College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

Women Must Know How to Train Men <> Like Dogs, haha

MANAGING MEN <> WOMEN MUST LEARN HOW

By William Bond…..comments by Rasa Von Werder…..5 20 14

The Femdom scene is in theory about women dominating men, even though men originally created it. Because of this, most of its behaviour is more masculine in character. Men go to a Dominatrix to be whipped, spanked or tortured, which is a masculine perspective. Men have been whipping slaves, children and women for centuries, to assert their power over them. So is this behaviour appropriate for women?

Up until the 20th century, it was commonplace for parents and schools to beat children. The saying of the time was, “spare the rod and spoil the child.” Child rearing was cruel in other ways. Male child experts in the early 20th century were advising mothers that picking up crying babies only encouraged them to cry more. They even advised mothers to lock a baby in a room on its own, if it cried too much. Mothers followed this advice, even though it went against their natural instincts in caring for babies.

Male child experts in the early 20th century were advising mothers that picking up crying babies only encouraged them to cry more.  They even advised mothers to lock a baby in a room on its own, if it cried too much.

Male child experts in the early 20th century were advising mothers that picking up crying babies only encouraged them to cry more. They even advised mothers to lock a baby in a room on its own, if it cried too much.

RASA SAYS: HERE WE HAVE “MANSPEAK,” THE MEN TALK, TALK, TALK ABOUT THINGS THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT. IT SEEMS TO ME THIS IS AN INDICATION OF THEIR JEALOUSY THAT WOMEN PAY MORE ATTENTION TO BABIES THAN THEM–IT’S SIBLING RIVALRY. THEY WANT ALL OUR NURTURING POWER. THEY STEAL OUR POWER BECAUSE THEY DO NOT USE IT SINCERELY.

Fortunately, one male child expert, Dr Benjamin Spock, broke ranks and in 1946 published a book called, “The Common Sense Book of Baby and Child Care,” this book encouraged mothers to follow their natural maternal instincts in caring for their children.

RASA SAYS: IT ALL COMES BACK TO THAT, OUR OWN NATURAL INSTINCT AND INNATE WISDOM, HANDED DOWN FROM WOMAN TO WOMAN. WHAT THEY DID WAS SEPARATE US FROM OUR ANCESTORS AND THEN TELL US WHAT TO DO; ALL ABOUT CONTROL OF US. BUT THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT REARING CHILDREN. ALL DR. SPOCK DID WAS HAVE GOOD ADVISE REGARDING ILLNESSES, AS HE WAS AN M.D. THAT WE CAN GET POINTERS ON AS WE NO LONGER HAVE FEMALE HEALERS–BUT THEY ARE COMING BACK AS WOMEN ARE GETTING MORE DOCTOR DEGREES THAN MEN. THEY WILL REWRITE THE MEDICAL PROFESSION, IN TIME.

HERE WE HAVE "MANSPEAK," THE MEN TALK, TALK, TALK ABOUT THINGS THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT.  IT SEEMS TO ME THIS IS AN INDICATION OF THEIR JEALOUSY THAT WOMEN PAY MORE ATTENTION TO BABIES THAN THEM--IT'S SIBLING RIVALRY.  THEY WANT ALL OUR NURTURING POWER.  THEY STEAL OUR POWER BECAUSE THEY DO NOT USE IT SINCERELY.

HERE WE HAVE “MANSPEAK,” THE MEN TALK, TALK, TALK ABOUT THINGS THEY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT. IT SEEMS TO ME THIS IS AN INDICATION OF THEIR JEALOUSY THAT WOMEN PAY MORE ATTENTION TO BABIES THAN THEM–IT’S SIBLING RIVALRY. THEY WANT ALL OUR NURTURING POWER. THEY STEAL OUR POWER BECAUSE THEY DO NOT USE IT SINCERELY.

BABYLILY BABY DEER MASTIFF

As the result, his book became a international best-seller and changed the way children were brought up in Western countries. Then, with the rise of Feminism in the 1960s, mothers questioned violence against children. As women became empowered and had rights to bring up children in the way they wanted, they rejected all forms of physical punishment. They even had the cane banned in schools.

We see a similar pattern in animal training. Again, up until the 20th century, animals were trained by punishment, but as women became empowered, and got involved in animal training, they questioned the use of punishment. This led to a more humane form of animal training, in recent years, where animals are far less beaten or hurt.

In 2005, BBC TV produced a show called, “Bring Your Husband To Heel,” it was about a dog trainer called Annie Claydon who showed wives how to train their husbands, using animal training methods. Unfortunately, this caused so many complaints that the BBC cancelled the show. The biggest complaint was that it was demeaning for men to be trained like an animal, but there is another way of looking at this.

RASA SAYS: WOMEN, SHUT UP. THEY DON’T EVEN KNOW WHEN THEY ARE BEING EMPOWERED AND ARE THE FIRST ONES TO RAISE A SHOUT WHEN BRAVE WOMEN MAKE STRIDES. TRYING TO SUCK UP TO MASSAH I SUPPOSE.

It has been recognized that dogs can be dangerous animals and for this reason it is recommended that dog-owners should train their dogs, so they have control over them. A properly trained dog is far less likely to attack people or children, than an untrained or badly trained dog. But men are far, far more dangerous than dogs, as men are more likely to attack their wives and family than any dog. This is why it is important that women learn how to train and control men, for their own self-protection.

RASA SAYS: THE STATISTICS SAY THAT MALES MOLEST THEIR OWN CHILDREN AND THOSE OF OTHERS IN ALARMING NUMBERS. THEY ARE ALSO MORE VIOLENT, MORE PRONE TO ANGER THEY CAN’T CONTROL. THE MOST DANGEROUS ANIMAL IN THE HOME IS A MALE NOT CONTROLLED BY A WOMAN/WOMEN.
OUR DISADVANTAGE IS WE ARE ALONE WITH THIS CREATURE. IN MATRIARCHY THERE WERE SEVERAL WOMEN AND NUMEROUS WOMEN CLOSE BY WHO COULD BE ON CALL DURING AN ALTERCATION. BUT IN THE NUCLEAR FAMILY – WHICH IS SET UP FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF MEN – WE ARE VULNERABLE. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT, THAT WE ARE SITTING DUCKS.
ANYTHING TO HELP US SUFFER LESS ABUSE AT THEIR HANDS WOULD BE HELPFUL.

animal training, in recent years, where animals are far less brutalized.

up until the 20th century, animals were trained by punishment, but as women became empowered, and got involved in animal training, they questioned the use of punishment. This led to a more humane form of animal training, in recent years, where animals are far less brutalized.

scan0165 - Copy scan0166

Now, training men like dogs is a common Femdom fantasy, but Femdom uses old fashioned methods in training men, by beating them, while Annie Claydon, in her show, used more humane, up-to-date methods. Using animal training on people is not a new idea, it has been employed by Behaviour Psychologists since the end of the 19th century.

Scientists have claimed psychology is not a real science, because it depends too much on opinions and theories. Even today, psychologists can make diagnosis on mental patients based on guesswork. They still diagnose people as schizophrenic or paranoid with little regard for the harm a wrong diagnosis can do to them. They can get away with this; because once a person is diagnosed with a mental illness, people will no longer take what they say seriously. This means that people diagnosed with a mental illness can find their human rights taken from them.

Behaviour Psychology has been the target of this criticism and for this reason only uses observable facts. They began with animal studies, like the infamous Ivan Pavlov experiments on dogs, which demonstrated how to make a dog neurotic. Then these animal studies were used on humans. Like the equally infamous “Little Albert experiment,” by John B. Watson, – this today would not be allowed, as it would be seen as child abuse. These types of experiments gave Behaviourism a bad name. Then John B. Watson was to make an extraordinary claim, which frightened many people, as he made it sounded like Behaviour Psychology, was simply brainwashing. He wrote. -

“Give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own specified world to bring them up in and I’ll guarantee to take any one at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might select – doctor, lawyer, artist, merchant-chief and, yes, even beggar-man and thief, regardless of his talents, penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocations, and race of his ancestors. I am going beyond my facts and I admit it, but so have the advocates of the contrary and they have been doing it for many thousands of years.”

Behaviourists hadn’t discovered anything new. People have known how to train animals and people for thousands of years. All the Behaviourists did was to observe and test what type of training was most effective, using scientific methods. The way people are trained is through reward and punishment, and it has to be said that men generally like to use punishment, while women prefer rewards.

n 2005, BBC TV produced a show called, "Bring Your Husband To Heel," it was about a dog trainer called Annie Claydon who showed wives how to train their husbands, using animal training methods.

536954_200150586789685_422960319_n 68693_10200304102110037_1450531862_n 317907_529913323695461_1342934668_n

Both punishment and reward was first used in Behaviourism but la,ter on, B. F. Skinner demonstrated that rewards were far more effective for training animals and people than punishment. His ideas were used by the military, advertisers and animal trainers but not so much in schools or the wider society. Because we live in a male dominated patriarchal society, people still believe that punishment is a better form of training people than rewards. In spite of the fact that evidence doesn’t show this.

The reason why rewards are better than punishment is not hard to work out. People who are punished only do enough to not get punished and no more, and if they can secretly sabotage what they are forced to do, they will. In sweatshops where people are overworked and underpaid, the standard of workmanship is generally poor, simply because people feel exploited and unappreciated and therefore have no interest or pride in their work.

Another example of this was in the British army in WW1 where it was discovered that private soldiers were deliberately acting if they were stupid. The soldiers gave their officers a hard time by pretending they didn’t understand or misunderstood what they were being ordered to do. Therefore, the officers would get frustrated in spending large amounts of time trying to explain what they wanted. This was because the men were trained by punishment and resented it. This led to a military discipline offence called, ‘dumb insolence,’ which is just another term for passive aggression.

Animal trainers used Skinner’s work because they found that rewards were the only way they could train dolphins and small whales. Also, this was a far safer way of training large animals like big cats or elephants. Upsetting a large animal by punishing them is a dangerous thing to do, as these animals have been known to take revenge and kill trainers when given the chance.

THE MOST DANGEROUS ANIMAL IN THE HOME IS A MALE NOT CONTROLLED BY A WOMAN/WOMEN

THE MOST DANGEROUS ANIMAL IN THE HOME IS A MALE NOT CONTROLLED BY A WOMAN/WOMEN

pic9 pic1 pic3pic4 pic8

THE ANIMALS CAGED ABOVE ARE BILE BEARS–UNBELIEVABLE TORTURE IN CHINA, CAGED UP FOR LIFE, WITH HORRIBLE PAINFUL CONTRAPTIONS TO THEIR STOMACHS TO REMOVE BILE–JUST TO SHOW HOW EVIL MALES ARE TO OTHERS–AND WOMEN RECOIL TOWARD TRAINING MEN LIKE DOGS? THEY WILL DO ANYTHING FOR MONEY, IN GENERAL. MILLIONS OF ANIMALS A YEAR TORTURED FOR HUMAN REMEDIES–ELEPHANTS KILLED FOR TUSKS IN FRONT OF THEIR BABIES–DITTO RHINOS – AND WOMEN FEEL SORRY FOR MALES BEING DEHUMANIZED?  THIS DEMONIC SYSTEM HAS TO STOP AND IT IS BEING STOPPED BY MOTHER GOD AS KALI, THE KILLER OF MEN.

The men who started Femdom have never understood any of this, as they tried to encourage women to punish men as a means of female domination. Whereas we can see in the case of Annie Claydon, she preferred to use rewards to train both dogs and men. The reason why men prefer to train animals and people through punishment is because force and aggression are masculine characteristics. But another reason is that it is simple and direct and easy to understand, while training through rewards can be more complicated. Because it involves keen observation and understanding of how the person or animal you are attempting to train, thinks and feels. Observation and empathy are generally feminine qualities.

So, modern training is the study of human and animal behaviour and trying to understand why animals and men behave they way they do. Then to encourage, the behaviour you want through rewards, like food, petting and praise. Modern trainers also have the attitude that if a trained animal does something wrong, then it is the trainers fault and not the animals. Therefore, there is no reason why a trainer should want to punish an animal.

So how does this work out in practise? Something simple would be to train a dog to sit on command. The trainer holds up a dog treat above the dog’s head, which gets the dogs attention. She then slightly moves forward, to cause the dog to retreat just enough to sit down. While at the same time, she gives the command, “sit” just before the dog’s bottom hits the ground. She then rewards the dog with the treat and with petting and praise. So in the dog’s mind, is the association between the word “sit”, it sitting down and then getting food. This then is repeated many times until the dog will automatically sit on command, without having to be tricked into sitting or given a treat.

Obviously, women can’t use this trick on men, unless it is a Femdom fantasy scene. But she can observe his behaviour and praise him, whenever he does something she wants him to do, or directly order him to do something and then praise him when he obeys her. Repetition is another part of training, if she gets the man to do as he is told a number of times, it became automatic for him to obey her. The military uses this method to train soldiers by giving them an enormous number of orders until obeying orders come second nature to soldiers. Likewise, the more times a man obeys orders from a woman, the more habitual it becomes for him to obey her.

It is claimed that in dog training it is important to establish who the alpha leader is. The old-fashioned way was by the cruel method of tying a dog to a post and then beating it. Modern trainers have realized that such extreme methods are not needed to establish who the boss is. It can be done through body language and tone of voice. Just by the trainer thinking that she is the boss, will bring about the appropriate body language. This works for both dogs and men.

DOGS MAN'S BEST FRIEND, BUT MAN IS NOT DOGS BEST FRIEND

DOGS MAN’S BEST FRIEND, BUT MAN IS NOT DOGS BEST FRIEND

KELZEB TooDamnedCute bardot1

PICTURED ABOVE IS BRIGITTE BARDOT

Animal trainers are taught a lot about body language. This is because animals don’t speak, but communicate with each other through body language and so animals better understand this than we do. This means, animal trainers have to be aware of their body language, to know how to communicate with animals. This is why animal trainers must have self-awareness. Body language also works on humans on the unconscious level. So awareness of your own body language is important in training both dogs and men. (Though the body language that will work for men and dogs may not be appropriate when training other animals.)

In the USA there is a argument between two dog-training experts, Cesar Milan and Victoria Stilwell. The disagreement is that Cesar Milan believes strongly that the dog-owner needs to take the alpha position and be the pack leader to successfully train dogs. Victoria Stillwell disagrees and claims this is an old-fashioned idea and trying to be an alpha leader is not required. This might be true for her, but not necessary for other people. Her body language, tone of her voice and even the way she dresses, clearly shows to both dogs and men, that she is the boss. That is the reason why she finds training dogs so easy, she doesn’t have to try to be the pack leader, because her normal body language tells dogs very clearly, that’s what she is.

RASA SAYS: IT SOUNDS LIKE VICTORIA STILWELL IS IN DENIAL THAT SHE ALREADY REPRESENTS THE PACK LEADER. PEOPLE ARE SO DELUSIONAL.

The real issue between them is that Cesar Milan believes that to establish the alpha position the owner needs to restrain the dog by holding it down. Which although is nowhere as bad as beating the dog, it is still too much for Victoria Stillwell.

RASA SAYS: I USED TO WATCH CESAR ALL THE TIME. HE WOULD STAND UP TO A DOG, NOT BACK DOWN, JUST WALK CLOSER AND CLOSER, OR CONTINUE THE HAIRCUT OR WHATEVER, WITHOUT REGARD TO THE DOG BARKING OR MENACING. HE PROVED HE HAD NO FEAR – THE DOG WOULD BECOME AFRAID. I NEVER SAW HIM HOLD A DOG DOWN OR RECOMMEND IT. HE ALSO TAUGHT HIS CLIENTS TO WALK THROUGH HIS PACK WITHOUT LOOKING AT THEM, LIKE THEY HAD NO FEAR. A LOT OF THIS IS SCARY STUFF. I HAVE BEEN BITTEN BY A STRANGE DOG WHO JUST CHASED ME, BIT ME, AND RAN AWAY.
I DID TRY TO LEARN FROM CESAR AND OTHERS, BUT THERE IS A LOT TO THIS, TO TRAIN OTHERS, A TREMENDOUS APPLICATION OF THE MIND AND SKILL.

She claims that even this, is cruel to dogs. She campaigns against animal cruelty of all kinds, like her strong opposition to choke, prong and shock collars being used on dogs. Though she will recommend male dogs being castrated if they are too aggressive and for dogs to be put-down, if they make an unprovoked attack on children.

4a4142dceed30

Because Victoria Stillwell is a woman, she focuses a lot on positive training methods of rewards and observing dog behaviour to understanding what it thinks and feels. People can learn a lot from animal training in child-care. As some people can unwittingly train their children to be the opposite of what they want, because they lack self-awareness. The classic example of this would be the father complaining about his son’s bad language, when he grumbles. “My bloody kid swears all the time; I can’t think where the fuck he gets it from.”

RASA SAYS: THE IDEA OF THE ROLE MODEL IS PARAMOUNT IN GETTING OTHERS TO FOLLOW. THOSE CHILDREN WHO HAVE NEGATIVE ROLE MODELS HAVE A TERRIBLE BEGINNING, HARD TO OVERCOME. THEY IDENTIFY WITH THEIR ROLE MODELS. IF BOTH THEIR PARENTS DO NEGATIVE THINGS, IT IS A TERRIBLE HANDICAP FOR THE CHILD.
ONE PROBLEM WITH THE PATRIARCHY VS MATRIARCHY SCENE IS THAT MALES HAVE CREATED AL THE HEROES TO BE MALE, AND THEY HAVE DEPRIVED THE WOMEN OF CREDIT DUE TO THEM FOR ALL THEIR ACCOMPLISHMENTS, AND THEY WORK HARD ON GIVING MEN CREDIT FOR ALL THINGS AND DEPRIVING WOMEN OF SAME.
WOMEN NEED FEMALE ROLE MODELS.
I PROVIDED THIS WHEN I LIFTED WEIGHTS AND PROMOTED IT, THEN PREACHED AND DANCED, “STRIPPING FOR GOD,” THEN WENT ON NATIONAL TV SHOWS AS A FEMALE SUPREMACIST AND DOMINATRIX. NOW I GIVE EXAMPLES AS A GURU/TEACHER WHO AT THIS TIME IS HAVING FUN AND DONE WITH SEXUAL REPRESSION.
I KNEW THAT TO INFLUENCE WOMEN I HAD TO FIRST SET THE EXAMPLE, AND THEY HAVE FOLLOWED.
RIGHT NOW THE EXAMPLE IS TEACHING SEXUALITY. IN ORDER TO TEACH, I HAVE TO DO IT. MY 31 YEARS OF CELIBACY HAVE ENDED, AND I AM TAKING NUDE EROTIC SHOTS OF MALE MODELS TO PROVE MY POINT. I WAS THERE; I TOOK THE PICTURE– OF MANY MALES. PEOPLE CAN DRAW THEIR OWN CONCLUSIOS. IT’S LIBERATING TO WOMEN THAT IT IS NOT THEM AS THE SEX OBJECT, BUT THE MAN’S TURN.

