College of God & Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

Dreams Explain the Past & Prophesy Future

  • A Prince – a King – A Cat – A Love Affair Between Prince and Lowly Girl

I’m in a small Church & at first it seems like there are a good amount of people while the light is dim but when it gets brighter I see here I am in the right side pews & on the left is only one old couple, the female has a white curly hairdo like those old lady permanents. She’s closer to me, her husband to her left in the pew, they’re a few rows ahead.

I see a Priest or priests in front as if higher up & with them officiating is the ‘Prince of Wxx’ {this not the real person, just a symbol}.

He had an AFFAIR with a girl from my neighborhood which is poor. And within this area is one yet more lowly – a ghetto or slum. This girl came from there, status wise the lowest of the low!

And she has had a serious affair with this Prince – both of them being in love – for a good amount of time – yet no one knows about it. I hold in my hands a TINY BOOK, abut 4”x4” – maroon cover – that I hold up to him & tell him I’ve produced an account of that affair!

Now later on a CAT appears who is confined. I take care of it but it’s been confined so long it wants to RUN but I cannot allow it to run as it will get lost & could be in danger; I must keep it on a leash So I go out with the cat & we’re in a GOLDEN WHEAT FIELD, I have it on a long gray soft leash & I run at first but she wants to run faster, I run as fast as I can to give her the exercise.

Later this cat turns into the tiniest creature like a quarter inch diameter & is confined to a sort of plastic see-through purse or pouch – I hope she has enough air.

I did meet up with the female who had the AFFAIR with the Prince – a while after it was over. She’s wearing gray/blue, dull, short straight brown hair, not so good looking. She doesn’t want to think about or recall the affair, nor does she want to talk abut it – just wants to walk away without comment – don’t know why this is. Maybe HURT.

Later the Prince turns into a KING but can’t recall what else happens.   {End}

MEANING:

*{I suspect the Prince who turns into a King is the REAL Mr. A. And the woman of the lowest class would be ME because that’s how I am viewed being in the adult trade. But us having a significant affair seems far fetched, doesn’t make sense – it was just one incident. Unless it’s gone on in our HEADS.

The cat I have on the leash, the one that wants to run I suspect is the real story {like ‘running a story’ – ‘cat out of the bag’, a secret being told}. This is me anticipating telling what really happened between Mr. A & myself – which I HAVE NEVER TOLD.

And it starts out with me telling this ‘Prince’ of a man that I have the account of the story & I’m going to use it. Why is this in a Church, Priests up in front, one old couple to the left? Why is the book so SMALL – just 4”x4” & has a maroon cover?

Maroon cover is suffering. Who suffered him or me? Him I guess.   Why am I announcing this to him in a Church? Why is he a priest among priests? Why is the Church empty except for me & the old couple? Mother God, help!

MG:  It’s like an official announcement before God. You’re asking God for guidance on everything every day. So you are bringing this into the open, before God.

No one knows about this but you & apparently this old couple. She has curly white hair. This is a symbol of someone worried, anxious – white hair is when your hair turns white – it’s from torture or worry. And curly in this case is the same thing – ‘curls your hair’ is something like ‘makes your hair stand up,’ curling is something affecting your mind badly.

Not sure who this lady represents except your own flesh & the husband would be who? Jesus – a Saint?

You’re asking or announcing you’re going to bring out this story in the open.

The cat becoming super tiny in the see-through bag again, is the story. People will see through this bag ‘letting the cat out’ is seeing, knowing there’s a cat in the bag instead of a pig {how people in the old days used to substitute a cat for a pig & sold it for the price of a pig – the buyer not seeing what was in the bag.} Why does the cat become so tiny? It’s a small incident?}*

The Tiny Infant who Loves Me

There’s this tiny male infant here – he’s little but he can walk. He does some small thing wrong & I smack him on his backside. He’s wearing an outfit that is multicolor print – he’s covered all over, material fairly close to his body, not loose, covered from neck to ankles, long sleeves.

Right after I smack him he turns to me & exclaims,

“I love you!”

Puts his arms stretched to me to pick him up, which I do.   {End}

MEANING:

          *{This sounds like you giving a slap on the bum to this man, Mr. A – a small insult or punishment. And he is revealing to you what he felt or feels – love for you the way one feels for one’s Mother.

And you accept his love. A lot of behaviors happen – including revenge – because love is strong. If a person had lukewarm feelings they would not get so upset about being rejected or ‘slapped’ as shown here.}*

7-19-25 Mr A Loves Me – is this a symbol of Success or is it Him?

I am standing in an open space – yu can see miles around, & I do see a building maybe a couple thousand feet in front of me, but wide open spaces all around, & roads everywhere.

A man is standing across the road from me – it’s Arnold, who usually represents SUCCESS.

I’m speaking to him & I say,

“I was AFRAID OF YOU.”

Suddenly he is upon me, a close embrace, & he lies down on something ON HIS BACK & I’m on top of him.  He’s HUGE – like maybe 10’ tall, & I’m one third his size, lying on top of him & I say,

“I love you.”

He says nothing but the fact that he took me in his arms, & held me to himself in this position means love.

It is SO VIVID that it feels like a real person, but is it Arnold reconciling with me or a symbol of {earthly} SUCCESS?

He is wearing something with soft like flannel light green large checks.

MEANING:

*{Since he is so much bigger than me I doubt if it’s the real man. It’s a symbol of success coming my way & look – there is a BUILDING behind Arnold, the rest are wide open spaces. And later on in the night I see this white building with the 20 families & God asks me if I want it.

That seems to point so a success with my New Religion/Order. Somehow I obtain a BUIDING?

The WIDE OPEN SPACES & roads – it’s an unlimited or wide open opportunity. Roads are paths, ways to get places. There is SUCCESS right  before me – a building behind him – nothing else is about. And after I SPEAK to him he crosses the road which means HE/IT/SUCCESS COMES TO ME.

It’s after I say I WAS AFRAID. Was means BEFORE – means I am not afraid NOW. Then success comes to me & it is HUGE. And it is EARTY because he’s wearing GREEN.

And this is from God’s Love & now I ACCEPT this when I saw “I love you.” By loving God I love God’s Will, God’s bounty, God’s success. I do not fear it; I have faith, hope & trust in God.}*   {End}

A Building for the New Order

So earthly wealth was is it? Only to HELP OTHERS, not luxuries. I am saving all my bread to start an Order, New Religion for women & their children – a Matriarchy. I also dreamed of it last night I saw a building. God showed it to me & said how would I like to have this building, with 20 families? It was a white painted clapoard building maybe 3 floors I saw a wooden unpainted outside staircase.

Don’t know why God showed me this.  It’s what I thinkg of every day – I have so much to do to write. I must rewrite the Catholic Catechism to suit our New Religion. It won’t take long – it’s all in my head, but I just have to do it.  {End}

MEANING:          *{Goes with the previous dream. The building being WHITE is a sign of ‘good’ – ‘mighty white of you.’  The unpainted staircase, wood, outside, what does that mean?

A staircase is a series of steps going up & down. So is it a few steps to get this building?

Why ’20 families’? Maybe to show this will be a huge opportunity.}* {End}

College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

MAN FEELS DIMINISHED

                             7-10-25 Its HIM who feels DIMINISHED

                   I’m at the old farmhouse & have been having so much trouble, turmoil, reverses & such. I see the kitchen & connected to it the living room & things have IMPROVED.

          A LADY has come to me, a dear friend. Or I should say she has become dear to me as she is helping me a lot – getting it all straightened out.

          I see outside something to do with dogs. {means inner senses}

          Now this MAN comes to me.

          He’s one of TWO MEN I LOVE. He is the 2nd one that comes to me – the first has already been here.

          So the 2nd one comes – he wants my love, it’s like courtship. He wants to know if thing are better for me, if I’m OK.

          I tell him things have improved greatly due to this lady – who is a DOCTOR. We stand in the living room looking through a large picture window & I see about 4-5-6 HORSES, dark, & they seem to be partly covered with MUD & they are facing away from me, meandering there – the light is dim outside. He does NOT pay attention to the horses & he listens to me as I whisper in his ear {why on earth do I TELL him this?}

          “The husband of this lady is the man I’m in love with.”

          This is a TERRIBLE SECRET for two reasons; obviously I’m in love with my good friend’s husband – that’s bad. And second, this man who’s in love with me will be hurt it’s not him.

          So this 2nd man now leaves because I preferred someone else. But he comes back through the kitchen wearing sort of ‘pajamas’ – strange – the pants are loose cotton like large hound’s tooth checks {black on white}. And he brings back what looks like a golf club but it’s half the size of that, very thin & black – & he was using it before while he was here as a sort of support or cane to go through the snow {make sense? Haha} & now he’s returning it.

          I felt he wanted an EXCUSE to return because he still loves me & just wanted to see me. So I take the occasion to whisper in his ear,

          “I love you too.”

          But he disregards this it seams he’s 2nd best – & is going to leave – I just make a shrugging gesture like,

          “OK, whatever….”

          Knowing if his love is strong he will return, it will work, but if it isn’t no matter. I leave it to FATE or whatever should be, will be.

          He was also wearing a black beanie hat both times.

          MEANING:

          {This was complicated & mysterious; I could not even tackle it until the next day. I SENSE it’s about a man I’m working on a project with who has suddenly broke off communications.

          Somehow he feels DIMINISHED, he’s 2nd best – I love someone else More & even though I love him – it’s not enough – he wants to be #1!

          But that can’t be as the MAN I love is Jesus! And the woman who helps me is His Holy Mother – in this dream they are husband & wife or partners.

          She’ the one that is HEPING ME straightening out the numerous challenges I have – I show this man but he disregards my problems, he is only concerned with how much I LOVE HIM & if I don’t show HIM enough love, he is leaving.

          So that explains the rift or change – it’s his PRIDE – which has to be nourished!

          It’s like two paths – I’ve often been here before – some certain man wants me – even super rich, super handsome, super status men – but I turned them down because of my PATH with God would be interrupted – I SENSED it was not the right way.

          What are the DARK HORSES, some covered with mud – lol. It’s my LIFE STORY & the PROJECTS I undertook which AGAINT ALL ODDS &  unexpectedly, SUCCEEDED. It was the work for God, which God EMPOWERED – which the word did not understand or respect.

         This dream says this man doesn’t care about all that {as I look through the picture window, he doesn’t even care to look}– my life – my projects – it’s himself he cares about – being loved. But somehow – not sure how – he fees DIMINISHED by my LOVE OF GOD!

          The ‘dark horses,’ some being COVERED WITH MUD is how my projects were ‘thrown mud’ on or disparaged, criticized looked down on –– so many things.  The horses are walking away from me, at least one with HIS HEAD DOWN which means sorrow or depression, – which is how they make you feel when they disrespect you.

          He LEAVES but returns & when he does he reveals himself to me. The ‘cane or club’ –half the size of a golf club – is symbol of his PENIS. I have made him feel DIMINISHED- & it’s black & thin, which is total depression. He used it as a support means he leaned on his manhood/masculinity, feeling strong, but I took that away somehow {?}.

          The hound’s tooth, loose pants – well, a hound’s tooth sounds like anger – as a dog would bite – & this is CLEAR – black & white means CLEAR – like the ‘writing on the wall’ or ‘clear as black & white’. I made this man MAD but HOW? Must check what I sent him that day.

          Now the black beanie cap, what is that? Head is MIND – thoughts – so to put a BLACK CAP on this would be depression – the end – a funeral.

Something has REALLY turned him off!

            dark horse

someone or something whose abilities, plans, or feelings are little known to others. (From a race horse about which little or nothing is known.) It’sdifficult to predictwhowillwintheprize—therearetwo or threedarkhorses in thetournament. Everyonewassurprised at theresults of theelection.Thedarkhorsewon.

          1. Someone who unexpectedly wins a competition. NobodythoughtChericouldwintheraceafterbreakingherleglastyear,butsheturnedout to be a darkhorseandtookfirstplace. No onethoughtthebrashnewcomerwould be a threat to theestablishedcandidates,buthe’sturningout to be a realdarkhorse in thiscampaign.I’drather be a darkhorsethan be expected to winandhaveanythinglessseen as a failure.

2. Someone whose skills, abilities, plans, or intentions are or had been unapparent to others. Primarily heard in UK, Australia.Angelawassuddenlyviewed as a darkhorsewhenshedisplayedherbeautifulsculptures at theartfair.Nobodyknewshehadsuchartistictalent . Wow, I thoughtLizhadthehighestGPA in thegradeforsure.WhoknewDaniellewas a darkhorsewithsuchgoodgrades? Rosewas a darkhorsewhenshesigned up forthetalentshow—nooneknewshecouldsinglikethat!

College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

Why Did I Lift Weights? Begin New Book

7-10-25 Begin Answering Body Building Questions

  1. What was it that made you want to start lifting weights

This has multi dimensional answers. Do I really know my UNCONSCIOUS mind?  Mostly I wanted to have a BEAUTIFUL BODY.  Specifically it was 1964 & I was SIX MONTHS pregnant. Everyone told one once you have a baby, your body goes to pot. I did not want this to happen so weight lifting would prevent it.

          I saw men lift weights. My brother lifted weights for high school football.

          When I was 14 living on the farm in New Jersey we knew this gorgeous police officer named Jim Doud. He wore a black uniform, had dark hair, – everyone was in love with him. He often visited us to speak with Mom & a 19 year old female who lived with us. He knew them from ‘Thorne’s Milk Bar’ where they both worked.

          When he visited it was always in uniform so of course he oozed sex appeal, but I was just a skinny 14 year old.

           Mom & this other lady LOOKED DOWN on me, like I was nothing – they even told me, directly & in actions, that I was ‘nothing,’ ‘not a good sight to look at’ & people stared at me in the street {when I wore shorts & a tank top} NOT because I was pretty but OTHER REASONS {what I could not imagine}. My Mom sought to demoralize me, take away my PRIDE, self respect & confidence, & she had marshaled these two persons – the 19 yr old female & my 17 yr old brother – to help her – which they gladly did for years. {They were see-sawed up when I was down.}

          So you have to picture this waif, like Cinderella, broken down by her family & peers – subjected to daily hate – feeling inconsequential but wanting to lift her head high. I was the house slave. They all worked outside & gained money. I was given no allowance but had to do all the housework as well as ironing their clothes & baby sitting a toddler. I was not allowed to cheerlead even, while my brother played football, because there was too much work to do at home.

          An incident with Jim Doud the cop proved they were wrong – I was not ugly. In fact, I had APPEAL FOR MEN.

