XXXXVI UNDERGROUND RAILROAD
The New Religion, for women only
Woman Thou Art God
Rasa Von Werder
MALES OPPOSE HUMAN RIGHTS -
THEIR CONTROL OF A SOCIETY BRINGS MISERY & DEATH. WORST ARE MUSLIM COUNTRIES. WE HAVE TO HAVE AN UNDERGROUND RAILROAD FOR GETTING WOMEN OUT OF THERE.
Just saw a brilliant documentary on Afghanistan. Twenty five years ago they were forward & progressive. Women had no sexual repression – they were encouraged to wear mini skirts, go out drinking, meet men, have fun. This showed pictures of the women – beautiful – wearing gorgeous modern clothes. They worked in all areas of life – went to school, had no restrictions in personal lives, education or jobs.
But now this says everything has reverted to the bad old days, before twenty five years ago – the prior freedom has been forgotten or ignored. The law, on paper (recently), gives women equal rights. But the culture, in the streets, is an ancient theocracy where women are killed, by their own father (even with the totally ‘progressive’ family who sponsored the documentary crew-a mom, dad & daughter) if they shame/dishonor the family. (And what constitutes shaming the family?–Having a boyfriend even if they are not doing sex, walking on the street with her face uncovered, or in some cases going to school or working.) This is it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iL0ApVOSFuk
The young (looks twenty) interviewer (honey blonde hair to her waist, was constantly reminded by her hostess to cover her hair–later had to wear a burqa, which is a sheet covering the entire body with a bad net over the eyes & nose–she stepped in horse shit, couldn’t see, was afraid to step in front of a car, got a headache, felt faint–the burqa made her physically ill. She put a camera inside it & really you had about half your vision blocked off. Why couldn’t they just make a net, I thought, that you could see through? This net was thick, like strands an 1/8th of an inch thick.)
Her hostess was from a progressive family. She got educated, got a doctor degree & now works for ‘doctors without borders’ for 1k a month – a huge amount for an Afghan. With this money she helps her family (three sisters, a brother & parents) & for this she is ‘treated with the status of a man.’
But she can’t have a ‘personal life.’ She fell in love with a guy from Kabul – he agreed to her freedom, she could work & not wear the burqa (btw today by law they do not have to wear it, but most women do because of severe reprisals from society, family. She is labeled ‘suspicious’ if she shows herself without cover.)
Ms Doctor had a man she loved who promised her she could keep her freedom. But her Mom said to her,
“If you go with this man, before you do, put a little poison in food for myself & your Dad, & you will be free.”
When Doc insisted, Mom got a hypertension episode, had to be taken to the doctor & there was the threat of her getting a heart attack. Ms Doc had to drop the man, cried for three days. What was the Mom’s objection?
“In Kabul it will not be like he says it is. If you are free, it will get back to the family & shame us.”
The sisters – all women – are desperate for normal freedom, to walk the street & shop with their faces bare so they can see. This is forbidden–By men of course. And boys – little kids – begin enforcing this with little girls. Girls ten years old were asked to show their wedding party outfits – the 10-12 yr old boys stood in the way saying no – no, no.
The eighteen-year old brother of the three sisters said if he had his way, none of them would get an education or walk bare faced ever. (There are situations where the hostess & interviewer went places bare faced, – seeing officials she interviewed, a female head of government, a female professor in a college & a male chief of police – they did not wear burqas for that. But shopping in the city they did.
The 18-yr old brother squirt said that the sister who became a doctor, he had been too young to intervene – he was sorry she went to school & became a doctor & now works.
The men often promise freedom while they’re preparing for marriage, (although there are few meetings alone, if any,) but later they take it back. In this special, ‘progressive’ family one female is allowed to see her fiancé alone (they did not explain under what conditions, like were they completely alone or chaperoned from a distance.) But as soon as they get engaged or even worse married, they ‘change their minds’ & she is NO LONGER ALLOWED TO LEAVE THE HOUSE, WITHOUT HIS PERMISSION – NO SCHOOL, NO WORK. (American negro slaves were also not permitted schooling except to learn to be servants, & obey Massah like the bible said. They were permitted to work from morning to night – but no pay. In England, servants were not permitted literacy up until when? Early 1900′s perhaps. Education brings people up, it empowers them: knowledge is power.)
What this ‘culture’ is– pure & simple, is male control of women, suspension of their human rights, males as masters, women as slaves. The males who promise they will not enforce this ‘culture’ on women after they marry reneges on the promise. If a female or even her SISTER wants to go on a trip – the man threatens divorce.
Sure, it’s more convenient for them to have a slave than an equal. Sure, you have to get my permission to leave the house. Good for the man, who cares how she feels? Sure, you cover yourself head to toe so no man can see you, you can’t then attract any man. Sure, you aren’t allowed to go to school where you might meet people & God forbid know more than me, sure, you can’t work where again you’ll meet people, meet men, will earn money you could hide & escape from me. You must stay barefoot & pregnant, a little slave under my feet, completely at my mercy & if you do anything against me I can kill you with impunity – just like a slave – the law in these Muslim countries never rules against men, only women.
Speaking of which, to divorce his wife a man only has to say three times ‘I divorce you,’ but a woman has to go through rigmarole in court to get a divorce.
One female here, a woman with four children had this complaint – her husband brought other men into the house to have sex with her for money. In other words, he was a pimp forcing her into prostitution. The judge granted her a divorce, but he would not pay her the divorce fee. He also wanted one of the children to live with him – probably intending to pimp them out. The judge did not permit this until the child got older – they were all under nine years old. How could a judge grant a child this sleazebag? Isn’t the child in danger? Of course it is, but men are God’s here, they can do no wrong even when they kill.
How can you argue with a society that allows men to kill with impunity – for shaming them? Of course it is illegal, but do they enforce it? Is the man arrested, jailed, condemned to death or life? No, I’ve never heard of a man being punished in these countries for brutalizing or killing women or children. This is Patriarchy at its worst – the way it used to be before feminism. No wonder Mother God is MAKING MEN EXTINCT – how can women fight against this, because the fight itself invites murder.
They were discussing, with the siblings, if they could march in the street protesting. They said no, no way – it would shame the family – & you know what that means.
I felt such pity for the Doctor Lady. She was condemned, without a husband, to live forever with her family. She would never have a husband, children, a life of love, unless of course she quit being a doctor, married one of these monsters & agreed to serfdom.
Here women gain all their ‘status’ & ‘identity’ through their husband & children, without this they are considered FAILURES & REJECTS like unwanted trash – not good enough for a man (haha, not good enough for a scumbag.) And even if she earned the money she does, SHE CANNOT LIVE ALONE. This was not discussed or explained, but I guess a woman living alone is also ‘a prostitute’. Males would probably break into her home, gang rape her, murder her & walk away righteously.
This is what males are like – this is ‘male culture’ – Patriarchy. Not all males are evil, so I am told, so I believe but they ‘good guys’ are swept along with the worst of them to enforce these rules against women. They might not be the rapist, but they will stand on the side & let them get raped. They are not like Jesus who INTERVENED at the stoning of the adulteress, using His God Power to figure out how to save her.
Who could ever have thought of such a thing? He said,
“He who is without sin, cast the first stone.”
Then he wrote in the sand. Each man who came by to look, he traced out their secret sin or sins, each dropped his stone in fear & slinked away. Soon there were no men, & Jesus said,