When training through rewards, the trainer has to be aware of what the animal or person they are trying to train, thinks are rewards. An example of this, is again in child-care, when parents have a extravert child who want to be the centre of attention. If the parents do not give the child attention when they are sensible, but give them a lot of attention when they are disruptive, they can unwittingly, train their children, to misbehave. This is because these children will prefer the negative attention where the parent is shouting at them or punishing them to getting no attention at all.

Parents who are more intelligent and self-aware may realize that extravert children crave attention and use this to train them. So, all they do is ignore the children when they are behaving in anti-social ways and only give them attention when they are acting sensibly. Or use their need for attention as a reward, when teaching them. (Though this may not work so well with introverted children, who may not want much attention and prefer to be left alone.) So what works for one child may not work for another.

Another example was a couple I knew where the man who was obedient to the woman began to change and would sometimes disobey her. The woman then tried spanking him, to make him obedient, it worked for awhile but then he went back to being disobedient again. She then discovered that he actually enjoyed being spanked by her, so what she thought was a punishment, was in reality, a reward. He was being disobedient so she would spank him. She then refused to do this anymore but he continued to be disobedient and that ended the relationship.

Women have one powerful tool in training men and that is nagging. Now, this may be a surprise to many women who have nagged their husbands for years and it hasn’t worked. The reason is that most women use nagging in a negative way. If we go back to Victoria Stillwell, she claims that you have to be positive when training dogs; the same is very true when nagging.

 

The reason why nagging can be effective in training men is that it is the same method used by religions, governments and advertiser to indoctrinate the people. All they do is to repeat the same idea over and over again, which is what nagging is. But to be effective, it has to about what you want and not what you don’t.

So if when a woman nags her husband and tells him repeatedly that he is a “no good, lazy, good-for-nothing.” All she is doing is brainwashing him into believing this to be true and he becomes more lazy. If she nags him that, “You, never bring me flowers and always forget my birthday,” she is unwittingly indoctrinated him to behave like that.

So nagging has to be positive. If a husband does something the wife wants him to keep on doing, then she needs to tell him this, and keep on telling him. So if a husband does bring his wife flowers then she needs to praise him, and then if he does not do it again, she has to remind him of what he did, but not in a way that is critical. Some women may complain they do this anyway and it doesn’t get results, and this is where knowledge of animal training is needed.
Animal trainers get it wrong all the time, when training animals, but then find that something they did, has confused the animal. It is very easy to give an animal or a man mixed messages, which can sabotage the training.

Some wives object to this, claiming that praising men is pandering to their egos, which is what women have been doing for centuries. Also, some women do think that she has to praise men to get what she wants, but she doesn’t get any praise in return. Women can have a genuine gripe about this, if praising men only gets limited results, whereas, if they learn animal training, they would accomplish a lot more. So women would be less inclined to complain about pandering to men’s ego, if doing this, gets them better results.

RASA SAYS: THIS PRAISE SITUATION, IS’T IT WHAT MOST OF US WOMEN DO ALL THE TIME? AND WHAT MEN USE TO GET SOME PUSSY? IS THIS SUPPOSED TO BE SOMETHING NEW? PEOPE DO IT TO ME ALL THE TIME, ALSO, TO GET SOMETHING OUT OF ME. IT’S AN OLD TRICK. THREE COLLEGE GIRLS I WAS OUT WITH THIS WEEKEND – ONE OF THEM PRAISED ME NAGGINGLY HOW GREAT I AM, HOW POPULAR, HOW FAMOUS, GET THEM FREE DRINKS. I WAS HESITANT. THE OWNER, A LADY WHO HAD JUST ASKED ME FOR MY AUTOGRAPH HEARD HER SCRIPT THE TENTH TIME, TOLD THE WAITRESS WE COULD EACH GET ONE SHOT, AND I ORDERED JACK DANIELS FOR THEM. PRAISE TO GET SOMETING OUT OF SOMEONE – AS OLD AS THE HILLS.
HOWEVER, I WOULD USE ANOTHER WORD: AFFIRMATION. AFFIRMATION OF THE GOOD IS A POSITIVE THING, USING IT WORKS.

Women have naturally used positive reinforcement on children for thousands of years. When women don’t listen to male child experts, they normally praise children and give them rewards and encouragement, to train them to be better people. What works for children also works on men and animals.

Another objection is that some people claim it is all about manipulating people, and yes, this is true. If you are a big and strong man, like John Wayne or Clint Eastward and not afraid to use violence, you don’t need to manipulate anyone, you just tell them, “do this, or else”. But if you are not a big macho man, then you have to use more clever methods to get what you want. Positive reinforcement, is a far more humane method of training people, that force and intimidation. However, it has to be admitted that many people do fear manipulation. What people like in the John Wayne approach, is that it is direct and easy to understand. Whereas people fear manipulation, as they may not understand what is going on.

RASA SAYS: GOOD POINT. I HATE DEVIOUSNESS.

Another point is that men use negative reinforcement on each other and on women. In competitive games men try to undermine the confidence of the people he is playing against. Men even make a competitive game out of insulting each other. They call it ‘banter’ where the cleverest insult wins the game. Unfortunately, they also play this game with women and even children, to undermine their confidence. When challenge about this behaviour the response is always, “can’t you take a joke?” The point being, that a person with no confidence is a lot easier to dominate, so this is why men do this. Surely positive reinforcement used by women is far, far better than negative reinforcement used by men. Though admittedly, women can also use negative reinforcement like with nagging and moral blackmail.

RASA SAYS: WILLIAM BOND IS MAKING REALLY GOOD POINTS HERE

Animal trainers can make animals do amazing things, but the act of training an animal requires time and patience. To get an animal to do a circus act, requires a trainer to break down the whole act into small pieces and then teach it, bit by bit. The same can be true for a woman training a man to do something he may not wish to do. For instance, a wife may have a husband who was never taught to do housework, and has no interest in learning. If she is a bossy woman and he is submissive, then it is not a problem, she can order her husband to do it. However, if she hasn’t this amount of control over him, she can use positive reinforcement.

She can start by asking her husband to help her do some of the housework together. She then should try to make it a pleasant experience, for him, by being friendly and giving him praise and thanks for what he is doing. So if she suggests they do it again, then he is likely to be agreeable to it. She then can make it a regular thing of them doing housework together. Over time, she can start to gradually give him more of the housework. But in doing this, she still needs to ensure the housework is still a pleasant experience for him, so praise and little rewards are still needed. When he is used to doing this, she can ask him to do some of it on his own. Then start to sometimes help him but others times to leave him to do it by himself, until finally she helps him less and less, until it becomes his job to do it all the time.

As the result, the wife has trained her husband to do the housework without him being aware she did this. And she even may have brainwashed him to enjoy doing housework. Animal trainers talk about small steps and “setting the animal up for success,” in other words making is as easy for the animal as possible . The same would be true of in training a man. Though the difference would be, the reason you take small steps with a man, is not to make it too obvious that he is being trained.

Animal trainers have discovered that it is far easier to train an animal if you make it a pleasant experience for them. Animal trainers can easy work out how dogs are feeling, by the action of their tails, ears and body language. It is not so easy with human beings, because human can hide or disguise their emotions. This is true of many men brought up in a macho environment who have learnt, not to display any feelings. Men even learn to act differently to what they actually feel, to survive in the macho world. This then can make it difficult for a woman to work out what men actually enjoy.

For instance, some men can respond positively when a woman shouts at him and acts like a sergeant major, but other men may hate this and would display passive aggression. They have this problem in sports psychology. Coaches have found that you can strongly motivate some players by shouting insults at them, but with others, it has the opposite effect. So some players need praise and encouragement to perform at their best, while others need, “a good kick up the backside.” This means that keen observation, flexibility and an open mind are very important in training men.

Some woman may complain that they don’t want to train men or play power games with them. Unfortunately, just because many women do not want to play games with men; it doesn’t mean men won’t play power games with women. This is why men rule the world; they are more willing to play power games, than what women are. Men are naturally competitive; this is why they like sport and even war. They also bring their competitive instincts into their relationships with women.

RASA SAYS: OBJECTION TO “THIS IS WHY MEN RULE THE WORLD.” YOU IMPLY HERE THAT RULING THE WORLD OCCURED ON SOME KIND OF A PLAYING FIELD. IT HAPPENED BY VIOLENT TRIBES RIDING ON HORSEBACK ATTACKING SMALL COMMUNITIES, KILLING PEOPLE. IT WAS NOT ANY SORT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE OR MIND GAMES, IT WAS STRICT VIOLENCE, AND STRICT VIOLENCE IS STILL THEIR BIGGEST CARD: WAR. WITHOUT WAR, THERE WOULD BE NO MALE DOMINANCE. ALL THE OTHER GAMES FOLLOW, BUT WAR – MURDER – IS THE FOUNDATION. WOMEN DID NOT WANT TO BECOME DEMONS AND KILL INNOCENT PEOPLE.

In the power game between the sexes, men have the advantage of size, strength, aggression and violence. This is how men have dominated women for thousands of years.

RASA SAYS: THAT IS AN IMPORTANT PART. ADD TO THAT INSTITUTIONALIZED DISCRIMINATION, LAWS THAT PREVENT FEMALES FROM EDUCATION AND JOBS AND YOU HAVE MOST OF IT.

Even if some men do not use violence, they can still use the threat of violence to intimidate women. So women have to be clever to deal with this, which is why many dominant women are also very intelligent women. Lack of intelligence is not a problem when using masculine forms of domination but is essential if women want to control men. If a woman doesn’t use her natural feminine wiles properly, they can be ineffective and can achieve the opposite results to what was intended. As we have seen in the case of negative nagging.

RASA SAYS: SPEAKING OF INTELLIGENCE. THE ONLY WOMAN WHO AVOIDED GETTING HER HEAD CHOPPED OFF BY HENRY VIII WAS THE ONE WHO TOLD HIM TO DISREGARD HER COMMENTS ABOUT RELIGION BECAUSE HER ARGUMENTS WERE MEANINGLESS ANYWAY – THEY WERE “A WOMAN’S OPINION.” HER INTELLIGENT DEFENSE SAVED HER LIFE.

Behaviourists hadn't discovered anything new.  People have known how to train animals and people for thousands of years.  All the Behaviourists did was to observe and test what type of training was most effective, using scientific methods.  The way people are trained is through reward and punishment, and it has to be said that men generally like to use punishment, while women prefer rewards.

Behaviourists hadn’t discovered anything new. People have known how to train animals and people for thousands of years. All the Behaviourists did was to observe and test what type of training was most effective, using scientific methods. The way people are trained is through reward and punishment, and it has to be said that men generally like to use punishment, while women prefer rewards.

502fe9e66c688 51955947367e4 51c32db27b6ed

Fortunately, for women, the methods women can use to win the battle of the sexes has now become a science. Academic women can study Behaviourist psychology and the works of B. F. Skinner, which is used to day by advertisers, political parties and the military to train soldiers. Less academic women also can use animal training, and see the videos on this on YouTube from animal trainers like Victoria Stillwell.

If you have problems in converting animal training to training men, then there are even books on this as well. Like, “What Shamu Taught Me About Life, Love and Marriage,” by Amy Sutherland, “How to Make Your Man Behave in 21 Days or Less Using the Secrets of Professional Dog Trainers,” by Karen Salmansohn and “How to Train a Man,” by Nancy Winters. All these books are written in a humorist style but that is only to try and make the subject matter acceptable to readers.

Amy Sutherland claims she trained her husband by praise and encouragement while ignoring any behaviour she didn’t want. Karen Salmansohn received a lot of criticism for her book in the Amazon.com reviews. One was called, “As A woman I am greatly offended by the ideas in this book.” This critic went on to say.-

“I read this book after reading an article in News week discussing the authors views on behavior modification for men. I do not write reviews, but I was very disappointed and upset while reading the damaging instructions that are given in this text. If you value yourself and the men in your life you will not perpetuate or endorse the outrageous thinking and behavior this book employed. I am ashamed of myself for purchasing the book. I thought surely it would be written in fun and not as a manual to alter a man’s character. It should not need to be said, but I feel it needs to be, women should treat men with respect and value who they are and not change them. Woman who feel justified in manipulating men to act a certain way are controlling and devalue the relationships between men and woman. The instructions detailed in this text are irresponsible and demeaning to both genders.”

RASA SAYS: AS USUAL, SOME WOMEN TRY TO WIN OUR WAR AGAINST THE MALE GENDER, BUT THERE ARE ALWAYS THE OTHERS WHO JUMP TO THEIR SIDE. TRYING TO MAKE POINTS WITH THE ENEMY, OR ELSE, FEELING GUILTY ABOUT BEING STRONG. THIS WOMAN IS A LOSER WHATEVER WAY YOU LOOK AT IT.

What the author of this review is forgetting is that all over the world, millions of women are assaulted, raped and murdered, by men, every year. If women are not taking an active interest in changing men, then there are a lot of patriarchal religions and governments that are. Men are being brainwashed by the media and the general culture to be violent macho men and this violence is being used against women. When men are encouraged to be violent, women always suffer, because women are physically smaller, weaker and less aggressive than men. As the result, women are at a big disadvantage, in a patriarchal society when men are taught violence.

Other people may object that if these methods can be used by women to train men, then there is no reason why they can’t be used by men, to train women. Yes, there is nothing to stop men doing this. However, positive reinforcement has to be a far more humane method of treating women than force and intimidation. In addition, positive reinforcement methods are more likely to be used by women than men, because observation, empathy and social skills are more natural for women. Another point is that alpha men already use behaviourism; both the military and advertisers have used these methods for a long time.

The reason why men prefer to train animals and people through punishment is because force and aggression are masculine characteristics

The reason why men prefer to train animals and people through punishment is because force and aggression are masculine characteristics

hunger scan 080 FIN hunger scan 082 hunger scan 087 autumn017 hunger scan 066

RASA SAYS: I MIGHT ASK HOW DOES THE MILITARY USE THE POSITIVE TO TRAIN MEN? I HAVE SEEN MOSTLY NEGATIVE–SERGEANTS SCREAMING AT THE RECRUITS, PUTTING THEM DOWN, ORDERS BEING MADE WITH NO NICENESS WHATSOEVER, NO PRAISE THAT I CAN SEE. BUT THIS IS MOVIES AND TV. HAVE I MISSED SOMETHING?

Women need to be aware that advertisers use these methods, to sell their children unhealthy junk food. Or governments are encouraging male violence through, “shoot-them-up” films and violent video games. Patriarchal religions with anti-women agendas have been brainwashing people for centuries. The more women know about the secrets of brainwashing and indoctrination, the better they will be in defending themselves and their families, as well as using it to ensure their male partners and sons are trained in a way that supports women and not the interests of the few alpha men that rule our world.

The point is, that if a woman was to have a pet like a lion or tiger and that pet was to kill her or her children, she would be condemned. She did not protect her family. Yet, as many women have found to their cost, that men can be as dangerous as any large wild animal. A woman, who was to have a pet lion, would at least learn how to handle and control it, for her own protection. The same is true when a woman chooses to live with a man.

RASA SAYS: OH, IF ONLY WE COULD CONTROL THEM. I BELIEVE THESE WAYS WORK TO SOME DEGREE. HOWEVER, THE BEST WAY, LET’S FACE IT — IS LEVERAGE. WHAT DO I MEAN? WOMEN HAVE TO GAIN THE UPPER HAND, AS MALES HAVE HAD. MALES PREVENTED WOMEN FROM EDUCATION AND WORK, FETTERED THEM TO WORK AS SLAVES EITHER IN THE HOUSE FUKKING, BREEDING, BEDDING, COOKING, CLEANING OR ELSE IN THE BROTHEL DOING WHAT THEY DO THERE. OTHER JOBS WERE NOT EASILY AVAILABLE.
BUT WOMEN HAVE BROKE FREE. THEY WILL SOON BE THE BOSSES OF MEN. THIS IS LEVEREGE.
THE GOLDEN RULE IS “THE ONE WITH THE GOLD MAKES THE RULES.”
AND PEOPLE WORK WITH THE SIDE “THEIR BREAD IS BUTTERED ON.”

ONCE WOMEN HAVE POWER MALES WILL NOT BE BEATING THEM UP AS EASILY, OR ABUSING CHILDREN. THE NUCLEAR FAMILY IS GOING THE WAY OF HIGH-BUTTON SHOES. MANY WOMEN WILL CHOOSE NOT TO MARRY, HAVE SEX WITH MULTIPLE GUYS WHILE THEIR CHILDREN, IF ANY, HAVE PROFESSIONAL CARE. THEY WILL HAVE MANY MORE CHOICES FOR LIFESTYLE AND RELATIONSHIPS.