          One day Jim Doud stops by the house & we are alone. He aid he thought my Mom or other lady were there.  I made him some tea & we sat in the kitchen. Then we step outside & he sees my bro’s weights lying there. He sets up some cinder blocks & loads up a barbell & puts it on them. He then takes off his shirt & t-shirt & proceeds to demonstrate how he lifts weights. I am in awe, just stood there shy as can be, hardly saying a word.

          Then the 19 year old comes home & is FLUSTRED that Jim is doing the weight routine in front of me, half naked & we’re all alone – as both she & Mom were infatuated with him. She keeps asking me,

          “How long has he been here?”

          over & over, worried something might have happened, & I keep lying,

“Ten minutes.”

            Josie aborted my meeting with the beautiful cop & I eventually forgot about it.

          Many years later as I was writing my biography the incident came to mind & Mother God {within me} said,

          “He was grooming you –  you were only 14 but in 3 years you would have been legal, so this was making your acquaintance. He was attracted to you – not your Mom or Josie.  But you could not imagine it as you were so beaten down. But this is proof of your desirability to men.

          In this demoralized state, shortly after – age 16 – I got a ride to California & there started my career. I was keen to prove myself, that I was good looking. I suspected I had a good body. I was obsessed with entering beauty contests but I learned most local yokel contests were fixed – as ugly girls who were related to the promoters & judges got the top spots – I saw movie-star quality females not even place!

          But the ONE contest that was NOT fixed was Miss NUDE Universe. Long story explained elsewhere. I WON that & it got me into Playboy.

          And I became a dancer – first go-go dancing where I proved myself a star of sorts, then headliner of the Coast to Coast Baker-Berger Circuit, where ending up at the Roxy Theater on 42nd St. NYC, downstairs was Tom Minichiello’s mid-city gym. I saw a sign in the window – Miss Americana. Asked him if I had a chance & he said YES. That was the contest where I met Franco & Arnold – 1972.

          To go back to 1964 I was pregnant with my child little Kellie, living in Santa Monica next to the Pier, went to an IFBB store where Dave Draper {who later sued Joe Weider was usng his pics without paying him} was sitting working on something. The man refused to sell me over 5 lb dumbbells, he feared I might hurt myself. I took them & went to another store for 10 pounders & eventually used my husband’s regular weights. He guided me on the standard routine which I kept for the rest of my life with some improvements.

          I also understood that the hard lifting of weights dissipated some of the anger at being abused – I had PTSD from what Mom did for years. You know how people are encouraged to beat a pillow with a plastic baseball bat or do some other extreme exercise to vent negative energies – it works. So the weights served multiple functions for me. Throughout my career I trained almost every day – I even took 15 lbs dumbbells with me on the road like the Playboy Club Chicago. I intended to keep what they advertised as “Miss Nude Universe – the most beautiful body in the World.” Someone brought my Mom to see me in NYC & they said she CRIED when she saw me on stage. Did not explain why. After all that hate & abuse – before she died she said to the other kids, “Rasa was the best one.”

            The gym where the famous body builders trained was close to me – “Gold’s Gym”- Venice, at that time a bit of a slum. I did not go there {it was men only} but I frequently went across the street from my apt to play volleyball – the renowned Muscle Beach.   {End}

College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

Priest Tries to Stop Me – How Patriarchy Works

But I smash through

          I was in a giant Church flying along the ceiling, round & round. It was the paintings of the Sistine Chapel but this was larger, & I was having the time of my life flying by the ceiling & chanting Hallelujah! Over & over.

          *{This I me exclaiming “Woman, Thou Art God” or something to do with emancipation of women & I am joyful. My spiritual power makes me do these things. I represent Matriarchy, female family/world dominance.}*

          A Priest, who could not fly, wanted to stop me & he found some technical way to climb up on something & he grabs me & we struggle as he wants to STOP ME from EXPRESSING MYSELF. I seem to be pulling on his flesh & skin tightly – on his hands & not sure what he does to me but our hands are in powerful combat – he is strong & so am I.

          *{The Priest represents PATRIARCHY & he wants to stop me & make the world believe men are dominant. He cannot fly means he has no SPIRITUAL POWER & he can only stop me-woman through PHYSICAL means. We are both equally strong PHYSICALLY. In this dream we are pinching each other’s hands intensely…this symbolizes how SATAN cannot reach Heaven or where we are in our SPIRITUAL NATURE but he can only TEMPT, distract us, derail us ON EARTH, in our flesh & that is the only way he can top us on earth from entertaining the joys of our spiritual liberty. This might cast a thought to how I got female bodybuilding established – changing the Overton window so they would start body building contests – so women could face the demons of Patriarchy on the physical level, by gaining machisma.}*

          After that he tries another tactic to interfere with me. He & his associates find a man who is like St. Joseph & they parade him through the Church. People believe in this man so much – he’s a symbol of goodness – family man & Saint – that the attention goes away from me & everyone looks at him. So this is the second way this man interferes with me.

          This St. Joseph person, I see him close walking by with men around him & he looks like “Family Joe, the man next door,” with straight light hair & a beige sweater, soft, & he gives off a feeling of innocence.  I only see him from the back, head & shoulders, with men close around him escorting him like he’s their ICON.

          *{Presenting this man who is St. Joseph or an ICON / REPRESENTATION of him is saying,

          “Man is the head of the family, ordained by God. He is the one we must look up to – not woman – Look TO THE MAN for God’s leadership…But understand, this is a SYMBOL that the Priest, or a man, has CREATED. He says this – not God. He ‘cannot fly’ – this is all happening on earth from the flesh, not from the Spirit of God, the Holy Spirit. Here men idolize certain men – hero worship.}*

          But then I have to go to the rest room & when I’m in there, my original enemy the Priest, sets up some kind of contraption around me – a box which is painted white & it has several sides but it goes round & round, around the sides there are openings but not big enough to get out of. I try to get out of this box – it was a setup – I heard those guys talking about it – & it’s not possible, but nevertheless, I smash through it.

          *{I SMASH THROUGH the Patriarchy with ‘Woman Thou Art God’ – female body building & various other exploits including ‘Stripping for God.’ I break free of the ‘glass ceiling’, the restrictions against women by demonstration, by activities, not only words.}*

Then I go to that Priest, grab him by the neck as if to strangle him & exclaim into his face,

“How would you like to be jammed into a box you can’t get out of?”

*{And having ESCAPED – smashing through – I now turn the tables & CONFRONT the Patriarchy asking how would they like to be restricted?  Notice the box they enslaved me in was painted WHITE as they are pretending it’s a GOOD THING. It has OPENINGS but you can’t get free – the openings aren’t big enough. They wanted to restrict our freedoms, keep us enclosed within boundaries set up by them & convince us it was righteous.}*   {End}

College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

Pete Jackson reminds us: War is a Racket!

WAR.  It seems to be as old as time itself.  And so many people seem to think it is inevitable.  However, it turns out that is not really true. War is neither timeless nor inevitable.  It has a beginning, and it has an end.  The beginning was about 7000 years ago (with the advent of patriarchy), while the end will be coming very soon (with the inevitable fall of patriarchy and rise of Matriarchy in the not-too-distant future).  And the end can’t come soon enough!
(Especially now with the world being at 89 seconds to midnight (!) on the Doomsday Clock. That is, the risk of nuclear war is the highest it has been in quite a while now.  If, God forbid, a “hot” war between the USA and Russia and/or China or North Korea were to occur, the odds of it going nuclear are practically certain.  Even a hot war with Iran is an extremely risky move to say the least, and thus very ill-advised for the USA to join!  The best that one could hope for in that scenario is an even more destabilized Middle East, and it goes downhill from there.)

Patriarchy inherently rewards aggression and violence, no doubt about that.  And it messes with our heads so as to condition us to accept such violence as normal.  And of course there is men’s tendency to think that war and scarcity are inevitable, which become self-fulfilling prophecies.  Women, on the other hand, would tend to reject such backwards thinking if they were in charge.  The late, great Buckminster Fuller himself said as much.
But there is also another reason why war is likely to occur under patriarchy, and that reason is discussed in depth by Major General Smedley Butler in his 1935 book, War Is A Racket.  Put simply, war is indeed a racket that is designed to further enrich the already ultra-rich oligarchs.  In other words, its genesis is none other than evil and powerful men who are willing to lie, cheat, steal, and kill for filthy lucre, and those sycophantic lackeys and ignorant masses who are brainwashed and duped to go along with it.   And of course, we know that patriarchy itself inevitably leads to oligarchy in the first place due to its “might makes right” and “winner take all” paradigm (that is nowadays most often cleverly disguised by the persistent and utterly hollow myth of “meritocracy”).

Indeed, patriarchy itself can be thought of as a gender war writ large, and the only way to end it once and for all–and all other wars that come from it–is for men to surrender to Women.  It’s a war men have lost before the war even began, despite winning nearly every battle–men just don’t realize it yet.
That said, General Butler’s book is more about how the perennial racket of war actually works in practice, and how to smash it for good (as opposed to the why the oligarchy exists in the first place).  But it goes a very long way towards explaining it, and he would be spinning in his grave if he were to see today’s massive, imperialistic war machine.

Maj Gen Smedley Butler’s book is the greatest anti-war document written

From the Wikipedia article:

In War Is a Racket, Butler points to a variety of examples, mostly from World War I, where industrialists, whose operations were subsidized by public funding, were able to generate substantial profits, making money from mass human suffering.The work is divided into five chapters:

  1. War is a racket
  2. Who makes the profits?
  3. Who pays the bills?
  4. How to smash this racket!
  5. To hell with war!

It contains this summary:”War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small ‘inside’ group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.”
Then he goes on to discuss who exactly profits from it and how.  It turns out it is not just weapons manufacturers, but also the big banks and other businesses that directly or indirectly deal with it as well.  In fact, the banksters are probably the biggest beneficiaries of war, since they lend money to finance it and then claw back so much in interest.  And manufacturers of non-weapons goods also have a market to sell their wares to in the military.  And of course, let’s not forget all the resources plundered from the other countries as “spoils of war”.

(And now we can add “defense contractors”, aka mercenary corporations, such as DynCorp, Blackwater, Halliburton, KBR, Raytheon, et al. to the list of war profiteers as well.)
War is, of course, a negative-sum game overall.  It does not really create wealth on balance, it actually destroys far more than it creates.  But it certainly brings in a ludicrous amount of ill-gotten wealth in the form of profit, plunder, and usury for the oligarchy.  As for the idea that it “stimulates the economy” in the short run, that is technically true, but as neo-Keynesian economist Dr. Paul Krugman has famously noted years ago, a faked alien invasion would be every bit as stimulating, but without all of the serious side effects such as countless deaths, injuries, PTSD, family breakdown, resource depletion, pollution, ecological damage, and property damage.
In other words, it steals, kills, and destroys.  Kinda like….SATAN. 
And guess who foots the bill for it all?  You guessed it–the taxpayers.  The oligarchs pull the wool over our eyes, while laughing all the way to the bank.  But truly the biggest part of the bill is paid for in blood by the soldiers themselves.  And even for those who survive the horrors of war, it still takes its toll on them regardless, both physically and psychologically.  And these soldiers generally hail not from the ranks of the wealthy, but rather from the poor and broader working class.  Not much has changed in that regard today, it seems.

(Note that since the gold standard was abolished in 1971, our Monetarily Sovereign federal government does not actually need taxes to fund anything, since they can just “print” (create) the money now if they wanted.  But since wars inherently chew through ludicrous amounts of non-monetary resources, all wars are thus inflationary regardless, so We the People still pay for it in the form of higher prices.)

And that’s to say nothing of the human toll of civilians in the other countries as well, who bear the brunt of it.
Then, General Butler discusses how to smash this evil racket once and for all.  To summarize, the three steps are as follows:  1) Take the profit out of war, 2) Put it up to a vote (limited to those who would be eligible for the draft) as to whether or not a war should be declared, and 3) Limit our military forces to home defense purposes.  Otherwise, nothing will stop the racket.

Again, as noted on Wikipedia:

In the booklet’s penultimate chapter, Butler recommended three steps to disrupt the war racket:

1. Making war unprofitable. Butler suggests that the means for war should be “conscripted” before those who would fight the war:

It can be smashed effectively only by taking the profit out of war. The only way to smash this racket is to conscript capital and industry and labour before the nation’s manhood can be conscripted. […] Let the officers and the directors and the high-powered executives of our armament factories and our steel companies and our munitions makers and our ship-builders and our airplane builders and the manufacturers of all other things that provide profit in war time as well as the bankers and the speculators, be conscripted — to get $30 a month [NOTE: that’s $667/month in 2024 dollars], the same wage as the lads in the trenches get.

2. Acts of war to be decided by those who fight it. He also suggests a limited referendum to determine if the war is to be fought. Eligible to vote would be those who risk death on the front lines.
3. Limitation of militaries to self-defense. For the United States, Butler recommends that the Navy be limited, by law, to operating within 200 miles of the coastline, and the Army restricted to the territorial limits of the country, ensuring that war, if fought, can never be one of aggression. 

Indeed, the time to end all of this insanity and evil is yesterday.  So what do we do in the meantime while patriarchy still exists?  Thus, inspired by Butler, I propose that a new law be passed that we call the War Pigs Act, named after both the ineffectual and toothless War Powers Resolution of 1973 and the 1970 Black Sabbath song “War Pigs”.  The first part of the new law would put some teeth in the War Powers Act by closing the loopholes and holding the President liable for any consequences of a war that is not authorized by Congress and is not during a state of emergency caused by an attack on the USA.  And absent a formal declaration of war by Congress, absolutely NO war may last beyond 90 days (60 days followed by a 30 day withdrawal), save for a temporary authorization of force that expires 90 days after the authorization passes or 180 days after the war began (if it began before the new law went into effect), whichever occurs first.  After that, there must be a formal declaration of war, or the war must end.  Period.

The second part of the law would implement some of General Butler’s recommendations from his book, taking into account that we currently have an all-volunteer military.  Take the profit out of war, first of all.  Use the tax code to do so.  And for any war lasting beyond six months (which by definition would now require a formal declaration of war), require an annual limited plebiscite of all citizens that would be eligible for military service.  Make it a non-secret ballot such that those who vote “yes” would be drafted if we run out of volunteers, followed by those who abstain from the vote if necessary.  Those who vote “no” would be exempt from any such draft.  A kind of “consensual conscription”, if you will.  We would all have skin in the game.  Women would be included as well, but before they draft the very first Woman, we should draft men in their 40s and 50s first.  That’s the demographic group who starts the wars but rarely fights them.  It’s only fair, right fellas?  Watch as war becomes a thing of the past, at least for the stupid ones and decade(s) long quagmires like Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.

(It would also be a good idea to do like the Iroquois once did:  give Women elders the power to VETO any decision to go to war.  That alone would prevent essentially all wars that are not waged in strict and absolute defense of the homeland.)

