College of God & Love, College of Matriarchal Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Shrine to Shakti, Uncategorized

XXXVI<>MEN ARE SUBMISSIVE

XXXVI MEN ARE SUBMISSIVE

THE NEW RELIGION

by William Bond with words from Rasa Von Werder

Thirty years ago I had the first ideas about a matriarchal religion and wrote a book with the help of my friend Pamela Suffield called,” Gospel of the Goddess”. We wrote it as a New-Age book but found the New-Age people weren’t interested in it. Then we discovered that the only people who liked it were people into femdom.

So eventually I found myself being encouraged to write on femdom sites on the internet. What I discovered was that people assumed that if women ruled the world they would be as cruel and uncaring as men. Pamela made it clear to me, that a woman can be dominant and compassionate at the same time. But when I wrote this on femdom groups I never got any positive feedback.

(RASA SAYS: THAT IS THE COMMON ASSUMPTION IN THE FEMDOM COMMUNITY & ELSEWHERE BECAUSE PEOPLE HAVE NOT THOUGHT THE ISSUE OUT. THE GENERAL PUBLIC IS FILLED WITH ASSUMPTIONS & DELUSIONS ABOUT MANY THINGS.)

Pamela dropped out because of this but I persisted and I entered the BDSM world of sadism and masochism trying to make sense of it all. People in the femdom scene did speculate why men wanted to be dominated by women because it went against the whole idea that men were the natural dominant sex. But the real reason remained a mystery.

(RASA SAYS: I WAS A PROFESSIONAL DOMINANT FOR TEN YEARS & I WAS SO BUSY ON THE WORK END OF IT I DID NOT HAVE TIME TO THINK ABOUT WHAT THEY REALLY WERE ABOUT. I WAS A PRODUCER OF VIDEOS – THEY GAVE ME SCRIPTS – I PRODUCED THEM & MADE A LOT OF MONEY BY SELLING MULTIPLE COPIES. YEARS LATER I HAD TIME TO THINK ABOUT IT & CAME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT A LOT OF THE FEMDOM SCENE IS MALES LONGING TO BE BACK WITH THEIR MOTHER. THEY WERE SMALL, SHE WAS BIG, THEY FEARED HER. BUT SHE ALSO LOVED THEM & MADE THEM FEEL SECURE. THEY DRAMATIZE THESE FEELINGS THEY HAD WHERE SHE BECOMES A HUGE DOMINATING FIEND – IN REAL LIFE YELLING AT A LITTLE BOY MIGHT HAVE SEEMED THAT WAY, OR SPANKING HIM. THEY WANT YOU TO REPRODUCE THIS SCENARIO & MAKE THEM FEEL SECURE WITH MOM AGAIN.)

After awhile I began to realize that sadomasochist desires probably had a lot to do with men’s competitive urges. We see sex and violence linked when animals like stags and bulls fight each for dominance and access to females. So a male animal has to fight other males and win, before he can have sex with females. This suggests that violence, dominance and submission are strongly connected to sex, in the minds of these animals. It seems the same is true for human males as well.

The problem is for most men that only a handful of men get to play the dominant role. In our hierarchal system only the leaders are in a dominant position and have real power, most men are powerless. So the femdom scene reflects the true situation of the majority of men in any patriarchal society.

It is true that patriarchy does encourage men to be dominant in their relationships with women and are made to feel ashamed if a woman dominates them. In the Western world up until the second half of the 20th century if a man failed to dominate his wife he was considered a wimp and not a ‘real man’.

(RASA SAYS: INDEED BY ALL MEANS A PATRIARCHAL SOCIETY DOES NOT PERMIT A MALE TO BE DOMINATED BY A WOMAN. THAT IS WHY OLDER WOMEN ARE NOT TO GO OUT WITH YOUNG MALES – THEY KNOW SHE’LL INFLUENCE HIM. THEY GO TO GREAT LENGTHS TO MAKE THIS A TABOO, SAYING OLD WOMEN ARE UGLY, SEXLESS, NOT WORTHY OF YOUR DESIRE. IF YOU DATE ONE THEY RIDICULE YOU. IF YOU LOVE ONE THEY CALL YOU ‘MAMMA’S BOY’ AS IF THAT WAS SOMETHING TO BE ASHAMED OF. BEING A MAMMA’S BOY IS ONE WHO OBEYS A FEMALE & THAT’S WHAT THEY FEAR. YOU MUST OBEY OTHER MEN SO THEY CAN DRAG YOU TO YOUR DOOM.)

In Islamic countries it was even worse with the ‘honour’ system. In this culture if a woman didn’t respect or disobeys her husband or male relation he was ‘dis-honoured’. The only way he could then regain his honour was to beat her up or murder her.

(RASA SAYS: THESE ARE PATHETIC DEMONICALLY POSSESSED PEOPLE.)

This then begs the question; if it is natural for a man to be the dominant sex, why does it need such an extreme violent custom to enforce it? If it was a natural behaviour it wouldn’t need to be enforced by any violent custom. This suggests it is not natural for men to be the dominant sex.

Because of this many men are either forced to play the role of a dominant male even though he doesn’t want to do this. Or the woman’s dominance is kept a secret and she only dominates him behind closed doors. Though it seems that women are not into dominance and submission in the same way men are.

Females are different because they also connect sex with love because sex gives them children with whom they have a deep maternal love. This suggests that men connect sex with dominance, submission and violence while women connect sex with love. Though there is a crossover, men can teach women how to connect sex with sadomasochist desires and women can teach men how to connect sex with loving relationships.

The problem is that this can also create a misunderstanding between men and women. This is because many men assume that women who love them deeply must be masochistic and feel they have the right to abuse them. This is because masculine men see love as a weakness. They think, “nice guys come last” and so a loving person must be a loser. As the result, it is assumed by them that cruel and sadistic people are strong, while caring and loving people are weak.

(RASA SAYS: THE TEACHINGS OF SATAN & HIS CREW.)

This ignores that fact that loving women have to be very strong to be pregnant, give birth and then devote their lives in caring for helpless children. If women didn’t have the strength to do this, the human race would have become extinct long ago.

The masculine attitude affects the whole of patriarchal life. Male rulers like kings, emperors and presidents are told they have to be cruel and ruthless to be effective rulers. Generals are told they have to ruthlessly and use their troops like pawns on a chessboard and not care about casualties. There are also told to show no mercy to the enemy if they want to win.

(RASA SAYS: THE PATRIARCHY IS THE CULTURE OF DEATH. THEY COME TO ‘STEAL, KILL & DESTROY.’ MATRIARCHY IS THE CULTURE OF LIFE. PATRIARCHY IS THE RULE OF SATAN, ‘SATAN IS THE PRINCE OF THIS WORLD’ JESUS SAID. THE FIRST REVELATION GOD EVER SPOKE TO ME IN 1971 – WAS ‘SATAN RULES THE WORLD & HE WORKS THROUGH MEN.’ IT WAS A FRIGHTENING REVELATION TO ME.)

Soldiers are also considered to be useless if they cannot ruthlessly kill the enemy. Businessmen are told that they must sack employees when they are no longer needed. As well as screwing down employees wages as much as possible, to maximize profits. While politicians are taught they have to use Machiavellian methods in which to destroy the opposition and deceive the voters.

(SATAN IS ANTI LOVE, SO OF COURSE PATRIARCHY IS. THERE IS NO LOVE IN HIS SYSTEM WHATSOEVER. IN THE END HE BRINGS DEATH & DAMNATION TO EVERYONE IF HE HAS HIS WAY.)

So in this, “dog eat dog” world, love is clearly a weakness. Many politicians will only talk about love and compassion to win votes and forget about it when voted into power. But this is only true while compassionate women are kept out of power and don’t active the power of the One within themselves. This is probably why patriarchal societies have actively tried to prevented women gaining political, financial and religious power.

(RASA SAYS: SATAN WAS UNABLE TO POSSESS WOMEN THE WAY HE DID MEN, NEITHER CAN THE WARMONGERS GET GOOD WOMEN SOLDIERS TO TORTURE & KILL INNOCENT PEOPLE. HE WAS ABLE TO POSSESS HUMAN MEN & MAKE THEM DEMONIC, & THAT IS THE BASIS OF PATRIARCHY. THEIR WARS ARE SATAN’S PLAYGROUND.)

The patriarchal elite have known they cannot stop women from loving so they have encouraged women to love others but never themselves. So women were made to feel guilty about this and encouraged to love brutal men but never themselves or other women.

But unconditional love is a love for yourself as well as everything else, there is no-limits to unconditional love. When a woman learns total unconditional love where she can both love herself and love everyone else, she can be a caring dominant woman.

(RASA SAYS: LOVING YOURSELF IS THE BEGINNING OF ALL LOVE. IF ONE DOES NOT LOVE THEMSELF THEY CANNOT GENERATE LOVE FOR OTHERS. IT’S BETTER TO LIVE FOR OTHERS IN THE RIGHTEOUS WAY THAN TO KILL YOURSELF FOR THEM. LOVE THY NEIGHBOR AS THYSELF – THE WORD THYSELF MEANS MAKE SURE YOU LOVE YOURSELF. OF COURSE THERE’S A THEOLOGY OF MARTYRDOM THE WAY JESUS PERMITTED HIS CRUCIFIXION, BUT THAT’S ANOTHER ROAD.)

This is in total contrast to what we are told. So the dominance and submission desires cause men to assume that not only are loving women masochistic. They also assume that if they love women then they themselves must be masochistic and must therefore submit to women.

Many women can love others without the baggage of thinking in terms of dominance and submission but it is harder for men to do this. Unfortunately, the femdom scene was created by men and it has been men who have taught women how to be dominant. So they teach women to dominate like a man and be cruel and violent.

We see this is they way women are dressed in Femdom scene where women wear black leather which is very masculine dress. They also suppose to dominate through physical punishment which again is a masculine way of doing this.

Yet over the centuries many wives have found it easy to dominate their husbands without having to do anything like this. Women do not have to adopt masculine methods to dominate men. There are many women who find it easy to dominate men and their secret is to simply tell men what to do. Once women realise that men are the submissive sex and will obey orders from those in authority, she finds many men will obey her.

This power can be made more powerful if a woman connects to the One and realise she has a stronger connect to the One than most men. So by this connection she can feel she is a Goddess. This then gives her a greater authority, which men can tune into and make them want to serve and obey her.

Many wives have dominated their husbands throughout the patriarchal age but only work through their husbands. This was because in the past women were only allowed to do menial work and kept away from any high paying work. But today women do not have to be limited by this and can have the same work as men. Though few women haven’t yet used their Goddess power to gain both financial and political power for themselves.

The patriarchy has kept women powerless by getting them to worship male gods and undermining their confidence. It is well known in sports that one way to win is to demoralize your opponent through verbal abuse. This is also used in war, business and politics as well as the sex-war between men and women.