I ALSO KNOW THAT, ON THE OTHER HAND, THERE WILL BE A SET OF NEW PROBLEMS FOR WOMEN ONCE THEY ARE WEALTHIER THAN MEN. THERE WILL BE EXTORTION, THEFT, ALL KINDS OF FINANCIAL CHICANERY. I HAVE BEEN THROUGH SOME OF IT, THE THEFT AND FRIVOLOUS LAWSUIT PART. WHENEVER I HAVE A MALE IN THE HOUSE NOW, I MAKE SURE ALL MY FINANCIAL PAPERS AND CREDIT CARDS, CHECK BOOKS, INFORMATION, ARE ALL LOCKED UP. WHAT THESE POVERTY-STRICKEN MEN WILL DO IS GO THROUGH EVERYTHING A WOMAN HAS IN ORDER TO STEAL AND BRING LAWSUITS TO GET MONEY OUT OF WOMEN–THIS IS INEVITABLE, AND IT WILL BE WORSE WITH MALES DOING THIS TO WOMEN THAN WHAT WOMEN HAVE DONE TO MEN–AS MALES ARE NOT AS NICE AS WOMEN, WE ALL KNOW. THEY WILL BE DESPERATE, AND DESPERATE PEOPLE DO DESPERATE THINGS. WOMEN MIGHT EVEN HAVE HELP GROUPS OF HOW TO PROTECT THEMSELVES ONCE THEY BEGIN DATING MALES WHO ARE SEX OBJECTS AND IN NEED OF CASH. SOME OF THESE GUYS FANCY THEMSELVES AS GIGOLOS. THEY HAVE SEX WITH YOU AND THEN AFTERWARD DEMAND MONEY. I HAD TO CALL THE POLICE ON ONE SUCH CASE AS I DIDN’T KNOW IF HE WOULD GET VIOLENT. THE POLICE REMOVED HIM FROM MY HOME.

INDEED, I PREDICT A NEW SET OF PROBLEMS RATHER THAN THE ONES WE HAVE DEALT WITH IN THE PAST. WITH ROLE REVERSAL CONSIDER ALL THAT A POOR PERSON DOES TO TRY AND GET MONEY OUT OF THE RICH–WOMEN WILL NEED A NEW KIND OF DEFENSE AND PROTECTION.

THE EASIEST WAY I CAN THINK OF TO PREVENT TOO MUCH TROUBLE IS TO “FUKK’M AND DUKK’M.”

IN OTHER WORDS, ONCE YOU LET THEM INTO YOUR HOUSE FOR ANY LENGTH OF TIME, HAVE A LIVE-IN RELATIONSHIP, YOU ARE AT GREATEST RISK. I HAVE SEEN WEALTHY FAMOUS PEOPLE GET SUED FOR ALL KINDS OF MONEY BY SOME COMPANION WHO FUKKED THEM AND GOT A LOT, BUT WANTED MORE. THAT’S WHAT I MEAN BY NEW SETS OF PROBLEMS.

by William Bond…..Comments Rasa Von Werder…..5 20 14

College of Matriarchal Love, College of Religion & Theology, College of the Gender War

KALI MA KILLER HISTORY OF DEATH AND LIFE

KALI MA KILLER HISTORY OF DEATH AND LIFE

Typed out for Mother God by William Bond

Kali Ma – from the book by Barbara G. Walker, “The Woman’s Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets”

With Comments by Guru Rasa Von Werder

“Dark Mother,” the Hindu Triple Goddess of creation, preservation, and destruction; now most commonly known in her Destroyer aspect, squatting over her dead consort Shiva and devouring his entrails, while her yoni sexually devours his lingam (penis). Kali is “The hungry earth, which devours its own children and fattens on their corpses…It is in India that the experience of the Terrible Mother has been given its most grandiose form as Kali. But all this – and it should not be forgotten – is an image not only of the Feminine but particularly and specifically of the Maternal. For in a profound way life and birth are always bound up with death and destruction.”

RASA SAYS: PLEASE NOTE THAT KALI IS KILLING SHIVA – SHIVA THE MALE GOD. TO ME, THIS IS A VIVID AND PRECISE SYMBOL OF MALE EXTINCTION. ANOTHER ITEM STRIKES ME:  “her yoni sexually devours his lingam (penis)”.  AGAIN, THIS IS NOT SHE AS SHAKTI, GIVING LIFE, SHE IS TAKING IT.  HOW IS MAN GOING EXTINCT?  WITH HIS Y CHROMOSOME CRUMBLING, HE IS GETTING INCREASINGLY INFERTILE.  HE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO DUPLICATE HIS DNA INCLUDING THAT Y CHROMOSOME THAT MAKES MEN.  AND SO, MOTHER GOD IS AFFECTING HIM IN HIS SEXUAL REPRODUCTION, DEVOURING HIS PENIS TO DEATH.  THIS IS ANOTHER CLUE TO EXTINCTION.  SO STRANGE THAT THIS WAS KNOWN THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO, WHEN PATRIARCHS BEGAN ATTACKING, TAKING OVER, WHEN SATAN APPEARED, HIS DEMISE WAS ALSO WRITTEN ON THE WALL – KNOWN – ON THE VERY DAY HE THOUGHT HE WOULD RULE FOREVER.

Kali was the basic archetypal image of the birth-and-death Mother, simultaneously womb and tomb, giver of life and devourer of her children: the same image portrayed in a thousand ancient religions. Even modern psychologists face this image with uneasy acknowledgement of its power. It seems the image of the angry, punishing, castrating Father is somehow less threatening than that of the destructive Mother – perhaps because she symbolized the inexorable reality of death, whereas he only postulated a problematic post-mortem judgment.

RASA: PLEASE BEAR IN MIND AS YOU READ ALL THIS, EVERYTHING IS ATTRIBUTED TO KALI. BUT MOTHER GOD HAS A MYRIAD OF FORMS, AND YOU CAN SEE ABOUT THE SAME THING FOR ALL HER FORMS—IT’S ALL HER IN VARIOUS APPEARANCES. BUT AGAIN, WHY IS SHE SO SPECIFIC IN THIS APPEARANCE? IT IS WITHOUT A DOUBT THE KILLING OF MALE—ALL MEN AS SHE STANDS NOT JUST ON ONE MAN OR ONE DEMON, BUT THE GOD OF ALL MEN, THE MASCULINE GOD SHIVA, NOT GIVING HIM LIFE AS SHAKTI DOES ON TOP OF HIM, BUT GIVING HIM DEATH. TAKE NOT THAT WHEN MOTHER GOD GIVES LIFE TO SHIVA HE IS ON THE GROUND INERT. SHE GETS ON TOP OF HIM AND BRINGS HIM LIFE. THIS, AS KALI, IS THE OPPOSITE.

Tantric worshipers of Kali thought it essential to face her Curse, the terror of death, as willing as they accept Blessings from her beautiful, nurturing, maternal aspect. For them, wisdom meant learning that no coin has only one side: as death can’t exist without life, so also life can’t exit without death. Kali’s sages communed with her in the grisly atmosphere of the cremation ground, to become familiar with images of death. They said: “His Goddess, his loving Mother in time, who gives him birth and loves him in the flesh, also destroys him in the flesh. His image of Her is incomplete if he does not know Her as his tearer and devourer.”

Few western scholars understood the profound philosophy behind the hideous image of Kali the Destroyer. The London Museum displayed such an image with the label saying only, “Kali – Destroying Demon.” The Encyclopaedia Britannica devoted five columns to Christian interpretations of the Logos without ever mentioning it origins in Kali’s Om or Creative Word; Kali herself was dismissed in a brief paragraph as the wife of Shiva and “a goddess of disease.”

RASA SAYS: IMBECILIC MALES AND THEIR POLITICIZED ACADEMIA, DISCREDITING ALL FROM MOTHER GOD AND WOMEN. THEY WILL DIE FOR IT.

Certainly, as the Kalika or Crone she governed every form of death including disease; but she also ruled every form of life.

Kali stood for Existence, which meant Becoming because all her world was an eternal living flux from which all things rose and disappeared again, in endless cycles. The gods, whom she bore and devoured, addressed her thus:

RASA SAYS: NOTICE SHE BORE THE GODS. MOTHER GOD IS THE SOURCE OF MALE GODS.

Thou art the Original of all manifestations; Thou art the birthplace of even Us; Thou knowest the whole world, yet none know Thee…Thou art both Subtle and Gross, Manifested and Veiled, Formless, yet with form. Who can understand thee?…It is Thou art the Supreme Primordial Kalika…Resuming after dissolution Thine own from, dark and formless, Thou alone remainest as One ineffable and inconceivable…though they self without beginning, multiform by the power of Maya, thou art the Beginning of all, Creatrix, Protectress, and Destructress.

Brahman’s assigned Kali’s three functions to three male gods, calling them Brahma the creator, Vishnu the preserver, and Kali’s archaic consort Shiva the destroyer; but many scriptures opposed this male trinity as offensively artificial. A prayer in the Tantrasara said: “O Mother! Cause and Mother of the World! Thou art the One Primordial Being, Mother of innumerable creatures, Creatrix of the very gods; even of Brahma the Creator, Vishnu the Preserver, and Shiva the Destroyer! O Mother, in hymning Thy praise I purify my speech!” The Nivana Tantra treated the claims of male gods with contempt:

RASA: TREATED MALE GODS WITH CONTEMPT. INDEED. HER KIDS.

Brahma, Vishnu, Mahesvara [Shiva], and other gods are born of the body of that beginningless and eternal Kalika, and at the time of dissolution they again disappear in Her. O Devi, for this reason, so long as the living man does not know the supreme truth in regard to Her…his desire for liberation can only give rise to ridicule. From a part only of Kalika, the primordial Shakti, arises Brahma, from a part of only arises Vishu, and from a part only arises Shiva. O fair-eyed Devi, just as rivers and lakes are unable to traverse a vast sea, so Brahma and other gods lose their separate existence on entering the uncrossable and infinite being of Great Brahma and the other gods is nothing but such a little water as is for a hollow made by a cow’s hoof. Just as it is impossible for a hollow made by a cow’s hoof to form a notion of the unfathomable depths of a sea, so it is impossible for Braham and other gods to have a knowledge of the nature of Kali.

RASA: NO GOD STANDS BEFORE MOTHER GOD.

Even the arrogant Vishnu, who claimed to have brought the whole earth out of the primal abyss, received the grace of enlightenment concerning Kali and wrote a poem about her: “Material cause of all change, manifestation and destruction…the whole Universe rests upon Her, rises out of Her and melts away unto Her. From Her are crystallized the original elements and qualities which construct the apparent worlds. She is both mother and grave…The gods themselves are merely constructs out of Her maternal substance, which is both consciousness and potential joy.”

The Yogini Tantra said of Kali, “Whatever power anything possesses, that is the Goddess.” Shakti, “Power,” was one of her important names. Without her, neither man nor god could act at all.

RASA SAYS: AGAIN, LET US REMEMBER, THAT ALL THESE TERMS GO BACK TO “MOTHER GOD” AS WE IN THE WEST UNDERSTAND IT. MOTHER GOD IS SHAKTI, DURGA, KALI, AND ALL OTHER NAMES, AND ALL THE QUALITIES HEREIN WORSHIPED AND EXPRESSED GO TO “MOTHER GOD.” MOTHER IS CALLED DURGA, SHAKTI, KALI, ETC.

It is She as Power (Shakti) who takes the active and changeful part in generation, as also in conceiving, bearing, and giving birth to the World-Child. All this is the function of the divine, as it is of the human, mother…It is thus to the Mother that man owes the World of Forms of Universe. Without Her as material cause, Being cannot display itself. It is but a corpse…primacy is given to the Mother, and it is said, “What care I for the Father if I but be on the lap of the Mother?”

A Tantric scholar points out that “the poets have found much more intimate cries of the heart when they spoke of the Deity as their ‘Mother’ than when addressed themselves as God as Father.” Kali’s poets approached her through love: “By feeling is She known. How then can lack of feeling find Her/” In their view, “All is the Mother and She is really herself. ‘Sa’ham’ (She I Am) the Sakta says, and all that he senses is She in the form in which he perceives her. It is She who in, and as, him drinks the consecrated wine, and She is the wine.” She feeds him as a mother feeds her child, and he becomes immortal: “Deathless are those who have fed at the breast of the Mother of the Universe.” The Yoginihrdaya Tantra says, “Obeisance to Her who is pure Being-Consciousness-Bliss, as Power, who exists in the form of Time and Space and all that is therein, and who is the radiant Illuminatrix in all beings.”

As a Mother, Kali was called Treasure-House of Compassion (karuna), Giver of Life to the world, the Life of all lives. Contrary to the west’s idea of her as a purely destructive Goddess, she was the fount of every kind of love, which flowed into the world only through her agents on earth, women. Thus it was said a male worshipper of Kali “bows down at the feet of women,” regarding them as his rightful teachers.

RASA SAYS: THIS LAST PARAGRAPH IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO WOMEN FOR THEIR MATRIARCHY AND TO MEN FOR THEIR RESTITUTION THROUGH THE WORSHIP OF MOTHER GOD AND WOMEN.

The name Eve may have originated with Kali’s Ieva or Jiva, the primordial female principle of manifestation; she gave birth to her “first manifested form” and called him Idam (Adam). She also bore the same title given to Eve in the Old Testament: Mother of All Living (Jaganmata).

RASA SAYS: MOTHER GOD, THROUGH FEMALE, GAVE BIRTH TO THE FIRST MAN THROUGH PARTHENOGENESIS. THE “OUT OF THE RIB OF ADAM” IS A FAIRY TALE OF OLD HUSBANDS AND THEIR WISHFUL THINKING-LIES.

As the primal Deep, or menstrual Ocean of Blood at creation, Kali was certainly the same as the biblical tehom, Tiamat, or tohu bohu, the “flux” representing her state of formlessness between manifested universes. As Mahanila-Sarasvati the great blue River-Goddess, she was probably the original namesake of the River Nile. As Kundalini the Female Serpent, she resembled the archaic Egyptian serpent-mother said to have created the world. It was said of Kundalini that at the beginning of the universe, she starts to uncoil in “a spiral line movement which is the movement of creation.” This spiral line was vitally important in late Palaeolithic and Neolithic religious symbolism, representing death and rebirth as movement into the disappearing-point of formlessness, and out of it again, to a new world of form. Spirals therefore appeared on tombs, as one of the world’s first mystical symbols.

RASA SAYS: KUNDALINI SHAKTI IS SHAKTI, ALSO CALLED CHITI-SHAKTI, AND REPRESENTS THE HOLY SPIRIT OF GOD, THE FEMININE DIVINE SPIRIT.

Luna priests of Sinai, formerly priestesses of the Moon-goddess, called themselves Kalu. Similar priestesses of prehistoric Ireland were kelles, origin of the name Kelly, which meant hierophantic clan devoted to “the Goddess Kele” (see Kelle). This was cognate with the Saxon Kale, or Cale, whose lunar calendar or Kalends included the spring month of Sproutkale, when Mother Earth (Kale) put forth new shoots. In antiquity the Phoenicians referred to the strait of Gibraltar as Calpe , because it was considered the passage to the western paradise of the Mother.

RASA SAYS: AHA, NOW I KNOW WHY ST. PATRICK ALWAYS BLESSES ME ON HIS DAY. I USED THE NAME KELLIE FOR MUCH OF MY LIFE, AS THE DANCER/PREACHER OF MUCH FAME, AND NAMED MY DAUGHTER KELLIE.

Indo-European languages branched from the root of Sanskrit, said to be Kali’s invention. She created the magic letters of the Sanskrit alphabet and inscribed them on the rosary of skulls around her neck. The letters were magic because they stood fro primordial creative energy expressed in sound – Kali’s mantras brought into being the very things whose names she spoke for the first time, in her bold language. In short, Kali’s worshippers originated the doctrine of the logos or creative Word, which Christians later adopted and pretended it was their own idea,

RASA SAYS: HERE IS THE EXAMPLE OF MALES STEALING FROM WOMEN, THEN PRETENDING THEY INVENTED IT. ALL MALE RELIGIONS ORIGINATED FROM WOMEN’S TEACHINGS, INCLUDING THE KORAN.

Kali’s letters magically combined the elements, which were previously separate as fiery-airy (male) or watery-earthy (female) forces. The former were “cruel”; the latter “benevolent.” This distinction seemed to reflect the Tantric view of Kali as Lady of Life and her spouse as Lord of Death.

Though called “the One,” Kali was always a trinity: the same Vigin-Mother-Crone triad established perhaps nine or ten millennia ago, giving the Celts their triple Morrigan; the Greeks their triple Moerae and all the other manifestations of the Threefold Goddess; the Norsemen their triple Norms; the Romans their triple Fates and the triadic Uni (Juno); the Egyptians their triple Mut; the Arabs their triple Moon-goddess – she was the same everywhere. Even the Christians modeled their threefold God on her archetypal trinity.

Her three forms were manifested in many ways: in the three divisions of the year, the three phases of the moon, the three sections of the cosmos (heaven, earth and the underworld), the three stage of life, the three trimesters of pregnancy, and so on. Women represented her spirit in mortal flesh. “The Divine Mother first appears in and as Her worshipper’s earthly mother, then as his wife; thirdly as Kalika, She reveals Herself in old age, disease and death.”

Three kinds of priestesses tended her shrines: Yoginis or Shaktis, the “Maidens”; Matri, the “Mother”; and Dakinis, the “Skywalkers” who attended the dying, governed funerary rites and acted as angels of death. All their counterparts in the spirit world. To this day, Tantric Buddhism relates the three mortal forms of women to the divine female trinity called Three Most Precious Ones.

Kali’s three forms appeared in the sacred colors known as Cunas: white for the Virgin, red for the Mother, black for the Crone, symbolizing birth, life, death. Black was Kali’s fundamental color as the Destroyer, for it meant the formless condition she assumed between creations, when all the elements where dissolved in her primordial substance. “As white, yellow, and other colors all disappear in black, in the same way…all beings enter Kali.”