For the record, I am personally 100% against the draft on principle.  Unless absolutely necessary, I view it as a form of slavery and involuntary servitude, and if there were ever such a thing as a truly just war (as per St. Augustine’s Just War Theory criteria), which is about as rare as a unicorn, conscription would be unnecessary, since volunteers would be plentiful.  And today’s technology further makes it largely obsolete to raise such large numbers of boots on the ground.  But since nuance, gray areas, and exceptions that prove every rule do in fact exist in the real world (see WWII and the American Civil War, for example), I will note that if we ever must have a draft, only those who voted yes (or chose not to vote) for such a war should be drafted.

General Butler was a true American hero and patriot.  After his distinguished career in the United States Marine Corps including during WWI (during and after which he eventually found out just how much of a racket it really was), he later quashed an attempted Wall Street fascist coup against FDR’s government in 1933-1934.  Yes, there really was a plot by the Rockefellers, Mellon Bank, Standard Oil, General Motors, Goodyear, US Steel, and many others (including pro-Nazi forces!) to overthrow the federal government and install their own fascist dictatorship do their bidding, complete with concentration camps for, in their own words, “Jews and other undesirables”.  And the money for the plot bankrolled by the big banks/corporations was funneled through Prescott Bush’s companies (yes, THAT Bush, who also did business with the Nazis as well).  They all thought they could use Butler for the plot and he pretended to play along at first, only to foil their plot by telling Congress about it just before it went ahead.  He literally saved America from falling to full-blown fascism, in other words.  He was indeed history’s original whistleblower, and then in 1935, he wrote his magnum opus, which unfortunately fell on deaf ears the world over.  
War was a racket then, and still is today.  And it always will be as long as it exists.

As General Butler famously said, 

“TO HELL WITH WAR!”
“Either war is obsolete, or man is.”

— Buckminster Fuller

“War, what is it good for?  Absolutely NOTHING!”

— Edwin Starr

“Come the war, come the avarice, come the war, come hell…Come attrition, come the reek of bones, come attrition, come hell…This is why, why we fight, why we lie awake…And this is why, this is why we fight…”

— The Decemberists

“Now the labor leader’s screaming when they close the missile plant, United Fruit screams at the Cuban shore. Call it peace or call it treason, call it love or call it reason, but I ain’t marching anymore.”

— Phil Ochs

“I declare the war is over, it’s over, it’s over…”

— Phil Ochs

“But the hardest thing I’ll ask you, if you would only try, is take your children by their hands and look into their eyes.  And there you’ll see the answer you should have seen before.  If we win the wars at home, there’ll be no fighting anymore”

— Phil Ochs 
“We share the same biology, regardless of ideology. But what might save us, me and you, Is if the Russians love their children too”
— Sting and Sergei Prokofiev 

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

Females Future–the New Order

 

Females Future – the New Order from Pete Jackson & Rasa Von Werder

Position Statement Pete Jackson 3-8-24

Responses from Rasa Von Werder

15COMMANDS copy.jpg HEM 

The following is a list of questions and answers about the positions that I, Ajax the Great (Pete Jackson) take on various issues.  Opinions expressed herein are personal and not necessarily those of the Matriarchy movement as a whole or any of its members, including Guru Rasa Von Werder and William Bond.  Unless otherwise noted, my views and those of my own True Spirit of America Party (TSAP) are basically equivalent.  And it should go without saying that the answers to all of these questions will ultimately be decided by the Women of the future.

(Last updated March 2024)

Q1)  Why do you believe that Women are the superior gender overall?

A1)  Because it is largely self-evident.  Ashley Montagu discussed it in detail in his 1953 bombshell of a book, The Natural Superiority of Women, which has been updated several times since then and never successfully refuted.  And he is by no means the only one to have made such observations.  Deep down, we all kinda know as much even if we don’t want to admit it.

Rasa0322Scans181 Rasa0322Scans185 Rasa0322Scans184 Rasa0322Scans183 Rasa0322Scans182 Rasa0322Scans189

 

Rasa says: Indeed, men know it & are in terror of women. Just the mention of women’s rights makes their shackles rise up & they go into ‘fight or fight’ mode. I have had revenge taken on me for speaking the subject, both in person & on the internet, including death threats. Friends with a husband-wife, the husband told me ‘You won’t be welcome here any more if you talk like that.’ {It was MILD stuff – Other men locally, when I was talking to their wives & girlfriends, – one of them pretending to shake my hand, as usual tried to break it in a squeeze. But results were gotten, each woman got things out of him they had asked for for years – one got a new refrigerator, the other a 3k sound system to practice her music} Why so extreme? Because they take it as a personal attack on them, their manhood, their RIGHT to be dominant & deep inside they FEAR female dominance because they KNOW the woman is the BOSS – the MOTHER – & she WILL take over if not held down by all means necessary. As William Bond says: “When the cork is not held down it rises up” – as women have when the strongholds against them have loosened.

Pete Jackson continues:   Q2)  What kind of government do you think Women should create upon taking over?

A2)  I believe that Women will make that decision themselves, and have faith that they will make the right one, but if they want my advice I would recommend social democracy, democratic socialism, or something in between to start with.  From there on, I would recommend moving towards what Riane Eisler calls the “partnership” model as well as 
https://susanelizabethryan.com/2019/07/20/r-buckminster-fuller-on-women-1968/ for the future.

 

Rasa continues: OK this is a DEEP & TRICKY question & there are important nuances here, factors that NO ONE ever speaks of to my hearing.

In the New Religion-Order I am starting – it’s aimed at WOMEN – not men, NOT equality or any kind of ‘egalitarianism’ Riane Eisler or Heidi GotNerd not withstanding. It is ‘safe space’ – female sequestered, protected & secure, female standing on her own two feet, no man need apply except learning our religion from the OUTSIDE, or for the most part, donating their sperm as we breed for our own community. There might be some relationships, close knit, even marriage, but this will not be the norm, the norm is the Order is the second ‘parent’ of the child begotten here & we provide all that is necessary for them. We’ll suggest to ur females of breeding age not to ook for the traditional husband hook up, but to see men as subordinate – providing NOT security but love, affection if any, & sperm if the female wants kids. They can ‘come & go’ or if they stay, we’ll talk about how they wan to work it. Do they want nighty visits like the Mosuos? Or once a week dates? Or do they want to live with the guy – in one of our Villages or completely off premises? Whatever she does, the order, if she remains in good standing, backs her up. If anything GOES WRONG she has the order for a safe haven.

{We anticipate men getting bent out of shape when she spends more time with us than with him, but for her to receive all the benefits, it will take time. What is he going to do for her, sitting in the house, waiting on him? Nothing, except ‘do this, do that – keep the house clean & organized, provide me love & affection & sex, support my needs.’ When he goes on the computer he’ll be looking for other women, chatting with them – he has his slave working, he can have fun. Or else he goes to the bars or hookers looking for diversion & leaves her alone or TIED TO THE CHILDREN.

Rasa0322Scans188 Rasa0322Scans187 Rasa0322Scans186 Rasa0322Scans193 Rasa0322Scans198

But at the Order, she has SISTERHOOD-STRENGTH – & this is one of the most important features of the Order; total CHILD CARE SERVICES! There is nothing that more chains a woman to the house than her children – men planned it that way {been there, done that.}. In the days of Matriarchy, with extensive families dominated by women – there were sisters, Aunts, Moms & Grandmas around. One could do whatever they had to do without fear of leaving children alone. But with a man as the head of the household – no women around – she has no help except cumbersome child care, where usually it’s daytime only. And it’s expensive – & unreliable or could be dangerous. Our services will be FREE from other members who volunteer, including a surrogate Mom who is there for overnight & protracted absences. This is a TREMENDOUS CROSS off the backs of the Mothers!

There is more. The woman can HAVE FUN with us – outdoor & indoor recreation. When the weather’s fine we have basketball, badminton, croquet, horseshoes, hiking in the ‘wilderness’ Villages, sitting around meditating in Nature – indoor sports when weather’s not good or after dark:, table tennis, chess, checkers, cards, all the usual indoor games.

Besides that, each facility will have one hour DANCING nightly for all ages including those with infirmities {they can sit in a chair for dancing – which I’m doing right now} & after that, sitting by the large fireplace having a group discussion or reading – one hour with kids, one without.

We can have a ‘movie night’ once a week with a large screen – where we make popcorn, grill hot dogs & cheese sandwiches at the fireplace while we watch. {No microwave ovens ever – they cause cancer.}

The Order offers meaningful work – paid & volunteer – plus camaraderie, a shoulder to lean on, a roof over her head, a religion that makes sense – FREEDOM.

Rasa0322Scans175 Rasa0322Scans173 Rasa0322Scans177 - Copy Rasa0322Scans176 Rasa0322Scans179 Rasa0322Scans178 Rasa0322Scans180 Rasa0322Scans195 Rasa0322Scans196

Given all this a husband will be jealous & demand,

“You married me, not the Order. What are you doing over there? Your place is at home, taking care of me & the kids!”

Yes, there will be a CONFLICT especially if the wife is at the Order every day. Even if she goes there one day a week – you can bet your bottom dollar he will protest! I know women who wanted one night a week ‘girl’s night out’ & the guys complained SO MUCH they finally gave up. And yet guys often go, after work, to a bar or a friend’s house, or to see other women – you name it, they act like they are free as a bird – you’re not – ESPECIALLY if you have kids – you MUST STAY HOME!

For years I wondered why single women are not invited to married people’s homes. Then finally figured out – single women ae Sisters / supporters / a way out, for the married woman. They offer a backup – they give a shoulder to lean on – they even have a place you can stay after he beats you up. They can give financial support. For all these reasons, married women are not supposed to have female friends, unless they are MARRIED & presumed to be owned by another man – kept under his control. {You’d be surprised how automatic & sub-rosa that control is!}

But single men ARE invited to married households because they give support to the man! I’ve witnessed married men, backed up with their friends, intimidate & sass their wives. Men work IN GANGS, but women aren’t supposed to! The gang is your little army!

But THERE IS MORE & it is important. Lots of men are pleased by the idea of equal partnership rather than women going off on their own terms. But LISTEN:

Women need REHABILITATION. They have been INJURED for thousands of years, beaten, demoralized; they have been robbed of their IDENTITY!

That’s why God gave me the dictum: Woman, Thou Art God, to get them back on track, on their own two feet, their own identity, their Source, which is God.

Rasa0322Scans104 Rasa0322Scans130 Rasa0322Scans133 Rasa0322Scans134 Rasa0322Scans138 Rasa0322Scans148 Rasa0322Scans147 Rasa0322Scans149 Rasa0322Scans159

They have been told that God is a Man, the Son of God is a man, & the Holy Spirit is neither male nor female. That means women are not a part of the ‘Holy Trinity.’ They have been left out of the Kingdom of God! The Catholic Church gives the impression that woman is only of use as An instrument for bringing a MAN into the world – the Son of God. All her prerogatives, her greatness, beauty & superiority comes from HIM – she has nothing of God ON HER OWN – it’s all HIM.

And so, although she’s the Greatest Woman on Earth – she’s only a reflection of a man, she does not stand on her own two feet! This is the doctrine the Catholic Church proclaims, Protestants notwithstanding – they say Catholics WORSHIP Mary but the CC FORBIDS IT! {We in the New Religion worship Mary equal to Jesus.}

That’s one issue, there’s more.

I’ve just been watching videos of horse rehabilitation. They are malnourished; you can see the bones sticking out from the sides. Hair on the sides is falling off in clumps. They are infested with parasites & worms in their guts. Some are so dehydrated & starved weak, they collapse, can’t even stand up. Some have hoofs that need trimming badly, they have trouble walking. One had abscesses in his teeth; he had trouble eating & was suffering. Horses are depressed, forlorn, given up hope, afraid. They need rehab because they’ve been abused, neglected, their needs were not met by the ‘owners’ or those in control.

Also saw a dog-rehab center. A man who gets into the pen with new dogs makes videos. There’s a sweet medium size black dog- he’s scared – most of them are scared when he gets into the pen & sits with them. The man says,

“A dog like this, when he’s adopted, needs time. If he wants to go under the bed & stay there let him. Don’t expect him to behave warm & bubbly like a regular dog, let him adjust. He might want to sit in a corner, be alone. Leave him be. Give him all the time he needs.”

Again, reading about the orphan kids in Romania, there were thousands – so many they didn’t have enough care givers, & the kids were neglected. They were sent off to adopting parents in the West & in America. I saw a documentary 40 years ago re one of them. He couldn’t get along with anyone – he’d have fits. Neaighor kids were driven away & didn’t want to come back. No one could control, appease or help him in any normal way. This rehab expert said,

“All you can do is whoever is in the house, adults, grab him & restrain him, lie on top of him for as long as he takes to quiet & calm down.”

This abnormal therapy did help, & he was finally able to part time get along with neighbor kids & play.

 

I’ve met many abused people in my farm area community. The’e now grown & told me their stories. Some adjusted – some did not so well. It depends how bad it was & their own disposition. One young gys you can’t leave aloe with his young brother – he was abut 26 whe I met them, his bro maybe 24. If they were alone, the oder one would beat up bis brother, every time. JuWhy? It was his reaction to the rage he felt at a stepdad his Mm brought home from a bar. This man got drunk every night, came back to the house, sodomized BOTH boys & raped their sister. During the day, as ‘man of the house,’ he fed them DOG FOOD. The social services finally came over & straightened the mess out.

Both these young men could not live alone – had a care giver lady who looked out for them, all lived in a large apt. I visited as one of the bys worked for me. She also told her story of being sexually abused age 6 by their neighbor, when she complained to her Dad he said,

“all men do that.”

And he was abusing the neighbor’s little girl 6 years old.

Another example is slaves. People that have been slaves for generations cannot be expected to act like the aristocrats who managed them as serfs, slaves & peasants.

I put it to you that women have been abused. They need time to recover. You assume, because women are genetically & other ways superior, they can right now take positions of authority leadership, dominion over men, over family, over businesses, governments, all that.

Horses are way stronger than men but men have contraptions {the bit}, guns, whips, all kinds weapons to keep horses in check. Those that fight back end up in the bone yard.

Rasa0322Scans029 Rasa0322Scans032 Rasa0322Scans031 Rasa0322Scans036 Rasa0322Scans037 Rasa0322Scans048 Rasa0322Scans047 Rasa0322Scans050 Rasa0322Scans049 Rasa0322Scans051 Rasa0322Scans054 Rasa0322Scans053

Bulls are way stronger than men but the ring in their nose renders them docile.

Elephants are stronger than men. But they kill the parents right in front of the baby. They take the baby & use cymbals & cans & make loud noises for days until he doesn’t know right from left, back to front up or down, he’s disoriented. They make him so confused, so afraid, he obeys whatever he’s led to do.