Many women cannot understand why men say horrible and nasty things to them and don’t realise it is part of the power-game men play. Competitive men look for weaknesses in each other and will exploit any they find. So if this type of man finds he can upset his girlfriend by any verbal abuse, he will exploit this to his own advantage.

Men also have the power of violence and can use his greater size and strength

This is because masculine men see relationships as a competitive game of dominance and submission. This then is a big problem for any women who think relationships are all about love.

These dominance and submission desires in men also are reflected in how men organize themselves. For a group of men to do a task together they find it easier to appoint a leader who tells the other men what to do. For this reason all patriarchal societies are organized in a hierarchical structure.

We see this in all patriarchal societies were they are ruled by a small very rich and powerful ruling elite while the majority of people are poor and powerless. What is also surprising is the small ruling elite is worshiped by the people.

Logically this doesn’t make sense, unless it has to do with men’s masochistic desires to worship winners. The small ruling elite is seen like the dominant stag or bull as winner and is therefore worshiped by the losers who are the poor and powerless.

Not only do men worship the ruling elite they are totally obedient to them. We see this in warfare where soldiers where obey without question orders that will put their lives in extreme danger.

Perhaps it might be that men are the true natural submissive sex because slavery has been commonplace throughout recorded history. Serfs and slaves are totally powerless people, they are actually owned by other people and they have no rights and can be beaten or murdered with impunity. While the fruits of their labour goes to their owner and not to them.

It is true that women have also been slaves but women at least have good reason for this. Women are smaller, weaker and less aggressive than men so it is a lot harder for women to fight back when slavery is imposed on them through violence and intimidation.

If men are the dominant sex, as claimed by patriarchal propaganda, why have we had slavery and serfdom? We have had slavery from the time of the Ancient Greeks and Romans up until the 19th century. So men cannot be very domineering, if it is so easy for other men to turn them into slaves and serfs?

We also find the same situation in the military, where soldiers are seen as being tough macho men. Yet soldier will obey without question, the most insane orders which will result in their deaths. The extremes of this are World War One where soldiers climbed out of their trenches to face near certain death by machine gun fire because they were ordered to do so. Or in World War Two where Japanese Kamikaze suicide pilots deliberately crashed their aircraft into enemy shipping because they were also obeying orders. Patriarchy will spin this as iron discipline, but it is also extreme submission to authority.

The surprising thing is that the military can train men to kill themselves when ordered to do so, without any intense brainwashing. All they do is boss them around on a parade ground and they get so used to obeying orders that they will obey the most insane orders on the battle field.

What is striking about all patriarchal societies is that that they are all based on a hierarchal structure, where it seems men cannot work together unless they appoint a leader to tell them what to do. These leaders then get total obedience to the degree it is very easy for all patriarchal leaders to abuse their power.

This is why in all male dominated societies there is a vast gap between rich and poor because the ruling elite find it too easy to exploit the people they rule. This is only possible because men have within them a very strong instinct to obey orders from anyone in a leadership position. We have had in the past kings, emperors and dictators who have been obviously insane and yet still retain power. So strong is men’s instinct to obey a leader.

So this means that if women want to rule men all they have to do is to adopt the leadership position. Patriarchy has stopped women doing this by undermining women’s confidence in themselves. They also have told women that men are the natural dominant sex and women have believed this.

The femdom scene does show us that many men have strong desires to worship and obey women. But unfortunately the men advise women that they must act and behave like a macho males to successful dominate men. Yet most women don’t want to do this and this is why there is a shortage of dominant women in the femdom scene. Women are better able to dominate men by acting and behaving like women.

Although men play power-games with each other and with women, most men in all these power-games are losers. We see this in how patriarchal societies are designed where a small ruling elite have all the power and wealth while the majority of the people are poor and powerless.

So the average man is far more submissive than he is willing to admit. Women can take over and dominate men once she realized that men are the true submissive sex. So she can rule men by acting like a goddess and men will want to worship her. (End of William Bond’s article)

HERE WILLIAM HAS PROVEN BY ARGUMENT THAT MEN ARE THE SUBMISSIVE SEX. I agree with him. In order to be the boss of men, you act like the boss & he’ll obey. Don’t be afraid of him. Believe in yourself, your own Divinity, nature & identity. If you believe in yourself, have faith, trust & confidence in Mother God working through you, you will win on all fronts.

Put yourself into the HAND OF MOTHER GOD. Trust Her, honor Her, believe in Her, surrender to Her – She is the God within you. With Her help you can CONQUER ALL THINGS – Be they men, poverty, illness, bad relationships, all challenges. She can wipe out debt, fix crooked relationships/find new ones, give you opportunities, get you out of addiction, bring you to your greatest good. Work each day on TRUSTING HER.

Woman, thou art God! Go forth & rule yourself, your family & world! To be continued article by William Bond Words by Rasa Von Werder 11-9-19

College of God & Love, College of Matriarchal Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Shrine to Shakti, Uncategorized

XXXV<>PAST MATRIARCHY

XXXV THE LAST MATRIARCHAL AGE

by guest author WILLIAM BOND

William Bond has been working on these issues many years, his book, ‘Gospel of the Godess’ was published thirty years ago. He’s a rare man who understands things on the subject as no other man I know.

So what do these teachings mean in our present day society of the 21th century? We live in a world that has been dominated by the men for the last 5,000 years. The result has been a world of conflict, oppression, war, genocide and chaos. We are now in danger of destroying ourselves with destructive weapons like nuclear bombs as well as widespread pollution.

The situation is now becoming so dangerous that the One is encouraging women to regain power so we can return to the protection of the One. Unfortunately, too many women are learning how to gain power by learning from men. But men can only teach women how to be more aggressive and competitive. Teachings like this only take us all further away from the One.

An example of this would be politics where women politicians are taught by men to be as deceptive, corrupt and competitive as male politicians. The result has been that when female politicians act and behave like men, they can only mimic what men do and are not leading us back to the One.

Although as more women that come into positions of power the more confident women will eventually become in being themselves and no longer have to pretend to be men. When they finally do this they can start to lead humanity back to the One.

About 5,000 years ago men took control of our world and they were able to do this when women listened to deceitful men who encouraged women to break their connection to the One.

There was a time in the past when women ruled the world and patriarchy has since tried to destroy all knowledge and evidence of this. So how could women rule the world when men are physically bigger and stronger as well as being more competitive and aggressive than women?

When women ruled the world there was a religion where people worshiped the Great Mother who gave birth to our world. The Great Mother is of course the One. She is all-that-there-is. It was through this religion that women connected to the One as the Great Mother.

Women then were representatives of the Great Mother in this world and so all women were worshiped by men as goddesses. So men have a natural desire to worship women and this desire becomes far stronger when women find ways to connect to the One. This means, the more women are able to once again connect themselves to the One the more men will want to worship and obey them.

(RASA SAYS: THE ONE REFERS TO NONDUALITY, SEE THE LAST TWO CHAPTERS ON THIS. IN NONDUALITY YOU ARE NOT SUBJECTIVE IN YOUR VIEW OF THE WORLD, YOU SEE IT OBJECTIVELY, FROM A VIEW OF THE GOD-SELF. YOU SEE YOURSELF ACTING LIKE A CHARACTER IN A MOVIE OR PLAY. THIS WAS IMO WHAT HAPPENED TO ADAM & EVE ‘IN THE GARDEN.’ THE APPLE IS GOOD & EVIL, IT IS NONDUALITY VS SEPARATION. IT SHOWS THE FALL OF MANKIND, NOT DUE TO WOMEN IN TRUTH, BUT DUE TO PATRIARCHY, MEN.

HERE WILLIAM RIGHTLY BLAMES MEN FOR WOMEN LOSING THE ONE – WE ALL LOST IT WHEN MEN TOOK OVER. BEING IN THE NONDUALITY MODE, IN CHRISTIAN TERMS YOU MIGHT CALL IT CONTEMPLATION – YOU ARE LIVING IN A HEAVEN ON EARTH, LIKE THE GARDEN OF EDEN. IT’S A CONSCIOUSNESS OF BLISS, HAPPINESS; IT’S THE ONLY WAY & PLACE WE CAN BE HAPPY. THERE IS MUCH MORE TO BE SAID ON THIS IN FUTURE.)

So how did women lose the connection to the Great Mother? Although the One had unlimited wisdom and intelligence it didn’t know or understand the world of separation. It was only men who knew and understood this world. The One couldn’t comprehend the world of lies, deception and trickery created by men. So didn’t know what to do when these things were used against women.

Deceitful and ambitious men told women that it was unfair that people only worshiped a female deity and they should be allowed to worship a male god as well.

Women allowed this to happen, and so men were allowed to form their own priesthood and worship male gods. In the spirit of fairness women began to worship these male gods as well and in the process lost their power. This was because these male gods represent separation and conflict and took women away from the Oneness of the Great Mother.

So the male priests began to teach and practice masculine teachings which were about aggression, competitiveness and hatred. They also taught women about sacrificial love which is close to women’s maternal love for their children. So the priests taught that maternal love and sacrificial love where the same thing.

This seems to be true because a mother will sacrifice herself for her child. but for a mother to be able to care for her child she has to ensure she is strong enough to do this. So the sacrificial aspect of this is limited because if a mother sacrifices herself completely she can become so mentally or physically weak, she cannot properly care for or protect her child.

The women who listened to the priests began to feel guilty about putting any of her own needs before the child and the priests sensing a weakness, encouraged this feelings of guilt even more. So in the end women began to feel guilty about loving herself in any situation and as the result she began to lose her connection to the One and was no longer in tune with her Goddess power.

The One has never demanded sacrificial love, the One is an all encompassing love for everything and that includes our love for ourselves. The male priests in the spirit of separation encouraged the split between our love for ourselves and others. They were encouraged to do this when they saw it broke women’s connection to the One.

They also encouraged men to have sacrificial love for others and were even successful in making some men feel guilty about loving themselves. This guilt was used by the male priests to help them gain greater control over men.

Through this, these men were able to break away from the control of the women. They quickly created a world of chaos and conflict and when they were challenged about this they defended their power through deception and violence.

So the holy women of the Great Mother religion then found themselves in conflict with male dominated religions. The women who returned to the original teaching of the Great Mother saved themselves but the women who tried to compete with men lost out.

Some women went as far as becoming Amazons and fighting men on the battle-field. But men have all the physical advantages in warfare and women lost when attempting this. This means that when women try to act and behave like men, they find they are at a big disadvantage.

Another problem for women is that men have what Sigmund Freud called the Madonna–whore complex. The famous psychologist points out that men either worship women as Goddesses, or treat them as abused slaves.