The Black Goddess was known in Finland as Kalma (Kali Ma), a haunter of tombs and an eater of the dead. European “witches” worshipped her in the same funereal places, for the same reasons, that Tantric yogis and dakinis worshipped her in cremation grounds, as Smashana-Kali, Lady of the Dead. Their ceremonies were held in the places of ghosts where ordinary folk feared to go. So were ceremonies of western “witches” – that is, pagans. They adored the Black Mother Earth in cemeteries, where Roman tombstones invoked her with the phase, Mater genuit, Mater recipit – the Mother bore me, the Mother took me back.

RASA SAYS: CONTACT WITH SOULS IN PURGATORY IS AN IMPORTANT FORM OF MINISTRY. I HAD IT FOR 30 YEARS, HELPED THOUSANDS OF SOULS BY MY PRAYERS AND SUFFERINGS.

Sometimes Kali the Destroyer wore red, suggesting the blood of life that she gave and took back: “As She devours all existence, as She chews all things existing with Her fierce teeth, therefore a mass of blood is imagined to be the apparel of the Queen of the Gods at the final dissolution. The gypsies, who worshipped Kalika as a disease-causing Goddess they called “the Aunt,” clothed her in red, the proper color for gypsy funerals.

Blood was as much a part of Kali’s worship as it was of the worship of the biblical God who said blood must be poured on his altars to bring remission of sins (Hebrew 9:22). The difference between the western God’s demand for blood and Kali’s was that Jewish priests took away the meat and ate it themselves (Numbers 18:9), whereas devotees of Kali were permitted to eat their own offerings, as in Calcutta :

The temple serves simply as a slaughterhouse, for those performing the sacrifice retain their animals, leaving only the head of the temple as a symbolic gift, while the blood flows to the Goddess. For to the Goddess is due the lifeblood of all creatures – since it is she who has bestowed it – and that is why the beast must be slaughtered in her temple; that is why temple and slaughterhouse are one.

This ritual is performed amid gruesome filth; in the mud compounded of blood and earth, the heads of the animals are heaped up like trophies before the statue of the Goddess, while those sacrificing return home for a family banquet of the bodies of their animals. The Goddess desires only the blood of the offerings, hence beheading is the form of sacrifice, since the blood drains quickly from the beheaded beasts…the head signifies the whole, the total sacrifice.

RASA SAYS: THIS HAD TO HAVE BEEN INTRODUCED BY MEN. MOTHER GOD DOES NOT WANT US TO SACRIFICE LIVING CREATURES, BUT WANTS US TO SACRIFICE OUR SINS; ADDICTIONS, BAD HABITS, VICES, ATTACHMENTS TO EARTH THAT KEEP US FROM GOD. IN MATRIARCHY THEY DID NOT SLAUGHTER ANIMALS, THEY KEPT GOATS AND SHEEP FOR MILK AND WOOL BARBARA WALKER SAYS ELSEWHERE. BUDDHA, A VERY MATERNAL SPIRITUAL LEADER, SAID NOT TO SACRIFICE ANIMALS. THIS HAD TO BE INVENTED BY THE MALES.

Beheading or throat-cutting were common methods of sacrificial killing in the western world too. “Kosher” killing for Yahweh consisted, and still consists, of draining the animal’s blood, because blood was the special food of deities. Kali demanded sacrifice of male animals only, for they were expendable – a custom harking back to the primitive belief that males had no part in the cycles of generation. Shiva himself, as Kali’s sacrificial spouse, commanded that female animals must never be slain at the altar.

Kali was the Ocean of Blood at the beginning and end of the world, and ultimate destruction of the universe was prefigured by destruction of each individual, though her karmic wheel always brought reincarnation. After death came nothing-at-all, which Tantric sages called the third of the three states of being; to experience it was like the experience of Dreamless Sleep. This state was also called “the Generative Womb of All, the Beginning and End of Beings.” Kali devoured Time itself. At the end of Time, she resumed her “dark formlessness,” which appeared in all the myths of before-creation and after-doomsday as elemental Chaos.

The mystical experience of Kali was often described as a preview of formlessness beyond the veil of death: a psychic return to the womb, to be united with Kali’s oceanic being. Thus Ramakrishna described it:

I was suffering from excruciating pain because I had not been blessed with a vision of the Mother…I feared that it might not be my lot to realize her in this life. I could not bear the separation any longer; life did not seem to be worth living. Then my eyes fell on the sword that was kept in the Mother’s temple. Determined to put an end to my life, I jumped up and seized it, when suddenly the blessed Mother revealed herself to me…the temple and all vanished, leaving no trace; instead there was a limitless, infinite, shining ocean of consciousness or spirit. As far as the eye could see, its billows were rushing towards me from all sides…to swallow me up. I was panting for breath. I was caught in the billows and fell down senseless.

RASA SAYS: I ALSO SAW GOD AS THE INFINITE OCEAN OF BLISS, THE HORIZON KEPT OPENING, IT WAS THE GOLD OF LOVE. I WAS GOD, GOD WAS ME. PRIOR TO THIS I HAD HAD THE EXPERIENCE OF DROWNING IN THE OCEAN OF GRACE WHICH WAS NOT BLISSFUL.

Ramakrishna revitalized the worship of the Mother, as his pupil Vivekananda said; “It was no new truths that Ramakrishna came to preach, though his advent brought old truths to light.” Vivekananda predicted the resurgence of the Mother into the consciousness of the world’s population, after patriarchal religions had forced her into concealment in the unconscious. “One vision I see clear as life before me, that the ancient mother has awakened once more, sitting on her throne rejuvenated, more glorious than ever. Proclaim her to all the world with the voice of peace and benediction. Clearly, this Goddess was much more that the London Museum ‘s “Destroying Demon.”

RASA SAYS: BRAVO TO RAMAKRISHNA AND VIVEKANANDA

5 20 14 by Barbara G. Walker, comments Rasa Von Werder

 

College of the Gender War, Core Tenets, Shrine to Shakti

THE GENETIC EXPERIMENT CALLED MEN IS OVER

THE GENETIC EXPERIMENT CALLED MEN IS OVER

RASA VON WERDER     5 17 14

I HAVE BEEN ALARMED BY THE BIRTH RATE OF MUSLIMS AND CATHOLICS. YOU CAN SEE THE PROBLEM OF MOTHER GOD AND ALL LIFE BY SUCH STATISTICS – HOW PATRIARCHY KEEPS GOING NO MATTER WHAT WE DO.

IT TO ME, ONLY UNDERLINES HOW MOTHER GOD HAS DEALT WITH IT FROM THE ORIGINS—MALES CAN CIRCUMVENT MOTHER GOD AND WORSHIP OF HER BY CREATING MORE AND MORE DEMONS – PATRIARCHS – BUT EVEN THOUGH THEY FORCE WOMEN TO HAVE KIDS ONCE A YEAR – (WHICH IS CRUEL AND TYRANNICAL, BAD FOR MOTHERS AND CHILDREN, MOTHERS DIE, CHILDREN DON’T GET THE NURTURING THEY NEED, WE HAVE A PANDEMIC ON ATTACHMENT DISORDER) – NEVERTHELESS – IF THEY BECOME INFERTILE THE WOMAN DOES NOT GET PREGNANT, PATRIARCHY DWINDLES.

SO MOTHER GOD HAS GOT THEM RIGHT BY THE BALLS, NO MATTER WHAT MEN DO, IF THEY ARE INFERTILE THEY CANNOT CREATE MORE DEMONS/MEN.

THIS DOES NOT STOP WOMEN FROM CREATING WITH THEIR VARIOUS METHODS, THE EGG IS REPRODUCTIVE, THE WOMEN DOES NOT NEED THE MAN, BUT THE MAN NEEDS THE WOMAN, HE CANNOT REPRODUCE MEN WITHOUT THE FEMALE. THE MALE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GET AROUND THIS. MOTHER GOD HAS CHECKMATED HIM.
…………………………………………………………………………..

WILLIAM BOND SAYS:

like I said I am sure we have the technology for two women to have a child together already, it just needs someone with the money and scientific knowledge to make it happen.

Yes, I can understand why women want to get rid of men completely, considering the suffering men inflict on women. But I would prefer it if women can find a way to control men, even it if means men have to be women’s slaves. But if that is not possible, then perhaps it is best for men to disappear. Perhaps women will have pet dogs instead.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

WE STILL HAVE 100,000 YEARS LEFT OF THESE CREATURES.  I AM BOOKING THE MOST BEAUTIFUL MALES IN THE WORLD TO POSE ON THIS SITE.  IF YOU KNOW OF ANY, GET IN TOUCH.

WE STILL HAVE 100,000 YEARS LEFT OF THESE CREATURES. I AM BOOKING THE MOST BEAUTIFUL MALES IN THE WORLD TO POSE ON THIS SITE. IF YOU KNOW OF ANY, GET IN TOUCH.

IMG_9380 ZX CRPFLT IMG_9380 ZX FLAT IMG_9834 ZX CRPFLT

LET’S LEAVE IT AT THAT……YOU THINK IT MAKES ME JOYFUL TO IMAGINE BEING WITHOUT MALES, AS A HETEROSEXUAL FEMALE? I STEP OUT OF MY SKIN TO SEE THE ENTIRE PICTURE, –I AM NOT LIMITED TO MY BODY. I AM A SOUL, AN EMBODIMENT OF GOD, MOTHER GOD ON EARTH. PLEASE DO NOT PUT ME INTO THE SMALL FRAMEWORK OF “A WOMAN SCORNED” WHICH IS CALLED “PERSONALIZING.” (WHENEVER WOMEN COMPLAIN SOME GUY SAYS, “OH, YOU POOR DEAR, HOW MEN MUST HAVE HURT YOU.”) THEY MAKE IT SEEM LIKE SHE IS A PATHETIC, RESENTFUL VICTIM WHO NOW WANT TO DISH OUT HATE AND REVENGE. IN THIS WAY, MALES TAKE THE HEAT OFF THEMSELVES, THE ATTENTION AWAY FROM THEIR MALICE, AND PUT THE STING ONTO THE WOMAN AS ONE WHO IS DAMAGED AND WEAK.

I SEE WHAT MALES HAVE DONE ON EARTH–THE MIND-BOGGLING DESTRUCTION AND CRUELTY. IT IS FAR WORSE THAN ANYTHING EVER DONE TO ME. YOU CAN SEE THAT AS WELL.

AS FAR AS MAKING MEN OUR SLAVES, I BELIEVE THAT IS LEFT FOR THE NEXT 100,000 YEARS, UNTIL THEY ARE GONE. THAT DAY IS COMING SOON, THEY WILL BE SLAVES FOR A TIME, BEFORE THEY ARE ESCORTED OUT BY EVOLUTION AND THEIR OWN KARMA. THE GENETIC EXPERIMENT CALLED MEN IS OVER.

 

(SEE DR. BRYAN SYKES, WORLD TOP GENETICIST, ON MALE EXTINCTION:  “ADAM’S CURSE-A FUTURE WITHOUT MEN”)

RASA VON WERDER…..5 17 14  Comment by William Bond

College of God & Love, College of Love Making, College of Matriarchal Love, College of Religion & Theology, College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

KALI KILLS MEN! <> TO STOP THEIR PATRIARCHY

KALI KILLS MEN! <> TO STOP THEIR PATRIARCHY

EXPLANATION OF MALE EXTINCTION THROUGH THE IMAGE OF KALI:

I NEVER UNDERSTOOD KALI, & IN STUDYING HER READ A LOT OF LONG-WINDED STUFF THAT BASICALLY EXPLAINED SHE IS THE GODDESS OF “CREATION & DESTRUCTION.” THAT DID NOT SATISFY ME BECAUSE HER IMAGE IS PURE DESTRUCTION, NO CREATION, & THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER IMAGES OF MOTHER GOD THAT BESPEAK CREATION.

HERE IS THE CLUE: DURGA TURNED HERSELF INTO KALI DURING THE BATTLE WITH THE GREATEST DEMON WHO EVER LIVED (SYMBOL OF PATRIARCHY, NAMED MAHISHASURA)…..AT ONE POINT IN HER BATTLE WITH THE DEMONS THIS ONE DEMON SPURTS BLOOD WHEN SHE SPEARS HIM. THE PROBLEM IS EVERY DROP OF BLOOD SPRINGS FORTH A NEW DEMON!

AT THIS POINT DURGA, (WHO IS ONE IMAGE OF MOTHER GOD AS WARRIOR AGAINST GREAT EVIL) TURNS HERSELF INTO KALI, THE FEROCIOUS IMAGE WE KNOW OF. IN THIS FORM SHE LAPS UP THE BLOOD OF THIS DEMON SO NO MORE CAN SPRING FORTH.

CONSIDER HER IMAGE WITH A LONG TONGUE, SALIVATING, GARLANDS OF SKULLS AROUND HER WAIST, STANDING ON SOMEONE KILLING HIM, HOLDING A SWORD HAVING CHOPPED OFF SOMEONE’S HEAD.

WHAT WAS SHOWN ME IS THIS IS THE IMAGE OF MALE EXTINCTION.

 

CONSIDER: EACH DROP OF BLOOD COMING OUT OF THE MALE IS LIKE HIS SPERM. EXTINCTION IS HAPPENING LIKE SO: THE Y CHROMOSOME CANNOT REPAIR ITSELF. (WHEN THIS BEGAN I HAVE YET TO DISCOVER). HOWEVER, THE SPERM COUNTS OF MALES DETERIORATING RAPIDLY IS A RECENT OCCURRENCE (THEY BEGAN REALIZING IT’S EXTENT IN 1992). IT IS BY THE SPERM COUNT DIMINISHING UNTIL THEY CANNOT REPLICATE THEMSELVES ANY MORE THAT MALE EXTINCTION OCCURS.  IN OTHER WORDS, MALES ARE CREATED WHEN THE Y CHROMOSOME IS PASSED ON, WITHOUT THE  CHROMOSOME,  MALES STOP BEING BORN.  THE Y CHROMOSOME IS PASSED ON FROM THE MALE.  (HOWEVER, THIS DOES NOT PREVENT FEMALES FROM REPRODUCING!  THE HUMAN RACE WILL NOT GO EXTINCT.)

FIGURES PROVE THAT IN 1950 THERE WERE ONE MILLION SPERM COUNTS PER ML – OF MALES STUDIED ACROSS THE GLOBE. THIS FELL TO 75 MIL IN 1970 AND 50 MIL IN 1990 – WITHIN 40 YEARS, MALE SPERM HAS DECREASED BY HALF.

DR. BRYAN SYKES SAID THAT BY WAY OF NATURAL OCCURRENCE, THERE WILL BE MUTATIONS OF THE MALE SPERM – REGULARLY – (DUE TO THE BREAKDOWN OF THE Y CHROMOSOME) – AND AS THIS CONTINUES, HE PREDICTS MALE EXTINCTION AROUND 100,000 YEARS, GIVE OR TAKE 25,000.

THE IMAGE OF KALI SPEAKS TO ME THAT MOTHER GOD (OR NATURE AS BRYAN SYKES CALLS IT) IS REMOVING MEN – THIS IS HER WAY OF STOPPING THEM – AN EFFECTIVE MEANS TO BE SURE.

WHAT GAVE ME THE SECOND HINT WAS THE DILEMMA OF MORE AND MORE DEMONS BEING BORN FROM THE BLOOD OF THE DEMON AS IT SPATTERED. THIS I TOOK TO BE THAT NO MATTER WHAT MOTHER GOD DID TO STOP PATRIARCHY, AS MORE AND MORE MALES ARE BORN IT CONTINUES. IT IS MALES WHO STAND FOR PATRIARCHY, MALES WHO MAKE WAR AGAINST MOTHER GOD AND WOMEN. REMOVING MALES IS THE END OF THE PROBLEM. EVERYTHING ELSE HAS BEEN TRIED – AS EXEMPLIFIED BY HER BATTLES.

A THIRD HINT WHAT THIS MYTH IS ABOUT IS “KALI YUGA” – AN EVIL AGE WHOSE ONLY MERCY IS THAT IT’S SHORT. SO KALI YUGA IS THE AGE OF PATRIARCHY, THE AGE MOTHER GOD STOPS THROUGH KALI.

I WILL DO MORE RESEARCH ON THIS IN THE NEXT DAYS, THIS IS THE BEGINNING.

RASA VON WERDER…..5 16 14

College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

HERO FANTASIES OF MEN <> LEGENDS IN THEIR OWN MINDS

MALE SUPERHERO FANTASIES <> LEGENDS IN THEIR OWN MINDS

By William Bond……..Comments by Rasa Von Werder

Thanking Female Supremacy Now 2 for the wonderful illustrations.  She finds the images, photo shops them, and adds captions.  Brilliant work!

Male fantasies seem to revolve around competition, conflict and violence. In any comic book character, we find supreme beings like Superman or Spider-man, prodigiously powered heroes fighting against mega villains. Violence is the central theme of these stories and the hero wins in the end  by  being stronger or smarter than the villain.

These stories are popular with males because most of them would like these powers. Boys also like western, martial arts, spy, gangster and war stories. Although these heroes don’t have superpowers they are strong and skillful with their fists or guns.

So whether to be obedient to women or to other men is not an issue with men.  It only becomes an issue when they are brainwashed into believing they are superior to women, by alpha men.  Patriarchal leaders do this, because they want men to obey them and not obey women instead.

So whether to be obedient to women or to other men is not an issue with men. It only becomes an issue when they are brainwashed into believing they are superior to women, by alpha men. Patriarchal leaders do this, because they want men to obey them and not obey women instead.