I tell you anyone who thinks women can take charge of the family & the world without an Order such as this is a fool Women have been injured, they need time to adjust, to find themselves & regain their identity, their relationship with God, who is within them.

I’m not going to get into all the symptoms women portray as reactions to their abuse, but there are many, mostly based on fear, confusion & brainwashing.

Our New Religion, Order needs time to ease their fears & give them Faith in themselves & their God, to unconfuse them with the Truth – & de-program them from all the brainwashing.

To have the enemy with them at this time delays their rehab. The enemy is the smiling assassin, filled with lies – the false promises, & this enemy reminds them of where they have been – the memories haunt them & attach them to the sinister past. They need to SEPARATE & find themselves, they need time – years in fact. My goal for the Order is 120 years – 4 generations – before women gain what they need to stand tall without a doubt they can do it.

Egalitarian my foot. Before that can even begin to happen much has to occur. Besides, in the end, it will be a woman-dominant word. Take note of William Bond’s writing on how men cannot deal with equality – they either lead or you lead them. With men slowly going extinct – hopefully not blowing up the planet before then – there is no question on which gender has to be in charge.  {end}   Rasa Von Werder

397217665_2226378250885086_2286305383880400490_n 396951066_637542328536167_9199633098571339693_n 398099910_10210570417533950_6553765307406620462_n 396731985_1143416603497386_8146761046070943253_n 398053438_887011349449953_3488022662457929569_n 398493378_640588024947955_2255249918719731985_n 397996970_640893994917358_6137859964469670850_n 398843291_6684925064953098_7231551965390311902_n 398181066_3340765846068227_3516112680046844717_n 397555700_367493362330596_6027707453852770544_n 399180646_1337565607120023_4170702151563546820_n 399725579_637972831874858_8324364215072733880_n 398212738_341907511847297_9149348252089761804_n

College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

New Order for Women

New Order for Women – What’s it About 2-3-24

The New Religion & Matriarchal Order for Women is Still a Mystery to Some

REGINA JACOBSON 

William Bond writes:  

Hi Everyone

One thing I have been thinking about with starting a matriarchal community is that, why would anyone want to join it? 

 

We can see the attraction for women, they will be in charge. But I know what many women would say, “what’s the catch”. This is because many women would have problems in believing men will submit to female rule. 

 

So we have to think about men, why would they want to join a matriarchal community where they will be bossed around by women? Femdom men would like it, but would most ordinary men want that? 

 

People will only join up if they think their lives will be better in a matriarchal community. So I think we have to think about how to motivate people to want to join.

Thomas_Gainsborough_GAT017 THOMAS_GAINSBOROUGH_LADY_GEORGIANA_CAVENDISH TITIAN 2 titian-paintings-prints-reproductions-1363089357_org tumblr_mejxr24kWQ1rv2dfko1_500 velaZQUEZ 2 victorian_Lady_figure.327104319_std 

Pete Jackson says:

William, your response is tangential to this conversation, and really part of another ongoing and perennial discussion, but still something to think about nonetheless. Not so much for Rasa’s New Order for Women, as men joining as full members as it were would be counter to the basic principle of safe space for Women, but rather more for any other alternative, unaffiliated or very partially affiliated Matriarchal and quasi-Matriarchal communities, both religious and secular, both segregated and integrated, and everything in between, etc. that will inevitably pop up in the future.  (To put it in the lingua franca of the world’s currently largest but declining church, and thus make it a bit easier to wrap one’s mind around:  some such communities will be in “full communion” with the Bishop of Binghamton (aka Rasa), others in “partial communion”, and still others will be de facto “excommunicate and anathema”, but even so, all of which nonetheless have their own roles to play in the broader movement.)  You certainly make some great points overall.  Thank you.  Best wishes to you both, Pete

 

Rasa: These are really good thoughts, very insightful.

 

Pete adds:

          I don’t think I have anything else to add to the conversation at this time, or anything else about the new Order right now, but another time I might.  We shall see if I have any further ideas that are actually worth sharing, and not just me blowing hot air.  It’s a topic that truly deserves the utmost respect, not mere silly armchair philosophizing or “shooting from the hip” as I sometimes tend to do when I get out of my depth. Though I think I am better than I used to be.  (And unless specifically otherwise noted, all of my blog articles past, present, and future should be presumed to pertain to the society of the nation and world as a whole and my general vision thereof, not to the Order, regardless of the topic.)

 

          Rasa answers:

          Indeed, what William is asking is a new subject. Pete & I discussed the freedom vs. security measures I plan to take regarding men wanting to come to our dance/gatherings. We finished that, now this. {But a lot more must be said re this in future.}

          Why would women want to join our order?

          These reasons: Women will have a place of SECURITY in the way a good loving & secure family would provide for its children.

          We have finances. They will never be broke, penniless, homeless, worrying re bill payment. They have a home to go to – it is the Order. If they leave to get married & it goes bad, they return to our premises, with their kids if any. Support will be given for education & starting their own businesses. Support for all levels of educational on & off premises. We have our own schooling including higher education & show business. But if they choose to go off premises or if other types education is appropriate for them –{some women might want to learn architecture & construction, car repair, law enforcement, nursing & the like} – we help them study & graduate. They can be of service to the Order with these skills.

 

          We have the New Religion aimed to Empower women – learning to worship the God within ourselves, not a God of the Patriarchs. This is cleansing of the mind from the brainwash put upon us for thousands of years. We don’t need a Father, but a Mother God. We will conduct intensive studies into how our Empire of women fell & retrieve the lost Wisdom of women. All that women are & what they are meant to be will be explored – women as Mothers, Leaders of the family & the world, honoring the Great Infinite Mother God that made us & training our children in this positive new way.

          There will be emotional & physical security & safety away from men. Where women are, especially the young, here come the men, trying to tell us what to do – Intimidating, harassing, calling us names like ‘man haters, bullying us, challenging us, even threats if it comes to that. A world filled with Patriarchal men is NOT OUR FRIEND. We need to GET AWAY & this is where.

          Women need SAFE SPACE. Where will the go? Men have the entire world, which is on their side. Besides that, to get away from women & family, they have men’s clubs & brotherhood. They have men’s activities like sports & hunting. But women are supposed to be confined, barefoot & pregnant, no ladies night out every week – no sisterhood. Women literally, once married, are not allowed SINGLE female friends. It’s a cultural taboo! Because single women will EMPOWER the married female – give her support, a place to ESCAPE, mental & emotional strength, even finances, & this is a NO NO as Sisterhood in patriarchy is TABOO!

          The Order is a refuge for single & married women – a place to hide, to escape, to be private, to think her own thoughts & dream her own dreams. – A place of strength & love from her Sisters, a female Valhalla.

Delphic-Sibyl-large Diego_Velázquez_-_Queen_Margarita_on_Horseback_-_WGA24409 f91eaf7d5c406212999141c379793beb Femme-au-chapeau-rose-et-collier-de-perles-by-Jean-Metzinger fernando_botero_circus_girl_in_her_trailer_d5739403h gainsborough Geopoliticus.jpg DALI goya GUY ROSE h2_29.100.10 John_Singer_Sargent_-_Mrs_Carl_Meyer_and_her_Children_-_Google_Art_Project 

          The next question is a CORKER:        

So we have to think about men, why would they want to join a matriarchal community where they will be bossed around by women? Femdom men would like it, but would most ordinary men want that?

          Rasa:   How wrongly you think, William!

          This is not about men, nor do we solicit men to join our Order. The men who do join will be few & their privileges will be limited. Those who are attracted to our Female Members or want to marry them will have to join if they want to participate in anything we do. There will probably be one man to ten women if that. But the women will have CHILDREN & this will be encouraged, in or out of marriage. Half the kids will be boys. Within a few generations we’ll have many male members born into our community & trained in our POV. These will be encouraged to marry women who think like us, mostly those within our Order, but if outside, their wives will be encouraged {not mandated} to be a part of us.

          In this Order, we are not focused on men. We need time & space to find ourselves, who we are – what a woman is supposed to be by the design of the Almighty. We need time, space & sounding boards to examine our thoughts, feelings & aspirations. We need Sisters to encourage us, hear us out. The LAST THING we need is for men to monitor us, judge us, critique what we do or tell us how to think, feel & act. This is what we’re getting away from. These are the chains we are to break, the fetters, the fences, the patriarchal guards against our freedom. As I said, this is to find ourselves as we are, not as men want us to be.

 

          Second, Femdom men will not find a fitting place within our Order. What is a Femdom man, a submissive as we have experienced in the Patriarchy?

          These men want to be NURSED by a Mother. They have a kind of severe Attachment Disorder {need of Mother nourishment}. Attachment Disorder is rampant in a Patriarchy – probably all humans within it have some of it, but these men are so extreme that they DRAIN the female of all her time & strength. They are even worse, if you can believe it, than the regular ‘normal’ Patriarchs.

         {I have experience with a female who has this disorder. Only by internet, I tried for ONE MONTH to help her as surrogate ‘Mother.’ It was so draining I could not do it – I excused myself from the role.

          The girl was so bad she would get physically ill if a female she ‘fell in love with’ stopped attending to her. It could be anyone – a store keeper, the mail lady, a friend, anyone. She would form attachments, the way men do to ‘dominant’ women – & if it went wrong or the female turned cold, she would get physically ill.

          She PAID a psychologist woman just to HOLD her an hour at a time to relieve her pain & her terrible need!}

          I had one Hindu male ‘fell’ for me – he met me once. He remembered me when his family moved to London & started calling me EVERY DAY for TWO YEARS! He did this sneakily where I did not know his number – so with the phone I had I could not block him. The third year he slacked off a bit – only called once a week. It did not pay to speak to him – he would then call EVEN MORE. I asked him to write me by mail – he refused. It had to be this sneaky way where I couldn’t block him.

          Finally by the Grace of God I got a new phone that let me block anyone – including if the number was not shown. He still tried, borrowing dozens of phones from other people – I blocked every one until he gave up.

          A ‘slave’ on the internet got to me & one day sent me 73 letters! I said no more, he quit, & was all over the place seeking new women. These slaves are fickle & have their eyes out constantly for anyone who would dominate them. It’s a SICKNESS.

76d45631d8e7bba8675c5a37740d75af 82a1e06595761179cc55cd4dd00746f6 83e7cd1d7ad9f3945e6d8e454b45e329 97e4f61264eb26f58242cfa20e563a1b 106 357abc73a45698cb2da4391af7542e72 465px-revolutionary_romania_by_c_d_rosenthal 494px-pieter_de_hooch_-_a_woman_peeling_apples-resized-600 884d7d29749bf4b8cf27b02d27f3a53c 996c599ab7fd403bface0885e455309f 1024px-edouard_manet_004 1103f2220f985e940c3236195957b735 1940 5159CVW2X3L._SY355_ 9164b7bc7b49cded1bc13e0dddc1af3b

          They cannot live without a Mother & their need is so strong they are emotional toddlers. They make the woman center her life around them, worse than regular men, but they are MORE DANGEROUS because as grown men – when you don’t give them what they want they sometimes TAKE REVENGE & it can be serious! Sometimes the ‘payback’ annoying, but other times they do DAMAGE to property. I had close calls, I heard of women who got really whacked this way.

          Think of a toddler who needs a wet nurse – this is them, emotionally, even the Masochists, who recall their Mom as a Dominating Bitch who beats, intimidates & scares them.

          We do not need to saddle or Members with this as they need time for other matters, unless they want to start a Female Domination business. They are free to do that as they are free to go out into the world & do whatever business they please, except, Members will need to spend some quality time, at least in the beginning, like a Seminary, to learn our Religion & our ways, & this will take some years. This pertains to the Leadership type Members, not the ones who want to be on our premises part time – say once a week. The leaders need time & energy for education & the Order should be their first priority, not the needs of any man.

          If anyone tells me that the ‘submissive’ men serve the women I can tell you otherwise, having been in that field for over ten years. There’s a reason why they PAY for services – we serve THEM, what they do for us does not make up for the hoops they put us through {more so mentally, emotionally a well as the physical.}

          In conclusion William, I think you’re looking at our Order in a slanted way, through the eyes of men, you’ve failed to see what we’re about or what I’m trying to do. You were not supportive of the New Religion from the beginning – instead you immediately set out to write a ‘New Religion for Femdom Men.’ This offended me as I felt you could be trying to help me in this monumental task instead of going off on your own & as usual, serving Femdom men.

          This new Order is not about men, Femdom or otherwise. It’s about women; it’s new therefore, as few Orders are made for women. The religious places where women usually go off on are controlled by men & therefore they are NOTHING like what we’re doing.

          We are not about being told what to do by men – their version of morality, our behavior, our thoughts, feelings or actions. We are NOT serving men of any sort, on bended knee to them or nursing them. We need to get away & this is our Refuge of Women.   {end}

 0c73baf5e518a426fef10bd029944372 1a7ddc8f112f3f1050087782045d3b8e 3 4dc178680a0360e51dfaca6220db5010 5a661703a92363e201b9e19e487e36bf 5e857246efd7d5a8451435f2e1c0f2fa 6a00ccff930f92d75600d09e63258dbe2b 6a015434a64eda970c01a73da8de89970d-800wi 9jpbs6hz49539436 11-Boldini-Lina-Cavalieri-e1359709204434 15d7b224ad11a638329b1af02119268f 27th 33f73446b4b8f3c1911d6476b0e83242 36e0663862ed8d8b9e4e1b32696a5047 69fc3259118cb214d6daa1545a29cbe2 76d45631d8e7bba8675c5a37740d75af 82a1e06595761179cc55cd4dd00746f6

Pete says:

One thing I might add about the Femdom men you describe. Many of the self-proclaimed “serious” FLR lifestylist men would vehemently object to what you said, of course, but from what I have observed mainly online, they are also largely cut from that very same cloth as well, cynical as that may sound. The biggest difference, if any, is that they cannot seem to fully distinguish fantasy from reality. And the few exceptions, who only go to prove the rule, are the ones who generally DON’T wear it on their sleeve.

