF STEEL, BUT IT STILL DOES NOT PREVENT HER FROM GETTING BEATEN BY A RAGING MALE, OR WORSE.
IN THE BONOBO SOCIETY, OUR COUSINS, WHEN A MALE INTIMIDATES A FEMALE, ALL THE FEMALES SURROUND HIM AND PREVENT FURTHER VIOLENCE.

IN A HUMAN MATRIARCHAL SITUATION, THERE WERE MULTIPLE WOMEN IN A HOUSE, I AM SURE THESE WOMEN COULD GANG UP AGAINST ONE MAN AGGRAVATING A WOMAN.

FURTHERMORE, IF THE MAN KNOWS SOCIETY IS AGAINST HIS VIOLENCE OR RAPE, HE MIGHT BE SLOW TO ACT. BUT IF HE KNOWS THE POLITICAL SYSTEM IS ON HIS SIDE, HE IS PRONE TO DO ANYTHING. CERTAINLY MUSLIMS IN A MUSLIM WORLD CAN DO ANYTHING TO WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN THEIR HOME. WHAT MUSLIM WOULD PROSECUTE THEM FOR ANYTHING?

FURTHERMORE WHEN A WOMAN GOES TO THE POLICE FOR RAPE IN ANY MUSLIM COUNTRY SHE IS JAILED AND PROSECUTED – PROBABLY GETS RAPED IN JAIL. FOREIGN WOMEN WHO SHOWED THEIR ANKLE IN PUBLIC OR LAUGHED WERE ARRESTED, MADE TO SIGN PAPERS SAYING THEY WERE PROSTITUTES, THEN GIVEN SEVERE LASHINGS.

ARE THERE ANY JAILS HOLDING MUSLIM PEDOPHILES OR WIFE BEATERS OR ABUSERS? HOW COULD THERE BE, WHEN MUSLIMS ARE TAUGHT BY THEIR PRIESTS THAT CHILD ABUSE IS ALRIGHT? THERE IS NO PROSECUTION FOR CHILD ABUSE, CERTAINLY NONE FOR BEATING WIVES, WHATEVER THE MAN DOES IS ALLOWED. HOW CAN A WOMAN OR CHILD SURVIVE HERE?

IN THE WESTERN WORLD IT IS NOT AS BAD, BUT IT’S FAR FROM PERFECT. I HAVE BEEN BEATEN, PUNCHED AND RAPED AND MOST CASES, JUSTICE HAS NOT BEEN SERVED.

AS MATRIARCHY GROWS STRONGER ECONOMICALLY AND POLITICALLY WOMEN WILL BE LESS ENDANGERED BY MEN. WE’RE ON OUR WAY OUT OF THE WOODS.

by William Bond, …..Comments by Rasa Von Werder…..5 12 14

1376470_307671582705665_368294360_n 1374091_307668809372609_531050515_n 1374227_307671192705704_1516124580_n 1374240_307668252705998_741370943_n 1374240_307670332705790_935548851_n 1374714_307669999372490_1050422561_n 1374860_307671836038973_1389030903_n 1375263_307670929372397_1650757618_n 1375311_306721742800649_2086767737_n

An extreme example of this is the military, where officers can order their men to do insane things like attacking the enemy in hundreds or thousands, or go against machine gun fire knowing that the majority of them will not survive.  Men like to call this bravery or iron-discipline but it also extreme submission to authority.

An extreme example of this is the military, where officers can order their men to do insane things like attacking the enemy in hundreds or thousands, or go against machine gun fire knowing that the majority of them will not survive. Men like to call this bravery or iron-discipline but it also extreme submission to authority.

5,308 views
Mature Content

This site contains artistic nudity which may be considered offensive and/or inappropriate. Furthermore, this content may be considered adult content, if you are not of legal age or are easily offended, you are required to click the exit button.