1157503_284684018337755_1114485626_n 1471145_331376470335176_424868782_n 1524859_331376243668532_1066651580_n 1003496_277746772364813_1253780800_n 1016797_277746289031528_1396306055_n 1016971_277746282364862_1216715503_n

RASA SAYS: YES, INDEED, I AGREE. RECENTLY THEY HAD A SERIES OF JOHN WAYNE MOVIES ON TCM. I NEVER WATCHED JOHN WAYNE MOVIES BECAUSE THEY ARE MOSTLY COWBOY SHOOT’M’UPS OR WAR STUFF. BUT WITH THE HOSTS EXPLAINING IN DETAIL THE LIFE OF JOHN WAYNE, THE HISTORY OF HIS MOVIES, IT SEEMED SO INTERESTED, I TOOK A PEEK. (AFTER WATCHING SEVERAL OF THESE PICTURES I GOT A REWARD; JOHN WAYNE BECAME MY FRIEND FROM HEAVEN AND NOW GIVES ME GOOD ADVICE. HE ESPECIALLY RATTED OUT THE MALE MODELS THAT WERE GIVING ME SO MUCH TROUBLE – HE OPENED MY EYES.)
IN ONE OF HIS EARLY MOVIES JOHN WAS AN INNOCENT COWBOY RUNNING WITH TWO LOSER TYPES AND CHASING SOME BEAUTIFUL WOMEN. HE HAS TO INFILTRATE THE AREA’S MOST DEADLY GANG, AND FINDS HIMSELF IN THEIR MIDST, WHERE THE WORST OF THEM PITS HIM INTO SOME CONTESTS.
WHAT DREW MY ATTENTION WAS THE PREDICTABILITY OF THESE CONTESTS – IN ALL MALE HERO MOVIES THE WINNER HAS TO HAVE SUPERLATIVE POWERS AND SKILLS. OBVIOUSLY THESE ARE ALL MALE FANTASIES AND THERE ARE NO MEN LIKE THESE, BUT IT’S EASY TO DRAW A PICTURE, INSERT CAPTIONS, OR HIRE AN ACTOR TO PRETEND TO BE HEROIC.
SO THIS VILLAIN CHALLENGES JOHN WAYNE TO THREE CONTESTS, WHERE EVERYONE SMIRKS THAT JOHN WILL BE DEFEATED, BUT JOHN WINS ALL THREE. DARNED IF I CAN RECALL THEM, BUT TWO WERE UNUSUAL, LIKE DART THROWING & SOMETHING ELSE WEIRD, THE THIRD BEING A SHOOTOUT. JOHN HITS THE MARK ON ALL THREE, HE’S THE GREATEST, NOW THE GANG PULLS HIM IN AND HE IS UNDER COVER.
ALL MEN WANT PEOPLE TO BELIEVE THEY ARE GREAT, BUT FEW ARE GREAT. GREAT MEN ARE BUDDHA, JESUS, MAHATMA GANDHI, SAINT MARTIN LUTHER KING JR., MY MATRIARCHAL HERO WILLIAM BOND, HONEST, STEADFAST MEN WHO DO RIGHT.
THE “WALTER MITTY” SYNDROME IS ALL IN THEIR HEADS.

So the fantasy world of most males is fierce competition and violence. This is why men like watching sports or playing them, because sport is about competition – and boxing, rugby, American or Australian football are especially violent. If men are unable to play sports, they can play violent video games. Even intellectual board games like chess have a background of war between kingdoms.

Why do men like competitive and violent games? The human male is not alone in liking violence. In the animal world the male lions, rams, stags and bulls fight against each other for dominance. Men likewise do the same, but where animals fight with claws or bang their heads together, men use spears, swords, rifles, machine-guns, bombs, tanks, aircraft, warships and nuclear bombs. As the result, weapon-technology makes men the most dangerous animals on the planet. We can see this, in the nuclear attack on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of WW2.

RASA SAYS: I HAVE DONE A LOT OF PRAYING AND CHANNELING ON THE EVIL OF MEN AND THE DEVASTATION TO OUR PLANET. THIS VIOLENCE EXPLAINED HERE HAS NOT GONE UNNOTICED BY THE UNIVERSE, THE HIGHER POWER OR WHAT WE CALL “GOD.” THAT WHICH IS ABOVE AND BEYOND IS PUTTING A STOP TO IT ALL BY REMOVING MEN OFF OUR PLANET, OR PUT IN ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE,
“HE WHO LIVES BY THE SWORD DIES BY THE SWORD.”
MEN, WHO DESIRE TO KILL MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, ANIMALS, AND NATURE, ARE DYING THEMSELVES. THEIR VIOLENCE, LUST FOR DEATH HAS COME UPON THEM. DR. BRYAN SYKES SAID,
“HUMAN MALES ARE A GENETIC MODIFICATION EXPERIMENT THAT DID NOT WORK, AND NATURE IS REMOVING THEM.”
HOW DID THIS EXPERIMENT NOT WORK?
BY THEIR MALICE.
ONCE, THEY LIVED PRODUCTIVELY UNDER THE SHELTER AND AUTHORITY OF WOMEN – THIS WENT ON FROM THE BEGINNING OF TIME TO ABOUT 5,000 YEARS AGO. IN THE AGE CALLED KALI YUGA, THEY BEGAN TO ATTACK PEACEFUL AGRARIAN COMMUNITIES, WHERE MEN AND WOMEN LIVED IN HARMONY, WHICH EVENTUALLY LED TO PATRIARCHY – (THE WORST SYSTEM EVER OPERATED ON OUR PLANET.)
THESE MEN ARE DESCRIBED IN THE BIBLE AS “LUCIFER” TURNING INTO “SATAN” AND TAKING A THIRD OF THE ANGELS WITH HIM – AN ANALOGY FOR MEN TURNING AGAINST MOTHER GOD AND WOMEN, WANTING TO BE WORSHIPED AS GOD, WANTING THE GLORY. THIS LUCIFER SAID HE WAS THE BRIGHTEST ANGEL IN HEAVEN AND HE SHOULD BE WORSHIPED, BUT THIS WAS AN AFFRONT AND THE GRACE OF GOD WAS DENIED HIM AND HENCEFORTH – HE WAS DOOMED.
GOD’S ANGEL CONSIGNED THIS CREATURE AND HIS FOLLOWERS TO HELL, BUT THEY ARE ALLOWED TO ROAM THE EARTH SEEKING WHOM THEY CAN DEVOUR. SATAN COMES TO
“STEAL, KILL AND DESTROY” – PATRIARCHY.

THERE IS NO REDEEMING VALUE TO SATAN (AND HIS DEMONS, AND HIS AGENDA, HIS PATRIARCHY) IN ANY WAY, NOR MUST WE PITY HIM. WE CAN ONLY AVOID HIM AND HIS TEMPTATIONS AND HIS WORKS, AND ARE TO COMBAT HIM WITH THE WORDS OF GOD, AS JESUS DID IN THE DESERT.
WE, WHO ARE OF GOD, ARE MIGHTILY ABUSED, AS SATAN AND HIS PATRIARCHAL DEMONS KNOW WHO WE ARE – WE ARE TO BE ESPECIALLY PERSECUTED.
THOSE WHO SIDE WITH SATAN, BOTH FEMALES AND MALES, ARE NOT ALL MURDERERS, BUT THEY ARE ON THE “BROAD HIGHWAY TO HELL”, LIVING ONLY FOR THE WORLD AND THE LOWER LIFE, DEVOID OF SPIRITUAL LOVE. THIS IS PART OF THE AGENDA OF SATAN, FOR US TO LIVE LIFE WITHOUT LOVE, TO FOLLOW THE WORLD AND DIE WITH IT. THIS IS HIS PLAN. HE HAS A DESTRUCTIVE IDEA FOR EACH AND EVERY ONE OF US.
AS THE SAINTS EXPLAIN, MORE PEOPLE ARE LOST THAN SAVED, AD PART OF THE REASON IS PATRIARCHY.

In their fantasies, men are even worse, as in the popular, “Star Wars” films, where some super-weapon destroys whole planets with billions of people. The trouble is what men fantasize becomes reality as technology advances. During the cold war between the USSR and the USA they brought us close to nuclear war. This would have wiped out our present civilization.

The problem for women is that men can take their competitive and violent behaviour into relationships. According to a World Health Organization; article “Violence against women: a problem of epidemic proportions”, they claim, “It affects more than one third of all women globally.” (They admit, this is a very conservative estimate.) This violence consists of assault, rape and murder. In Muslim countries, it can be worse with genital mutilation and acid thrown on the faces of women, as well as stoning and beheading.

62989_277746249031532_1262572581_n 44695_277746692364821_671342730_n

What is clear is that men would be better off following the orders of women and not other men.  This is because alpha men seem to care little about the men they rule - they will send them to wars to die, or create societies where the majority live in poverty, while they live in extreme wealth.  This is why female leaders would be better for the majority of men.

What is clear is that men would be better off following the orders of women and not other men. This is because alpha men seem to care little about the men they rule – they will send them to wars to die, or create societies where the majority live in poverty, while they live in extreme wealth. This is why female leaders would be better for the majority of men.

61661_277746742364816_300438893_n 62403_277746739031483_1509710043_n

RASA SAYS: INDIA ALSO, FOR LESS THAN ONE DOLLAR, MALES BUY ACID AND THROW IT INTO THE FACES OF THEIR WIVES, WHICH TOTALLY DISFIGURES THEM AND EVEN BLINDS THEM. FOR WHAT? MOST OF THEM, IT’S ABOUT DOWRY. THE WOMAN DIDN’T GIVE ENOUGH. ONE BEAUTIFUL GIRL SAID,
“WHERE WAS I GOING TO GET $75.?”
BECAUSE SHE COULD NOT DELIVER $75., HE BLINDED HER IN ONE EYE AND DISFIGURED HER, A ONCE STUNNING WOMAN IS UGLY FOR LIFE.
SHE CRIED BECAUSE SHE KNEW ANOTHER GIRL WHO GOT A FAKE EYE SURGERY SOME PLACE – A GIFT – BUT SHE COULD NOT AFFORD IT.

Men’s competitive instincts are also present in men’s sexual fantasies. Women have complained that pornography, seen and read by men, is men dominating or humiliating women as well as inflicting violence on them. This is because many men do see their relationship with women as a competitive power game. As the result, men can use their larger size and strength to dominate women through force.

RASA SAYS: I WONDER HOW MUCH OF THIS DOMINATION/VIOLENCE COMES FROM MALES BEING RAPED BY MEN AS CHILDREN? TO FORCE A CHILD TO SUCK HIS COCK AND RECEIVE SODOMY IS VERY PAINFUL – TRAUMATIC.

Men like to claim that women are a mystery, but women must find men’s behaviour quite strange. They think if you love men, they will give love in return. Some men can return love, but many become more selfish and abuse loving women.

Women then make the mistake of thinking that if they love these abusive men more, they will change. But it doesn’t work. Men think that if they abuse a woman and she gives love in return she is masochistic and “asking for it.”

RASA SAYS: SOME OF THEM DON’T BELIEVE THEIR BEHAVIOR IS ABUSIVE. THEY THINK THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO TREAT OTHERS AS THEY DO. THEY FIRST NEED A WAKE-UP CALL THAT WHAT THEY ARE DOING IS WRONG.

We can see this when Western men go to countries like the Philippines or Thailand to find wives. They do this because Asian women have a reputation of being loving and submissive. Yet Asian women’s loving nature doesn’t seem to be appreciated by Asian men, where violence against women is more commonplace than in the West.

RASA SAYS: WESTERN MEN WANT TO DO THEM LIKE ASIANS DO – ABUSE THEM, OR AT LEAST, FEEL FREE TO DO SO WHILE THE WOMAN SUBMITS. I HAVE SEEN REPORTS LIKE THIS.
ONE GUY WRITES BOOKS ABOUT MALE EMPOWERMENT. HE SAYS WESTERN WOMEN ARE DESTROYING MARRIAGE, MEN ARE GOING TO ASIAN COUNTRIES SUCH AS YOU SAY, TO FIND DECENT WIVES.
TRANSLATION: WESTERN WOMEN ARE STANDING UP TO US. THEY WON’T TAKE OUR CRAP ANY MORE, SO WE HAVE TO FIND WOMEN WHO WILL.

Feminists also have problems with men’s behaviour. They think that sexual equality is a reasonable and sensible idea, but men don’t get it. Yes, logically, men can see the sense of equality, but men’s competitive instincts get in the way. Competition and equality are not compatible. Competition is not about fairness; it is all about wining and losing. The winner gets everything and the loser nothing. Because of this, if men see women as losers, then they won’t appreciate the loving and caring aspects of women. Some men go as far as claiming that women’s loving nature is a weakness.

RASA SAYS: THROUGH THIS ARTICLE I WILL EXPLAIN HOW DANGEROUS IT IS TO BE “DOMINATING” THESE CREATURES. BUT I WILL SAY THIS – I AM LEARNING TO LOVE THEM LESS, BE LESS ACCOMMODATING.

Women see life differently, as they like the idea of equality, fairness and sharing. Women’s loving nature comes from their maternal instincts where they devote their lives in nurturing and caring for their children. They will also care for children who are not their own, as well the sick, the elderly, men and animals. The maternal instincts of females are very important for the survival of the human race, because without it, babies and children could not survive to be adults.

In recent times, what has come to the surface is a desire by men to want women to dominate them. This is called the Femdom scene, where men will pay or encourage women to be dominant and even inflict violence on men. So why would men want women to do this? Femdom is all about one partner dominating the other.

Male domination is part of many cultures like Islam, where a man is ‘dishonoured” if a woman was to disobey him or disrespect him. Because of this, according to Islamic custom, he then has the ‘right’ to beat her up or even murder her. So, male-dom is seen as ‘normal’ as it is part of many cultures of the world, while femdom is seen as strange and perverted because it’s not part of any world cultures.

So where did these male S/M fantasies in men come from? Sigmund Freud wrote about the Madonna/whore complex, where men either worship women as goddesses or despise them as sluts. Since then, many other psychologists and feminists have noticed the same thing. This unbalanced view of women probably comes from men’s competitive instincts, of seeing everyone in terms of winners or losers. If a woman is a winner she deserves to be worshiped, but if she is a loser then she is despised. Psychologists have noticed that this is a strong element of men’s sexual fantasies.

In the case of men who follow the Madonna/whore complex, they do not want to have sex with the Madonnas. This is also true of Femdom, where a man will go to a Dominatrix to be beaten or tortured, but not to have sex with her. There is also castration, cuckold and chastity belt fantasies involved in Femdom where men do not have sex with women he worships.

THE IDEA OF SEPARATING THE BOYS IS TO “IMPRINT” THE MALE UPON HIS BRAIN, WIRE IT TO GET THEM TO RESPOND TO MALE STIMULI AND AUTHORITY. OTHERWISE THE MALE WOULD REMAIN FOREVER BONDED WITH THE MOTHER/FEMALE. THIS IMPRINTING TAKIES THE FORM OF SEXUAL ABUSE AS WELL AS BRAINWASHING AGAINST WOMEN AND IN THE DIRECTION OF BRUTALITY. THE BOYS ARE BRUTALIZED BY MAKING THEM DO WHAT THEY WOULD NOT WANT TO DO – SUCK COCK AND GET SODOMISED.  WITH THEIR MOTHER/WOMEN THEY RECEIVE NORMAL, TENDER SENSUAL TOUCH; CARESS, MASSAGE, KISS FROM INNOCENT TO WHEN THEY GROW UP, EROTIC INTERCOURSE WITH WOMEN.

THE IDEA OF SEPARATING THE BOYS IS TO “IMPRINT” THE MALE UPON HIS BRAIN, WIRE IT TO GET THEM TO RESPOND TO MALE STIMULI AND AUTHORITY. OTHERWISE THE MALE WOULD REMAIN FOREVER BONDED WITH THE MOTHER/FEMALE.
THIS IMPRINTING TAKES THE FORM OF SEXUAL ABUSE AS WELL AS BRAINWASHING AGAINST WOMEN AND IN THE DIRECTION OF BRUTALITY.
THE BOYS ARE BRUTALIZED BY MAKING THEM DO WHAT THEY WOULD NOT WANT TO DO – SUCK COCK AND GET SODOMIZED. WITH THEIR MOTHER/WOMEN THEY RECEIVE NORMAL, TENDER SENSUAL TOUCH; CARESS, MASSAGE, INNOCENT KISS — WHEN THEY GROW UP, EROTIC INTERCOURSE WITH WOMEN.  BUT THE OLD SATAN MEN DO ANYTHING THEY CAN TO TRUNCATE THEIR RELATIONSHIPS WITH MOM AND WOMEN.

546891_307668239372666_86886383_n 546907_307668862705937_770959162_n 960033_307670409372449_184751276_n 988745_307668336039323_1987934063_n

Not all men are happy about the way males treat women. Many men get angry about violence done to women, because they do appreciate women. Yet equality, as advocated by feminists, still doesn’t seem to be an option to these men. They still believe that if they are not going to dominate women, then women should dominate them. Their competitive instincts are too strong to accept equality. Because of this, the middle ground of egalitarianism is not realistic.

Some men take their femdom fantasies to the extreme and want women to be cruel but few women want to do this. Also, many of these men become frighten of their own fantasies. They might fantasize being beaten by a cruel woman but not want to act it out in reality.

RASA SAYS: NO, MANY DO NOT, CANNOT LIVE OUT THEIR FANTASIES. THEY FEAR PAIN. THEY THINK ABOUT IT, IT SOUNDS EXCITING. BUT IN THE DOING OF IT THEY BACK OFF.

There are men who do actually have relationships with cruel women who beat them up. However, this does require the man not to use his greater size and strength to defend himself or hit her back. Many of these men find this too hard to take and soon want to get out of a relationship like this. It is a lot easier for a man to get out of an abusive relationship than it is for a woman, who is physically smaller and weaker than a man and may have children to care for. As the result, most abused women need the help of relations, the police, or a woman’s refuge, to do this. This becomes nearly impossible in extreme patriarchal societies, which do not support women.