 

          from Rasa:   Indeed Ajax, you are right. Like Freud said, if anyone disagrees with his theories let him have the same experience he had. They didn’t – they had ideas, delusions, but Freud had experience through his psychoanalysis of many. And so have I. It was 10 years on hand in a business. Besides that, from the age of 20, I had men approach me to be ‘slaves.’ I tried out one – total failure. However, there are exceptions. I had one ‘slave’ man named Jack. He was more helpful than anyone. Of all the men in my life, he was one of the 3 most effective, helpful & FUN to be around. There are exceptions to everything. Like when we spoke of the security measures & I laid out a list of who can’t be with us. It was strict. Then I mused about it, & this list would have removed my own spiritual husband, Nick, as he was a drug addict. And so, as the officers go through the scrutiny they must also interview the men personally on a casual basis, think & pray, & some men, although they fail the scrutiny, will be allowed in. Some will be technically ‘no good’ but the officers might hear a word from God which says, ‘let him in.’ We are a thoughtful, mystical, God centered group which goes by yardsticks beyond physical. After all, many Saints applied to several monasteries or convents & were rejected, until finally, they found one that would take them in. I think of Saint Faustina, my countrywoman, the Sister who brought us the devotion of Divine Mercy. Many others were not wanted like St. Joseph Cupertino was considered ‘simple minded’ & they believed he would not pass the priesthood test. But the Pope let him in without a test! He could LEVITATE! Then St. Francis of Assisi could not get an audience with the Pope. But one day after he prayed, the two armed guard at the gate looked the other way, he got in & spoke to the Pope & got his Order approved. Thanks for your thoughtful comments & also the very incisive comments in the article! 

 

images (29) images (31) mHpzdmXeVop1DXab59izW7QKr_I7mpk8FRh9BqKc3mc Rasa0322Scans099 tumblr_oihj2drBNX1tyncywo1_400 Why-Is-My-Cat-So-Lazy

College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

Men Must Apply to Date Us

Men Must Apply to Date Us 

2111!! 

 Strict security features to protect  Members of our Order    1-31-24

11112

From Pete Jackson:

Rasa, I have been meaning to comment on this, but I kept on forgetting over the years:
     (There should be a record kept of the relationships, when a man leaves a woman or a woman dismisses a man. He explains why he left; she explains why she dismissed him. These records can be accessed by any other woman who is interested.
     In this way, males who are unsatisfactory will not get away with what they do – if they are dismissed for transgressions,– they cannot easily bounce around & affect other women. Women will know ahead of time if there be any risks or detriments.)

     Pete says:

I would add that there is nothing inherently wrong with that, if such a thing is voluntary. But if such records and reporting were mandatory, that would come dangerously close to the Chinese “social credit” system with all of its myriad pitfalls. Most Women would probably prefer to keep at least some trysts “off the record” like the Mosuo often do. Just my $0.02.

Rasa says:

It’s an idea to be considered Ajax, not set in stone. There are many ideas I am writing that will be flexible. This can be discussed & worked out by the elders & seen from many perspectives. You could be right, we shall see. We shall think, meditate & discuss! Rasa

From Pete:

What is China’s Social Credit System, for those who don’t already know?

     Short answer: it’s every totalitarian’s dream come true.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_System

Per Wikipedia:

“The Social Credit System (Chinese: 社会信用体系; pinyin: shèhuì xìnyòng tǐxì) is a national credit rating and blacklist being developed by the government of China. The social credit initiative calls for the establishment of a record system so that businesses, individuals and government institutions can be tracked and evaluated for trustworthiness. There are multiple forms of the social credit system being experimented with, while the national regulatory method is based on whitelisting (termed redlisting in China) and blacklisting.”

(And that’s putting it nicely!)

##11 ##12 ##2121 11### 111

“China’s Social Credit System has been implicated in a number of controversies. Western critics view social credit as an intrusive mechanism that infringes on privacy. In October 2018, U.S. Vice President Mike Pence criticized the social credit system, describing it as “an Orwellian system premised on controlling virtually every facet of human life.”[114] In January 2019, George Soros criticized the social credit system, saying it would give CCP leader Xi Jinping “total control over the people of China””.

“In December 2017, Human Rights Watch described the proposed social credit system as “chilling” and filled with arbitrary abuses.”

And that was BEFORE the plandemic. And the WEF (Davos Gang) allegedly wants something like that for the entire world.

 

     It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see what the pitfalls would be, *especially* if it were applied to something as intimate as dating and mating. Anyone who has worked in show business is likely familiar with the ominous threat, “you’ll never work in this town again”, and social credit is, at best, a high tech version of that, and likely crossed with classic McCarthyism.

As for what I would suggest as an alternative way to protect Women from bad, evil, crappy, lowlife, toxic, and/or ne’er-do-well men who persist in their defection and bad behavior (i.e. that doesn’t quite rise to the level of criminality but is still toxic) and then bounce back and forth on to the next Woman and so on, I’m afraid I unfortunately don’t have any clear answers at this time. It is a classic trade-off between liberty and security, it seems, and thus perhaps a problem that may not have any solution in a free society.

It is just something we will have to accept, I guess. In any case, the Mosuo don’t seem to see the need for any sort of mandatory record keeping in that regard, nor do any other Matriarchal societies past or present.

     I will note that nowadays with the advent of the internet, word travels fast in terms of reputation. Throw in those ubiquitous Ring cameras, CCTV, and billions of smartphones with cameras, and in practice, privacy has already dwindled almost to the level of Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon, for better or worse. One partial solution in that vein would be a *voluntary* registry that Women can post reviews about men (as long as it is not libelous) without threat of censorship. Manosphere misogynistic men already apparently have their own site called “Register Her”, (to the reader: do NOT look at it unless you really want to get in a rage!) so why can’t Women turn the tables and have their own side called “Register Him”, then? Again, *voluntary* is the key word here. And *decentralized* as well.

Women could even do this right now if they wanted to. But it is ultimately something for future generations to decide.

In my every deliberation on any such matters, I ask myself, if I knew I were to die tomorrow and be reincarnated as a Woman, what sort of world would I want to live in? And I nearly always keep coming back to the same answer.

111#1 - Copy 1212 - Copy 12121212 - Copy 17629769_742520282596069_7563196868033438957_n - Copy 18194813_10158546965970591_4151928908364970428_n - Copy 18222269_10158546961240591_2540970686315522025_n 18222454_10158546964015591_5673335217189092561_n 18268152_1306468396067340_3646511364223101895_n 18268412_10158567126050591_6463561117454775134_n 18301113_10158567126630591_4421830910200518518_n 18447031_1492332470787961_457587970690991573_n 18486300_1495667453787796_6951564297312072487_n 121212123

Rasa says:

     Wow Ajax, talk about ‘food for thought’! It’s a complicated issue. I think we shall throw this concern to the elders. These would be the women over 60 – maybe 62 & up. Assuming they have experience, how would they protect women from bad guys who are not criminals but have all sorts of detrimental traits? Criminals we shall expunge, blacklist them for sure – no holds barred, just there’s the door & that’s it. By criminal I mean stealing, abuse, violence, anything serious. But there is MENTAL & EMOTIONAL CRUELTY that appears under the radar. A person can hurt you just by being SILENT or by leaving every day to God knows where – bars, whoring – being a bisexual, searching for drugs – all kinds crap. This would not register as ‘criminal.’ They can also be SARCASTIC & constantly even in subtle ways, putting her down – Criticizing her. Women don’t need that – we’ve been put down, criticized, devalued, swept aside long enough. I’m wondering if you’re overreacting to my suggestion – as you said, males are already registering us. I will look that site up. No one is speaking about that that I’ve heard of. It’s what they do to us, it seems to be permitted, but God forbid we use any restraint on them, even GOOD GUYS like you get upset! We are NOT NAZIS or COMMUNIST/TYRANTS, Chinese TORTURERS. This is a God-driven, God centered organization with the bywords same as Jesus Christ & the Saints. Why do you or would anyone fear we will do men in? It’s simply reporting negative stuff like I said, being silent, morose, uncommunicative, not doing their chores or duties, not caring, not helping, going away to do secret or unknown things. Like being ‘with the boys’ & what do boys do? Drinking, drugs, whoring, plotting against women. No, I think you have overreacted Ajax. We need a registry. I shall look for that female registry. Thank you for opening the discussion.   Rasa

From Pete:

         Indeed it is a war. But in the long run, it is one that men have lost before the war began, despite winning nearly every battle. Men just don’t realize it yet. (Much like the USA in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan.)

     I guess the main reason why I overreacted was due to my long observation that “cancel culture” has really gotten out of hand in this country (and some others) in recent years, where literally everyone is guilty until proven innocent in a court of public opinion. It’s the new McCarthyism. Once a person’s reputation is ruined, and it really doesn’t take very much, their life is basically over, often forever. That is largely why I so zealously and jealously guard my own reputation, almost literally with my life. And both genders are indeed guilty of this behavior nowadays, it seems.
     (Any readers who don’t know what “cancel culture” is are free to Google it.)
     Combine that with creeping Orwellian tendencies on both sides of the Atlantic (and Pacific too) these days, and that doesn’t make for anything good.
     I am well aware that you are nothing like that, of course.

!!!111 !!!1112 ### 1#1# 11!!11!! 111!!!1 111!!

From Rasa:

     We women will need to create a Matriarchal culture & there hasn’t been one for THOUSANDS of years – what 6k? And so we’re grasping at straws, ideas how to make SAFE SPACE for women. I have hundreds of ideas how we will build a community. I’m going over these ideas one by one, this was just one of them.
     I don’t see any other woman at this moment doing what I do – if there are, I haven’t noticed. People mostly COMPLAIN but their remedies are not forthcoming. I need solutions.

     The Order becomes a safety net so the Member does not FALL & hurt herself, the net is there to catch her. The Order has the responsibility of looking the man up, seek references which they check up on, check his police record. If he’s had relationships we know of, contact the women he’s broke up with, see what they say. He must confess if he’s been married {any children?} or lived with anyone, & give us where to contact them if he is willing. This part would help {it could be awfully embarrassing but it would help us tremendously.}. We should also FINGERPRINT the men in case there was or is a crime. We must know their ADDRESS, legit phone number, where they work, & their license & car.

We keep this info private. But if a female wants to start DATING one of the males, she can ask to see his records while under the supervision of an officer. If she hasn’t gone out with him yet, the officer can discuss with her his records in general without giving all the information. If it gets serious she should have access to all the data – not to keep – just to inspect it. It stays private.
     Now a lot of men will recoil at this! They are mostly looking to get laid, but that is their problem. Our problem – we must look after ourselves – is to get what we want, whatever it is, without any bad side effects. Therefore the net.
   Some women will want to just have sex. They might want to get pregnant, even, & keep the baby without a father. They might like the man for sex but not for husband. We are their security & home – they can do that with our encouragement. But if the man gets ‘in love’ or ‘obsessed’ with the female he had sex with – we must protect her. It can get complicated. If he’s stalking her he can’t come to the dances any more. She might have to get an order of protection. We will have to have security guards, dogs, whatever it takes. I am working all this out in my mind, there will be lots more working out when the time comes to build physically.
     With the male relationships it’ll get really complicated. No easy answers. It’ll be the same with women who fall in love with women, but there will be less violence – intimidation & threats. But it will get complicated.
     You might scoff at us requiring so much for the ‘dances’ attendees. At these dances we’ll have any of our members over the age of 12–girls 12, boys 14. {We will have boy Members, sons of the Mother Members.} That’s when I started going to dances – my Dad took us. Nothing bad occurred, just dancing. That’s when kids begin puberty & they are interested in sex, relationships, with male or female. So be it. We must accept normalcy!
         Again, to defend our scrutiny. This strict application does not by any means, guarantee safety for our members! Ted Bundy, before he had a record would have passed as he was charming, articulate & attractive. John Wayne Gacey could also pass before he had a record. Jeffrey Dahmer might also pass before he was ever arrested. There is evil lurking in the hearts of men that cannot be scrutinized except by God, or a psychic medium. It gives us partial protection.
     Then there are those who through relationships have proven themselves bad risks for closeness {some women want relationships, not only sex} – that’s where the registry comes in, that you object to – {taking away human rights you say}. – The women who write reports on males they had bad experiences with, of course it’s voluntary. No one forces them to explain. It could be as simple & innocent as
     ‘He’s a slob. Never cleans up his own mess, expects you to do everything. Drinks milk straight out of the bottle.’
     I also understand that we will WEED OUT the majority of males who’d like to meet females. It will be AGAINST OUR RULES strictly for a woman to associate with males who have not gone through the net. They will be reprimanded & in danger of being ousted from the community. {The males will try to persuade them to do this; they want to be free, let her take chances & risk her safety. Some will be naive & gullible & do it.} Whoever doesn’t mind filling out the data will have a clean record & good intentions. No men with past records – no men yet married – no men who intend to do a crime or have done a crime, will want to sign up. Men who are pure of heart, good intentions, good past records are most likely to join. That’s what we want.
     If we only have one newcomer a week attend, it’s no big deal – we have fun anyway. We’ll practice dancing, have contests & any show business training we have conducted, such as musical instruments or singing or reciting – this is a place to perform, show their stuff. It will inspire them to practice.
     PS – Regards reputations, the info discovered remains within the Order, not for public knowledge.

         One more thing. Pete, you’re reacting as if this will apply to the whole world & all men in it. This is just one Order trying to start out. Look at the Amish, Hutterites, Mennonites & whatever. Surely it does not frighten you that they have strict rules, ideas, dress codes, behavior & all that – to deviate means to be shunned. A group has a right to make its own rules, that’s what I’m doing. You’re acting like my ideas will apply to the entire world! Let us begin this way, hope for the best. I’m just trying to start a Matriarchal community good for women. I am including men with reservation. Shall I exclude them completely? Let the women run amuck so to speak, find their own men to have sex with with no scrutiny or reservations, references & information on them? Is that what you want? Will that make you happy? Rasa

IMG_20131220_0227 IMG_20131220_0228 IMG_20131220_0203 IMG_20131220_0239 IMG_20131220_0240 IMG_20131223_0113

Pete says:

   If it only applies to within the Order and for its members, that is a different story, I guess. I would still personally consider such rules to be a bit too strict, but that’s just me. I of course have no say on what goes on in the Order, as it is only for Women. I guess if someone doesn’t want to live under such rules, they should simply not join then. Fair enough. We will just have to agree to disagree about this I guess.

From Rasa:

     I just saw your comment Pete. It’s only for us. If you disagree, what would you propose to maintain the safety of our members, including the young, naive, inexperienced ones who go to our dances? Like twelve to eighteen, they don’t know much – Have not been in the world – Will be victims of scheming, self serving men. How would you protect them? I have a plan, do you? You don’t like my plan, so what is yours. You see that’s what makes me wonder. People complain. They hate this, that or the other. But what can they do to amend it?