Men are like this is other ways when they say, “you’re either for us or against us.” It is there competitive instincts that make it hard for them the take the moderate line in anything. As they divide the world up into winners and losers. So men have a similar attitude about women.

It seems men had not problems in worshiping women as Goddesses but when patriarchy undermined this, men went to the opposite extreme and treated women as abused slaves.

People can only tune into the power of the One through love because unconditional love and Oneness are the same thing. Once women start to compete against men then they lose that sense of Oneness. The One possess all the wisdom, intelligence and power of the whole universe, so women become all-powerful when they make that connection.

Masculine power on the other hand is the power of conflict. Men can become extremely powerful when they are totally ruthless, brutal and deceitful but this power if unchecked can only destroy itself.

Patriarchal men has gained power and kept it by knowing how to gain power over other men. The patriarchal age hasn’t benefited most men as it paradoxically turned the majority into slaves, serfs and peasants. The ruling elite of the patriarchal world found that all men are very obedient to anyone who presents themselves as figures of authority and exploited this to the full.

So instead of worshiping women as Goddesses, men found themselves worshiping the male ruling elite who treated them like slaves. In the past male rulers set themselves up as gods and expected the people to worship them as such.

Later when people saw through this deception the rulers then claimed they had the, “divine right of kings,” and that it was ‘God’s will’ that they are rulers. Yet, even today when people are aware that their rulers are not gods or divine-rulers, common people will still worship those who have political and financial power.

Because of this the vast gap between rich and poor is as bad as it ever has been because most men will meekly obey anyone in position of authority.

Men obedience to authority is clearly shown in war. We tend to think solders as tough macho men but the best soldiers are so passive they will obey the most insane orders without question. An example of this is World War One when soldiers of all countries would come out of the trenches to be mowed down by machine gun fire because they were ordered to do this. The military will spin this as iron discipline, but it is also extreme submission to authority.

The Japanese in World War Two went a step further and used Kamikaze suicide pilots to deliberately crash their aircraft into enemy shipping because they were also obeying orders. They weren’t volunteers, they were simply ordered to do this and none refused to obey.

So it means that women do not have to compete with men for power, all they have to do is present themselves as Goddesses and men will obey them. Perhaps we can learn something about this from the Femdom scene. (End William Bond’s article.)

From Rasa: Remember, Woman thou art God!

That means you can right the wrongs, once you find your identity with Mother God. There will be additional chapters on nondulity/finding the One or the God Self – there’s a science to it that I am familiar with.

It is not for everyone but it could be for you, if you are to save yourself, others & the world.

To be continued Article by William Bond for The New Religion – ‘Woman Thou Art God’ - Words from Rasa Von Werder 11-8-19

College of God & Love, College of Matriarchal Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Shrine to Shakti, Uncategorized

XXXIV <>NONDUALITY

XXXIV NONDUALITY-ADVAITA-THE ONE

Response to the article ‘The Feminine One’ by William Bond

William, you speak of going back to the One but when I wrote my chapter on Banishing the Ego you wrote in an e mail you did not believe a person could live without ego (but banishment of the ego is the path to connect with the ONE) – & I do understand your point & agree that without some connection, affiliation with time & space it would be difficult to function in this world, take care of ourselves & those around us. To be completely & at all times TOTALLY abstracted in the One (yogis call it SELF, Christians call it CONTEMPLATION or something similar) one would be IN A TRANCE such as Ramakrishna was for months (was it six?) where he did not eat – but a wise yogi would rouse him & make him swallow rice water, another yogi would beat him with a stick to wake up, eat, then Ramakrishna fell back into his trance.

(See further down where Ramakrishna is having a convo with Keshab & Keshab protests that if the ‘I’ is removed there is nothing there, we disappear, & Ramakrishna explains two different kinds of ego – ripe & unripe – give up the ‘unripe I’ but keep the ripe one. )

Ramana Maharshi, one of the greatest nonduality gurus, stated that no matter where you are in lifestyle or family, go ahead & practice this nonduality whenever, wherever you can. Do not think you have to be FOREVER alone, in a cave, on a mountain–I love what he says as I say the same thing. Isolation is not PERMANENT but highly recommended to FIND YOURSELF / the ‘I AM THAT I AM’ state, the state called ‘One with God,’ One with the God/Self, Intimacy with God, etc. I must here add, however, that Ramana did spend maybe ten years in caves & mountains exploring his spirituality alone (besides the original three years inside & near a temple in a deep trance.)

When Ramana Maharshi, at age sixteen, magically entered the state of nonduality, he went to a far-off region with a sacred mountain, Aranchula, threw away his money, bowed down to the local Temple saint, submitted himself, & stayed in trance for THREE YEARS. He would recline in the Temple or around it where wicked boys would torture & tease him – he did not respond. Insects crawled on him & bit him – he didn’t notice. (Luckily a kind man noticed his condition & locked him in a gated garden nearby, providing his food – he was practically anorexic.)

What Hindu yogis eat: When this man provided him with food, from reading the detailed accounts of the life of Baba Muktananda & also a male who went to India & stayed with a yogi a long time, we speak of MEAGER RATIONS. Muktananda told us where he lived, room & board, the landlord gave him RICE & MILLET & he was satisfied. I read an account of a PRISONER OF WAR in an Asian country who said their rations were nothing but millet – which is BIRD SEED. Have you ever seen millet? It’s a tiny round beige seed, tasteless to me, which is the main ingredient when you buy mixed birdseed, & it’s the last item they eat. A friend of mine, an asst. professor at Harvard, went to stay with Amma, the Hugging Saint – there were many Americans there. He said the food was so meager, they complained they could not live on it & built their own bakery to make bread. We must understand we Americans are getting big, bigger & monstrous from the food we eat. Many in other countries eat tiny amounts compared to us & little meat, & they are skin & bones. Look at India, Africa, the desert nomads on internet videos. Look what they eat, & see what we eat. Some of them live on less than 1,000 calories a day & they consider it adequate. Some children get only milk for breakfast before school – no food!)

(Similar to the Christian saints who sequestered themselves either in a cave, or on a high mountain such as Jesus & Moses, or their private room like St. Catherine of Sienna & dealt little with the world–such experiences lasted two, three years. After coming out of this they were transformed but could function well in the active life. I went through this in my apt in B’klyn. The length of time is not crucial, Jesus did the same in forty days & nights, my time alone was partial for a year, then almost total another year–I HAD to take care of myself & could not go completely ‘OUT’ but I attained the same graces these saints did. I saw God FACE TO FACE TWICE & that is PROOF I entered NONDUALITY completely, not partially, because I saw that I WAS GOD, GOD WAS ME. This state is in some way reached by all saints in all religions, whatever they call it, however they describe it.)

Being in the One, according to the teachings of Ramana Maharshi as well as my own experience, is being INSIDE oneself, the focus or attention on the Eternal Consciousness within, or one could also say ABOVE THE WORLD, seeing it objectively, where one’s mind/focus is NOT HERE SUBJECTIVELY, not here like ‘I am in my body, I feel pain when people insult me’ but I am ‘here in the realm of Infinity, above the world, above people….they cannot affect me or hurt me, flatter me or defame me, as I feel no reaction, I am not there inside my body within the character I play – these characters are fronts, they are not me, I am an Infinite Being, I am watching the world, people, their reaction to who they think is me, but they cannot move me, I am NOT THERE, I am even watching my own self like I am in the front row watching a play.

William speaks of women having to return to this state which he calls THE ONE which means the same as Nonduality – Finding the God Within, the God Self – which we originally were in, representing a MOTHER, & controlling/guiding men into righteousness. He says this is the solution & when women do this & take back the men under their wings we will have peace.

What is THE ONE based on other terms? I began writing this religion explaining how women must find the God WITHIN THEMSELVES–& have reiterated that now we must step apart from men & work on this angle – safe space for women – our autonomy – create our own world, religion, spirituality, zeitgeist, POV, moral compass, OUR AGENDA.

I suggest that those who can should forfeit marriage to work on finding this God – those who can’t should spend enough time each day, on themselves, alone, in meditation when possible – not interrupted by family, & this will SAVE THEMSELVES. Saving themselves first will enable them to save others – their family – people they don’t know – & the world.

I also put forth that those women who have the vision should find relationships with other women – gay or straight relationships, without fear of reprisals, criticism or judgement from this society. They can set up female dormitories, female co-op apartments, or women-only families (they can get sperm from outings which could be regular, ‘night out for fun’ but not permit the males to know anything about the progeny, put on the birth certificate ‘father unknown’–the males are irrelevant & have no parental rights over the child.) This would be stepping apart from Patriarchy in a big way.

As to the religion I propose, the one of finding GOD WITHIN. I shall only give a brief synopsis now & will enlarge upon it in future.

One of my gurus, Sri Ramakrishna, had this to say about THE GOD WITHIN – NONDUALITY – ADVAITA (prodounced Adoita):

Sri Ramakrishna: “I” and “mine” indicate ignorance. Without ignorance one cannot have such a feeling as “I am the doer; these are my wife, children, possessions, name and fame”.

Thereupon Keshab said, ‘Sir, if one gave up the “I”, nothing whatsoever would remain.’

Sri Ramakrishna: I am not asking you to give up all of the “I”. You should give up only the “unripe I”. The “unripe I” makes one feel: “I am the doer. These are my wife and children. I am a teacher.” Renounce this “unripe I” and keep the “ripe I”, which will make you feel that you are the servant of God, His devotee, and that God is the Doer and you are His instrument.

~ from “The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna”, chapter 12 – ‘The Festival at Panihati’ -> http://www.rkmhq.org/gospel/chapter12.htm

What is non duality in Christianity?

In spirituality, nondualism, also called non-duality, means “not two” or “one undivided without a second”. Nondualism primarily refers to a mature state of consciousness, in which the dichotomy of I-other is “transcended”, and awareness is described as “centerless” and “without dichotomies”.

another research:

What does non duality feel like?

Right now, have a go at feeling out the space around you. … You are always in a non-dual state, even if you feel like everything is duality. Non-dual awareness is supposedly like being the entire space and any feeling of a “body” is dissolved.

(Rasa says: don’t be alarmed by this. It’s not usually completely dissolved, most often partially dissolved. If you are completely dissolved you are in such a deep trance people have to wake you up to feed you & make you drink, or you might die.)

There is no feeling of effort when going about your daily life.

Another research concerns Ramakrishna endowing his disciple Vivekananda for the first time with nonduality:

On Vivekananda’s second visit, Ramakrishna placed his foot on his body, with the result that the room vanished and Vivekananda felt like he was about to merge into a void; this apparently far surpassed any of his childhood experiences:

“I was terribly frightened and thought I was facing death, for the loss of individuality meant that. Unable to control myself, I cried out, ‘What is this that you are doing to me? I have my parents at home!’ He laughed at this and stroking my chest said, ‘All right, let it rest now. Everything will come in time.’ No sooner had he said this than that strange experience vanished. I was myself again and found everything…as it had been before. All this..revolutionized my mind. I thought what it could possibly be. It came and went at the mere wish of this wonderful man!”