RASA SAYS: IN THE ANCIENT DAYS OF MATRIARCHY, THIS DID NOT HAPPEN; IT IS A RESULT OF THE NUCLEAR FAMILY, OR ELSE HAREMS CONTROLLED BY MEN. WHEN WOMEN HAD MATRIARCHAL CLANS THEY BANDED TOGETHER, LIKE BONOBOS, AND PREVENTED MALE ABUSE. THEY PREVENTED INTIMIDATION, BEATINGS AND CHILD ABUSE. THE NUCLEAR FAMILY IS A PATRIARCHAL INVENTION; SO ARE HAREMS OF WOMEN. ALL DONE FOR THE MALE’S CONVENIENCE ENDS UP EVIL.

Men’s competitive instinct is the reason they don’t appreciate caring women; they see a loving nature as submission. Men claim that, “the killer instinct” is needed to be a winner. The most competitive man is generally the most ruthless. These men not only win in sports, but in the games of business and politics; it’s is not surprising to find such men ruling our world. While men rule there can be no such thing as a loving, caring government.

It seems men appreciate women more if they are bossy or dominant, than if they are loving and caring. In the eyes of men, bossy women are winners while loving women are losers. Therefore, because men worship winners they will respect and worship dominant women because, to them, dominance and winning go together. The saying, “never give a sucker an even break,” tells us a lot about men’s attitudes.

RASA SAYS: THESE ARE INTERESTING IDEAS WHICH I HAVE FOUND DIFFICULT TO IMPLEMENT. THE THING IS, I THINK WOMEN OFTEN PLAY A GAME OF BEING NICE. THEN WHEN THE CURTAIN COMES DOWN, THEY HAVE SNAGGED YOU, THE TABLES TURN. THEY DON’T GET VIOLENT BUT THEY SIMPLY DON’T SERVE YOU ONCE THEY HAVE SNAGGED YOU.

I HAVE ALSO NOTICED THAT THE MOST POWERFUL FEMALE MOVIE STARS HAVE THAT ABILITY TO BE TOUGH AND DOMINATING – MANY OF THEM WERE BISEXUAL, WHICH MAYBE GAVE THEM AN EDGE. GRETA GARBO, MARLENE DIETRICH, MAE WEST (WAS ONCE A MALE IMPERSONATOR), BETTY DAVIS, BARBARA STANWYCK, JOAN CRAWFORD, EMANATED A TOUGHNESS THAT EARNED RESPECT.

Men like to have relationships where who is the boss is clearly established; if this is not done he will start to play power-games with his partner – he’s testing. It the woman reacts by standing up for herself, then he is likely to accept her as the boss. But if she tries to appease him, he will feel he is boss. If the woman is assertive sometimes and not at other times, this can confuse the man and the power games can go on throughout the whole of their relationship.

Some women experience men who verbally abuse them and don’t understand why. The answer lies in sport where competing players will verbally abuse each other. The main reason is to undermine the confidence of the opposing players. Men do the same to women if he is playing a power game with her. If he can undermine her confidence, then she is less likely to stand up for herself and is therefore easier to dominate.

So does this mean that women have to act like a cruel femdom dominatrix to gain the respect of men? The problem with this is that most women are not as cruel or violent as men. Women’s maternal instinct will get in the way of most women wanting to be callous and heartless with men. Women want to have loving relationships, not uncaring relationships where she is not allowed to love her partner. Therefore, if women want the type of relationship they like, with men, they have to set the agenda. And she can only do this if she is the dominant partner. This can sometimes be a problem in Femdom relationships.

The reason is, that if a woman tries to fit in with a man’s femdom fantasies she finds he starts to, “top from the bottom.” This means, she is in a relationship where it seems that he is submissive and she is dominant, but in reality it is he who is telling her how he wants her to behave. As the result, she ends up having to act out his fantasies and not hers.

In the competitive patriarchal world most men end up losers because only a handful of men can claim to be winners.  We can see this in any sport.  Most sports will have hundreds of players competing against each other, but in the end, there can be only one champion.  As the result, there can be only one winner out of hundreds of losers.  The same is also true in business and politics.  The numbers of leaders of countries or companies are very few compared with everyone else.  Therefore, although men are competitive, there are few winners.  Losing for men, is far more commonplace.

In the competitive patriarchal world most men end up losers because only a handful of men can claim to be winners. We can see this in any sport. Most sports will have hundreds of players competing against each other, but in the end, there can be only one champion. As the result, there can be only one winner out of hundreds of losers. The same is also true in business and politics. The numbers of leaders of countries or companies are very few compared with everyone else. Therefore, although men are competitive, there are few winners. Losing for men, is far more commonplace.

1236829_292209787585178_1107506869_n 1240479_296846847121472_1070151112_n 1208540_301527339986756_1355539099_n 1234832_301754269964063_1582440077_n

RASA SAYS: I CAN’T TELL YOU HOW MANY LETTERS I GET FROM MALES WHO SAY THEY WANT TO BE MY SLAVE AND THEN TELL ME WHAT TO DO. I ASK QUESTIONS, THEY DON’T ANSWER. I ASK TO SEND A PICTURE – NOT SENT, OR ONE WITHOUT A HEAD. THEN THEY DEMAND SKYPE OR THIS AND THAT. THEN I TELL THEM I AM NOT INTERESTED AND THEY TELL ME I LOST A GOOD SLAVE. HAHAHAHA.

What this means, is that a woman has to establish that she is the boss, in reality. And if that is not acceptable to him, then she should get out of the relationship. But once that is established, she is free to train him to be exactly what she wants him to be. She can even teach him to become a loving human being. So by teaching him how to love, she can have the loving relationship she wants. A woman who tries to teach a man how to love from a subordinate position is doing it the hard way.

RASA SAYS: THERE, YOU SAID IT. IN PATRIARCHY, WITH ALL THE FACETS BEING AGAINST WOMEN, WOMEN BEING IN SUBORDINATE POSITIONS CANNOT RULE. IT’S ONLY WHEN MATRIARCHY BECOMES MORE REAL WE CAN PUT OUR FOOT DOWN. IT’S ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO CONTROL MALES WHEN WE ARE SUBORDINATE—IT HAPPENS, BUT IT IS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT. THOSE OF US WHO TRY TO BE DOMINANT, THEY JUST LEAVE AND FIND A WOMAN TO SUBMIT.

A man will respect a bossy women and will learn from her, but will have no respect for a submissive woman and ignore what she has to say.

RASA SAYS: I DO UNDERSTAND THIS PREMISE, BUT WHAT HAPPENS IN A PATRIARCHAL SOCIETY, WHEN YOU REJECT THEM, STAND UP TO THEM, OR GET TOUGH, THEY FREQUENTLY THREATEN US OR EVEN BEAT US UP. IT HAS HAPPENED TO ME. THE THING IS, WE HAVE NO ONE TO BACK US UP – IT IS ONE LONE WOMAN AGAINST ONE LONE MAN, HE’S VIOLENT, HE’S NASTIER, BIGGER, STRONGER, LOVES TO HURT. NOW HE BEATS YOU UP OR RAPES YOU, YOU GO TO AUTHORITIES, THEY ARE ON HIS SIDE. SO IT IS DANGEROUS FOR US TO ACT DOMINANT IN PATRIARCHY. WILLIAM, YOU HAVE NEVER BEEN A WOMAN. YOU CAN BE DOMINANT AT TIMES, NOTHING HAPPENS, OTHER TIMES, YOU GET BEAT UP. THAT IS WHY THE BEST ROAD FOR WOMEN, SAY, WHEN LEAVING A MALE, IS TO DO IT BEHIND HIS BACK. THEY GET VIOLENT WHEN WE HURT THEM – WOMEN GET KILLED.
THE REASONING IS CLEAR, BUT IN ACTION, IT GETS TRICKY.

What has become clear in patriarchal history is that when men rule the world they only create conflict and poverty. Without the influence of women, men become so competitive, that they end up fighting with each other, which leads to warfare. This is made worse today with modern technology where powerful weapons can destroy whole cities. As we see in the Femdom scene men are not against women ruling the world, they only demand that women play the dominant role and act like winners. Men cannot respect women who try to appease them and behave like losers.

RASA SAYS: AS I SAID, WE HAVE TO GET INTO MATRIARCHY IN STAGES, WHERE WOMEN HAVE A BACKUP OR SUPPORT. TO DOMINATE THESE GUYS WITH NO BACKUP, NO SUPPORT, THE SOCIETY BEING AGAINST US, IS DANGEROUS.

Some women may object that men will not accept female dominance, but that is because they don’t understand the true nature of men. Women suffer far more abuse and violence in extreme patriarchal countries than in countries where Feminist women have demanded their rights. So trying to appease men, clearly does not work.

RASA SAYS: THE BEST POLICY AGAINST MALE ABUSE IS TO LEAVE THEM ON THE SLY AND GO WHERE THEY CANNOT GET AT YOU. SOMETIMES THEY STALK US. I HAVE HAD IT HAPPEN TO ME MORE THAN ONCE. USUALLY THE BEST PROTECTION IS ANOTHER MAN, IF YOU CAN FIND ONE, OR A BIG DOG. DOMINATION IS DANGEROUS IN PATRIARCHY; CAN YOU NOT SEE THIS, WILLIAM BOND? I WAS A PROFESSIONAL DOMINANT FOR TEN YEARS, IT GOT ME INTO TROUBLE A COUPLE TIMES. MEN CHANGE THEIR MINDS, THEY GET VIOLENT.

Although men will compete against women for power, they are used to being losers.

RASA SAYS: WOW, THAT IS A MOUTHFUL: “they are used to being losers” – WILLIAM COMES UP WITH THE MOST AMAZING INSIGHTS!

In the competitive patriarchal world most men end up losers because only a handful of men can claim to be winners. We can see this in any sport. Most sports will have hundreds of players competing against each other, but in the end, there can be only one champion. As the result, there can be only one winner out of hundreds of losers. The same is also true in business and politics. The numbers of leaders of countries or companies are very few compared with everyone else. Therefore, although men are competitive, there are few winners. Losing for men, is far more commonplace.

RASA SAYS: YES, AND LOSING AGAINST A WOMAN IS THEIR ULTIMATE DEFEAT, FOR, WHEN MEN LOSE AGAINST OTHER MEN, THEY CAN TAKE THAT BETTER, AS THEY ARE LED TO BELIEVE MEN ARE THE NATURAL DOMINANTS, THE STRONGER ONES. BUT WHEN A WOMAN, WHO IS SAID IN PATRIARCHY, TO BE THE WEAKER SEX, DEFEATS AND DOMINATES A MAN, HE SEES THIS AS THE ULTIMATE HUMILIATION. IT IS AT THESE TIMES THEY ARE THE MOST DANGEROUS AND VIOLENT. WOMEN KNOW THE PRICE TO PAY FOR REJECTING A MAN HARSHLY. WOMEN LEARN TO LIE, TO BE SNEAKY – THEY MUST BE WITH MEN – IN ORDER TO PROTECT THEIR SKINS. I HAVE LEARNED THE HARD WAY WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU REJECT THEM FORCEFULLY – I HAVE BEEN PUSHED AND BEATEN BADLY BY MEN.

Men are also used to obeying orders. The whole of patriarchal society could not exist without men’s total obedience to authority.

RASA SAYS: ANOTHER GOOD POINT ONLY WILLIAM COULD HAVE THOUGHT OF. MANY THINGS WILLIAM SAYS ARE TOTALLY ORIGINAL, NO ACADEMIC SAYS THESE THINGS, BECAUSE ACADEMICS ARE FOLLOWERS – THEY SEE REALITY LIKE STATISTICS, STUDIES AND EXPERIENTIAL KNOWLEDGE (INTERVIEWS, CONVERSATIONS, OBSERVATIONS), THEN THEY MAKE REPORTS ON IT. THEY DO NOT DO A LOT OF ANALYSIS, THEY DON’T DARE. BUT IF YOU NOTICE WILLIAM ANALYZES, AND SO DO I. HE DRAWS CONCLUSIONS, HE AND I SEE THINGS SUCH AS THE OTHER “MATRIARCHAL PUNDITS” DO NOT. TO BE HONEST, WE LEAD THE WAY. THEY SHOULD GIVE US CREDIT, BUT THEY ARE TOO PROUD AND SELFISH.

An extreme example of this is the military, where officers can order their men to do insane things like attacking the enemy in hundreds or thousands, or go against machine gun fire knowing that the majority of them will not survive. Men like to call this bravery or iron-discipline but it also extreme submission to authority.

RASA SAYS: INDEED, IT IS SUCH A FARCE TO CALL MILITARY MEN “HEROES” AUTOMATICALLY – ASSUME THEY DID HEROIC THINGS, WHEN MOST DID NOT. THE MEDIA LIKES TO EXPRESS THINGS IN THEIR OWN BIZARRE WAY, LIKE PEOPLE WHO HAVE SUFFERED CATASTROPHIC OR FATAL ILLNESSES. THE TABLOIDS CALL THEM “BRAVE” WHEN MAYBE THEY WERE COWARDS, SCARED TO DEATH. THEN THEY MARSHAL IN OUR POOR BOYS WHO HAVEN’T EVEN LIVED, SEND THEM PETRIFIED TO KILL AND BE KILLED, AND CALL THEM “BRAVE” WHEN THEY DIE, AND GIVE THEM POSTHUMOUS MEDALS (WHICH MEAN LITTLE OR NOTHING.) THESE POOR BOYS ARE DELUDED AND BRAINWASHED. I MEET THEM DOWNTOWN, HAIR SHAVED DOWN TO SKIN, GETTING READY TO BE USED AS CANNON FODDER, OR WHAT IS EVEN WORSE, TO GO FOREIGN PLACES AND DO DAMAGE TO CIVILIANS.

The ultimate example of men’s submission is suicide bombers, who will obey orders to blow themselves up. The Japanese were able to order their pilots to make kamikaze attacks on enemy ships in WW2. While today, many terrorist groups use suicide bombers, who strap explosives around their bodies and set them off in crowded areas. So men will obey orders even if the order is to kill themselves.

RASA SAYS: JUST GOES TO SHOW HOW STUPID MEN ARE, HOW SUSCEPTIBLE TO INTIMIDATION. I SAW A DOCUMENTARY ON WHAT HAPPENED IN JAPAN. THOSE GUYS DID NOT WANT TO DO IT. THEY WERE TOLD THEY HAD TO, – IF THEY CAME BACK ALIVE THEY WOULD EITHER BE KILLED OR LIVE LIVES WORSE THAN DEATH, THROUGH DISHONOR. THEY COULD NOT FACE COMING BACK. IMAGINE WHAT WENT THROUGH THEIR MINDS AS THEY KILLED THEMSELVES. WHEN YOU CONSIDER THINGS LIKE THIS YOU UNDERSTAND WHY I SAY,
“WE MUST SAVE MEN FROM MEN.”

So whether to be obedient to women or to other men is not an issue with men. It only becomes an issue when they are brainwashed into believing they are superior to women, by alpha men. Patriarchal leaders do this, because they want men to obey them and not obey women instead.

RASA SAYS: WHAT AN INCREDIBLE STATEMENT. THIS IS WHAT I’VE BEEN SAYING IN “OLD WOMAN – YOUNG MAN – WHY THEY BELONG TOGETHER.” IT IS THE OLD MEN WHO WANT CONTROL OVER THE YOUNG – THEY ARE THE FUTURE. OLD WOMEN WERE ONCE THE MENTORS, GUIDES OF THE YOUNG, INCLUDING THE MALES. THE MALES ARE ESPECIALLY TARGETED FOR WAR. MEN’S HOMOSEXUAL ATTACKS AGAINST THEM FROM CHILDHOOD ARE PART OF THE WORST DEVASTATION—MALES FIND WAYS OF SEPARATING CHILDREN FRO THEIR MOTHERS SO MOMS CANNOT PROTECT THEM. IT IS EITHER DONE IN MONASTERIES (CHINA, INDIA, TIBET) OR HAREMS (MUSLIMS, MORMONS), SAMBIA TYPE TRIBES THAT TAKE BOYS FAR INTO THE JUNGLE, OR SECRETLY IN WESTERN & OTHER CULTURES UNDER VARIOUS CLOAKS, STARTING WITH THE HOME, BUT INCLUDING CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, MILITARY — WHEREVER THEY CAN ROPE IN THE BOYS.

THE IDEA OF SEPARATING THE BOYS IS TO “IMPRINT” THE MALE UPON HIS BRAIN, WIRE IT TO GET THEM TO RESPOND TO MALE STIMULI AND AUTHORITY – OTHERWISE THE MALE WOULD REMAIN FOREVER BONDED WITH THE MOTHER/FEMALE.  THIS IMPRINTING TAKES THE FORM OF SEXUAL ABUSE AS WELL AS BRAINWASHING AGAINST WOMEN AND IN THE DIRECTION OF BRUTALITY.

THE BOYS ARE BRUTALIZED BY MAKING THEM DO WHAT THEY WOULD NOT WANT TO DO – SUCK COCK AND GET SODOMIZED. WITH THEIR MOTHER/WOMEN THEY RECEIVE NORMAL, TENDER SENSUAL TOUCH; CARESS, MASSAGE,  INNOCENT KISS — WHEN THEY GROW UP, EROTIC INTERCOURSE WITH WOMEN.

THE OLD MEN TRUNCATE ALL THAT, PUTTING THEMSELVES IN THE PLACE OF WOMEN, MOTHER WITH HER SENSUAL INTIMACY (WHICH IS IMPORTANT) AND EARLY EXPERIENCES WITH FEMALES. IT IS THE FIRST EXPERIENCES THAT MAKE A MARK. THANK GOD FOR SMALL MERCIES: THAT THEY CANNOT REMOVE THE CHILDREN PRIOR TO 5 OR 6 YEARS OLD – EXCEPT FOR RAPE IN THE HOME, THE BOYS ARE NOT TAKEN INTO MONASTERIES FOR ABUSE, NOR WERE THEY TAKEN BY THE ROMAN/GREEK/SPARTAN “MENTORS” PRIOR TO AGE 7. THE MONASTERIES IN CHINA DO ROPE THEM IN SOMETIMES AS EARLY AS 5, BUT USUALLY 6 OR 7 IS THE EARLIEST.