From Pete:

     I guess I don’t have any real plans or solutions in that regard at this time. (Or, at least none that wouldn’t come across as being too cavalier, such as a sort of “shore leave”.) I don’t think I have anything further to add at this time, except to note again that this is ultimately a classic trade-off between liberty and safety. Not everyone will agree on where on that spectrum is appropriate, and what constitutes an acceptable versus unacceptable risk, and that’s fine.   Best wishes, Pete

Rasa says:

OK try to imagine years from now. You have 3 daughters, 12, 15 & 17. They are all interested in males, – what do you do to protect them? Understand my position. As a leader of women who have been beaten in battle in the Gender War, I must now protect them from further assaults mentally/spiritually {with philosophies, religions & customs against women,} physically & emotionally. As a leader I have to anticipate all that men have done & will do if given the room – how do I stop them & give females Safe Space, while still giving them freedom to interact with men? That’s what I’m facing & trying to sort out. You probably never had reason to think this out before & instead of seeing it from the male POV see it from mine – a leader of young, innocent, naive or even mature, experienced women–all of us been hurt as all the slaves in those days were, who now want to be free. Think of our freedom, not men’s. How do we get free of this gender who has been our enemy? Do you imagine letting males do whatever they want will be the solution, little restrictions put on them? No scrutiny, no restraints? They have destroyed women in the past & they will do it again. That’s how I see it.      Rasa Von Werder  ……………………………………………………………………..PS  

Pete says:

I forgot one thing I should have said before: for the dances, it would probably best to have separate dances for ages 12-17 only on the one hand and 18+ only on the other. (And maybe some mixed dances as well if the elders approve.) That’s really the only other thing I had to add at this time.

From Rasa:

     Yes that is a thorny issue I’ve been musing about also.  There’s no EASY ANSWER for any of this.  We’re dealing with:

FREEDOM for the members, as well as SAFETY for them.

How is both freedom & safety accomplished?

And there are two agendas – for the men, for the women.  You so far represent the men, wanting their freedom.  But you have not come up with an answer of how the women will be protected.

Much of the questions here are up in the air, waiting to be thought out.  But sooner or later, they must be faced for anyone starting a Matriarchal Order.

You mentioned the Mosuos not have a security net like this.  That is NOT a good comparison.  They live in the Mountains, far from ‘civilization,’ & their environment has been ‘village like’ where everyone knows everyone.  How many JAILS have they there?  I reckon NONE.  How much crime, rape, abuse is there among the Mosuos?  I guess very little.  How violent are the men there?  Non violent in general.

And you said you knew of no Matriarchy in the past that had criteria like this, lol.  That is HUMOROUS!

Of course not – they were Matriarchal!  We live in a PATRIARCHY where men ASSUME, as they’ve been brainwashed for thousands of years, that they have more rights than women, they are permitted to hurt women a lot before they are finally prosecuted.  They do violence, rape, intimidation & sexual abuse.  No, these men are not like in any past or present Matriarchy.

These men are the products of one of if not the most violent male-cultures in the world – America.  We have more JAILS than any other country – I’ve seen the statistics.  We have more male violence, guns than any other country.  That is what we’re dealing with.

And I think one of the reasons you don’t see it my way is because you have no EXPERIENCE that women have.  Have you been abused as a child?  I mean sexually by a Dad or other male?  Have you ever been raped, beaten, threatened with bodily harm or life if you don’t do what the other person wants?  There are MANY THINGS you have never experienced which women routinely do.  Some women get it more than others – like those in the adult trade.

 

About the ages at our dances:  Legal age of consent in NY is 17, so within our Order here, it would be safe to let any of our members 17 or above attend.  That is to protect our Order as much as the Members – so we be not accused of introducing underage girls to men who might later {without our consent} have sex with them. There are many ways men get sex from females, including innocent or mature ones.  They can take them into the parking lot – seek some secluded place indoors – they find ways.  So if there’s no one there under 17 we are safer.

 

There’s many other questions.  This subject is a Pandora’s Box.  It would be easier to just say ‘no men’ or we have nothing to do with our Members {of any age} relations with men.  But that’s a cop out.  Because we must tend to all the needs of the members, including their emotional needs, if we are a real Order – real Matriarchal family.  Consider a Mother & Father {in this case the Mom is the one & only possibly – no Father} with children growing up.  In society the teeange girls have ‘coming out’ parties – their introduction to society.  This is not random blokes, willy nilly men, peasants, poor men, they seek males of their own status.  We don’t seek STATUS per say but STANDARDS.  As a family would block out undesirables, we do the same.  And the world is FULL of undesirables, especially men.

 

Exotic-Shorthair images (19) images (21) images (22) images (24) images (28) images (30) images (32) images (33) images (34) images (35) images (36) images (37) images (38)

  

College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

Loopholes to Matriarchy

William’s Question 1-9-24

LOOPHOLES TO MATRIARCHY 

2c57bf77cf1c8e8cfde253499f8ba9f8 2d82881b4d48196069ca944ad4a5197a 2f5a432d2e7922c8289e52bffc1fca56 5.-“Mona-Lisa”-by-Leonardo-da-Vinci 5-74

From William Bond–Hi Rasa:

Since the beginning of this year I’ve been attempting to write another book. I have been thinking about how it is possible to create a matriarchal society and it seems to me the only workable system we know off, is that of the Bonobo ape. In a sex war for dominance, men have the advantage of size, strength, aggression and violence. While the only way women can dominate men is through love, sex and sisterhood. So I’m thinking about whether women use similar methods to that of the bonobo ape. It would involve a very radical change of behavior. Women would have to freely give sex to men and at the same time have sex with other women to form a lesbian sisterhood. 

An alternative to this, is for women to be like the priestesses of ancient Goddess temples and form a prostitutes collective. So all the wealth and power that comes from prostitution end up in the hands of women and keep pimps and criminals out. So we could either have a new religion, or run it like a business. But whatever way we do it, women will end up trading sex for wealth and power over men. We also know that patriarchy is very anti-sexual and want to control women’s sexuality. an extreme case of this is Islam where women have to cover up their bodies completely and have their clitorises cut off.

I’m now having second thoughts about this and wonder if these proposals might be too radical? Because however you do it, women will end up having a lot of sex with many different men. So would it be realistic for women to use sex. lesbianism and sisterhood to dominate and control men?  It’s hard for me to say, as I’m a man so I don’t know what women would think about this idea. So I’m just wondering what you think about this Rasa.   William

lady_agnew lDb7CXP Leda and the Swan le-fleuve-scamandre-by-Francois-Boucher-051 Lilith_Wallpaper_19.189121756_std Livio02 main maria-a-sentimental-journey-by-laurence-sterne-1777 mary-e.-harding-delphinia maureen-o-hara-most-beautiful-women-2 maxresdefault-47

*{Rasa says: Prositution, though not formal, is exactly what we have been dong all these years ditto Bonobo style touching, feeling & sex. We do this in deference to them whether we like it or not, we are forced. Try being unpleasant to men & you will see revenge that is ten times worse than what you gave out. Merely IGNORING them has brought revenge upon me.

Your first idea – the Bonobo model plus sisterhood will never happen not realistic. As if we appease men Bonobo style, which we are doing anyway, that negates Sisterhood as women become our enemies we compete with them, there is a bad conflict. There’s jealousy, cattiness & hate woman to woman as long as we try to please men. For women to be hetero plus have a Sisterhood & become Lesbians is so unrealistic, no one would believe it. I guess being bisexual is what you’re saying, there aren’t enough bisexuals to pull this off, the majority maybe 75% are hetero & hetero they will stay.

If we take sex out of the equation, like using sex to dominate men, & find economic freedom – then we can continue engaging men for sex for our pleasure, not so much theirs. That is the model I’m working on in the New Religion & Order because it MAKES SENSE.

You are going BACKWARD in making sex the center to dominate men, that is EXACTLY what we want to abolish!

1cc19d35b9f44b39c4be70f78fea8d70 5508a8c14e519 5508a8f339d9f 5508a328d0ced 5508a4123794e 6803_963145560365046_5181715921460591453_n 404751_104396096428920_344316857_n 1934958_1515707205425275_4493650374846183019_n 1935367_976737559029029_3659932013915395967_n 1936550_1105280939504083_1020423132111201275_n 1977357_775857785824486_1627951132055780133_n 10247196_381008538718680_4791590882260983833_n

Why not create a book that bears with the facts – that human men have been discovered to be inferior due to having only one X chromosome to women’s 2 X’s, that we see in statistics & reports, & the jail system, that men are generally rogues, that women have held them up for millennia but now this is falling apart. As men go downhill, women are rising. Show this in a few relationships & partnerships, how it affects the individuals. The men are scared; they’re trying to see how they can retain their dominance. The women are breathing sighs of relief but this dominance is hard won as the men are not submitting easily & are fighting all the way. This is conflict. All the ways men take revenge& try to trap women once again; all the ways women are trying to get away from their snares, violence & unfairness. This is the drama a story needs.

The stumbling block of your propositions, in my view, is that women must continue using sex to dominate men. This suits men in general & submissive men in particular but this is what I HATED about being a dominatrix. It is them controlling us from the bottom & that’s what you’re proposing here, are you not? Like “use sex to dominate me.” That’s why I HATE femdom. As it isn’t freedom for us at all.

And oh yes, why not interject women forming ‘brothels’ for ‘Sacred Sex’ as the ancient ‘Sacred harlot’s did? Men come to the Temple of Love, worship at an altar where women preach & lecture then give a donation for intimacy which will help them gain Spirituality – Sacred Sex – Tantra. And these women are respected, revered & they get wealthy so they can be free to do whatever.}*

 KALI DESTROYER KILE DRISCOLL 8 7 16 KURDISH FEMME VS ISIS KURDISH VS ISIS KURDISH WM VS ISIS KURDISH WMN VS ISIS kurdish women ag ISIS KURDISH WOMEN AGAINST ISIS little-red-riding-hood-1130258_1920 loren-mansfield2-1009x1024 maxfield_parrish_01 Queen Boudicca by John Opie THOR PENTHOUSE TOPPER MS SUZUKI

From Pete:

Indeed, William.  In a nutshell, my response upthread was basically that I thought it best to simply to remove all restrictions, shame, and stigma on sexual activity between consenting adults, and let it develop organically.  Dr. James W. Prescott would likely concur.

I forgot to add one more thing:  it is quite interesting that the slogan “Smash Monogamy” in the early 1970s was actually coined by a group of lesbian Women, not men.  Though I would argue that a better slogan would be “Smash Enforced Monogamy”, since it is not monogamy per se that is the real problem, but rather its “enforcement” and “default” status in society.  It should be whatever floats one’s boat.  Tolerance should work both ways, of course.  And it should be the case for both genders, with no “reverse double standard” either.

People can argue until they are blue in the face about whether monogamy is natural or not.  But I would say that there are three kinds of monogamy:  strict, lifelong, and universal.  Pick two out of three.  To achieve anything close to all three requires a ludicrous amount of violence and coercion, and/or some sort of “safety valve”.  Even Orthodox Jews, arguably the most monogamous people in all of recorded history, who appear to have achieved all three, have always had a convenient escape hatch for men:  quick and easy divorce, but only for men. Which, of course, historically left Women and children high and dry, often destitute.  (Perhaps that was what Jesus was esoterically getting at when he *allegedly* prohibited divorce completely.  Though banning divorce, as we have seen historically, in practice only trapped Women and children even more in the quagmire of patriarchy.)     Pete

Hi Pete

I think the reason why patriarchy talked women into monogamy is that woman are always the ones left, “holding the baby”. So unrestricted sex and love can work for women if they have a powerful sisterhood whom will care for the children. Break up the sisterhood and women then have to rely on men for support when they have small children to look after. In this situation women then need strict marriage laws to make sure the man stays and helps look after his own children. 

So the break up of monogamy will bring about very radical changes in how men and women relate to each other. Women then have to form a sisterhood and depend on each other for support. They also can receive the help of men but bribe them with sex to get them to do what women want. 

William

                     *{Rasa says: That is PRECISELY what I’m trying to build in the New Order – a backup system for women with children. We are not left holding the bad when these guys leave us. They want to dumpp sperm then go off & have fun or find another female or dump in multiple women. We need SECURITY. Not looking for wealth & luxury – it’s security, room & board, education, a foundation of security for the family.

          This is what Matriarchy was all about, the security of the Sisterhood with child care built in. The nuclear family keeps woman as slaves to the home. How can she go out & work when she has one or more kids? I did that, it was extremely difficult. We need sisters at the home front, caring for children while we go out. That is the FOUNDATION of Matriarchy.}

From Pete:

Indeed, and that’s precisely where some naysayers will speciously claim that we are putting the cart before the horse.  But that said, with the advent of modern birth control, paternity testing, and especially the welfare state and its social safety nets (all nonexistent for most of recorded history), these concerns are greatly attenuated as a result.  So in recent decades, it’s not really putting the cart before the horse IMHO.   

But again, it is best to let it all develop *organically* rather than impose it from the top down.  Done correctly, it will be the ultimate kill switch for patriarchy, as I have noted before.  True, journeys are often far more dangerous than destinations, but this particular destination is worth the journey.

(The Tamera ecovillage in Portugal comes to mind, for example. But it also needs to be done within “mass society” as well as best as one can.) Pete

*{Rasa says. What you say Pete, re the welfare system & all that, yes, there are institutions & social agencies & actions in place that do diminish the man’s control over women especially their abandonment & lack of care. That is part of the culture that is evidence of men getting weaker in their stranglehold.

It’s all happening on different fronts in different ways. Abortion is weakening the man’s domination as he can’t always saddle the female with unwanted children. Birth control, all its forms & condoms weaken his hold. But it’s only part of the answer, albeit a good part.

Women’s sexual freedom cannot happen suddenly – like a light bulb came on. By many changes in society on many levels, gradually it will occur. Then it means patriarchy is done.

My Order hopefully, or its blueprint, will help.

The Tamera ecovillage in Portugal – I looked it up. It’s a good start – egalitarianism, equality, all that, it’s not Matriarchy.

I intend to take a BIG PLUNGE into SERIOUS MATRIARCHY with my Order.

As far as your book, in conclusion I saw the two propositions are a no-no. Dramatizing the actual reality that is really happening IMO could be better. Maybe if you focus on the Prostitution as the center of the story with a powerful Priestess/Madame & the men who get involved for good or bad would be dramatic.

And breakup of Monogamy? It cannot be required nor should it be a taboo to break it. You want to be monogamous? Go for it? You don’t? Fine. You want multiple lovers? OK. You want lovers of both genders? Float your boat. Freedom

Sexual freedom for women destroys Patriarchy. The taboos, restrictions, ‘morals,’ have nothing to do with righteousness or God – they are man-made. Women must unmake them. That’s our New Religion}* 

From Pete:  Good answer overall, Rasa. 

 Though I would say both of your perspectives make sense in their own way.  William may have over-egged the proverbial pudding a bit, but he still makes some good points, as do you.  

I don’t think I have much else to add to this conversation, except to bring up the interesting case of the Mosuo people (who are of course Matriarchal and practice a form of “free love”) that both of you have discussed in the past, and that has worked for thousands of years.  (Note that sex is NOT used by the Mosuo Women as a tool to appease OR to control men, at least not explicitly.)