RASA SAYS: IF YOU MAY RECALL MY WRITINGS ON NONDUAL EXPERIENCES, HOW SPOOKY THEY WERE. I WAS IN ‘OUTER SPACE’ WITHOUT ANYTHING TO HOLD ONTO THE FIRST TIMES IN 1982, AFTER WHICH I SAW GOD FACE TO FACE TWICE. ONLY RECENTLY I BEGAN MEDITATING ON THIS THEME AGAIN & AT THE EDGE OF IT FELT LIKE I WAS ON A CLIFF IN THE GRAND CANYON WHERE I COULD FALL IN & SNAPPED BACK FROM FEAR. UPON STUDYING THIS LOOKING BACK I THINK THE FOUR DAYS & NIGHTS OF BEING ‘ABOVE IMAGES,’ A BLISSFUL TRANCE-LIKE STATE, A GIFT GIVEN ME UPON FINISHING THE FOUR VOLUME ‘MYSTICAL CITY OF GOD’ – WAS NONDUALITY. THIS WAS LATE 1981.

My last Yoga guru was Ramana Maharshi. He guided me into nonduality in 2007 -

I had started the journey with a female living guru, ‘Swami G’, but we had a falling out as she simply did not like me & insisted I DID NOT have the ‘Divine Stigmata’–(she failed to understand the Interior Divine Stigmata which is real & harbored by several known female saints – St. Teresa of Avila, St. Catherine of Sienna, St. Faustina, St. Gertrude the Great – & said if I did not have bleeding wounds I didn’t have it. I asked her if her Kundalini was real &she said yes. But it is invisible, is it not? So is my Divine Stigmata.)

There is an excellent video on You tube with teachings from Ramana. It’s called ‘Sri Ramana Maharshi – JNANI, uploaded May 25, 2018.

How Ramana Maharshi discovered God Within:

The turning point in Venkataraman’s (his birth name) life came spontaneously in mid-July 1896. One afternoon, the youth for no apparent reason was overwhelmed by a sudden, violent fear of death. Years later, he narrated this experience as follows:

It was about six weeks before I left Madura for good that a great change in my life took place . It was quite sudden. I was sitting in a room on the first floor of my uncle’s house. I seldom had any sickness and on that day there was nothing wrong with my health, but a sudden, violent fear of death overtook me. (Rasa says: could this have been the impending nonduality, death of the ego he was sensing? It sounds like it to me.) There was nothing in my state of health to account for it; and I did not try to account for it or to find out whether there was any reason for the fear. I just felt, ‘I am going to die,’ and began thinking what to do about it. It did not occur to me to consult a doctor or my elders or friends. I felt that I had to solve the problem myself, then and there.

The shock of the fear of death drove my mind inwards and I said to myself mentally, without actually framing the words: ‘Now death has come; what does it mean? What is it that is dying? This body dies.’ And I at once dramatized the occurrence of death. I lay with my limbs stretched out stiff as though rigor mortis had set in and imitated a corpse so as to give greater reality to the enquiry. I held my breath and kept my lips tightly closed so that no sound could escape, so that neither the word ‘I’ or any other word could be uttered, ‘Well then,’ I said to myself, ‘this body is dead. It will be carried stiff to the burning ground and there burnt and reduced to ashes. But with the death of this body am I dead? Is the body ‘I’? It is silent and inert but I feel the full force of my personality and even the voice of the ‘I’ within me, apart from it. So I am Spirit transcending the body.

The body dies but the Spirit that transcends it cannot be touched by death. This means I am the deathless Spirit.’ All this was not dull thought; it flashed through me vividly as living truth which I perceived directly, almost without thought-process. ‘I’ was something very real, the only real thing about my present state, and all the conscious activity connected with my body was centred on that ‘I’. From that moment onwards the ‘I’ or Self focused attention on itself by a powerful fascination. Fear of death had vanished once and for all. Absorption in the Self continued unbroken from that time on. Other thoughts might come and go like the various notes of music, but the ‘I’ continued like the fundamental sruti note that underlies and blends with all the other notes. Whether the body was engaged in talking, reading, or anything else, I was still centred on ‘I’. Previous to that crisis I had no clear perception of my Self and was not consciously attracted to it. I felt no perceptible or direct interest in it, much less any inclination to dwell permanently in it.

(RASA SAYS: Notice how FRIGHTENING the change from living in ego/time & place/this world of people & things into the consciousness of NO EGO, ETERNITY, NO ATTACHMENT is. It is a DEATH indeed – death to this world. This is what happens when our body dies, to some degree, although attachments, the mind still being here on earth, causes a delay in the Beatific Vision, these attachments must be removed/cleansed in Purgatory.)

The effect of the death experience brought about a complete change in Venkataraman’s interests and outlook. He became meek and submissive without complaining or retaliating against unfair treatment. He later described his condition:

One of the features of my new state was my changed attitude to the Meenakshi Temple. Formerly I used to go there occasionally with friends to look at the images and put the sacred ash and vermillion on my brow and would return home almost unmoved. But after the awakening I went there almost every evening. I used to go alone and stand motionless for a long time before an image of Siva or Meenakshi or Nataraja and the sixty-three saints, and as I stood there waves of emotion overwhelmed me.

This philosophy/discipline/consciousness is not easy to attain but there are formulas. I reviewed with you my Christian formula which led to the Beatific Vision in chapter XXVII ‘Ego Banishment.’ In future I will discuss the Yoga formula & my recent attempts with it. Meanwhile, remember,

Woman Thou Art God,

finding the God within, realizing Her, living her, will free you from Patriarchy, the slavery to it & men, will save you, bring you happiness, enable you to help others & save the world – Go for it!

To be continued Rasa Von Werder 11-4-19

College of God & Love, College of Matriarchal Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Shrine to Shakti, Uncategorized

XXXIII<>FEMININE ONE

XXXIII THE FEMININE ONE by WILLIAM BOND

Inspired by my efforts in writing ‘The New Religion’ William Bond jumped in to present several

chapters on the subject. Here’s the first one:

Chapter One

We all come from the One and the One is female. We were all one mind, one spirit and lived in perfect love and harmony. Unfortunately that total perfection created stagnation. In a total harmonious world there was no reason or motivation to change anything. So there came a desire from the One to experience life outside of itself, to experience individually and relationships.

To do this, She created a material universe and within it created bodies, so parts of the One could inhabit these bodies and experience the illusion of being separate from the One. This gave the One, a taste of what it is like to be separate but then it went further and created beings that had no memory of being part of the One.

Because of this, these beings began to experience loneliness, fear and suffering in this world of separation. For this reason they quickly had a powerful desire to return to the One. So their first exploration in the world of separation was brief.

Yet, the One wanted to learn more about the world of separation and created a being that revelled in a separate world and that was how the masculine was created.

The masculine was able to live outside of the One because it was created to enjoyed competition. Someone who enjoys competing, fighting and conflict is a person that can live outside of the One. But this competitive instinct also led to hatred, violence and suffering.

This wasn’t a too much a problem in animals but became a real problem in an intelligent creature like a human being. As men found that could make weapons like spears and clubs in which to attack each other, leading to murder, wars and genocide.

For this reason the One created men to want to worship and obey women. This gave women power over men so they could restrain their violent instincts. Women also had a stronger connection the all-powerful One and could easy call on her power and wisdom when it was needed.

Unfortunately, the human male is an intelligent creature and because of his competitive instincts began to plot and scheme for ways of competing against women for power. So some men would be attempting to undermine women’s confidence or try to manipulate and deceive women.

These efforts never worked while women remained in contact with the limitless wisdom and power of the Feminine One, but then some men found a way to break this connection.

At the time, people worshiped the Great Mother who gave birth to the world. So men suggested to women that it was unfair that people only worshiped a Female deity and they should worship a male deity as well. Women did think this was fair and reasonable and went along with it.

So then the Great Mother had a son, (similar to the images of the Virgin Mary and Jesus or Isis and Horus). Then later people began to worship female and male deities as brother and sister or male and female lovers.

At first this didn’t seem to be a problem, but the worship of a male god caused problems for women trying to connect to the Feminine One. The feminine is complete Oneness, love and harmony. The masculine is separation, loneliness, conflict, fear and hatred. So the vibrations are totally different, making it more difficult to connect to the Feminine One, when praying to male deity alongside a female deity.

Over time as women prayed to these male and female deities they found it harder to connect to the Feminine One. They slowly lost their power as men no longer worshiped them as goddesses and they become equal in status to men.

Men’s competitive instincts drove them to wanting more power so the male deities became more important than the female deities. This then made contact with the Feminine One even more difficult for women and they found themselves at the mercy of male aggression and violence and the patriarchal age was born.

Finally, the new patriarchal rulers decided that there was only one god and he was male. Women then lost their connection to the Feminine One and became the slaves of men.

This is a disaster for both sexes because although women have suffered under patriarchal rule, so has men. This is because without her control and guidance man is in danger of destroying himself and the world he lives in.

As the male is separated from the One, he can explore what it is like to be individual and separate. But when he breaks away from the control of the female he then goes into a spiral of loneliness, fear, conflict, hatred, violence, war, chaos and destruction. Unfortunately this is exactly what has happened over the last 5,000 years.

This then is the dance of the female and male. The female is forever taking us back to the One to experience total love and harmony. The male is attempting to take us further away from the One into conflict and chaos.

This means that men learn from women about love, compassion and harmony. Women learn from men about aggression, competitiveness and hatred.

A world totally dominated by men will quickly destroy itself, as men will continually fight each other. While a world dominated by women will return us back to the One of total love and harmony. So can we find a way to return to the One through a matriarchal religion?

Religion is about our connection to God as well as teachings to make our lives better for us all. But unfortunately, patriarchal religions fail to do this. Most people who pray to God fail to find any connection him while the teachings don’t seem to make life better for us.

The problem is that we worship male gods and this is the main reason why religions fail to deliver on what they promise. Male gods are masculine and the masculine is all about aggression and competition. So for this reason it’s not surprising to find male dominated religions and religious sect fighting each other.

Male gods are not only aggressive but intolerant as well, as people are threatened with, ‘hellfire and damnation’, when they die if they fail to follow the teachings of the male priesthood. So it is no wonder people find it hard to connect to a judgmental and punitive god like this.

Gods like this give religion a bad name and for this reason some religions have attempted to show god in a better light. We find this in the Christian teachings of Jesus in the New Testament where he promoted the idea of loving Father God. This has been only partly successful as many Christians have preferred the judgmental God of the Old Testament.