I BELIEVE IF THE MALES BEGAN RAPING THESE BABIES FROM DIAPERS, MOST OF THEM WOULD BE GAY/BISEXUAL. A FEW ARE SAVED FOR HETEROSEXUALITY BY THEIR EARLY EXPERIENCES WITH MOM.
HOWEVER, NONE ESCAPES HATRED OF WOMEN IN PATRIARCHY. AT THE VERY LEAST, THEY SHOW CONTEMPT OR A LACK OF RESPECT. FEW MALES VENERATE WOMEN AS THEY WOULD IN A MATRIARCHY.

What is clear is that men would be better off following the orders of women and not other men. This is because alpha men seem to care little about the men they rule – they will send them to wars to die, or create societies where the majority live in poverty, while they live in extreme wealth. This is why female leaders would be better for the majority of men.

On the personal level a dominant woman is far less likely to abuse a man and her family than a dominant man is to abuse his wife and family. According to, The Lancet medical journal: “More than a third of women murdered around the world are killed by their partner.” This figure is higher in extreme patriarchal countries where violence again a woman is encouraged. But this is not true the other way around, as few women have been known to kill their husbands. Also, fathers are far more likely to kill or abuse their children than are mothers.

So it is better for all families, if wives are the dominant partner. And it will be a lot better for everyone, if women rule the world.

RASA SAYS: SOME ADDITIONAL THOUGHTS. ABOUT DOMINATING MEN. DO YOU REALIZE WILLIAM, HOW DANGEROUS IT IS FOR A WOMAN TO BE HARSH WITH MEN, TO DOMINATE THEM, OR TO BERATE OR REJECT THEM IN A PATRIARCHAL SOCIETY? IT SOUNDS GOOD, TO DOMINATE MEN. BUT WHEN YOU DO IT, YOU MIGHT SUFFER VIOLENCE. THAT’S WHY WOMEN BACK OFF – THEY STAY QUIET WHEN MALES CARRY ON. WOMEN HAVE LEARNED BY EXPERIENCE HOW MEN BEHAVE, THEY NEED TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AND THE CHILDREN.

I KNOW IT SOUNDS GREAT TO “DOMINATE” A GUY. I HAVE DONE IT.  WHEN YOU MEET A MAN YOU HAVE TO TREAD CAREFULLY TO SEE WHAT HE IS LIKE. FIRST, IS HE DANGEROUS? IS HE A LOOSE CANNON? DOES HE HAVE PROBLEMS IN HIS HEAD THAT COULD MAKE HIM GO OFF? YOU CAREFULLY SCREEN MEN BY PHONE BEFORE YOU MEET THEM.
AFTER YOU MEET THEM, YOU ARE IN DANGER BECAUSE YOU WILL BE ALONE WITH THEM. ONCE THEY START GOING CRAZY YOU MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO DEFEND YOURSELF – YOU’RE ON EGGSHELLS THE FIRST MONTHS, YEAR, YOU KNOW A MAN.

I EVEN HEARD OF ONE WHO WAS WONDERFUL FOR YEARS UNTIL HE GOT HIS WIFE TO QUIT HER JOB (A GREAT JOB!), GET RID OF ALL HER FRIENDS, BUY A HOUSE IN A REMOTE LOCATION – THEN AND ONLY THEN DID HE RELEASE HIS DEMONS. HE YELLED AND SCREAMED AT HER, EVEN HOLDING A GUN TO HER HEAD. HE WENT FROM JEKYLL TO HYDE. SHE SOMEHOW FORGAVE HIM AGAIN AND AGAIN, BEFORE FINALLY QUITTING, LUCKY TO BE ALIVE. SHE TOLD HER STORY ON THE RADIO.

IN MY PERSONAL AND BUSINESS LIFE I HAVE HAD TO SCREEN AND MEET HUNDREDS OF MEN – SO I SPEAK FROM EXPERIENCE.
AS A WOMAN WHO HIRES MODELS, I THANK GOD FOR THE PHONE WHERE I CAN DIAL 911. A MODEL THAT I WAS PAYING $200. TO SUDDENLY DEMANDED MORE MONEY, HE SAID,

“I COULD GO CRAZY – I HAVE A TEMPER.”

TODAY, I TAKE NO CHANCES. I DIALED 911 AND THE POLICE REMOVED HIM FROM MY HOUSE.

ANOTHER SHAKEDOWN OCCURRED WITH A HOUSE PAINTER WHO I KNEW FOR YEARS, MY NEIGHBOR. I PAID HIM ALONG THE WAY, BUT AFTER A WHILE, I OWED HIM THE BALANCE. THE LAST DAY HE GAVE ME A BILL $2,000. MORE THAN OUR AGREEMENT. I ASKED HIM WHAT IT WAS ALL ABOUT – INSTEAD OF TALKING TO ME HE STARTED YELLING,
“JUST PAY ME – JUST PAY ME.”

HE KEPT YELLING FOR A HALF HOUR. MY CRIPPLED HOUSEMAN COULD NOT HAVE HELPED. I WAS AT A LOSS WHAT TO DO. JUST THEN A FRIEND CALLED ME, A NEIGHBOR. SHE HEARD HIM YELLING, I EVEN HAD HIM TALK TO HER ON THE PHONE AND HE WAS INCOHERENT. SHE ASKED ME IF SHE SHOULD CALL THE POLICE, I SAID YES.
IT TOOK THE POLICE – 2 CARS CAME – 45 MINUTES TO CALM HIM DOWN. THIS MAN COULD HAVE BEEN DANGEROUS, IT WAS HARD FOR THE POLICE TO MANAGE HIM. HE SAID TO HIM,

“IF YOU ARE TALKING LIKE THIS TO ME, I CAN IMAGINE HOW YOU SPOKE TO HER.”
HE FINALLY CALMED DOWN AND I PAID HIM THE AGREED SUM.

THE PROBLEM WITH MALES AND A LONE WOMAN – A FEMALE WHO HAS NO HUSBAND, SERVANTS OR BACKUP TEAM BEHIND HER – THEY FEEL BIG AND BOLD AND WANT TO GET THEIR WAY. MEN DO ROUTINELY CHARGE WOMEN FOR THE SAME SERVICES, MORE THAN THEY DO MEN. IT’S ALL,

“SHE’S WEAK, SHE CAN’T FIGHT BACK – I WILL GET MORE OUT OF HER.”

IN FACT, AUTOMOTIVE PLACES HAVE A HANDBOOK WHERE THEY TELL SALESMEN TO CHARGE THE MOST MONEY TO WOMEN, ESPECIALLY BLACK WOMEN! THESE ARE THE POOREST OF THE POOR! IT’S ALL ABOUT USING US UP – WE ARE WEAK, THEY ARE STRONG, CHOKE THE MONEY OUT OF US, RAPE US, OR BOTH.

I WILL TELL ONE MORE STORY. IN MY 20’S I HAD A BOYFRIEND WHO WAS FAIRLY SUBMISSIVE. HE USUALLY DID WHAT HE WAS TOLD, TO A DEGREE, SO I BECAME MORE DOMINATING. ONE DAY BEFORE GOING TO WORK, I GAVE HIM MONEY TO BUY PAINT AND START PAINTING MY APARTMENT.

EIGHT HOURS LATER I CAME HOME AND HE WAS PASSED OUT ON THE COUCH. THE PAINT WAS ON THE FLOOR, OPEN, HE HAD DONE A TINY BIT OF THE WALL, BOUGHT WHISKEY, GOT DRUNK.

I WOKE HIM UP, YELLED AT HIM TO GET OUT OF THE HOUSE, I WAS THROUGH WITH HIM.

HE GOT UP, STARTED KICKING ME WITH KARATE KICKS, PICKED UP THE PAINT AND THREW IT ALL OVER MY APARTMENT, SMATTERING ALL MY BELONGINGS, PAINT WAS DRIPPING OFF MY FURNITURE AND WALLS.

I FLED DOWN THE SIX FLIGHTS OF CHAIRS WITH HIM CHASING ME WITH AN IRON BAR.

MY WHOLE BODY, ESPECIALLY BREASTS, WERE COVERED WITH BLACK AND BLUE MARKS. THE POLICE OFFICER WHO TOOK THE CASE TOLD ME THEY ALWAYS ATTACK THE BREASTS.

HE ALSO TRIED TO PERSUADE ME TO DROP THE CHARGES. INDEED, THEY SAY POLICE DON’T LIKE TO START DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES BECAUSE WOMEN USUALLY DROP THE CHARGES – BUT THIS PROVES THAT POLICE WANT YOU TO DROP THEM. HE KEPT TELLING ME TO FORGIVE THE GUY!

I DID TAKE HIM TO COURT, HIS MOTHER PAID A FINE—I GAVE THE SUM TO MY GURU. THE APARTMENT WAS NEVER THE SAME UNTIL YEARS LATER WHEN I TOTALLY REMODELED IT. THERE WAS SO MUCH DAMAGE BECAUSE AFTER BEING BEATEN, AND STRESS WISE, I DID NOT HAVE THE ENERGY TO REMOVE THE DRIPS OFF THE WALLS, THE HARDENED DRIPS REMAINED FOR YEARS.

THAT BRINGS US BACK TO DOMINATION.

IN ORDER TO BE THE DOMINANT PERSON, YOU HAVE TO HAVE SOMEONE BEHIND YOU PROTECTING YOU, OTHERWISE YOU HAVE NO LEVERAGE. WHEN YOU STAND UP AGAINST ANOTHER, IT IS YOUR STRENGTH AGAINST HIS. A WOMAN MIGHT HAVE NERVES OF STEEL, BUT IT STILL DOES NOT PREVENT HER FROM GETTING BEATEN BY A RAGING MALE, OR WORSE.
IN THE BONOBO SOCIETY, OUR COUSINS, WHEN A MALE INTIMIDATES A FEMALE, ALL THE FEMALES SURROUND HIM AND PREVENT FURTHER VIOLENCE.

IN A HUMAN MATRIARCHAL SITUATION, THERE WERE MULTIPLE WOMEN IN A HOUSE, I AM SURE THESE WOMEN COULD GANG UP AGAINST ONE MAN AGGRAVATING A WOMAN.

FURTHERMORE, IF THE MAN KNOWS SOCIETY IS AGAINST HIS VIOLENCE OR RAPE, HE MIGHT BE SLOW TO ACT. BUT IF HE KNOWS THE POLITICAL SYSTEM IS ON HIS SIDE, HE IS PRONE TO DO ANYTHING. CERTAINLY MUSLIMS IN A MUSLIM WORLD CAN DO ANYTHING TO WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN THEIR HOME. WHAT MUSLIM WOULD PROSECUTE THEM FOR ANYTHING?

FURTHERMORE WHEN A WOMAN GOES TO THE POLICE FOR RAPE IN ANY MUSLIM COUNTRY SHE IS JAILED AND PROSECUTED – PROBABLY GETS RAPED IN JAIL. FOREIGN WOMEN WHO SHOWED THEIR ANKLE IN PUBLIC OR LAUGHED WERE ARRESTED, MADE TO SIGN PAPERS SAYING THEY WERE PROSTITUTES, THEN GIVEN SEVERE LASHINGS.

ARE THERE ANY JAILS HOLDING MUSLIM PEDOPHILES OR WIFE BEATERS OR ABUSERS? HOW COULD THERE BE, WHEN MUSLIMS ARE TAUGHT BY THEIR PRIESTS THAT CHILD ABUSE IS ALRIGHT? THERE IS NO PROSECUTION FOR CHILD ABUSE, CERTAINLY NONE FOR BEATING WIVES, WHATEVER THE MAN DOES IS ALLOWED. HOW CAN A WOMAN OR CHILD SURVIVE HERE?

IN THE WESTERN WORLD IT IS NOT AS BAD, BUT IT’S FAR FROM PERFECT. I HAVE BEEN BEATEN, PUNCHED AND RAPED AND MOST CASES, JUSTICE HAS NOT BEEN SERVED.

AS MATRIARCHY GROWS STRONGER ECONOMICALLY AND POLITICALLY WOMEN WILL BE LESS ENDANGERED BY MEN. WE’RE ON OUR WAY OUT OF THE WOODS.

by William Bond, …..Comments by Rasa Von Werder…..5 12 14

1376470_307671582705665_368294360_n 1374091_307668809372609_531050515_n 1374227_307671192705704_1516124580_n 1374240_307668252705998_741370943_n 1374240_307670332705790_935548851_n 1374714_307669999372490_1050422561_n 1374860_307671836038973_1389030903_n 1375263_307670929372397_1650757618_n 1375311_306721742800649_2086767737_n

An extreme example of this is the military, where officers can order their men to do insane things like attacking the enemy in hundreds or thousands, or go against machine gun fire knowing that the majority of them will not survive.  Men like to call this bravery or iron-discipline but it also extreme submission to authority.

An extreme example of this is the military, where officers can order their men to do insane things like attacking the enemy in hundreds or thousands, or go against machine gun fire knowing that the majority of them will not survive. Men like to call this bravery or iron-discipline but it also extreme submission to authority.

College of the Gender War, Core Tenets

PSYCOPATHS RULE OUR WORLD <> IT’S PATRIARCHY

PSYCOPATH PATRIARCHAL LEADERS by William Bond…..comments Rasa Von Werder….. 4 30 14

If we want to understand why we live in a world of conflict — wars, violence, abuse, poverty and suffering, then we have to go back to basics.  What is undisputed is that men rule our world and have done so for thousands of years.  Male-rule is what feminists call patriarchy – masculine rule – and masculinity (as defined in our present society) is aggression, force, violence and intimidation.

LET ME JUST ADD HERE THAT ALL THE STATISTICS – EDUCATIONAL AND EMPLOYMENT WISE, ARE POINTING TO WOMEN RISING, MEN FALLING BEHIND.  THE FUTURE IS WOMEN, IT IS MATRIARCHY.  HOLD ON, KEEP PRAYING AND BELIEVING, WOMEN WILL RULE THE WORLD, MEN WILL FALL.  THEY ARE GOING EXTINCT.  THEIR OWN ACTIONS HAVE BROUGHT DEATH UPON THEM.

LET ME JUST ADD HERE THAT ALL THE STATISTICS – EDUCATIONAL AND EMPLOYMENT WISE, ARE POINTING TO WOMEN RISING, MEN FALLING BEHIND. THE FUTURE IS WOMEN, IT IS MATRIARCHY. HOLD ON, KEEP PRAYING AND BELIEVING, WOMEN WILL RULE THE WORLD, MEN WILL FALL. THEY ARE GOING EXTINCT. THEIR OWN ACTIONS HAVE BROUGHT DEATH UPON THEM.

10154024_241263816077634_598268664_n 1959294_10152052052459563_63901021_n

RASA SAYS:  THIS BEGS, FOR ME, A NEW DEFINITION OF “MASCULINE.”  I POSIT AS A MASCULINE MAN, FOR INSTANCE, SAINT REV. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.  THERE WAS A REAL MAN, WHO RISKED HIS LIFE TO SAVE OTHERS, AND GAVE HIS LIFE AS JESUS DID.  I READ HIS BOOK “THE STRENGTH TO LOVE,” WHICH WAS ABOUT LOVING THOSE IN SPITE OF THE FACT THEY BOMB YOUR HOUSE.  HE KNEW THE MEANING OF LOVE, HE WAS STRONG.  THAT’S A REAL MAN, OR A REAL WOMAN.  BULLIES ARE NOT REAL MEN, THEY ARE COWARDS, THEY ARE WEAK, CRUEL, AND THEY WILL BE REMOVED AWAY LIKE “THE CHAFF WHICH THE WIND BLOWETH AWAY”.  THEY ARE ALL BLUFF AND BLUSTER, BUT IN ETERNAL LIFE, THEY HAVE NO SUBSTANCE EXCEPT BURNING IN HELL.

We can see this in the way male animals behave in the rutting season.  Every spring animals like bulls, rams and stags fight each other for dominance and access to females.  In these fights the winner takes all, the biggest and strongest males gain access to all females, while the weaker ones get zero.  A successful stag is not only bigger and stronger, but aggressive, ruthless and selfish.  Sharing with other stags is not an option; there can be only one winner who takes everything for himself.

RASA SAYS:  YES, INDEED, GOOD ANALOGY.  HOWEVER, I TAKE NOTE THATANIMALS KILL BY THEIR INSTINCT, TAKE HAREMS THROUGH VIOLENCE, BUT THERE IT ENDS.  HUMAN MALES ARE NOT ANIMALISTIC, BUT “SUBHUMAN,” AS THEY NOT ONLY FOLLOW INSTINCTS BUT THEY ARE SENSELESSLY SADISTIC.  ANIMALS DO NOT RAPE TINY ONE DAY OLD BABIES (AND MANY ARE KILLED) OR SMALL INFANTS….THEY DO NOT PLAN MURDER, THEY DO NOT DO “GENOCIDES.”  THEY DO NOT, IN ORDER TO GAIN PLUNDER, WIPE OUT THOUSANDS OR HOPE TO MURDER MILLIONS.  THEY DO NOT USE THEIR MINDS TO CREATE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION SUCH AS ATOM BOMBS, INVENTION OF AIDS PUT SECRETLY INTO VACCINES; THEY DO NOT PLAN TO MICROCHIP MILLIONS AND USE THEM AS SLAVES, THEY DO NOT CREATE CONCENTRATION CAMPS WITH OVENS READY TO EVAPORATE PEOPLE AT 2,500 DEGREES.  THEY DO NOT SKIN OTHER ANIMALS ALIVE TO GET PAID FOR THEIR PELTS.  THEY DO NOT PLAN FRANKENSTEIN CROPS LIKE GMO’S NOR DO THEY PLAN TO MAKE HEALTHY FOODS ILLEGAL.  HUMAN MALES HAVE TAKEN THIS INSTINCT TO THE POINT OF DEMONIC SUCH AS HAS NEVER EXISTED – THAT IS WHY MOTHER GOD IS RENDERING HUMAN MALES EXTINCT.