And again, in any case, whatever the solution is, it will have to develop organically, and with at least some concessions made to modern times.  I had mentioned the Tamera ecovillage in Portugal, for example, but I would further add that even within “mass society” there are (according to philosopher Charles Eisenstein) some broadly similar pockets here and there, such as in parts of Colorado and Western Massachusetts in recent years.  Not necessarily Matriarchal, at least not explicitly, but a step in the right direction IMHO.   Best wishes,  Pete

 From William – Hi Rasa:

I think what you are proposing is already happening. There are books about why women are doing better than men in education. We also see the result of this as there are now more female politicians and business leaders. I suppose if things keep on going the way they are, women will probably in a another 100 years time, be ruling everything. The trouble is I don’t think I’ve got anything to say about this. The type of book your proposing should be written by academics who has access to all the facts and figures about this. 

 

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/02/21/new-book-explains-why-women-outpace-men-education

 

So if Ashley Montagu is right and women are naturally superior to men. Then the only way men can become the dominant sex is to actively suppress women. But once men stop doing this, then women naturally rise to the top and take over and perhaps is is what feminist have been doing.  They tell everyone they only want equality but I think they only say this to fool men. I think the feminist do want to take over and rule they world, but are afraid if they say this, as they fear it might provoke a male backlash. So they are working towards this silently and secretly and would prefer us to shut up about women ruling the world. 

Yes, I can see patriarchy has been very successful in making sex unpleasant for women. As far as men are concern sex is all about dominance and submission, and this includes femdom sex. Whereas women want sex to be about love making. (Although many men do also want sex to be about love as well). But I agree with the idea of Sacred Sex, I think the problem with femdom is that men are still in charge of it. So to them it is still about dominance and submission and not so much about men worshipping women. So perhaps I have to think about the spiritual side of sex to make this work.   William

11156334_10153170849803886_8901359381613103_n 12122610_10205132990187665_255468407498266298_n 12193692_926653384037642_4958662872587448413_n 12196300_915766025168583_5224751620633338681_n

Pete – Good response, William: 

 Like I said, I think you are both correct to one degree or another.  It is however important NOT to make any solution androcentric (centering men), in terms of appeasement or control.  Rather it should be gynocentric (centering Women).

          From Rasa:

                     William, this is what I’m getting now. A novel is a FANTASY. This fantasy can be ANYTHING.  My reaction was from my own POV & feelings, which I am LOATH to have to continue USING SEX to appease or control men.  I – we women – have done that since the beginning of Patriarchy & myself & I am sure other women are sick to death of it.

And so, I would HATE your book.  But you aren’t writing for me, it’s for femdom men & they want it!  And it’s also an emotional release for you, you’ve done this many times, you’re good at it, you just need a NEW ANGLE & for that, ask the minds of femdom men what kind of fantasy they like.

For ten years I produced glamour, femdom & fetish videos for men & made a fortune.  I received their SCRIPTS & also saw that the more extreme, brutal, cruel we were, the more the videos sold.  I had to do what the market demanded, so I exaggerated the action in the ads & also pushed myself & my actors to their limit to act the way the audience wanted – even though it was make believe.  I had to demonstrate to these feminine young models how to act like they HATED the guys.  I was so effective that one actor was scared & said,

“I’d hate to meet you when you’re drunk!”

And he never showed up again for work, lol.

{I had the same thing happen with a spiritual disciple.  He wanted me to appear to him mystically & COMMAND HIM to worship me.  He began his devotion, made an altar.  Within days I appeared & touched him on the shoulder until it hurt & demanded,

“Worship me!”

he told me the story, then disappeared.  Why?  He couldn’t handle it.

Most of these guys I dominated had fantasies, such as being sodomized by a big dildo held by a woman.  But when it came time to do it, they wanted the dildo smaller & smaller until it became A BUTT PLUG, lol.

I had one male with plenty fantasies but when I pulled out all the stops dominating him, HE CRIED.

What you’re doing is fantasy.  So is Peter Rabbit & all the adventures created by Beatrix Potter.  So was ‘Twilight Zone,’ So was the ‘Harry Potter’ series, so was Star Trek – thousands of fantasies by thousands of writers & it works, when done well.  There’s an audience.

So go ahead & create hetero women who also become lesbians to control men, whatever you can imagine – if it suits the audience!  It doesn’t have to MAKE SENSE the way I said, its entertainment!

If you do what I want our submissive men will hate it, if you do what they want I’ll hate it.  Do what they want, they are ‘paying your bills,’ lol.   Best of Luck with the novel.  

PART II

Pete says:  very well-said, Rasa. 

          Fantasy is indeed exactly that, fantasy.  It may or may not contain a kernel of truth at times (and of course sometimes that kernel even can be the size of a whole cornfield if one wants), but it NEED NOT be so.  Fantasy is really ultimately for it’s own sake.

Best of luck with your novel, William.   Pete 

Hi Rasa

I wasn’t thinking so much about the femdom scene but more about the bonobo ape and the way female bonobos dominate male bonobos through sex and sisterhood. As far as I know, the female bonobo doesn’t act like a dominatrix. 

What interests me is that patriarchy does it’s best to restrict female sexuality. The extreme case of this, is that the Muslims force women to cover their bodes and even their faces and cut off the clitorises of females. Patriarchy also does it’s best to restrict prostitution and make it illegal. So what is it about female sexuality that patriarchal religions fear? That is what I’m more interested in.    william
 Rasa says:   Hi William:

 I think we spoke about this before & decided that the ‘kill switch’ to Patriarchy is women’s sexual freedom.  I first heard it when channeling St. Martin Luther King Jr. – He said to me when women are sexually free, that ends Patriarchy.  It all starts from there.

    Think about it from all angles.  Women get pregnant from any man they want, no man knows for sure, are these his kids?  So he cannot claim JURISDICTION or OWNERSHIP of new people, which DISEMPOWERS him.  He canot make the children work for & with him or fight with him!  The woman he’s been with will not stay in the dwelling he wants her to – she goes wherever she wishes, she & other women build their own dwellings, huts, cabins etc.  Or apts & houses in our ‘civilized’ society & go on welfare &/or work, sisters maybe help one another – Moms, aunts, grandmas, cousins all as One. 

     When the man wants sex, where does he go?  He has to be on bended knee to get it, do as the women wish – work – hunt, whatever.  But he cannot intimidate, frighten, abuse, beat up or dominate a woman when she is surrounded by female helpers on all sides.  And he cannot gain access to her children to dominate them!

    Control over women & their children is ‘the first conspiracy’ as we agreed many years ago.

    Men CANNOT create new people – this disempowers them.  They are helpless & powerless without women.  Women CAN create new people; this gives them ALL THE POWER.

    Therefore, it is imperative for men to gain control over the female & her power to reproduce – without it, he is HER SUBORDINATE.  All he can do is OBEY & whatever the females want, he must do it if he wants access to them.  If he doesn’t obey, he can be pushed to the outer limits of the village or society, he can become unwanted & unattended to – an OUTCAST from the society of women.

 16832217_659028077632218_4444817391443423161_n 16865075_902032076606496_4795361887499660971_n 16865162_661634557371570_3932915714896680852_n 16999016_1419439168088386_1232802164688318700_n 17021492_663044967230529_2478103537345511047_n 17155506_910407895768914_1719674989504836472_n 17155974_911239872352383_8754130692231228414_n 17191112_10155286446603706_2933647556017640564_n (1) 17191276_908292249313812_609179299355470074_n 17200880_909904439152593_2505010925969608394_n (1) 17201032_279455849157780_3601604058578802205_n 17201139_805000369646965_3066843982946246351_n (1) 17264355_1870062059944967_7674470614543647373_n 17264373_1788992828094651_3474789751412212455_n 17264765_1871704773114029_8765032385131706471_n 17309576_912381712238199_662331486903649289_n 17309642_1428600763827799_1495108440907955796_n

    For us to follow the model of the Bonobos is better than Chimpanzees or any animal I can think of.  The females rule with the help of other females, although some males are stubborn & resist their authority.  But for us to HAVE TO HAVE SEX with men to keep them quiet, obedient & well behaved is way too much to expect.  If we are AUTONOMOUS we should not have to do that.

 That’s the difference between your view & mine.  In yours, we have to OBEY THEM by appeasement.  In mine THEY HAVE TO OBEY US because WE HAVE THE POWER & THE AUTHORITY.

    The model I seek is:  “You do as we say or you are out of here.  We do not molly coddle, appease, put on an act for you just to keep you here….You either obey or get out.”         Rasa

 

12196154_10156161118465184_8976523003086411781_n funny-cat-memes-jokes-fb52-png__700 image0012 IMG_1637 iStock-167768212 main-qimg-effbe2a6e26f46f5ac8827188c7b3a50-pjlq OIP (4) OIP (20) OIP (21) Pine Marten Read-Only pinemarten R (41) R (43) Top-30-Funny-Cat-Memes-funny Top-30-Funny-Cat-Memes-Hilarious tumblr_b5213db6c100aee757658e3f11a54b9b_0f0a1765_500 when-your-dinner-is-usually-at-6-but-its-601-and-theres-nodish-in-sight-meme when-your-humans-guest-calls-you-a-chunky-kitty-meme

 

College of Matriarchal Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

Getting Matriarchy Started: How?

How We Get Matriarchy Started

R (63) - Copy R (64) - Copy 

Re an interview Mike Adams & Laura Aboli:

 

At the END of this enlightening interview Mike Adams presents a form of currency which has GOLD INSIDE it which is increasingly being accepted by merchants he says.  The problem with 24 carat gold & silver coins is how do you divide them & spend them?  These are divided to spend.  He explains the TESTING he did.  I TRUST Mike Adams as I trust few people.  He personally saved me long ago from this fake’ detox water’ that was being SOLD at huge prices – I bought some as it was advertised on Alex Jones, thought it was authentic.  But Mike Adams TESTED it & it was TOXIC!  From then on I was his fan.  The merchant I bought mine from gave everyone back their money.

 

What I’m saying is Mike Adams can be trusted.  His company even offered me a spot to do videos or pod casts on, to be part of his work.  I have not yet even tried to do it for lack of ability to concentrate on what it takes but some day I might.

 

In this interview – it is chilling – they talk about how the globalists are going to take from us all our assets, stocks, money, cars.  They will own everything even if we’ve paid for it.  Hard to believe but they explain some of it, it’s eerie, scary, but it’s fact they say.  And I believe them.

 

Am I going to get gold backs?  Lol, no plans to do so – too scared.  If the world comes to an end I guess I’ll just die with the rest of them.  It’s too much for my mind to handle, cold give one a nervous breakdown if one dwells upon this.  Maybe it won’t happen.  I will stick to just what God talks to me about – Matriarchy vs Patriarchy.  I can’t contain in this brain beyond that.  I cannot face Hell the way I would if I accepted all of this as going to happen.    

download (14) download (15) download (16) imagenCL_castilla-y-leon_soria_berlanga-de-duero_BI images (2) images (10) images (12) images (14) images (16) images IMG_1881 Juliad_Aubigny 

I need to pray to meditate on what God wants me to do regards my work.  Listening to Mike Adams is so disturbing – Pete you said take all this with a block of salt & that makes me feel better.  But still, knowing the facts what the demons are trying to do, I need to evaluate what does God want me to think, feel & work at?  What is most productive for humanity?  And what about promotion?  I’m doing little of that because I simply cannot concentrate on production & promotion at the same time.

 

Oh yes, I looked up how does Dolly Parton look today – & saw an interview.  She must have had comprehensive surgery as her waist is super tiny & not a sign of age on her face.  And Jeff Bezos JUST GAVE HER 150 MILLION DOLLARS to do with as she wishes – which when asked she said it will be put to GOOD USE.  Indeed, I do trust her more than most others she has spent big money on helping others.  But the RESPONSIBIITY of spending this amount of money to help others where would one start?  You’d have to have an office & staff doing research.  Unless of course she needs all that to maintain her surgeries & wardrobe, lol  Her costumes alone are so out there she must have a storeroom the size of Wal-Mart to house them.

 

From William Bond Hi Everyone:

 

I also find what is happening worrying as we seem to be now ruled by a gang of criminals. But I don’t think their rule will last long as they are also incredibly stupid. We see this in the way they gave away western technology and manufacturing to China. Yes, by doing this they undermined the power of the working class in the West, but turned China into the most powerful country on the planet. 

 

We also see this in the Ukraine war. The Western elite believed that Russia was only, “a gas station posing as a country”. So they were shocked when they imposed sanctions on Russia to find the Russian economy is stronger than western economies and is winning the economic war. The Ukraine war is also demonstrating that Russia is ahead of the West in both technology and manufacturing. 

 

So I think in the short term, things will go badly for Western countries as the criminals that rule us are destroying both North America and Europe. But if we can get rid of the criminal gang that is ruling us, then we can recover. 

 

This is possible as we saw with Russia. In the 1990s with the fall of the USSR, Russia was a failed state rule by a drunk who allowed mafia criminal gangs and oligarchs to take over. Fortunately Putin then became leader and slowly restored law and order and put some of the oligarchs into prison and the rest capitulated to him. But doing this, in the space of 25 years he restored Russia to a powerful and stable country once again. 

 

I think it is a pity we don’t have a present a viable matriarchal political party. It is in time of social upheaval when new political parties can emerge and take power. But the patriarchal system is always unstable and if we can get something started then patriarchy will in time break down again, giving the chance for women taking over.    William

 

 From Pete Jackson   Good morning, William:

  We have always been ruled by a gang of criminals, basically, it’s called patriarchy. And mostly they have been quite stupid, at least in the long term. And while Putin did (temporarily) restore power to Russia, of course, he is not exactly on the right side of history either.  He is an autocratic and authoritarian dictator with lots and lots of blood on his hands, crooked as well, and he too will eventually fall from power as well.  Especially as his military quagmire in Ukraine drags on and on (much like the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the graveyard of empires, or the American wars of Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan once more).  Much like Trump “draining the swamp” only to fill it back up with his own crocodile crooks.