Buddhism has also attempted to give more compassionate teachings and Buddhists are encouraged to connect to Nirvana through meditation. Unfortunately only a minority of people are willing to spend years of meditation to do this.

So what would it be like to worship God as a female and have an exclusive female priesthood? It would be a religion based on the feminine rather than masculine principles. So what difference would this make?

We can see how this plays out in the animal world. Male animals like stags, bulls, rams and lions fight each other for dominance and access to females. Then when the strongest male animal has impregnated the females, they give birth and devoted their time caring for their young.

So males have competitive and aggressive instincts while females have maternal and nurturing instincts. These is why men like watching and playing sports and compete with each other in business and politics and why male dominated countries and religions fight wars.

Most women on the other hand have desires to give birth to children and devote their lives to caring for them. Women not only want to care for their own children but will care for other people’s children as well as the sick, the elderly and animals.

So if we were to worship God as a Woman we would expect her to be nurturing and love us all unconditionally. So this would be a deity we would find easy to connect to as we know she wouldn’t judge, condemn or punish us. The teachings of a maternal Mother God would also be about love which would encourage us to love each other and make our world a better place.

We can only return to the love and harmony of the One when women reconnect to Her and become, once again, one with Her unlimited power and wisdom.

(End of William’s chapter, ‘The Feminine One.’)

XXXIII Addendum From Rasa Von Werder: Concerning William Bond’s article

‘The Feminine One’

William, you speak of going back to the One but when I wrote my chapter on Banishing the Ego you wrote in an e mail you did not believe a person could live without ego (but banishment of the ego is the path to connect with the ONE) – & I do understand your point & agree that without some connection, affiliation with time & space it would be difficult to function in this world, take care of ourselves & those around us. To be completely & at all times TOTALLY abstracted in the One (yogis call it SELF, Christians call it CONTEMPLATION or something similar) one would be IN A TRANCE such as Ramakrishna was for months (was it six?) where he did not eat – but a wise yogi would rouse him & make him swallow rice water, another yogi would beat him with a stick to wake up, eat, then Ramakrishna fell back into his trance.

When Ramana Maharshi, at age sixteen, magically entered the state of nonduality, he went to a far-off region with a sacred mountain, Aranchula threw away his money, bowed down to the local Temple saint, submitted himself, & stayed in trance for THREE YEARS. He would lie around in the Temple or around it where WICKED BOYS would torture & tease him – he did not respond. Insects crawled on him & bit him – he didn’t notice. (Luckily a kind man understood his situation & locked him in a gated garden nearby, providing him the meager food he ate - he was skin & bones.)

(Similar to the Christian saints who sequestered themselves either in a cave, or on a high mountain such as Jesus & Moses, or their private room like St. Catherine of Sienna & dealt little with the world–such experiences lasted two, three years. After coming out of this they were transformed but could function well in the active life. I went through this in my apt in B’klyn. The length of time is not crucial, Jesus did the same in forty days & nights, my time alone was partial for a year, then almost total another year–I HAD to take care of myself & could not go completely ‘OUT’ but I attained the same graces these saints did. I saw God FACE TO FACE TWICE & that is PROOF I entered NONDUALITY completely, not partially, because I saw that I WAS GOD, GOD WAS ME. This state is in some way reached by all saints in all religions, whatever they call it, however they describe it.)

Being in the One, according to the teachings of Ramana Maharshi as well as my own experience, is being INSIDE oneself, the focus or attention on the Eternal Consciousness within, or one could also say ABOVE THE WORLD, seeing it objectively, where one’s mind/focus is NOT HERE SUBJECTIVELY, not here like ‘I am in my body, I feel pain when people insult me’ but I am ‘here in the realm of Infinity, above the world, above people….they cannot affect me or hurt me, flatter me or defame me, as I feel no reaction, I am not there inside my body within the character I play – these characters are all fronts, they are not me, I am an Infinite Being, I am watching the world, people, their reaction to who they think is me, but they cannot move me, I am NOT THERE, I am even watching my own self like I am in the front row watching a play.

William speaks of women having to return to this state which he calls THE ONE which means the same as Nonduality – Finding the God Within, the God Self – which we originally were in, representing a MOTHER, & controlling/guiding men into righteousness. He says this is the solution & when women do this & take back the men under their wings we will have peace.

What is THE ONE based on other terms? I began writing this religion explaining how women must find the God WITHIN THEMSELVES–& have reiterated that now we must step apart from men & work on this angle – safe space for women – our autonomy – create our own world, religion, spirituality, zeitgeist, POV, moral compass, OUR AGENDA.

I suggest that those who can should forfeit marriage to work on finding this God – those who can’t should spend enough time each day, on themselves, alone, in meditation when possible – not interrupted by family, & this will SAVE THEMSELVES. Saving themselves first will enable them to save others – their family & the world.

I also put forth that those women who have the vision should find relationships with other women – gay or straight relationships, without fear of reprisals, criticism or judgement from this society. They can set up female dormitories, female co-op apartments, or women-only families (they can get sperm from outings which could be regular, ‘night out for fun’ but not permit the males to know anything about the progeny, put on the birth certificate ‘father unknown’–the males are irrelevant & have no parental rights over the child.) This would be stepping apart from Patriarchy in a big way.

As to the religion I propose, the one of finding GOD WITHIN. I shall only give a brief synopsis now & will enlarge upon it in future.

One of my gurus, Sri Ramakrishna, had this to say about THE GOD WITHIN – NONDUALITY – ADVAITA (prodounced Adoita):

Sri Ramakrishna: “I” and “mine” indicate ignorance. Without ignorance one cannot have such a feeling as “I am the doer; these are my wife, children, possessions, name and fame”.

Thereupon Keshab said, ‘Sir, if one gave up the “I”, nothing whatsoever would remain.’

Sri Ramakrishna: I am not asking you to give up all of the “I”. You should give up only the “unripe I”. The “unripe I” makes one feel: “I am the doer. These are my wife and children. I am a teacher.” Renounce this “unripe I” and keep the “ripe I”, which will make you feel that you are the servant of God, His devotee, and that God is the Doer and you are His instrument.

~ from “The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna”, chapter 12 – ‘The Festival at Panihati’ -> http://www.rkmhq.org/gospel/chapter12.htm

What is non duality in Christianity?

In spirituality, nondualism, also called non-duality, means “not two” or “one undivided without a second”. Nondualism primarily refers to a mature state of consciousness, in which the dichotomy of I-other is “transcended”, and awareness is described as “centerless” and “without dichotomies”.

another research:

What does non duality feel like?

Right now, have a go at feeling out the space around you. … You are always in a non-dual state, even if you feel like everything is duality. Non-dual awareness is supposedly like being the entire space and any feeling of a “body” is dissolved. There is no feeling of effort when going about your daily life. another research concerns Ramakrishna endowing his disciple Vivekananda for the first time with nonduality:

On Vivekananda’s second visit, Ramakrishna placed his foot on his body, with the result that the room vanished and Vivekananda felt like he was about to merge into a void; this apparently far surpassed any of his childhood experiences: “I was terribly frightened and thought I was facing death, for the loss of individuality meant that. Unable to control myself, I cried out, ‘What is this that you are doing to me? I have my parents at home!’ He laughed at this and stroking my chest said, ‘All right, let it rest now. Everything will come in time.’ No sooner had he said this than that strange experience vanished. I was myself again and found everything…as it had been before. All this..revolutionized my mind. I thought what it could possibly be. It came and went at the mere wish of this wonderful man!”

RASA SAYS: IF YOU MAY RECALL MY WRITINGS ON NONDUAL EXPERIENCES, HOW SPOOKY THEY WERE. I WAS IN ‘OUTER SPACE’ WITHOUT ANYTHING TO HOLD ONTO THE FIRST TIMES IN 1982, AFTER WHICH I SAW GOD FACE TO FACE TWICE. ONLY RECENTLY I BEGAN MEDITATING ON THIS THEME AGAIN & AT THE EDGE OF IT FELT LIKE I WAS ON A CLIFF IN THE GRAND CANYON WHERE I COULD FALL IN & SNAPPED BACK FROM FEAR. UPON STUDYING THIS LOOKING BACK I THINK THE FOUR DAYS & NIGHTS OF BEING ‘ABOVE IMAGES,’ A BLISSFUL TRANCE-LIKE STATE, A GIFT GIVEN ME UPON FINISHING THE FOUR VOLUME ‘MYSTICAL CITY OF GOD’ – WAS NONDUALITY. THIS WAS LATE 1981.

My last Yoga guru was Ramana Maharshi. He guided me into nonduality in 2007 -

I had started the journey with a female living guru, ‘Swami G’, but we had a falling out as she simply did not like me & insisted I DID NOT have the ‘Divine Stigmata’–(she failed to understand the Interior Divine Stigmata which is real & harbored by several known female saints – St. Teresa of Avila, St. Catherine of Sienna, St. Faustina, St. Gertrude the Great – & said if I did not have bleeding wounds I didn’t have it. I asked her if her Kundalini was real &she said yes. But it is invisible, is it not? So is my Divine Stigmata.)

There is an excellent video on You tube with teachings from Ramana. It’s called ‘Sri Ramana Maharshi – JNANI, uploaded May 25, 2018.

This philosophy/discipline/consciousness is not easy to attain but there are formulas. I reviewed with you my Christian formula which led to the Beatific Vision in chapter XXVII ‘Ego Banishment.’ In future I will discuss the Yoga formula & my recent attempts with it. Meanwhile, remember,

Woman Thou Art God,

finding the God within, realizing Her, living her, will free you from Patriarchy, the slavery to it & men, will save you, bring you happiness, enable you to help others & save the world – Go for it!

To be continued Article by William Bond Addendum by Rasa Von Werder 11-3-19

College of God & Love, College of Matriarchal Love, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Shrine to Shakti, Uncategorized

XXXII<>FEARS MEN HAVE

XXXII THE FEARS MEN HAVE – Guest Author Ajax the Great

Now that we know men are going down, women coming up-human males are

going extinct, there are fears dwelling in men’s minds voiced here by Ajax the

Great. Never mind it will be 100,000 years from now, they act as if it’ll

happen to them personally & their imagination of what we’ll do to them is

boundless. Ajax’s writing is regular type, Rasa’s in caps.

The Man Question

In any intellectually honest discussion of the future of humanity, especially in regards to the inevitability of Women reclaiming their rightful position as the new leaders of the free world, the “Man Question” eventually comes up. That is, what do we do with all of them after Women eventually take over?

It’s no secret that men are quickly becoming the redundant gender. Thanks to technology, globalization, and the ascendancy of Women, men are becoming less and less necessary as time goes on. Women are rising while men are falling. And in the long run, according to geneticist Dr. Bryan Sykes, men are slowly going extinct due to the gradual deterioration of the Y-chromosome with each new generation.