We see the same in patriarchal societies.  The vast majority of the wealth and power of any country is possessed by a small minority of people.  Like rutting stags, the winner takes all, while the losers, the poor, get “the crumbs from the rich man’s table”.  Men, also like stags, are violent, because the boundaries of any country are decided by war.  For this reason, all countries have to have a strong military against invasion.

RASA:  IT IS A PATTERN.  UNTIL AND UNLESS WOMEN TAKE OVER COMPLETELY THIS WILL GO ON AS IF BUT HALF THE WORLD IS PATRIARCHAL, THE OTHER HALF HAS TO HAVE ARMIES TO PROTECT THEMSELVES FROM THEIR VIOLENCE.

In any patriarchal society – where men dominate – we have the rule of force, aggression and violence.  If “masculine” people rule our world, then off course it is going to be a brutal where “might is right”. If we want a loving, caring world, then the only way to achieve this is to be ruled by loving and nurturing women.

The abuse of women and children is going to happen because they are smaller and weaker than fully grown men. Men use can use their greater size and strength to get what they want from smaller and weaker people.  The psychiatrist Sigmund Freud hinted at this in his Oedipus complex theory, where the son wants to kill his own father, and possess his mother.  The actual reason for this is probably that the son was being abused by the father and hates him.  He also wants to protect his mother from abuse by the father, but Freud wasn’t allowed to say this.  The tragedy of this is that the son, when he grows up, is likely to treat his own wife and children in exactly the same way.

Freud did write a paper on the physical and sexual abuse children suffered by their fathers and other male relations, but this paper was censored.  To save his career, Freud no longer posited the theories but only hinted at them.  Since then, things have changed with the rise of feminism.  Women are now able to assert themselves and take more control over the children.  As the result, men who beat their wives and physically/sexually abuse their children can now be sent to prison.  As women gained power, children were protected from male abuse.

RASA SAYS:  EXCELLENT POINT.  UNTIL WOMEN ARE EMPOWERED, THEY ARE LIMITED AS TO WHAT THEY CAN DO.  WHEN WOMEN GO TO THE JUDICIAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, IT IS POLITICIZED AGAINST THEM, IN FAVOR OF MEN.  I HAVE BEEN THEIR VICTIM.  WHEN A WOMAN IS RAPED, THEY BLAME THE WOMAN.  WHEN A CHILD IS RAPED, THEY REALLY DON’T CARE.  IF ALL THE MEN WHO RAPE WOMEN AND CHILDREN WERE PUT INTO PRISON, PROBABLY HALF OF ALL MALES WOULD BE INCARCERATED.  MALES STICK UP FOR OTHER MALES.  THE MALE POLICE PERSUADE WOMEN TO DROP CHARGES.  MALE DA’S WON’T PROSECUTE CRIMINALS FOR INJURING OR RAPING WOMEN – IT HAPPENED TO ME TWICE.  THIS IS CHANGING, BUT IT STILL EXISTS.  IN MANY COUNTRIES, WOMEN HAVE NO RIGHTS.  THEY ARE SLAVES AND THEY ARE SAVAGED.  LOOK AT THE THEOCRATIC MUSLIM COUNTRIES.
OBVIOUSLY, ALL THE STATISTICS PROVE WOMEN ARE RISING, MEN ARE FALLING.  BUT IT IS THE WESTERN WOMEN THAT ARE RISING, AND THEY WILL HAVE TO PICK UP THE REST OF THE WOMEN IN OPPRESSED COUNTRIES.  IT WILL TAKE TIME.  WE WILL DO IT.

4ffc6f4b3147b

ANOTHER GOOD POINT THAT I FIRST HEARD FROM WILLIAM BOND.  THE SAME ABUSE/VIOLENCE ON WOMEN DOES NOT ENGENDER THE SAME REACTION FROM WOMEN AS IT DOES MEN.  IT’S THE DIFFERENCE IN THE BRAIN, THE INSTINCT.  WOMEN HAVE A STRONGER INSTINCT TO GIVE LIFE, MEN LESS SO; THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE THE PROTECTORS SO THEY HAVE MORE VIOLENT TENDENCIES; BUT THESE MUST BE TEMPERED AND GUIDED RIGHTLY, NOT RUN AMUCK.

ANOTHER GOOD POINT THAT I FIRST HEARD FROM WILLIAM BOND. THE SAME ABUSE/VIOLENCE ON WOMEN DOES NOT ENGENDER THE SAME REACTION FROM WOMEN AS IT DOES MEN. IT’S THE DIFFERENCE IN THE BRAIN, THE INSTINCT. WOMEN HAVE A STRONGER INSTINCT TO GIVE LIFE, MEN LESS SO; THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE THE PROTECTORS SO THEY HAVE MORE VIOLENT TENDENCIES; BUT THESE MUST BE TEMPERED AND GUIDED RIGHTLY, NOT RUN AMUCK.

4fc03211e7fc2 4fcbde9727308 4fe624e753cd1

The more males dominate a country, the more violent it becomes, as women, children and other men suffer violence, rape and abuse. In such a brutal world we end up with psychopaths running everything, as they are the most vicious and brutal.

An example of this would be Saddam Hussein, who ruled Iraq from 1979 to 2003.  He became the leader as being a psychopath and had no qualms about killing or torturing people.  In the eyes of many this made him a strong leader.  In fact, people now claim that the people of Iraq suffer more from violence, since he was deposed by the USA, than while he was in power.  This is because without a strong brutal leader, in this extreme patriarchal county, law and order has broken down.  The whole of history is full of leaders like this, who take power and hold on to it, through violence and brutality.

Unfortunately, psychopaths not only exist in extreme patriarchal countries but in more moderate, democratic countries.  In their book, “Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work”, by Paul Babiak, Ph.D., and Robert Hare, Ph.D.  They point that in business, psychopaths are far more likely to be successful.  The reason is that they have the ‘right’ qualities to succeed in a male dominated world.  To quote. –

“Several abilities – skills, actually – make it difficult to see psychopaths for who they are. First, they are motivated to, and have a talent for, ‘reading people’ and for sizing them up quickly. They identify a person’s likes and dislikes, motives, needs, weak spots, and vulnerabilities… Second, many psychopaths come across as having excellent oral communication skills. In many cases, these skills are more apparent than real because of their readiness to jump right into a conversation without the social inhibitions that hamper most people… Third, they are masters of impression management; their insight into the psyche of others combined with a superficial – but convincing – verbal fluency allows them to change their situation skillfully as it suits the situation and their game plan.”

This doesn’t only apply to businessmen; you only have to look at successful politicians to see the same thing.  A politician in a patriarchal system has to be able to appear on TV and tell lies without any hint of shame or embarrassment.  This means that being a psychopath is a big advantage in patriarchal politics.

Men off course invent all sorts of excuses to justify why we live in a world of injustice and violence.  Patriarchal religions like to blame the Devil for all the harm men do.  The big problem with this idea is that if God has created everything, then he made the Devil as well.  So why would God make a person like the Devil, who opposes him?  Religion also tries to blame women as well, in spite of the fact women are far less violent and far more caring than men.

RASA SAYS:  MY OPINION OF THE DEVIL AND SATAN IS THE ORIGIN IS MEN, IT COMES FROM THEIR PSYCHE, THEIR ID.  THEY HAVE UNLEASHED THE MILLIONS OR BILLIONS OF DEMONS ON THIS PLANET.  IT COMES FROM THEIR LOWER CHAKRAS AND INSTINCTS.  BUT THEY ARE WORSE THAN ANIMALS, THEY ARE SUBHUMAN, AS I ALREADY SAID.  IT IS NOT ALIENS, IT’S HUMAN MEN.  IF IT WAS ALIENS, WOMEN MIGHT BE AFFECTED – BUT THEY ARE NOT.  WHY ONLY MEN?  THE ALIENS ARE THE FALL GUY, THE EXCUSE, THEY ALWAYS HAVE AN EXCUSE.  THEY TRY TO USE ANIMALS AS EXCUSES, THAT WE ARE VIOLENT AS THEY ARE.  BUT OUR CLOSEST COUSINS ARE THE BONOBOS.

IMG_1740 ZX FLAT IMG_1748 ZX FLAT IMG_1756 ZX FLAT

FIRST THE SUIT, THEN THE BIRTHDAY SUIT

FIRST THE SUIT, THEN THE BIRTHDAY SUIT

HOW THE MIND WORKS: SEEING SOME DRESSED, DISROBING, CAN BE EXTREMELY EXCITING. SEEING SOMEONE UNDRESSED DOES NOT INSPIRE ANTICIPATION.

HOW THE MIND WORKS: SEEING SOME DRESSED, DISROBING, CAN BE EXTREMELY EXCITING. SEEING SOMEONE UNDRESSED DOES NOT INSPIRE ANTICIPATION.

MODEL REPRESENTATION BY RASA VON WORDER. APPLY NOW TO BECOME A CELEBRATION OF BEAUTY, TALENT AND VIVACITY. YOU MUST BE MALE AND AS GORGEOUS AS THESE MODELS.

MODEL REPRESENTATION BY RASA VON WERDER. APPLY NOW TO BECOME A CELEBRATION OF BEAUTY, TALENT AND VIVACITY. YOU MUST BE MALE AND AS GORGEOUS AS THESE MODELS.

RASA'S IMAGES OF BEAUTIFUL MALES INSPIRE OTHER WOMEN TO GO AFTER THEM, ESPECIALLY THE OLD WOMEN WITH YOUNG MEN.  IF YOU LOOK LIKE THIS OR KNOW ANY MODELS WHO DO, CONTACT ME TO WORK

RASA’S IMAGES OF BEAUTIFUL MALES INSPIRE OTHER WOMEN TO GO AFTER THEM, ESPECIALLY THE OLD WOMEN WITH YOUNG MEN. IF YOU LOOK LIKE THIS OR KNOW ANY MODELS WHO DO, CONTACT ME TO WORK

CONSIDER THAT, WILLIAM BOND.  INDEED THERE ARE BULLS AND STAGS.  BUT OUR GENEOLOGY IS CLOSEST TO BONOBOS.  THEY ARE MATRIARCHAL, THEY ARE HORNY, FRIENDLY, THEY SOLVE ALL CONFLICTS BY TOUCHING AND FEELING.  THE MOTHERS RULE THE FAMILY AND SOCIETY, AND THEY ARE STRONG, AND THEY POSTURE, BUT THERE IS NO WAR.  WHEN MALES INTIMIDATE FEMALES, THEY ARE MOBBED AND PREVENTED BY SEVERAL FEMALES, THEY CANNOT DOMINATE.

Science tries to justify men’s selfishness and violence onto “evolution”.  They claim that the violence of male animals is “survival of the fittest”; where the strongest and fittest males get to breed the next generation of animals.  They totally ignore the female’s role in evolution.  The fact is that the mother gives birth and cares for the young, and this is a far more important role in the survival of any species, than what males do.

RASA SAYS:  WHAT A BRILLIANT POINT WILLIAM HAS MADE, THAT EVOLUTION IS NOT JUST ABOUT MEN, AS MEN WANT US TO BELIEVE.  THE BEHAVIOR OF THE FEMALE WITH HER OFFSPRING IS MORE IMPORTANT!

Conspiracy theories try to blame secret societies like the Freemasons, the Illuminati or even alien reptiles for the ills of our world.  The rich tend to blame the poor and the poor blame the rich, but few people will acknowledge the fact that as it is men who are ruling our world, then the problem must be male rulers.

RASA SAYS:  ABSOLUTE LOGIC, ONCE AGAIN, OF WILLIAM BOND.

 

MEN ARE JUST AS EVIL TO MEN AS THEY ARE TO WOMEN AND CHILDREN.  WE MUST SAVE MEN ALSO FROM MEN.

MEN ARE JUST AS EVIL TO MEN AS THEY ARE TO WOMEN AND CHILDREN. WE MUST SAVE MEN ALSO FROM MEN.

49d6297c1fbca 49d62739bd65a 49d631476f806 49d2588745d07 49d62ab9e3891

It must be obvious that any system that puts psychopaths in leadership positions is a bad arrangement.  Yet, this is what patriarchy does all the time.  Men are naturally aggressive and competitive, and this is not a real problem if they are kept under control.  Unfortunately, when men rule our world the most violent, aggressive or devious men end up in positions of power.

RASA SAYS:  SURE, IF WILLIAM BOND OR JESUS CHRIST RULED OUR SOCIETY WE’D HAVE A PEACEFUL AND LOVING WORLD.

Patriarchy also breeds psychopaths.  It has been discovered that many psychopaths had appalling childhoods.  A case in point would be Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin and Saddam Hussein – all of whom were beaten mercilessly as children.  Extreme patriarchal cultures encourage this, as they claim that abuse, “toughens up” boys and turns them into ‘real men’.  Certainly turning a man into a psychopath makes him a good soldier, as he can kill without mercy.  A more ordinary man is not such a good soldier, as he has qualms about killing the ‘enemy.’

RASA SAYS:  GOOD POINT.  BEING BRUTAL AND VIOLENT TOWARD MEN MAKES THEM SO, AND THEREFORE, OUR WORLD ENCOURAGES VIOLENCE THROUGH ALL MEDIA; GLORIFIES IT.  THEY HAVE EXCUSES FOR THIS AS “ENTERTAINMENT,” AND “FREEDOM OF SPEECH,” BUT IT’S MORE THAN THAT.  THEY WANT TO BREED DEMONS – MEN WITH NO FEELINGS WHO KILL WITHOUT MERCY.

If we do not want to be ruled by psychopaths then the obvious solution is for women to rule our world.    It is known that psychopaths can be created by extreme abuse, and in a patriarchal society where women are physically smaller and weaker than the average male, they are far more likely to suffer abuse of all kinds.  Yet, in-spite of this, there are still far less female psychopaths then male.

RASA SAYS:  ANOTHER GOOD POINT THAT I FIRST HEARD FROM WILLIAM BOND.  THE SAME ABUSE/VIOLENCE ON WOMEN DOES NOT ENGENDER THE SAME REACTION FROM WOMEN AS IT DOES MEN.  IT’S THE DIFFERENCE IN THE BRAIN, THE INSTINCT.  WOMEN HAVE A STRONGER INSTINCT TO GIVE LIFE, MEN LESS SO; THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE THE PROTECTORS SO THEY HAVE MORE VIOLENT TENDENCIES; BUT THESE MUST BE TEMPERED AND GUIDED RIGHTLY, NOT RUN AMUCK.

So it makes sense for us to be ruled by caring and nurturing females rather than aggressive males.  We can see all over the world the more women are oppressed the more violent societies become.  But in countries where women are empowered society is peaceful.  When women are powerful, everyone benefits – bear in mind how brutal men are to other males.  Abusive fathers appear in elite families as well as poor – men such as Stalin, Hitler and Saddam were brutalized.

The only way to overcome all these problems is to have women take over.  It is true, there are caring men, but the psychos rise to the top — What psychopaths do is take acting lessons in how to appear loving and caring, then they are elected.

RASA SAYS:  YOU CAN SEE LIARS ON TOP OF ALL GOVERNMENTS PRETENDING TO BE HELPING PEOPLE, AND THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THEIR LIES.  IT HAS HAPPENED NUMEROUS TIMES IN HISTORIES.  TAKE KIND HEROD TELLING THE MAGI TO LET HIM KNOW WHERE JESUS IS BORN SO HE TOO, CAN GO WORSHIP HIM.  THEN HEROD SENDS OUT HIS SOLDIERS TO KILL ALL THE BOYS UNDER THE AGE OF TWO.  HE EVEN DUPED THE WOMEN TO BRING THE CHILDREN TO HIS HEADQUARTERS SO THEY COULD BE FETED – THEY BROUGHT THEM ALL DECKED OUT IN GARLANDS OF FLOWERS, WHERE THE SOLDIERS STABBED AND SPEARED THEM TO DEATH.  AND WHAT HAPPENED TO HEROD AND ALL THESE MALE LEADERS WHO KILL SO MANY PEOPLE?  THEY GET WHAT THEY DESERVE EVENTUALLY BUT USUALLY ON EARTH, THEY, LIKE THE GODFATHER, DIE OF OLD AGE.  BUT THE INNOCENT ARE KILLED.  SO MUCH FOR JUSTICE ON EARTH, CERTAINLY DOESN’T EXIST IN A PATRIARCHAL WORLD.

Yes, there are ruthless and deceiving women as well, but not in the same numbers as men.  Women have a powerful maternal instinct and once this instinct is activated then she not only wants to love and care for children of her own, she has the same desire to care for other people’s children, to look after the sick, old people and animals.  If we look at violence, we find that men commit over 99% of all acts of violence.  The reason is that because as women bring life to our world and want to nurture it, so it is harder for women to be cruel and uncaring for others than with men.

The competitive and aggressive instincts of men make them totally unsuitable to rule our world; they instigate conflict, war and injustice.  The maternal/ nurturing instincts of women enable them to run the family and the world – A world ruled by women would be fair, loving and caring.

by William Bond…..comments Rasa Von Werder….. 4 30 14

RASA SAYS:  LET ME JUST ADD HERE THAT ALL THE STATISTICS – EDUCATIONAL AND EMPLOYMENT WISE, ARE POINTING TO WOMEN RISING, MEN FALLING BEHIND.  THE FUTURE IS WOMEN, IT IS MATRIARCHY.  HOLD ON, KEEP PRAYING AND BELIEVING, WOMEN WILL RULE THE WORLD, MEN WILL FALL.  THEY ARE GOING EXTINCT.  THEIR OWN ACTIONS HAVE BROUGHT DEATH UPON THEM.

 

1,839 views
Mature Content

This site contains artistic nudity which may be considered offensive and/or inappropriate. Furthermore, this content may be considered adult content, if you are not of legal age or are easily offended, you are required to click the exit button.