 

The only way to end this vicious cycle is for Women to take over, basically.      Best wishes,    Pete

 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111111 14469497_1667783320218660_6929200270694651685_n 17155172_372742886445011_1713183700203837197_n 17155329_912251392251231_9043716931055264463_n 17426079_10210145282961070_5697961285233396166_n 17457894_239689119835861_7319668676452778263_n 17458263_1397220717002084_4211756770046852638_n 17522532_926160280860342_4021753040339807923_n 17523158_1748373175448531_1521078685640379913_n 17523543_10155111405452719_8345142739055689082_n 17553555_1935597099997633_3447002291725377633_n 17757457_1664561337179310_3423882473663368225_n 17861663_10212545010800906_6788529636815196638_n

From William        Hi Pete:

I feel about Putin the same way I feel about Trump. At one time I thought Trump was terrible, until I realized just how much the mainstream media hated him and then I changed my opinion of him. I think the mainstream media and the whole establishment hate Putin even more than Trump. Which suggests to me these men must be doing something right. Anyone the mainstream media praises, you know is a sell out.    William

 

From Pete:

With all due respect, I guess we will just have to agree to disagree about both Trump and Putin.  Though I do think there is at least a kernel of truth (possibly even the size of a cornfield) to what you just said about how the establishment rabidly hates them, it’s really more evil against evil, IMHO.  To put it in Dungeons and Dragons parlance, Trump and Putin are both hot-blooded, rogue, “chaotic evil”, and are thus seen as a threat to the cold-blooded “lawful evil” and “neutral evil” psychopaths ruling the world, as well as their self-interested “true neutral” sycophantic lackeys.  They are really two sides of the same coin, and the very top ruling oligarchs and their “shadow government” of course play both sides to divide and conquer.   Best wishes,  Pete

 From Rasa Von Werder:

I see all this in RELIGIOUS terms. My mind is on the righteousness of God & how She has put the WOMAN as the Mother/leader of the family & the world.  I see the Patriarchal world as the quasiHell on earth which evil men have created.

    The various leaders, to my mind, are mostly, if not all, DEMONICS.  I know some of them weren’t because no matter the evil they did, they still Ascended into Heaven, as I know for a fact, Richard Nixon is in Heaven because once for several months, he appeared to me daily to assist me in dream interpretation.  Why, I don’t know as I never did anything for him, or did I?  Maybe because I pitied him when he was being persecuted, don’t know.  But I also know he did evil as he signed the ‘Special Virus Act’ funded by Congress with 500M in 1971, which led to the creation of AIDS as biological warfare, & he was also a strong part of perpetrating the Viet Nam war.  Those are evil acts but yet, he ended up in Heaven.

    And I lump them all, basically into ‘perpetrators or puppets’ of the Big Satan, whoever he is, that works through the Globalists.  And identifying all their acts, who the main villains are, is not my expertise, althought I have some ideas, like for sure, know that WHO – World Health Orgaization is 100% Satanic.  Because I know they poisoned millions of Africans with AIDS under the smallpox vaccine, & other crimes more recent.  By listening to Mike Adams & others I know the names of some of the demonics but don’t know all the details.

    You guys study areas I don’t & so you flush out my deficits, which is a good thing for our Cause, & you both see it from different POV’s.  The way Pete described it in these letters, I am more in agreement with his view.  He does not see any of these Patriarchal leaders with rose colored glasses; I like the way he describes Putin. No matter what ‘good’ these guys do, say, he made Russia strong again, he has ‘blood on his hands’ & other cruel items.  So this is reality.  Patriarchs are, by definition, evil.  What good they do is part of a bigger agenda of evil – they do good in a temporary way, say, for their own country.  But in the long run, they are part of an evil agenda which holds down women, abuses & injures women & children AS WELL AS OTHER MEN.  This is the intrinsic, fundamental evil of patriarchs.  They are part of this doomed game of ‘I will give you all the Kingdoms of the world & their glory if you will bow down & worship me,’ & they are bowing down & worshipping Satan through Patriarchy.

          Patriarchy is Satanic, demonic, it is all evil. It has no redeeming virtue at all. What ‘good’ happens is transitory, impermanent, at base, it lacks LOVE & CARING & so it has thrown God out of the equation & its conclusion is HELL.

    This is the picture I am concentrating on.  But it’s OK if you guys are experts in the individual actions of these guys – I’m not so it’s good that you are!

    Thanks for the 3 Kings Day greeting Pete.  They are proof that Jesus was a reincarnated Guru from the East – India or Tibet.  So they are extremely important in my religion.   

    BTW I didn’t even know the mainstream media hated Trump & Putin.  It seemed to me at least half the media is for Trump, as he gets whatever he wants & looks like he’ll run for President again & maybe make it, according to Mike Adams.  There will always be half the media supposedly Democrat & half supposedly Republican.  To me, Tweedle de De & Tweedle de Dum like Noam Chomsky says. –  Both evil Patriarchic organizations.  Even if Hilary had been elected President, she would have been a Patriarch, a dick in skirt as we say.  No individual woman elected into office creates a Matriarchy, the senate, Congress & Fortune 500 companies have to be represented by OVER 50% women – that is the PATH to matriarchy {although it will take a couple hundred years to undo the damage men have done} not one single impotent woman who has to do as the charlatans say.     Rasa

Love these statements of Pete:    “We have always been ruled by a gang of criminals, basically, it’s called patriarchy. And mostly they have been quite stupid, at least in the long term. ” 

Rasa says:  Patriarchy is Satanic, demonic, it is all evil.  It has no redeeming virtue at all.  What ‘good’ happens is transitory, impermanent, at base, it lacks LOVE & CARING & so it has thrown God out of the equation & its conclusion is HELL.

 

From Pete:

I am somewhat surprised that Tricky Dick Nixon (I always thought that was a funny nickname) is in Heaven, lol, but then again, there may very well have been a little bit of Light behind his otherwise dead eyes, that God felt was worth saving for some reason.  Lots of gray areas, it seems. (Interestingly, Nixon was politically to the left of Bill Clinton and even Obama on most issues, at least in practice.) Even the WHO, while its leaders are clearly 100% demonic, some good people are nonetheless likely sucked into their vast orbit without realizing just how evil they really are.   Best wishes,  Pete

 

Rasa says:

That’s just it, Pete – a lot of INNOCENT &/or non-demonics are SUCKED INTO Patriarchy.  Some may be cool or lukewarm toward God, but they are not demonic.  And they might get sucked in for physical/material reasons that override any spiritual sensitivity they have.  It is extremely difficult for us to know who goes to Hell, who does not.  Truly.  One example:  Timothy McVeigh.  Not only did he NOT go to Hell but he did only ONE YEAR TO THE DAY OF HIS EXCUTION in Purgatory {Elvis Presley did FIVE YEARS!}.  People screamed at me when I told them that, 

 

“Don’t you know what he did? – The innocent people & children, “etc.

 

Yes I know. But who am I to judge, or you?

 

Many people including ourselves get sucked into systems of Patriarchy where our hands are tied.  They tell us to jump – we do it.  I hate to remind you – the vaccines.  So many innocent people who thought they were harmless or even beneficial got sucked in & who knows the consequences?

 

Then there are taxes. They are ILLEGAL – Income taxes that is.  The people never ratified this when a vote was called for.  Try not paying your taxes & you will be in jail.  {Pete says in fact, it was ratified.  OK.  Thanks.}

 

OK being President or Prime Minister is a much bigger scale.  They have to sign all kinds of things they might not want to – but if they don’t – they will get impeached or assassinated.  Bucking the Globalists can mean death if you’re in a high place & doing big things.  Lincoln was going to change the Federal Reserve System, he got killed. {Pete corrects me, he WAS against the bankers but not the Federal Reserve.  Kennedy was against the Federal Reserve.}

 

So IMO the high-up leaders do lots of things they would not do if they had a choice.  One should think twice before seeking high offices.  But some don’t care, or care little.  Thinking of one Governor who shall remain nameless who I don’t think gives a shyt about anyone. It’s that “I will give you all the kingdoms & their glory if you will bow down & worship me” once again.   Rasa 

Below, the event of preaching for women for equal rights in the military – got into a lot of media – & a thank you letter from President Carter’s Chief of Correspondence saying ‘You have the President’s best wishes.’ – & The speech in front of the White House that ended the Cold War {within a few short years} Also preached in front of the Canadian Parliament Peace Tower in Ottowa, Canada

combatdutyarticle2thumb combatdutyarticlethumb combatsignbw kelliecombatslide (1) kellieicanadianpartm (1) thumbnail - 2022-07-16T205113.678 thumbnail (42) thumbnail (56) washcombatduty01 washspeech01 washspeech02 

ME to MOTHER GOD:

          My friends William & Pete believe in women entering the political field & taking over. Wouldn’t that be nice? But here’s the rub – they aren’t that much interested in seeking offices! And so what is the route by which we will get to Matriarchy?

MG: There isn’t any ONE ROUTE, there are many roads leading to Rome.

Many people must work on many platforms, wherever they are capable. Some politics, yes. Some, the religious pulpit except we aren’t hearing from women there, are we, {except when Rasa preached before dancing}. Some as authors – there has been great influence here. Some activists, doing pod cast interviews like Laura Aboli with Mike Adams {except they aren’t talking about Matriarchy! It’s that same’ole same’ole waiting for the good guys – the man on the White Horse, the Knight in Shining Armour – all waiting for HIM – not for women!}

Somehow or other we’ve got to break the ice about getting MATRIARCHY ON THE TABLE! It’s NOT TALKED ABOUT on any mainstream TV show & only RARELY in the alternative media.

When Rasa first got involved around 1995 in studying the dissidents, they were not represented by women – they did NOT put the issue of M v s P on the table – ever. She was listening to Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, Michael Parenti & dozens of others through ‘Alternative Radio.’ She bought $8-900 of audio tapes. These men never even CONSIDERED the issue!

Now HOW, HOW, HOW do we get Matriarchy ON THE TABLE? Will Rasa be the one to do it eventually? Can she stay well long enough, get back in the mainstream media soon enough? Yes, mainstream, like Oprah Winfrey. Isn’t that how she got BODYBUILDING to take off? Not ALTERNATIVE but MAINSTREAM MEDIA like Esquire, To Tell the Truth, Mike Douglas, & Playboy.

There were a few alternative women doing body building {Pudgy Stockton & circus performers} – but that did not cut the mustard. An idea has to get into the MAINSTREAM.

ME: Mother God, it isn’t me per se, it’s YOU – it’s God. If you steer me to do this of course I must & I will. But I cannot do it alone. There is no one backing me up. I don’t have what it takes without God. I have to have God as I did for my other big ventures, like preaching in front of the White House & Stripping for God. No human could have thought of it or made me do it, it was YOU. And I am asking, are you going to prepare me & then steer me onto Oprah & other such shows? As a human I can only think of why they would NOT permit me voice. But can you make it happen? Or rather, WILL you make it happen?

MG: We shall see. When the time is RIPE is when you will know, not until then. Like all your other endeavors, you were not warned way ahead of time nor did you anticipate any of it – you would have been too scared, lol. We’ll spring it on you when the time comes & if we do, you will proceed.

ME: PS If & when you can empower me to do this, after it is done, I will be written out of the credit such as with all else except ‘Stripping for God’ – that was the only project they could not take from me. Is that how it will be? Suddenly people will be speaking of this issue mainstream & I will be forgotten.

MG: That is not your concern. You just obey & leave the fruits or results to us. So what if you don’t get credit? It’s God who did it, through you. God gets the credit; you shall not have Her Glory. So capish? Just be quiet & when the time comes, maybe when you truly no longer care or when you have passed on you will be recognized. Don’t think about recognition – that is the ‘kingdoms of the world & their glory’.

PS Consider how negative many other women have been with you regarding recognition. As you ou did so much work, they butted in to attack you because they were JEALOUS of any RECOGNITION you might get. They wanted to be the Queen Bee, the Big Banana, the Woman on a Pedestal. You see how WRONG that is?

If a person does what they do FOR RECOGNITION it’s not done OUT OF LOVE. If you do a favor & expect something in return, it’s not charity, it’s a sort of business. Not saying this is always wrong.

But you’re working FOR A CAUSE, the cause of God, for which God sent you to earth. Why do you seek or ask for recognition? You must give this quest up, it’s not living in perfection. You must give your love to God freely & without a price tag! God sent you to do certain things – help others get closer to God & empower women. Do it & let the chips fall where they may. So they ignore what you did, as the speech in Washington. So they wrote you out of female body building. You did it, didn’t you? It bore fruit, didn’t it? Rejoice in that, & that you OBEYED GOD, you did what the Infinite Majesty wanted & trust that She will eventually reward you with Love, if not here, then in Eternity.   

Back to politics, from William:

I can remember tricky dicky. Although the Watergate scandal revealed Nixon to be a criminal, he was also Quaker and because of his Quaker beliefs he was against war. So he took the USA out of the Vietnam war. He also made peace with Communist China and tried to make peace with the USSR. This must have alarmed the Military/Industrial complex and I think this was the main reason the establishment turned against him and had him impeached. Had he been allowed to remain in power he could have ended the cold-war in the 1970s. 

 

I think the same is true of Trump. In-spite of all his faults it seems he doesn’t like war. He tried to get out USA troops out of Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan but was blocked by the USA military. He also tried to make peace with North Korea and Russia but again the establishment turned against him. So I think he has made an enemy of the Military/Industrial complex and this is why the establishment hate him.   William

 From Pete:

Yes there is a lot of nuance, William.  Nixon did indeed end the Vietnam War, albeit gradually, after four years of his presidency and lots of bombing.  Though perhaps with the military industrial complex (MIC) and the oligarchy pulling the strings of whoever is in power, Nixon in this case, that may have been the best he could have done in practice. (Even Henry Kissinger, his secretary of state, also got credit for ending the war.)  And yes, he did make peace with China too.

 

(The military industrial complex should really be called the “mercenary industrial complex”, since, as the late, great Major General Smedley Butler famously noted way back in the day, “War Is a Racket”. War greatly destroys wealth and lives for the many, but greatly enriches the tiny few at the top.)

 

I wouldn’t say Trump is anti-war per se, and like any wannabe alpha male he does luuurrrve to bang on his chest and poke every proverbial angry bear he can find, but he certainly took umbrage (and rightly so) at the ridiculous protracted military quagmires of Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan, and wanted to get us out of those. Ironically, he was the one who made the deal with the Taliban to exit Afghanistan, which Biden inherited, and the rest is history.  Like Vietnam, it was a war America lost before the war even began.  As for his frenemy, Kim Jong Un of North Korea, who really knows what is going through his head.  First they hated each other, then they became buddies almost overnight.  So overall, I can see how the MIC and thus the establishment would not like him very much, and consider him to be a rogue and a loose cannon.    Best wishes to you both,   Pete   {end}

253734219_589104605649373_6824109223632505544_n

thumbnail (5) thumbnail (6) thumbnail (7) thumbnail (8) thumbnail (10) 274986657_10228202000620401_4693371719241679409_n 4295714217_d3e15ea056_b ac9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

898 views
Mature Content

This site contains artistic nudity which may be considered offensive and/or inappropriate. Furthermore, this content may be considered adult content, if you are not of legal age or are easily offended, you are required to click the exit button.