(RASA SAYS: THE PROBLEM WITH THE Y CHROMOSOME IS THAT IT CANNOT REPAIR ITSELF, WHILE THE X CAN REPAIR ITSELF, & BEING A MALE DEPENDS ON HAVING THE Y.

MEN WERE CREATED IN THE BEGINNING BY WOMEN USING PARTHENOGENESIS (NO WE DID NOT COME OUT OF HIS RIB), THE WAY MARY GAVE BIRTH TO JESUS, WITHOUT THE HELP OF A MALE. IT’S SPONTANEOUS. WE NO LONGER USE THAT ABILITY OFTEN, BUT THERE HAVE BEEN REPORTS – WHICH NO ONE BELIEVES. IT’S A VESTIGIAL ABILITY WE WILL REACTIVATE.)

Add to that all the numerous man-made gender-bending chemicals (endocrine disruptors)

(RASA SAYS: PTHALATES, WHICH PLASTICS ARE MADE OF, & CHEMICAL WASTES SUCH AS FEMALE HORMONES. THERE HAVE BEEN REPORTS OF BOY INFANTS HAVING DEFORMED SEX GLANDS BECAUSE OF THIS.)

in our environment and, as Bob Dylan would say, it clearly doesn’t take a weatherman to tell you which way the wind is blowing!

And in the past 7000 years or so since us fellas took over, what have we done? We paved paradise and put up a parking lot, we created a desert and called it “peace”. We have devoured and suffocated our own empire, the world is on fire, and now we are all paying a heavy price for it. Men apparently got the bright idea to take over the (known) world piece by piece, by deposing Women from power. That’s right, it was originally Women who were in charge for most of humanity’s existence, and us fellas apparently thought we could do a better job as leaders than you ladies did. Well, history shows us that we were wrong–dead wrong in fact. Indeed, the best advice that us men can give to Women is “don’t be like us”.

Having established that Women will (and should) eventually take over, the Man Question nonetheless remains. This is the part of the discussion where men really get uncomfortable if not defensive, for obvious reasons. We tend to fear that Women will do to us what we did to them, if not much worse still. And we may even fear that the “Final Solution” to the Man Question will be very similar to that of the Nazis and the Jewish Question, if not even worse still. We already know that, barring a miracle of miracles, Mother God is gradually making men extinct within roughly the next 125,000 years according to Sykes, or 3000 years from now at the very earliest to 5 million years at the latest according to the predictions of other scientists. That still leaves millennia between the return of Matriarchy and Mother God’s own Final Solution. In the meantime, to put it bluntly, will men be exterminated, enslaved, or exiled? Or some combination of the three? Or (hopefully) none of the above?

(RASA SAYS: THE TAKEOVER OF WOMEN FROM MEN WILL BE SO GRADUAL THAT AT SOME EPOCHS, IT MIGHT BE DIFFICULT TO EVEN REALIZE WOMEN ARE TAKING OVER FROM MEN. IT’S NOT LIKE THE COUPS MEN PERFORM IN ONE GROUP OVERTHROWING ANOTHER MILITARILY – THESE ARE SUDDEN, VIOLENT & DESTRUCTIVE. ALTHOUGH I DO ADMIT THAT IN MY LIFETIME THE SOCIETY HAS GONE ‘DAY TO NIGHT’–THERE HAS BEEN A MONUMENTAL SHIFT IN FAVOR OF MATRIARCHY SINCE I WAS A GIRL – SAY 1960 – & THAT BEING THE RESULT OF BETTY FRIEDAN STARTING THE ‘SECOND WAVE’ OF THE WOMEN’S MOVEMENT.)

1) It is still too soon to tell exactly what Women will do upon taking over, but I personally doubt that Women would actually want to “play God” and exterminate men themselves, because they are better than that.

(RASA SAYS: WHAT A CRAZY IDEA. THE MAIN CHANGE WILL NOT BE AGAINST MEN PER SE BUT MALE CRIMINALS. HERE THERE WILL BE THE STRONGEST REACTIONS FROM WOMEN IN POWER: RAPISTS, PEDOPHILES, THOSE WHO DO VIOLENCE TO THE INNOCENT WILL BE DEALT WITH STRONGLY, NOT EXCUSED OR SLAPPED ON THE WRIST AS THEY ARE TODAY. WE LIVE IN A ‘POLITICIZED JUDICIAL JUSTICE SYSTEM,’ POLITICIZED TOWARD BEING MERCIFUL TO MEN, NOT SO TO WOMEN. WOMEN ARE PUNISHED SEVEN TIMES WORSE FOR KILLING MEN THAN MEN ARE FOR KILLING WOMEN – & SOME OF THESE WOMEN KILLED IN SELF DEFENSE. POLITICALLY A WOMAN IS AFRAID TO PROTECT HERSELF AGAINST A MAN FOR THE PUNISHMENT SHE WILL GET.

I READ IN AN ACLU BOOK ON WOMEN’S RIGHTS, THAT MALES ARE “EXPECTED TO BE BAD” WHILE WOMEN ARE “EXPECTED TO BE GOOD,” THAT IS WHY WOMEN ARE PUNISHED WORSE. THAT IS INSANE. WOMEN WHO STAND AROUND THE STREET ARE PICKED UP FOR PROSTITUTION, MEN ARE NOT. WOMEN ARE FOR THIS & OTHER REASONS AFRAID TO WALK THE STREETS AT NIGHT–MEN OWN THE STREETS AFTER DARK. THESE ARE THE KIND OF THINGS THAT WILL CHANGE. THERE MIGHT BE MORE PROTECTION FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN AT NIGHT – WHY SHOULD THEY BE AFRAID TO BE OUTSIDE AFTER DARK? BECAUSE MEN ARE LIKE WILD ANIMALS IN THE JUNGLE?)

Not only are most Women not inclined to do such things, but they will also realize that doing so will likely backfire. If it did happen, it would require the sort of authoritarian dictatorship that is inherently anathema to the feminine paradigm of leadership, and whoever those dictators are will eventually turn on the majority of Women, in a sort of “patriarchy in drag”. To paraphrase Pastor Niemoller, “First, they came for the men…” Besides, there will likely be too much “fraternizing with the enemy”, if you catch my drift.

(RASA SAYS: ARE WOMEN AS REVENGEFUL AS MEN? NO THEY ARE NOT, BECAUSE THE FRONTAL LOBES OF THEIR BRAINS ARE ACTIVE, THE LEGISLATIVE PART OF OUR BEHAVIOR DWELLS THERE – THE FINER QUALITIES. ARE ALL WOMEN NICER THAN ALL MEN? OF COURSE NOT. THERE WILL BE SOME HERE & THERE WHO WILL BE CRUEL TO MEN, BUT NOT AS MANY AS HAVE BEEN CRUEL TO WOMEN.

HERE ARE SOME EXAMPLES OF MALE REVENGE AGAINST ME: AS A 21-YEAR OLD GIRL I WAS SLATED TO APPEAR IN A BEAUTY CONTEST SPONSORED BY THIS PHOTOGRAPHER, BUT LATER ON I CHANGED MY ALLEGIANCE TO ANOTHER PHOTOGRAPHER & WAS SPONSORED BY HIM. THE FIRST ONE CAME TO MY DRIVEWAY, PICKED UP THE HOOD OF MY CAR, & WITH A HAMMER CRACKED MY BATTERY. I SAW IT FROM MY WINDOW.

ANOTHER CASE WHICH WAS SERIOUS HARM I HAD A TWO YEAR OLD CHILD WHEN MY HUSBAND KNEW HE WAS DYING. I HAD TAKEN CARE OF HIM & THE CHILD FOR TWO YEARS. DURING THIS TIME I HAD GOTTEN RAPED & GOT PREGNANT – HE BELIEVED I LET THE MAN DO IT (NOT SO.) HE HAD NO REASON TO BELIEVE THIS MAN RATHER THAN ME, JUST HIS EVIL MIND. BECAUSE OF THIS HE CANCELLED HIS LIFE INSURANCE BEFORE HE DIED, LEAVING NOT ONLY ME, BUT HIS OWN CHILD PENNILESS. ALL ALONE, WITHOUT FAMILY HELP, I IMMEDIATELY WENT TO A CLUB CALLED “THE BALL” IN SANTA MONICA WHERE I BEGAN MY NUDE DANCING CAREER – ONE THAT LASTED MOST OF MY LIFE.

THIRD & LAST EXAMPLE HAPPENED RECENTLY. ( THESE ARE JUST THREE OF THE POSSIBLY HUNDREDS OF ACTS OF REVENGE DONE TO ME BY MEN I REFUSED, REJECTED OR OFFENDED.) I WAS AT A DINER TALKING TO A ‘TOW-TRUCK’ MAN WHO WORKED NEXT DOOR & SAID THINGS ABOUT FEMALE EMPOWERMENT. THEY WERE NOT AWFUL THINGS, JUST SMALL ONES. HE SAID NOTHING, WASN’T UPSET OR ANYTHING. A YEAR LATER THERE WAS NO ROOM IN THE PARKING LOT OF THE DINER, BUT THE DINER OWNER OWNED THE PROPERTY NEXT DOOR SO I PARKED THERE. WHEN I CAME OUT SOMEONE HAD BOXED IN MY CAR SO I COULD NOT GET OUT NO MATTER HOW HARD I TRIED. GOING BACK TO THE DINER I ASKED THE OWNER FOR HELP. HE CALLED THE TOWTRUCK GUY IN A RAGE – THE GUY HAD ON PURPOSE GONE OUT FOR A JOB. BY THE TIME HE RETURNED & MOVED THE CARS HE PUT THERE TWO HOURS HAD GONE BY. HE ADMITTED TO DOING IT ON PURPOSE. I SAID NOT A WORD & JUST LEFT, BEING WISED UP AS HOW REVENGEFUL PEOPLE ARE. AND WOMEN ARE ALSO REVENGEFUL SO THEY ARE NOT ALL SAINTS, I SHALL LEAVE THOSE ANECDOTES OFF.

2) As for (non-voluntary) slavery, that is also a concept which is anathema to the feminine paradigm of leadership. And ethical issues and human rights aside, it also poses some practical problems as well. What Femdom fans think Matriarchy will be like is nothing like what it actually will be like, as Femdom (as it is typically practiced) is far too androcentric in two ways. First, Femdom is done primarily for the pleasure of men rather than Women, and secondly, it requires Women to essentially behave like the worst of men, with cruelty, ruthlessness, violence, and torture. Besides, if Women were to actually OWN men as chattel slaves, or even the somewhat milder concept of in loco parentis, that would mean that Women would become responsible for the needs and welfare of their men and vicariously liable for their actions, much like they would be for a dog or child. Men will thus become too much of a burden. Might as well just cut out the middleman and get a dog! As the saying goes, heavy is the head that wears the crown.

(RASA SAYS: ANOTHER PREPOSTEROUS FEAR & YES I HAVE HEARD MANY MEN VOICE THIS. AS FAR AS FEMDOM, I WAS A DOMINATRIX FOR TEN YEARS & LATER ON, AFTER I WAS OUT OF THE BUSINESS, HAD TIME TO ANALYZE IT. THE REASON MALES WANT SO MUCH EXTREMITY FROM US WOMEN IS THEY WANT TO FEEL AS THEY DID WHEN THEY WERE A CHILD WITH THEIR MOM. WHEN YOU’RE LITTLE, SHE’S A GIANT & CAN BE MENACING. IN SPITE OF YOUR FEAR, HAVING THIS MOM GIVES YOU SECURITY, KNOWING AT HEART SHE LOVES YOU, OWNS YOU, WILL TAKE CARE OF YOU. THIS IS THE FEELING THEY WANT TO RESTORE – THAT OF BEING WITH MOM, THE GIVER OF SECURITY.)

Of course, that only touches on the problems of individual ownership of male slaves. What about collective ownership? What about the ones who go unclaimed? Do they become wards of the state? Will they eventually be rounded up and put into detention camps, which then become labor camps? There could be a sign that says “work will set you free”, though it sounds so much better in the original German. And eventually, we would run out of room, and we all know what would happen next. In other words, TURN ON THE GAS!

(But wait, they didn’t really say men should be “exterminated”. No, they said “exiled”, right? Riiiiight. And I’m the Queen of England.)

(RASA SAYS: I DO GET THE POINT. I SIMPLY CANNOT IMAGINE WOMEN DOING THIS TO MEN BECAUSE IN SPITE OF A FEW WOMEN WHO ARE INSANE, THEY ARE MOTHERS & HAVE THE NURTURING INSTINCT. THEY WILL THINK OF THEIR LOVED ONES–HUSBANDS, SONS, & IMAGINE THESE GUYS ‘EXTERMINATED’ & IT WOULD BE LOATHE FOR THEM TO DO. WHAT I’M MOST AFRAID OF IS THAT WOMEN WILL FIND IT TOO HARD TO DEAL HARSHLY WITH CRIMINALS – THOSE WHO RAPE, TORTURE & EVEN KILL LITTLE CHILDREN–OR GROWNUPS & EVEN ANIMALS FOR ‘PLEASURE’. I HOPE THEY WILL HARDEN THEIR HEARTS AGAINST SUCH MONSTERS.)

3) So what about exile, then? Put them all on an island somewhere? Or perhaps have a gender apartheid society over here? With men only being allowed to inhabit certain areas? (We could call them “ghettos”, perhaps?) The main problem with that idea, human rights aside, is that when left to their own devices, men will feed off of each other’s energy and become their own insular and dangerous subculture, increasing the risk of a coup. Thus there would have to be some sort of supervision by Women, for the same reason that we have civilian control over the military. And eventually they will run out of room, and we all know what happens next (see #1 and #2 above). Exile would thus carry logistical issues that can easily lead to the same problems that the other options pose.

(RASA SAYS: ANOTHER WILD IDEA. YES THEY WILL BECOME DANGEROUS MURDERERS IF EXILED IN FAR OFF PLACES – THIS IS HOW PATRIARCHY STARTED, BY HORDES OF MAN-TRIBES COMING DOWN FROM THE STEPPES, MONGOLIAN MOUNTAINS, ATTACKING AGRARIAN MATRIARCHAL VILLAGES. WHY WERE THESE MEN SEQUESTERED IN LARGE NUMBERS? WERE THESE MISCREANTS ALREADY EXILED AS CRIMINALS FROM DECENT COMMUNITIES? CRIMINALS WHEN LOADED INTO JAILS, HAVE TO BE KEPT THERE BY FORCE. IMAGINE THE MOST STRICT LOCK-UP PRISONERS, THEY ARE NOW SET FREE, WHAT THEY WOULD DO. YOU WOULD INVITE VIOLENT ATTACKS BY EXILING THEM, UNLESS THEY WERE SENT TO ANOTHER PLANET. BUT THAT YOU WOULD ONLY DO TO CRIMINALS. I SAY IF THEY ARE VIOLENT CRIMINALS WHO DO HEINOUS CRIMES, THEY SHOULD BE EXECUTED. THOSE WHO DO SERIOUS VIOLENCE TO OTHERS, ADULTS & ESPECIALLY CHILDREN, SHOULD BE REMOVED OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH. NO COMPLICATED, EXPENSIVE EXECUTIONS, ORDINARY FIRING SQUADS WILL DO.)

Thus, for both moral and practical reasons, we ought to take all three measures off the table for good. All three would lead to “reverse patriarchy” and/or “patriarchy in drag” rather than actual Matriarchy. History has shown that, at least in the long run, nothing good will come from playing God. Doing so is part of the patriarchal paradigm of “might makes right” and “the ends justify the means”. In contrast, the Matriarchal paradigm would be more akin to what Jesus Christ said, “Whatever you do to the least of these, you do to me”. Even if you believe that men are lower than animals, notice how that directive still applies to men, a fortiori in fact.

(RASA SAYS: INDEED, THE JOKE IS ‘MEN ARE NOT ANIMALS, ANIMALS ARE NICE.’ BUT I HAVE SAID BEFORE, IF MEN ARE INFERIOR TO US SO ARE OUR DOGS & CATS, BUT WE TREAT THEM LOVINGLY.)

So having established that, what then should be done in the meantime after Women take over? Ultimately, that will be up to the Women of the future to decide, but we ought to start thinking about it now. Aside from banning men from running for political office or running large corporations, and perhaps also restricting modern gun ownership for men,

(RASA SAYS: THREE GOOD IDEAS. ALSO, AS IN CANADA, MALES SHOULD BE RESTRICTED FROM HAVING ANYTHING TO DO WITH CHILD CARE. MALES SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN CUSTODY OVER CHILDREN WHERE THEY CAN SPEND TIME ALONE WITH THEM. WE KNOW NOT ALL ARE PEDOPHILES, BUT MANY ARE. THIS AUTHOR WILL DISAGREE WITH ME BUT THAT’S ALRIGHT.

THERE ARE NUMEROUS INSTANCES OF REVENGE MALES TAKE ON CHILDREN AFTER A SPLIT WITH THE WIFE. REMEMBER ‘THE BURNING BED?’ WHERE A MAN TOOK HIS SON TO A MOTEL, SET IT AFIRE & THE CHILD WAS BURNED OVER MOST OF HIS BODY. THE MAN NEVER REPENTED AS FAR AS I READ, JUST KEPT COMPLAINING ‘WHAT MY WIFE DID TO ME.’ THAT CHILD IS SCARRED FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE, HEAD TO TOE, SUFFERING PERMANENTLY.

A FRIEND OF MINE–HER FEMALE FRIEND WAS DATING A GUY WHO HAD SPLIT WITH HIS WIFE. HE WAS GIVEN VISITATION RIGHTS ALONE WITH THEIR SIX YEAR OLD SON. HIS NEW GIRL FRIEND THEN RECEIVED THE CHILD TO BABY SIT. SHE NOTICED SOMETHING AWFUL & BROUGHT THE BOY TO MY FRIEND, TOOK HIS PANTS DOWN TO SHOW. THE ANUS LOOKED LIKE A LARGE OBJECT HAD BEEN PUSHED INTO IT, IT WAS STILL WIDE OPEN. THE DAD WAS RAPING THE CHILD, WHEN FINISHED WITH HIS ‘TOY’ TURNED HIM OVER TO THE NEW FEMALE FOR CARE GIVING.

I HAVE HEARD MOM’S EXCLAIM HOW EAGER THE DAD IS TO GET THE CHILD, BUT BRINGS IT BACK SHORTLY. THAT COULD BE BECAUSE HE’S DONE WITH RAPE & HAS NO MORE USE FOR THE POOR LITTLE ONE.

A HIDEOUS CASE I RECALL IN CA WHEN I WAS A DANCER/MODEL. A GAY COSTUME MAKER OF MINE, AN UGLY GUY WITH POCK MARKS ALL OVER HIS FACE, CALLED ME & ASKED ME TO GO WITH HIM TO THE VET – THAT HE WAS AFRAID. I HAD NO IDEA WHY HE WAS AFRAID BUT BEING AN ANIMAL LOVER, I WENT WITH HIM. HIS FRIEND HAD LEFT HIS TOY POODLE WITH HIM WHILE HE WENT ON VACATION.

THE VET EXAMINED THE POOR PUPPY, HAD TO INSERT HIS FINGERS INTO HIS ANUS TO SCOOP OUT THE DEFECATION, AS IT HAD JAMMED UP INTO HIS COLON (SO BADLY HE COULD NOT POOP). I DID NOT IMAGINE THEN WHAT HAD HAPPENED – THE VET GLARED AT THE GUY & SAID HE WOULD REPORT HIM TO THE ASPCA. ONLY YEARS LATER DID I UNDERSTAND PERVERT WAS RAPING THE POOR LITTLE DOG–HE ONLY STOPPED BECAUSE HIS FRIEND WAS DUE BACK FROM VACATION NEXT DAY & WOULD FIND OUT ABOUT THIS UNLESS THE VET FIXED HIM UP. I COULD NOT EVEN CONCEIVE SUCH A THING WHEN I WAS 21. (THAT IS MUCH OF OUR PROBLEM, WE ASSUME SUCH THINGS CAN’T HAPPEN, WE ARE BLIND. ALL OF US FELT THAT WAY ABOUT PRIESTS ALSO. I NEVER IMAGINED PRIESTS WERE HAVING SEX WITH ANYONE, MUCH LESS KIDS, UNTIL WAY UP IN MY YEARS WHEN THESE THINGS WERE BROUGHT OUT IN THE OPEN.)

OF STUDIES DONE ON PEDOPHILES, THEY FIND WAYS OF BEING ALONE WITH CHILDREN, UNDER A FRONT. FOR EXAMPLE: I WILL TAKE THE DAUGHTERS CAMPING LIKE A GOOD FATHER. I READ THIS CASE, THE DAD WAS HAVING SEX WITH BOTH SMALL DAUGHTERS.

THERE ARE MILLIONS OF SUCH CASES, I HAVE HEARD, SEEN & READ HUNDREDS. I KNOW THE PERCENTAGE OF PEDOPHILES IS SKY-HIGH, MY ESTIMATE IS ONE OF THREE DADS MOLESTS HIS CHILDREN. DON’T TRUST THEM. THEY HAVE SCANT LITTLE NURTURING FEELINGS, SO WHEN THEY WANT TO BE ALONE, ‘TAKE CARE OF,’ OR TAKE THE CHILD OUT FOR ICE CREAM OR RECREATION – BE SUSPICIOUS. WATCH HIM LIKE A HAWK, EXAMINE THE CHILD’S RECTUM & VAGINA AFTER BEING ALONE WITH DAD, IF THEY ARE SIX OR YOUNGER. IF THEY ARE OLD ENOUGH TO TALK, TEACH THEM WHAT ABUSE IS, HOW TO EXPRESS THEMSELVES IF SOMEONE IS DOING PERSONAL, FORBIDDEN THINGS TO THEM. UNLESS THEY ARE TAUGHT THEY WOULDN’T KNOW HOW TO EXPLAIN IT. AND IF THEY COMPLAIN TAKE THEM SERIOUSLY.

THERE’S A MAN I KNOW OF WHO MARRIED A FEMALE WITH THREE SONS. HE TAUGHT THEM CHESS WHERE THEY GO TO CHESS TOURNAMENTS CONSTANTLY, OUT OF TOWN. THEY STAY IN HOTELS WHERE HE HAS SEX WITH ALL THREE BOYS.

AND STAY-AT-HOME DADS? THE WORST THING TO DO. LEAVING A CHILD WITH A MAN IN THE HOUSE IS LIKE LEAVING A MOUSE WITH A BOA CONSTRICTOR. I KNOW OF ONE. THE MOTHER HASN’T A CLUE, I SAW THE CHILD TRYING TO EXPLAIN SYMBOLICALLY TO A GROUP OF US AT A GET TOGETHER, SHE WAS SEVEN – NO ONE UNDERSTOOD THE CLUES BUT ME, BUT I ONLY PUT IT TOGETHER AFTER THE FETE.

AND FOSTER FATHERS? DON’T EVEN ASK. I’M SURPRISED WHEN THEY DON’T MOLEST THE CHILDREN. EVERY PERSON I SPOKE TO WHO HAD BEEN FOSTERED TOLD ME THEY’D BEEN MOLESTED BY THE DAD. THESE SITUATIONS TURNED SOME BOYS INTO BISEXUALS, GAVE FEMALES PTSD WHERE THEY GOT ON SUBSTANCES. I SAW IT.

I believe that men should still have the same individual civil and human rights that Women would have. At least insofar as their own bodies and minds are concerned, the individual should be sovereign regardless of gender. And the onus should be on the powers that be, not the individual, to demonstrate whether one is no longer competent in that regard. Likewise, rogue males need to be held accountable for their actions as individuals, especially those who harm Women and/or children.

(RASA SAYS: MY CONTENTION IS THE BIGGEST CHANGE WILL BE WITH ROGUE MALES GETTING WHAT THEY SHOULD – NOT LIKE IT IS NOW.

AS FAR AS PREVENTING MALES FROM BECOMING WICKED OR POTENTIALLY HARMING OTHERS BY HAVING POWER, THAT WILL ALSO BE A GOOD IDEA. THE GOVERNING OF HUMANS REQUIRES CARING & NURTURING. MALES ARE NOT DESIGNED FOR THAT – IT’S WHAT GOT US INTO TROUBLE IN THE FIRST PLACE. THEY ARE CREATED TO BE THE HELPMATES OF WOMEN; PROTECT US. THIS MEANS PUTTING THEMSELVES IN HARMS WAY FOR THE WEAKER, IT CALLS FOR VIOLENCE AT TIMES, HURTING OR KILLING ANIMALS OR MEN. BECAUSE OF THIS MEN HAVE LESS CARING/NURTURING ABILITY& ARE MORE IMPULSIVE & VIOLENT (POLICE ARE TRAINED TO ACT INSTANTLY IN DANGER BECAUSE TO THINK COULD COST THEM OR SOMEONE ELSE THEIR LIFE) . IT GOES WITH THE TERRITORY, YOU CANNOT BE A GOOD MOTHER & A MAN AT THE SAME TIME – YOU CANNOT BE A GOOD NURTURER & A RUTHLESS KILLER, IT’S TWO DIFFERENT INSTINCTS–EXCEPT IN SOME CASES LIKE BEARS PROTECTING THEIR YOUNG. HUMAN FEMALES DO BECOME VIOLENT, BUT MOST OF THAT HAS BEEN BRED & BRAINWASHED OUT OF THEM – MEN BEAT UP THE KIDS WHILE THE WOMAN LOOKS ON HELPLESSLY, HER POSITION IS DREADFUL–SHE’S NOT TRAINED OR ENCOURAGED TO ACT AGAINST MEN, IF SHE DOES, THE LAW PUNISHES HER & SHE HAS NO WOMEN TO BACK HER WHEN THE MAN ACTS UP.

EACH ONE WAS TO STAY IN THEIR PLACE. BUT WHEN MALES DECIDED TO JUMP OUT OF THEIR LANE & TAKE THE PLACE OF WOMEN, ALL HELL BROKE LOOSE, WE GAINED WHAT WE HAVE NOW – THE DOG-EAT-DOG RAT RACE WHERE THERE’S NO LOVE, THE CULTURE OF DEATH, THEY COME TO ‘STEAL, KILL & DESTROY,’ ALL BASED ON WAR, VIOLENCE, UNJUST LAWS & EXPLOITATION, CARING NOTHING FOR ECOLOGY, OUR PLANET THAT SUSTAINS US – WE LIVE IN CHAOS, A QUASI HELL BECAUSE OF MEN.)

As for how Women will keep men under control within the framework of a free society (and thus keep men from taking over once again), there are a number of ways this can be done without resorting to the grossly unethical means discussed above. We will need plenty of “bread and circuses” to keep the redundant fellas occupied, namely entertainment of various kinds,

(RASA SAYS: (What the author means by ‘bread & circuses’ is in the Roman days the coliseum was built to entertain the masses FOR FREE–they were also given free bread or food. This was I presume to keep them occupied & leave the government alone.)

IN A MATRIARCHAL SOCIETY, THERE IS NO SEXUAL REPRESSION BETWEEN CONSENTING ADULTS & SO, THIS IS A BASIC NEED THAT IS PROVIDED TO MEN & WOMEN, WHICH REVS UP THE FEEL-GOOD HORMONES & KEEPS US HEALTHY. SEX, AFFECTION & LOVE ARE BASIC THINGS ALL HUMANS NEED.

AS FAR AS ENTERTAINMENT THERE ARE ALL SORTS OF HEALTHY, AMUSING GAMES, SPORTS & RECREATIONS THAT ARE HARMLESS. VIOLENT ENTERTAINMENTS SUCH AS FIGHTING SHOULD BE ABOLISHED, UNLESS THEY CHANGE IT LIKE SO: FOR EVERY MALE FIGHT THERE HAS TO BE AN EQUAL FEMALE FIGHT PROFESSIONALLY PROMOTED. YOU CANNOT GLORIFY MALE FIGHTING SKILL UNLESS YOU TRAIN & GLORIFY THE SAME IN WOMEN. ALL DONE FOR MEN IN SPORTS INCLUDING BODY BUILDING, HAS TO BE EQUALLY PROMOTED WITH WOMEN.)

as well as a Universal Basic Income Guarantee for all. Additionally, the Humphrey-Hawkins Full Employment Act, which was passed in 1978 but never fully implemented, should be revisited as a way to guarantee full employment without significantly increasing inflation. In other words, the government should create a Job Guarantee program.

(RASA SAYS: THAT SOUNDS LIKE A SANE PLAN TO ME. PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE DESPERATE OR LIVE UNDER BRIDGES, HOMELESSNESS CANNOT EXIST IF THERE IS ANY JUSTICE.)

Last but not least, we can also learn a lot from our cousins, the bonobos. That goes for both banding together against rogue males, as well as doing away with “compulsory heterosexuality”. As the saying goes, “sisterhood is powerful“.

(RASA SAYS: LOVE BETWEEN WOMEN SHOULD NOT BE VILIFIED BUT ENCOURAGED FOR THOSE WHO’D LIKE TO PURSUE IT. FEMALE PARTNERSHIPS ARE GOOD IDEAS. FEMALE COMMUNES, CAREFULLY MONITORED (AGAINST MALES) DORMS SHOULD BE PURSUED STARTING NOW – ALL WILL HELP USHER IN MATRIARCHY.)

Of course, if Women really wanted to accelerate the process of male extinction in an ethical manner, there are other things they can do as well. For example, they can pay men to get vasectomies as well as to utilize the emerging new reversible alternatives in the pipeline such as the intra-vas device or Vasalgel. And men can go and party their way into extinction. In the meantime, Women can work on perfecting parthenogenesis, or reproducing without men, and they could choose to have only girl babies if they wanted. Ultimately, it would be up to them.

(RASA SAYS: ALL GREAT IDEAS. GO FOR IT!)

As for what kind of government Women will create in the future, I believe that Women will make that decision themselves, and have faith that they will make the right one, but if they want my advice I would recommend social democracy, democratic socialism, or something in between to start with. From there, I would recommend moving towards what Riane Eisler calls the “partnership” model as well as Buckminster Fuller’s ideas for the future. But take over they must. Otherwise, we are merely rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

Let the planetary healing begin!

RASA SAYS: ANYTHING AS LONG AS IT’S RUN BY WOMEN ALONE, WILL WORK. IN THE ANCIENT DAYS WE HAD QUEENS, IT WORKED. COMMUNISM WAS GOOD ON PAPER- HAD EQUALITY FOR WOMEN & FREEDOM OF RELIGION, BUT RUN BY MEN, THESE RIGHTS WERE ABORTED.

CHRISTIANITY WAS BEAUTIFUL, STARTED BY THE MASTER OF LOVE, JESUS CHRIST, BUT RUN BY MEN IT BECAME MURDEROUS CRUSADES & THE HOLOCAUST OF WOMEN, & THEN A HOMO-PRIESTHOOD (NOT AGAINST HOMOS BUT THE WHOLE PRIESTHOOD?) & PEDOPHILIA.

AS FAR AS DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM, THAT’S WHAT NOAM CHOMSKY SAID IS BEST – SOUNDS ALRIGHT TO ME.

THE NON-NEGOTIABLE ITEM IS THAT IT MUST BE RUN BY WOMEN SOLELY, WITHOUT MEN MAKING DECISIONS OR PRESSURING WOMEN UNDULY. WE TRUST IN WOMEN’S INSTINCT & MOTHER GOD GUIDING THEM.

WOMAN, THU ART GOD!

GO FORTH IN TRUTH, ARMED WITH YOUR GOD POWER, TO SAVE YOURSELF, THOSE YOU LOVE, & THE ENTIRE WORLD! YOU CAN DO IT!

To be continued Article by Ajax the Great Comments by Rasa Von Werder 11-1-19

719 views